pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18453 · v1 · pith:LZFDEPJRnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Frustration from Localized Zhang-Rice States: A Unified Theory of Doping-Driven Magnetic Transitions in Cuprates

Xiaodong Wang , Ping Xu , Jiong Mei , Shao-Hang Shi , Zi-Xiang Li , Mingpu Qin , Kun Jiang , Hui-Ke Jin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 08:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords cupratesZhang-Rice singletsmagnetic frustrationdopingantiferromagnetic orderspin glasssuperexchange
0
0 comments X

The pith

Doped holes form localized Zhang-Rice singlets that generate extra magnetic exchanges, creating frustration that destroys antiferromagnetic order in cuprates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that doped holes in cuprates do not simply remove spins like vacancies. Instead, each hole creates a spatially localized Zhang-Rice singlet that actively produces new superexchange couplings to next-nearest and third-nearest neighbor sites. These added interactions introduce strong magnetic frustration on the spin lattice. A reader following this line would see why the Néel antiferromagnetic phase collapses at very low hole concentrations and why a spin-glass regime appears before other phases take over, while the electron-doped side behaves differently.

Core claim

Doped holes form spatially localized Zhang-Rice singlets which actively mediate emergent next-nearest J2 and third-nearest J3 neighbor superexchanges; this dopant-induced exchange pathway generates significant magnetic frustration, naturally explaining the rapid collapse of the Néel AFM order and the emergence of a spin-glass phase on the hole-doped side.

What carries the argument

Localized Zhang-Rice singlets that mediate dopant-induced J2 and J3 superexchanges to produce magnetic frustration.

If this is right

  • The Néel antiferromagnetic order collapses rapidly once hole doping introduces the extra exchange paths.
  • A spin-glass phase emerges as the immediate consequence of the added frustration at low doping.
  • The same mechanism accounts for the strong asymmetry between hole-doped and electron-doped magnetic behavior.
  • Doping-driven magnetic phase transitions across the lightly doped regime are unified by the frustration generated by these singlets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the emergent J2 and J3 are confirmed, similar localized singlet effects might appear in other doped Mott insulators and could be engineered by changing the local orbital overlap.
  • Neutron scattering at wavevectors tied to next-nearest and third-nearest neighbor correlations would provide a direct test of the strength of the induced exchanges.
  • The picture suggests that controlling the spatial extent of the Zhang-Rice state could tune the degree of frustration and stabilize or suppress the spin-glass regime.

Load-bearing premise

Localized Zhang-Rice singlets must actively generate new superexchange paths rather than acting only as non-magnetic vacancies that dilute the lattice.

What would settle it

A direct calculation or measurement showing that the effective J2 and J3 couplings remain unchanged upon light hole doping, or the absence of a spin-glass phase at the doping levels where the theory predicts it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18453 by Hui-Ke Jin, Jiong Mei, Kun Jiang, Mingpu Qin, Ping Xu, Shao-Hang Shi, Xiaodong Wang, Zi-Xiang Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Asymmetric evolution of the AFM order upon electron and hole doping. (a) The staggered magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Finite-temperature phase diagram obtained from classical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Emergence of the spin-glass phase and static domain-wall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The microscopic mechanism by which doped holes disrupt the antiferromagnetic order is one of the fundamental questions in cuprates. In this work, we propose a unified microscopic theory in which doped holes form spatially localized Zhang-Rice singlets which actively mediate emergent spin exchange. Rather than acting as simple non-magnetic vacancies, these localized states introduce emergent next-nearest $J_2$ and third-nearest $J_3$ neighbor superexchanges. This dopant-induced exchange pathway generates significant magnetic frustration, naturally explaining the rapid collapse of the N\'eel AFM order and the emergence of a spin-glass phase on the hole-doped side. Our findings provide a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex doping-driven magnetic phase transitions and magnetic electron-hole asymmetry in lightly doped cuprates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unified microscopic theory for doping-driven magnetic transitions in cuprates. Doped holes form spatially localized Zhang-Rice singlets on CuO2 plaquettes that, rather than acting as static non-magnetic vacancies, actively mediate emergent next-nearest-neighbor J2 and third-nearest-neighbor J3 superexchange pathways. These dopant-induced interactions generate substantial magnetic frustration, which the authors argue accounts for the rapid collapse of Néel antiferromagnetic order at low hole doping (x ≲ 0.05) and the subsequent spin-glass regime, while explaining the observed electron-hole asymmetry in the magnetic phase diagram.

