pith. sign in

arxiv: 1506.02802 · v3 · pith:LZELV7OEnew · submitted 2015-06-09 · 💱 q-fin.PM · math.OC· math.PR· q-fin.TR

The Limits of Leverage

classification 💱 q-fin.PM math.OCmath.PRq-fin.TR
keywords costsassetleveragereturnsvolatilityconstantproportionalsharpe
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

When trading incurs proportional costs, leverage can scale an asset's return only up to a maximum multiple, which is sensitive to its volatility and liquidity. In a model with one safe and one risky asset, with constant investment opportunities and proportional costs, we find strategies that maximize long term returns given average volatility. As leverage increases, rising rebalancing costs imply declining Sharpe ratios. Beyond a critical level, even returns decline. Holding the Sharpe ratio constant, higher asset volatility leads to superior returns through lower costs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.