Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Holography in flipped AdS/$\mathbb{Z}$: Another approach to dS holography

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read QFT in flipped AdS$_n/\mathbb{Z}$ has a dual flipped CFT$_{n-1}$ on a Lorentzian torus, and the fCFT$_2$ Cardy formula counts the dS$_3$ and Kerr-dS$_3$ horizon entropies.

desk verdict A careful, honestly hedged proposal for dS holography through flipped AdS/Z: the analytic continuation machinery is genuinely useful, but the extrapolate dictionary is proposed rather than derived, and the normalizability premise is the soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08837 v1 pith:LZQEWU3X submitted 2026-08-09 hep-th

Bin Chen , Zezhou Hu , Xin-Cheng Mao , Shan-Ming Ruan This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords deSitterholographyflippedAdSCFTanalyticcontinuationextrapolatedictionaryCardyformulacosmologicalhorizonentropyLorentziantorus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that quantum field theory in a spacetime called flipped AdS$_n/\mathbb{Z}$ has a holographic dual: a boundary theory, dubbed flipped CFT$_{n-1}$, living on the Lorentzian torus $S^{n-2}\times S^1$. The two bulk spacetimes, de Sitter and flipped AdS, arise by two different analytic continuations of the same Euclidean sphere $S^n$, and the paper uses that relation to build a bulk-to-boundary dictionary for fAdS rather than for dS directly. It checks the dictionary by matching holographic two-point functions with correlators derived from the conformal symmetry of fCFT. As an application, the Cardy formula of fCFT$_2$ reproduces the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy of the cosmological horizon for both pure dS$_3$ and Kerr-dS$_3$, giving a concrete starting point for an alternative de Sitter holography.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the extrapolate dictionary of Section 3.1, which reads boundary operators off the two normalizable asymptotic modes of a free bulk scalar in asymptotically fAdS spacetimes. Around it the paper assembles two supporting mechanisms: the analytic-continuation triangle in which the same Euclidean sphere $S^n$ yields dS$_n$ via $\theta_1\to i\tau$ and fAdS$_n$ via $\psi\to i\rho$, and the two-point-function comparison between the holographic limit of the bulk correlator and the conformal Ward identity on the Lorentzian torus with the $i\epsilon$ branch chosen in Appendix B. For the entropy application, the mechanism is the Cardy formula on the Lorentzian torus, with the modular parameter determined from the conical-defect geometry that also produces Kerr-dS$_3$.