Significance. If the quantitative derivation of the emergent J2(x) and J3(x) holds and reproduces the experimental doping scale for Néel suppression, the work would supply a microscopic mechanism for a long-standing puzzle in cuprate physics: the pronounced asymmetry between hole- and electron-doped magnetic transitions. It would also offer a falsifiable link between local Zhang-Rice physics and the global phase diagram without introducing additional free parameters beyond the standard t-J or Hubbard model.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Derivation of effective spin Hamiltonian): The central claim that localized Zhang-Rice singlets generate sizable emergent J2 and J3 rests on a perturbative or numerical mapping, yet the resulting J2/J1 and J3/J1 ratios at x = 0.02–0.05 are not reported. Without these values or a direct comparison to the bare J1 that shows frustration sufficient to destroy long-range Néel order, the mechanism remains unquantified and the doping asymmetry is not demonstrated.
  2. [§4] §4 (Comparison to experiment): The manuscript states that the frustration explains the spin-glass phase, but no calculated phase boundary or critical doping xc is provided that can be compared to the experimental Néel collapse near x ≈ 0.02–0.03. This leaves the load-bearing prediction untested within the paper.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the emergent exchanges is introduced as J2 and J3 without an explicit definition of the lattice vectors or the sign convention relative to the original nearest-neighbor J1.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption should clarify whether the plotted spin correlations are obtained from the full effective Hamiltonian or from a simplified J1-J2-J3 model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, clarifying the content of the derivation and indicating where we will strengthen the presentation in revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Derivation of effective spin Hamiltonian): The central claim that localized Zhang-Rice singlets generate sizable emergent J2 and J3 rests on a perturbative or numerical mapping, yet the resulting J2/J1 and J3/J1 ratios at x = 0.02–0.05 are not reported. Without these values or a direct comparison to the bare J1 that shows frustration sufficient to destroy long-range Néel order, the mechanism remains unquantified and the doping asymmetry is not demonstrated.

    Authors: In §3 we derive the effective spin Hamiltonian by second-order perturbation theory in the hopping processes that connect the localized Zhang-Rice singlet to neighboring Cu spins, yielding explicit doping-dependent expressions for the emergent J2(x) and J3(x). While the functional forms and the underlying virtual processes are presented, we agree that tabulating the numerical ratios J2/J1 and J3/J1 at the experimentally relevant dopings x = 0.02–0.05, together with a comparison to the known critical frustration ratio for Néel suppression in the J1-J2-J3 model, would make the quantitative impact clearer. We will add this table and the corresponding discussion in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Comparison to experiment): The manuscript states that the frustration explains the spin-glass phase, but no calculated phase boundary or critical doping xc is provided that can be compared to the experimental Néel collapse near x ≈ 0.02–0.03. This leaves the load-bearing prediction untested within the paper.

    Authors: Our manuscript focuses on the microscopic derivation of the doping-dependent frustration rather than a full numerical solution of the resulting J1-J2-J3 model. Using established literature values for the critical frustration ratio at which Néel order is destroyed (J2/J1 ≳ 0.4 in the J1-J2 model), the emergent J2(x) we obtain reaches this threshold near x ≈ 0.03, consistent with experiment. We will add an explicit estimate of xc based on this comparison in the revised §4, while noting that a complete phase-boundary calculation for the doping-dependent couplings lies beyond the scope of the present work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: central claim presented as proposal without reduction to fitted inputs or self-citation