What would settle it

A direct evaluation of the bulk path integral on the Euclidean sphere with a boundary source should reproduce the boundary two-point function (3.17); if it instead yields the delta-function branch or a different normalization, the proposed extrapolate dictionary is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the fAdS/fCFT correspondence: QFT in flipped AdS$_n/\mathbb{Z}$ admits a dual description as flipped CFT$_{n-1}$ on the conformal boundary $T^{n-2,1}=S^{n-2}\times S^1$, with the extrapolate dictionary $\hat\phi\sim\sum_{\xi=\pm}e^{-\rho\delta_\xi}O_\xi$ identifying boundary operators of scaling dimensions $\delta_\pm=(n-1)/2\pm\sqrt{(n-1)^2/4-m^2l^2}$. The holographic two-point function $\langle O_\pm O_\pm\rangle\propto (y\cdot y'-\cos(t-t')+i\epsilon)^{-\delta_\pm}$ agrees with the conformal-symmetry derivation in Appendix B. Because fAdS and dS are related by analytic continuation, the same continuation on the boundary maps fCFT to a candidate dual of de Sitter space. In three dimensions the Cardy formula of fCFT$_2$, with an imaginary central charge and imaginary temperature, yields $S=\pi l/(2G)$ for pure dS$_3$ and $S=2\pi r_+/(4G)$ for Kerr-dS$_3$, matching the Bekenstein–Hawking entropies of the cosmological horizons.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that boundary operators $O_\pm$ can be read off from the asymptotic expansion of a bulk scalar even though both asymptotic modes are normalizable and no non-normalizable source mode exists; this operator dictionary is proposed rather than derived from a bulk path integral, and the entropy count stands or falls with it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the correspondence is correct, the dS$_3$ cosmological horizon has a microscopic state count given by fCFT$_2$ degrees of freedom, not merely a formal Cardy reproduction.
  • The extrapolate dictionary gives explicit boundary correlators for asymptotically fAdS spacetimes, so higher-point functions, stress-tensor data, and entanglement quantities become computable on the fCFT side.
  • The construction extends to Kerr-dS$_3$ through discrete quotients that fix the modular parameter of the boundary torus; the same quotient logic may apply to other asymptotically dS$_3$ geometries.
  • The fCFT boundary theory can serve as the starting point for the induced continuation $A_{\rm bdry}$ described in the paper, either recovering conventional dS/CFT or producing a distinct dS dual.
  • Restoring the excluded light-cone branch (3.18) would connect fAdS holography to Carrollian and celestial-style flat holography, since that branch is the analogue of the delta-function branch there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension the paper does not carry out is to derive the extrapolate dictionary from a bulk path integral with a genuine non-normalizable source; if such a derivation fails, the dictionary would need revision.
  • Because the $i\epsilon$ branch in (B.13) is chosen by hand to enforce periodicity, alternative branch choices would define different fCFT vacua; bulk observables that distinguish them could single out one vacuum.
  • Continuing the fCFT two-point functions to the dS boundary and comparing with known dS/CFT correlators would decide between the paper's Route A and Route B, a check the paper leaves open.
  • The light-cone delta-function branch suggests that fAdS holography might interpolate between AdS/CFT and flat-space Carrollian duals if that branch is included rather than discarded.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a holographic proposal for "flipped AdS/Z" (fAdS), a Lorentzian spacetime obtained by a Wick rotation from the sphere and locally isometric to AdS with an overall sign flip. It shows that QFT in fAdS_n and in dS_n derive from the same Euclidean sphere correlator, provides a canonical quantization of fAdS, proposes an extrapolate dictionary (3.5) with two boundary operators O± for each bulk scalar, computes holographic two-point functions (3.17), and compares them with a conformal-symmetry derivation in Appendix B. It then uses the Cardy formula of the boundary fCFT_2 to reproduce the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy of dS_3 and Kerr-dS_3. The paper frames fAdS/fCFT as an alternative starting point toward dS holography and explicitly discusses open questions about the induced boundary continuation.

Significance. The analytic-continuation relation between dS_n and fAdS_n, including the canonical quantization and the common Euclidean origin of both theories, is a clear and useful contribution; the paper is careful about many technical details and provides an independent boundary derivation of the two-point functions. If the proposed fAdS/fCFT correspondence can be justified, it would offer a genuinely different route to de Sitter holography with a connected Lorentzian-torus boundary. At present, however, the entropy checks are consistency checks in which the central charge and temperature are chosen so that the Cardy formula returns known horizon entropies, and the extrapolate dictionary itself rests on an unproven normalizability claim. The value of the paper is therefore conditional on resolving the dictionary issue.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.5)] The assertion preceding Eq. (3.5) that "the two modes φ± are both normalizable at the boundary" is not supported by the Klein-Gordon inner product used in the paper. For a mode φξ ~ e^{-ρδξ}, the norm on a constant-ρ slice has leading measure (sinhρ)^{n-2} coshρ, so ∫ dρ (sinhρ)^{n-2} coshρ |φξ|² ~ ∫ dρ e^{(n-1-2δξ)ρ}. With δ_-=(n-1)/2 - M, this integral diverges for real M>0; only δ_+ is square-integrable. Thus, under the paper's own norm (2.28), δ_- is a non-normalizable, source-like mode, and the claimed absence of a source mode is not established. Since the two-operator dictionary (3.5), the holographic two-point functions (3.15)/(3.17), and the subsequent entropy applications all depend on this split, the central dictionary needs either a derivation from a bulk path integral or a precise alternative definition of normalizability and a check that both modes satisfy it. The state conditions (3.10)–(3.11) relate O_+ to O_- only in specific vacua and do not supply this missing justification.
  2. [§4.1–4.2, Eqs. (4.10), (4.30)] The entropy check is not an independent test of the fAdS/fCFT dictionary because the input parameters are chosen so that the Cardy formula returns the known horizon entropy. In Eq. (4.10), the imaginary central charge c=3il/(2G) and the imaginary temperature T=1/(2π i) are assigned by analytic continuation from AdS_3/CFT_2 and by the periodicity of t, respectively; the product cT is then fixed to the known value. Similarly, for Kerr-dS_3, the continued temperatures (4.31) are constructed from r± so that S=2πr_+/(4G). These calculations demonstrate a formal consistency, but they do not provide evidence that fCFT_2 contains horizon microstates unless the assignments are derived from a microscopic definition of the boundary theory. I recommend that the paper explicitly state this limitation and avoid presenting the Cardy calculation as an independent confirmation of the bulk-boundary dictionary.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (3.13)] The notation y·y′ should be defined explicitly as the inner product of unit vectors on S^{n-2}; it is used in several later formulae without introduction.
  2. [§3.1 and Appendix B] The paper should state clearly that the normalization c± in Eq. (3.17) is not fixed by conformal symmetry and is matched to the bulk calculation; this would avoid the impression that the normalization is an additional free parameter of the proposed dictionary.
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains the typo "unwrapt" for "unwrapped".
  4. [§3, Eq. (3.1)] The signature convention for T^{n-2,1}=S^{n-2}×S^1 is nonstandard: the text says there are n−2 temporal directions and one spatial direction, whereas T^{n-2,1} usually denotes n−2 spacelike directions and one timelike direction; please clarify the convention or change the notation.
  5. [§5] The statement that under l→−il_AdS the fAdS spacetime is locally continued to ordinary AdS should explicitly note that the compact identification t∼t+2π is part of the fAdS definition and is not inherited by the unwrapped AdS cover used in AdS/CFT.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; the only by-construction element is a disclosed iϵ choice in the boundary two-point function check, while the Cardy-entropy checks use independently fixed central charge and temperature.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Appendix B, transition from Eq. (B.12) to Eqs. (B.13)-(B.14)]
    "However, the holographic two-point function (3.17) is periodic. Fortunately, we can choose another ϵ-prescription since it cannot be determined through symmetries. We may instead replace the prescription in Eq. (B.12) by t−t′=±δΩ(1+iϵ)+2nπ, (B.13). In this case, the correlators are now periodic under t→t+2π."

    The boundary conformal-symmetry derivation is presented as an independent check of the holographic two-point function. However, the iϵ/causal-structure branch is not fixed by conformal symmetry; the text explicitly selects the branch because the bulk-derived correlator (3.17) is periodic on the torus. The later identification of (B.14) with (3.17) therefore feeds the bulk answer back into the 'independent' boundary input for the iϵ prescription. Only the causal-structure part is affected; the power-law form, scaling dimensions, and normalization are fixed independently, so the circularity is partial and does not infect the main fAdS/fCFT dictionary or entropy checks.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular in a load-bearing way. The extrapolate dictionary (3.5) is proposed as a conjecture for asymptotically fAdS spacetimes, not derived from the boundary theory, and the bulk-to-boundary two-point functions (3.13)-(3.17) follow from applying that proposal to the bulk Green function; the boundary symmetry computation in Appendix B fixes the conformal structure independently. The dS3/Kerr-dS3 entropy checks are genuine algebraic checks: c=3il/(2G) is fixed by analytically continuing the Brown-Henneaux central charge, and the temperatures/modular parameters follow from the 2π boundary period and the discrete quotient construction, not by adjusting parameters to the Bekenstein-Hawking result; the Cardy formula then outputs S=πl/(2G) or 2πr+/(4G). The paper explicitly flags the open status of the boundary continuation A_bdry to dS and the non-unitarity concerns. Self-citations [46,47] are used only as background for multi-time QFT and are not load-bearing. The only by-construction element is the disclosed choice of iϵ in Appendix B, which makes part of the two-point function consistency check self-referential; it is a minor, localized issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The construction depends on the Euclidean sphere path integral defining the vacuum, the existence of fCFT with SO(n-1,2) symmetry, and the applicability of the extrapolate and Cardy dictionaries after analytic continuation. The most fragile inputs are the normalizable-mode extrapolate dictionary and the continued values of c and T used in the entropy checks; these carry the central claims.