full rationale

The abstract frames the work as proposing a unified microscopic theory in which localized Zhang-Rice singlets actively mediate emergent J2 and J3 superexchanges that generate frustration. No equations, self-citations, or parameter-fitting steps are exhibited in the provided text that would make the effective exchanges or the resulting magnetic transitions equivalent to the inputs by construction. The mechanism is asserted as an explanation for the observed doping asymmetry rather than derived via a self-referential loop or renamed empirical pattern. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not trigger any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The theory depends on the domain assumption that doped holes form localized Zhang-Rice singlets capable of mediating new exchange paths; no free parameters or invented particles are explicitly quantified in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Doped holes form spatially localized Zhang-Rice singlets that actively mediate emergent spin exchange rather than acting as simple non-magnetic vacancies.
    This premise is stated directly in the abstract as the foundation of the unified theory.
invented entities (1)
  • emergent next-nearest J2 and third-nearest J3 neighbor superexchanges no independent evidence
    purpose: To generate magnetic frustration from the localized singlets
    These exchange pathways are introduced to explain the doping-driven transitions; no independent evidence outside the model is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5694 in / 1426 out tokens · 41216 ms · 2026-05-20T08:54:26.069197+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a mott insula- tor: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 17 (2006)

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Za- anen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconduc- tivity in copper oxides, Nature518, 179 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    M. R. Norman and C. P ´epin, The electronic nature of high temperature cuprate superconductors, Reports on Progress in Physics66, 1547 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M ¨uller, Possible high T c supercon- ductivity in the Ba–La–Cu–O system, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik B Condensed Matter64, 189 (1986)

    work page 1986

  5. [5]

    N. P. Armitage, P. Fournier, and R. L. Greene, Progress and perspectives on electron-doped cuprates, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2421 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective hamiltonian for the su- perconducting Cu oxides, Phys. Rev. B37, 3759 (1988)

    work page 1988

  7. [7]

    V . J. Emery, Theory of high-T c superconductivity in oxides, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 2794 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [8]

    B. I. Shraiman and E. D. Siggia, Mobile vacancies in a quantum heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 467 (1988)

    work page 1988

  9. [9]

    C. L. Kane, P. A. Lee, and N. Read, Motion of a single hole in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B39, 6880 (1989)

    work page 1989

  10. [10]

    Schmitt-Rink, C

    S. Schmitt-Rink, C. M. Varma, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Spectral function of holes in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2793 (1988)

    work page 1988

  11. [11]

    Z. B. Su, Y . M. Li, W. Y . Lai, and L. Yu, Self-consistent renor- malized hole motion in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1318 (1989)

    work page 1989

  12. [12]

    Sachdev, Hole motion in a quantum N ´eel state, Phys

    S. Sachdev, Hole motion in a quantum N ´eel state, Phys. Rev. B 39, 12232 (1989)

    work page 1989

  13. [13]

    D. N. Sheng, Y . C. Chen, and Z. Y . Weng, Phase string effect in a doped antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 5102 (1996)

    work page 1996

  14. [14]

    Z. Y . Weng, D. N. Sheng, Y .-C. Chen, and C. S. Ting, Phase string effect in thet−jmodel: General theory, Phys. Rev. B55, 3894 (1997)

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    Weng, Phase string theory for doped antiferromagnets, In- ternational Journal of Modern Physics B21, 773 (2007)

    Z.-Y . Weng, Phase string theory for doped antiferromagnets, In- ternational Journal of Modern Physics B21, 773 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Aharony, R

    A. Aharony, R. J. Birgeneau, A. Coniglio, M. A. Kastner, and H. E. Stanley, Magnetic phase diagram and magnetic pairing in doped La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 1330 (1988)

    work page 1988

  17. [17]

    V . J. Emery and G. Reiter, Mechanism for high-temperature su- perconductivity, Phys. Rev. B38, 4547 (1988)

    work page 1988

  18. [18]

    Keimer, A

    B. Keimer, A. Aharony, A. Auerbach, R. J. Birgeneau, A. Cas- sanho, Y . Endoh, R. W. Erwin, M. A. Kastner, and G. Shirane, N´eel transition and sublattice magnetization of pure and doped La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B45, 7430 (1992)

    work page 1992

  19. [19]

    Emery and S

    V . Emery and S. Kivelson, Frustrated electronic phase separa- tion and high-temperature superconductors, Physica C: Super- conductivity209, 597 (1993)

    work page 1993

  20. [20]

    S. H. Pan, J. P. O’Neal, R. L. Badzey, C. Chamon, H. Ding, J. R. Engelbrecht, Z. Wang, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, A. K. Gupta, K. W. Ng, E. W. Hudson, K. M. Lang, and J. C. Davis, Micro- scopic electronic inhomogeneity in the high-tc superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x, Nature413, 282 (2001)