free parameters (3)
  • fCFT central charge c = 3il/(2G)
    Used in the Cardy entropy check; obtained by analytic continuation from the Brown-Henneaux formula rather than by a microscopic fCFT computation, so it functions as an input to the entropy derivation.
  • Imaginary temperature assignment T = 1/(2π i) for dS3; T_L=(r_+-ir_-)/(2π i l), T_R=(r_++ir_-)/(2π i l) for Kerr-dS3
    The inverse period of the compact coordinate t is interpreted as an imaginary temperature so that the Cardy formula yields the known horizon entropy; this is a chosen continuation rather than a derived thermodynamic quantity.
  • Boundary two-point normalization c± = matched to 1/(-2)^Δ in Appendix B
    The overall coefficient of the fCFT two-point function is not fixed by conformal symmetry and is set by matching the bulk extrapolate result, so it is not an independent prediction.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The Euclidean sphere S^n with the Hartle-Hawking path integral defines the Euclidean vacuum for both dS and fAdS, and correlation functions of the Lorentzian theories are obtained by analytic continuation with the chosen iϵ prescriptions.
    Section 2.1, Eqs. (2.12)-(2.21); this is the foundation of the claimed dS/fAdS QFT relation.
  • domain assumption The dual of fAdS is a signature-flipped CFT on the Lorentzian torus T^{n-2,1} with conformal symmetry SO(n-1,2).
    Section 3 and Appendix B; the existence and symmetry structure of fCFT are assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The extrapolate dictionary (3.5) applies even though both asymptotic modes are normalizable; boundary operators O± are read from the asymptotic expansion and are constrained by state conditions.
    Section 3.1, Eq. (3.5) and Eqs. (3.10)-(3.11); no non-normalizable source mode exists, so this dictionary is proposed rather than derived.
  • domain assumption The Cardy formula applies to fCFT_2 on a Lorentzian torus after analytic continuation to imaginary temperature and imaginary central charge.
    Section 4, Eqs. (4.3)-(4.10); the paper explicitly flags the non-unitarity subtlety in Section 5, so the applicability of Cardy remains an assumption.
  • domain assumption For Kerr-dS3, the discrete quotient of S^3 and the subsequent analytic continuations identify the modular parameter of the boundary fCFT2 as τ=-l/(r_+-ir_-) and its conjugate.
    Section 4.2 and Appendix C; the entropy check depends on this quotient construction being the correct one.
  • ad hoc to paper The iϵ prescription in Appendix B is chosen so that the fCFT two-point function is periodic with t~t+2π.
    Eq. (B.13); the authors state that this prescription cannot be determined through symmetries and choose it by hand.
  • standard math Standard hypergeometric function identities, Gegenbauer polynomial expansions, and the Cardy formula for 2D CFTs are used without proof.
    Used in Section 2.2, Eqs. (2.38)-(2.50), and Section 4, Eqs. (4.1)-(4.3).
invented entities (2)
  • flipped CFT (fCFT)
    purpose: Proposed (n-1)-dimensional boundary dual of fAdS, living on a Lorentzian torus T^{n-2,1}; used for holographic two-point functions and the Cardy entropy checks.
    The existence and correlation functions of fCFT are inferred from matching bulk calculations and conformal symmetry within the same paper; no independent observable outside the construction is provided.
  • flipped AdS_n/Z spacetime (fAdS)
    purpose: Intermediate analytic-continuation spacetime relating S^n to dS_n; locally an overall-sign-flipped AdS with compact time direction.
    Defined by the explicit metric (1.14) as a mathematical construction; its physical existence is not independently evidenced outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holography in flipped AdS/$\mathbb{Z}$: Another approach to dS holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LZQEWU3X

@misc{pith2026260808837,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holography in flipped AdS/$\mathbbZ$: Another approach to dS holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LZQEWU3X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08837}
}
abstract

Motivated by the subtleties in the conventional dS/CFT correspondence, we explore analytic continuation as a constructive route to de Sitter holography. We show that quantum field theories in de Sitter space and in a spacetime that we call flipped $\mathrm{AdS}/\mathbb{Z}$ (fAdS) are related by analytic continuation. We then develop a holographic description of fAdS in terms of a boundary theory referred to as flipped CFT (fCFT). In particular, we construct the extrapolate dictionary for general asymptotically fAdS spacetimes and compute the holographic two-point functions, finding agreement with an independent derivation based on the conformal symmetry of fCFT. The analytic continuation relation between fAdS and dS further suggests that fCFT may provide a starting point for an alternative holographic description of de Sitter physics. As a nontrivial check of this picture, we show that the Cardy formula of fCFT$_2$ reproduces the Bekenstein--Hawking entropies of the cosmological horizons in both pure dS$_3$ and Kerr-dS$_3$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    de Sitter holography from a Lorentzian torus

    K. Fujiki, M. Kohara, J. Moreno, K. Shinmyo and T. Takayanagi,de Sitter holography from a Lorentzian torus,2608.01729

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys

    J.D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333

    1973

  3. [2]

    Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes, in1st Oxford Conference on Quantum Gravity, 8, 1975

    S.W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes, in1st Oxford Conference on Quantum Gravity, 8, 1975. – 41 –

    work page 1975

  4. [3]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2738

    1977

  5. [4]

    ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf

    G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf. Proc. C930308 (1993) 284 [gr-qc/9310026]

    arXiv 1993

  6. [5]

    Susskind,The World as a hologram,J

    L. Susskind,The World as a hologram,J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089]

    arXiv 1995

  7. [6]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [7]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

Show all 65 references
  1. [8]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates,JHEP02(1998) 009 [hep-th/9712251]

    A. Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates,JHEP02(1998) 009 [hep-th/9712251]

    1998 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Maldacena and A

    J.M. Maldacena and A. Strominger,AdS(3) black holes and a stringy exclusion principle,JHEP12(1998) 005 [hep-th/9804085]

    1998 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Carlip,What we don ’t know about BTZ black hole entropy,Class

    S. Carlip,What we don ’t know about BTZ black hole entropy,Class. Quant. Grav. 15(1998) 3609 [hep-th/9806026]

    1998 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Cardy,Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories, Nucl

    J.L. Cardy,Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories, Nucl. Phys. B270(1986) 186

    1986

  6. [13]

    Carlip,Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension,Phys

    S. Carlip,Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 2828 [hep-th/9812013]

    1999 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Carlip,Entropy from conformal field theory at Killing horizons,Class

    S. Carlip,Entropy from conformal field theory at Killing horizons,Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) 3327 [gr-qc/9906126]

    1999 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Guica, T

    M. Guica, T. Hartman, W. Song and A. Strominger,The Kerr/CFT Correspondence,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 124008 [0809.4266]

    2009 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Hartman, K

    T. Hartman, K. Murata, T. Nishioka and A. Strominger,CFT Duals for Extreme Black Holes,JHEP04(2009) 019 [0811.4393]

    2009 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Haco, S.W

    S. Haco, S.W. Hawking, M.J. Perry and A. Strominger,Black Hole Entropy and Soft Hair,JHEP12(2018) 098 [1810.01847]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Antoniadis, P.O

    I. Antoniadis, P.O. Mazur and E. Mottola,Comment on ”NonGaussian isocurvature perturbations from inflation ”,astro-ph/9705200

    arXiv

  12. [19]