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    Z. Wang, J. R. Engelbrecht, S. Wang, H. Ding, and S. H. Pan, Inhomogeneousd-wave superconducting state of a doped mott insulator, Phys. Rev. B65, 064509 (2002)

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    B. I. Shraiman and E. D. Siggia, Spiral phase of a doped quan- tum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1564 (1989)

    work page 1989

  23. [23]

    Alloul, J

    H. Alloul, J. Bobroff, M. Gabay, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Defects in correlated metals and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 45 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    S. Ye, J. Zhao, Z. Yao, S. Chen, Z. Dong, X. Li, L. Shi, Q. Liu, C. Jin, and Y . Wang, Visualizing the Zhang-Rice sin- glet, molecular orbitals and pair formation in cuprate (2023), 6 arXiv:2309.09260 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    P. Li, Y . Shen, M. Qin, K. Jiang, J. Hu, and T. Xi- ang, Bound states in doped charge transfer insulators (2024), arXiv:2408.00576 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Mei, S.-H

    J. Mei, S.-H. Shi, P. Xu, Z. Chen, H.-K. Jin, M. Qin, Z.-X. Li, and K. Jiang, Magnetic electron-hole asymmetry in cuprates: a computational revisit, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2511.15608 (2025), arXiv:2511.15608 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Zhao and Z.-Y

    J.-Y . Zhao and Z.-Y . Weng, Composite structure of single- particle spectral function in lightly-doped mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B111, 104502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    N. Xia, Y . Guo, and S. Yang, Unveiling stripe-shaped charge density modulations in doped mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 116504 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Z. Wang, F. Yao, Y . Huo, Z. Wei, Z. Song, M. Ren, Z. Cheng, J. Jia, Y .-J. Sun, and Q.-K. Xue, Visualization and manipula- tion of four-leaf clover-shaped electronic state in cuprate, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.21392 (2025), arXiv:2506.21392 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    S. Chen, Z. Yao, N. Xia, S. Ye, H. Zhang, J. Zhao, Q. Liu, C. Jin, S. Yang, and Y . Wang, Half-filled metal and molecular- orbital-mediated pairing in cuprate (2025), arXiv:2509.26472 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormal- ization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

    work page 1992

  32. [32]

    S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormal- ization groups, Phys. Rev. B48, 10345 (1993)

    work page 1993

  33. [33]

    F. C. Chou, F. Borsa, J. H. Cho, D. C. Johnston, A. Lascial- fari, D. R. Torgeson, and J. Ziolo, Magnetic phase diagram of lightly doped la 2−xsrxcuo4 from 139la nuclear quadrupole reso- nance, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 2323 (1993)

    work page 1993

  34. [34]

    Niedermayer, C

    C. Niedermayer, C. Bernhard, T. Blasius, A. Golnik, A. Mood- enbaugh, and J. I. Budnick, Common phase diagram for anti- ferromagnetism in la2−xsrxcuo4 andY 1−xcaxba2cu3O6 as seen by muon spin rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3843 (1998)

    work page 1998

  35. [35]

    R. J. Gooding, N. M. Salem, R. J. Birgeneau, and F. C. Chou, Sr impurity effects on the magnetic correlations of la2−xsrxcuo4, Phys. Rev. B55, 6360 (1997)

    work page 1997

  36. [36]

    Matsuda, M

    M. Matsuda, M. Fujita, K. Yamada, R. J. Birgeneau, M. A. Kastner, H. Hiraka, Y . Endoh, S. Wakimoto, and G. Shirane, Static and dynamic spin correlations in the spin-glass phase of slightly doped la2−xsrxcuo4, Phys. Rev. B62, 9148 (2000)

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Matsuda, Y

    M. Matsuda, Y . Endoh, K. Yamada, H. Kojima, I. Tanaka, R. J. Birgeneau, M. A. Kastner, and G. Shirane, Magnetic or- der, spin correlations, and superconductivity in single-crystal Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4+δ, Phys. Rev. B45, 12548 (1992)

    work page 1992

  38. [38]