    Hull,Timelike T duality, de Sitter space, large N gauge theories and topological field theory,JHEP07(1998) 021 [hep-th/9806146]

    C.M. Hull,Timelike T duality, de Sitter space, large N gauge theories and topological field theory,JHEP07(1998) 021 [hep-th/9806146]

    1998 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Maldacena and A

    J.M. Maldacena and A. Strominger,Statistical entropy of de Sitter space,JHEP02 (1998) 014 [gr-qc/9801096]. – 42 –

    1998 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Kim,Entropy of (2+1)-dimensional de Sitter space in terms of brick wall method,Phys

    W.T. Kim,Entropy of (2+1)-dimensional de Sitter space in terms of brick wall method,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 047503 [hep-th/9810169]

    1999 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Banados, T

    M. Banados, T. Brotz and M.E. Ortiz,Quantum three-dimensional de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 046002 [hep-th/9807216]

    1999 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Lin and Y.-S

    F.-L. Lin and Y.-S. Wu,Near horizon Virasoro symmetry and the entropy of de Sitter space in any dimension,Phys. Lett. B453(1999) 222 [hep-th/9901147]

    1999 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Bousso,Holography in general space-times,JHEP06(1999) 028 [hep-th/9906022]

    R. Bousso,Holography in general space-times,JHEP06(1999) 028 [hep-th/9906022]

    1999 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Bousso,Bekenstein bounds in de Sitter and flat space,JHEP04(2001) 035 [hep-th/0012052]

    R. Bousso,Bekenstein bounds in de Sitter and flat space,JHEP04(2001) 035 [hep-th/0012052]

    2001 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Banks,Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,Int

    T. Banks,Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 910 [hep-th/0007146]

    2001 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Bousso,Positive vacuum energy and the N bound,JHEP11(2000) 038 [hep-th/0010252]

    R. Bousso,Positive vacuum energy and the N bound,JHEP11(2000) 038 [hep-th/0010252]

    2000 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Horava and D. Minic,Deconstructing de Sitter,JHEP05 (2001) 043 [hep-th/0103171]

    2001 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001 [hep-th/0106109]

    E. Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001 [hep-th/0106109]

    2001 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP10(2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

    A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP10(2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

    2001 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Spradlin, A

    M. Spradlin, A. Strominger and A. Volovich,Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space, inLes Houches Summer School: Session 76: Euro Summer School on Unity of Fundamental Physics: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings, pp. 423–453, 10, 2001 [hep-th/0110007]

    2001 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Bousso, A

    R. Bousso, A. Maloney and A. Strominger,Conformal vacua and entropy in de Sitter space,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 104039 [hep-th/0112218]

    2002 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Park,Statistical entropy of three-dimensional Kerr-de Sitter space,Phys

    M.-I. Park,Statistical entropy of three-dimensional Kerr-de Sitter space,Phys. Lett. B440(1998) 275 [hep-th/9806119]

    1998 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Myung,Entropy of the three-dimensional Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole, Mod

    Y.S. Myung,Entropy of the three-dimensional Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole, Mod. Phys. Lett. A16(2001) 2353 [hep-th/0110123]

    2001 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Kabat and G

    D.N. Kabat and G. Lifschytz,De Sitter entropy from conformal field theory,JHEP 04(2002) 019 [hep-th/0203083]

    2002 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov,Conformal anomaly from dS / CFT correspondence, Phys. Lett. B519(2001) 145 [hep-th/0106191]

    2001 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Klemm,Some aspects of the de Sitter / CFT correspondence,Nucl

    D. Klemm,Some aspects of the de Sitter / CFT correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B625 (2002) 295 [hep-th/0106247]

    2002 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Carneiro da Cunha,Three-dimensional de Sitter gravity and the correspondence,Phys

    B.G. Carneiro da Cunha,Three-dimensional de Sitter gravity and the correspondence,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 104025 [hep-th/0110169]. – 43 –

    2002 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207

    1986

  33. [40]

    Henningson and K

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis,The Holographic Weyl anomaly,JHEP07(1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087]

    1998 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Balasubramanian and P

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus,A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.208(1999) 413 [hep-th/9902121]

    1999 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Balasubramanian, J

    V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer and D. Minic,Mass, entropy and holography in asymptotically de Sitter spaces,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 123508 [hep-th/0110108]

    2002 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Balasubramanian, J

    V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer and D. Minic,Notes on de Sitter space and holography,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5655 [hep-th/0207245]

    2002 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Banks, M.R

    T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec,AdS dynamics from conformal field theory,hep-th/9808016

    arXiv

  38. [45]

    Harlow and D

    D. Harlow and D. Stanford,Operator Dictionaries and Wave Functions in AdS/CFT and dS/CFT,1104.2621

    arXiv

  39. [46]

    B. Chen, Z. Hu and X.-C. Mao,QFT in Klein space,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 085005 [2505.16436]

    2026 arXiv

  40. [47]

    B. Chen, Z. Hu and X.-C. Mao,Quantum field theory in flat spacetime with multiple time directions,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 085008 [2506.21994]

    2025

  41. [49]

    Gradshteyn and I.M

    I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik,Table of integrals, series, and products, Mathematics of Computation20(2007) 1157–1160

    2007

  42. [50]

    Melton and A

    W. Melton and A. Strominger,Conformal field theory with periodic time,JHEP04 (2026) 175 [2512.09089]

    2026

  43. [51]

    Melton, A

    W. Melton, A. Sharma and A. Strominger,Conformal correlators on the Lorentzian torus,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L101701 [2310.15104]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bagchi, S

    A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu and S. Dutta,Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 241601 [2202.08438]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Mason, R

    L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian amplitudes and celestial symmetries,JHEP05(2024) 012 [2312.10138]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Alday, M

    L.F. Alday, M. Nocchi, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian amplitudes from holographic correlators,JHEP03(2025) 158 [2406.19343]

    2025 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Nguyen and J

    K. Nguyen and J. Salzer,Operator product expansion in Carrollian CFT,JHEP07 (2025) 193 [2503.15607]

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kawamoto, S.-M

    T. Kawamoto, S.-M. Ruan, Y.-k. Suzuki and T. Takayanagi,A half de Sitter holography,JHEP10(2023) 137 [2306.07575]. – 44 –

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    K. Doi, N. Ogawa, K. Shinmyo, Y.-k. Suzuki and T. Takayanagi,Probing de Sitter space using CFT states,JHEP02(2025) 093 [2405.14237]

    2025 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Saha and Zodinmawia,BMS Characters and Modular Invariance, JHEP07(2019) 138 [1902.07066]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Crawley, N

    E. Crawley, N. Miller, S.A. Narayanan and A. Strominger,State-operator correspondence in celestial conformal field theory,JHEP09(2021) 132 [2105.00331]

    2021 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Kulp and S

    J. Kulp and S. Pasterski,Multiparticle states for the flat hologram,JHEP08(2025) 091 [2501.00462]

    2025 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Allen,Vacuum States in de Sitter Space,Phys

    B. Allen,Vacuum States in de Sitter Space,Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 3136

    1985

  54. [62]

    de Boer, V

    J. de Boer, V. Jejjala and D. Minic,Alpha-states in de Sitter space,Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 044013 [hep-th/0406217]

    2005 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Chernikov and E.A

    N.A. Chernikov and E.A. Tagirov,Quantum theory of scalar field in de Sitter space-time,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A9(1968) 109

    1968

  56. [64]

    Wen and J

    Z.-Y. Wen and J. Avery,Some properties of hyperspherical harmonics,Journal of Mathematical Physics26(1985) 396

    1985

  57. [65]

    Mottola,Particle Creation in de Sitter Space,Phys

    E. Mottola,Particle Creation in de Sitter Space,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 754. – 45 –

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.