    Tohyama and S

    T. Tohyama and S. Maekawa, Role of next-nearest-neighbor hopping in thet–t ′–Jmodel, Phys. Rev. B49, 3596 (1994)

    work page 1994

  39. [39]

    R. J. Gooding, K. J. E. V os, and P. W. Leung, Theory of electron-hole asymmetry in doped CuO 2 planes, Phys. Rev. B 50, 12866 (1994)

    work page 1994

  40. [40]

    R. J. Gooding, N. M. Salem, and A. Mailhot, Theory of coex- isting transverse-spin freezing and long-ranged antiferromag- netic order in lightly doped la2−xsrxcuo4, Phys. Rev. B49, 6067 (1994)

    work page 1994

  41. [41]

    P. W. Anderson, New approach to the theory of superexchange interactions, Phys. Rev.115, 2 (1959)

    work page 1959

  42. [42]

    Zaanen, G

    J. Zaanen, G. A. Sawatzky, and J. W. Allen, Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 418 (1985)

    work page 1985

  43. [43]

    The supplemental material provides details for (i) derivation of the spin hamiltonian, (ii) details of numerics, and (iii) the mean- field ansatz

    work page

  44. [44]

    Sorella, Generalized lanczos algorithm for variational quan- tum monte carlo, Phys

    S. Sorella, Generalized lanczos algorithm for variational quan- tum monte carlo, Phys. Rev. B64, 024512 (2001)

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    Sorella, M

    S. Sorella, M. Casula, and D. Rocca, Weak binding between two aromatic rings: Feeling the van der waals attraction by quantum monte carlo methods, The Journal of Chemical Physics127, 014105 (2007)

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    G. M. Luke, L. P. Le, B. J. Sternlieb, Y . J. Uemura, J. H. Brewer, R. Kadono, R. F. Kiefl, S. R. Kreitzman, T. M. Riseman, C. E. Stronach, M. R. Davis, S. Uchida, H. Takagi, Y . Tokura, Y . Hi- daka, T. Murakami, J. Gopalakrishnan, A. W. Sleight, M. A. Subramanian, E. A. Early, J. T. Markert, M. B. Maple, and C. L. Seaman, Magnetic order and electronic p...

    work page 1990

  47. [47]

    Stauffer and A

    D. Stauffer and A. Aharony,Introduction to Percolation Theory, 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1994)

    work page 1994

  48. [48]

    A. W. Sandvik, Classical percolation transition in the diluted two-dimensionals= 1 2 heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B66, 024418 (2002)

    work page 2002

  49. [49]

    E. M. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, Studying two-dimensional systems with the density matrix renormalization group, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.3, 111 (2012)

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    M. A. Kastner, R. J. Birgeneau, G. Shirane, and Y . Endoh, Mag- netic, transport, and optical properties of monolayer copper ox- ides, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 897 (1998)

    work page 1998

  51. [51]

    Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block dis- tribution functions, Z

    K. Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block dis- tribution functions, Z. Phys. B43, 119 (1981)

    work page 1981

  52. [52]

    L. W. Lee and A. P. Young, Single spin and chiral glass transi- tion in vector spin glasses in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227203 (2003)

    work page 2003

  53. [53]

    Binder and A

    K. Binder and A. P. Young, Spin glasses: Experimental facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions, Rev. Mod. Phys.58, 801 (1986)

    work page 1986

  54. [54]

    D. J. Scalapino, Y . Imry, and P. Pincus, Generalized ginzburg- landau theory of pseudo-one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B11, 2042 (1975)

    work page 2042

  55. [55]

    Yasuda, S

    C. Yasuda, S. Todo, K. Hukushima, F. Alet, M. Keller, M. Troyer, and H. Takayama, N ´eel temperature of quasi-low- dimensional heisenberg antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 217201 (2005)

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    Julien, Magnetic order and superconductivity in la2- xsrxcuo4: a review, Physica B: Condensed Matter329-333, 693 (2003)

    M.-H. Julien, Magnetic order and superconductivity in la2- xsrxcuo4: a review, Physica B: Condensed Matter329-333, 693 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Wiesendanger, Spin mapping at the nanoscale and atomic scale, Rev

    R. Wiesendanger, Spin mapping at the nanoscale and atomic scale, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1495 (2009)

    work page 2009