Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 98 references

An SBC-based controller and processor for the laboratory model of PRATUSH Digital Receiver

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A Raspberry Pi 4B can act as the master controller, real-time processor, and data recorder for the PRATUSH digital correlation spectrometer, with 44-hour residual spectra of 12.5 mK that are consistent with thermal noise.

desk verdict Useful engineering with an honest write-up, but the central 12.5 mK 'devoid of systematics' claim is unverifiable until the smooth fit and flagging thresholds are specified. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05655 v1 pith:M2N35S4B submitted 2025-07-08 astro-ph.IM

Srivani K.S. , Girish B.S. , Mayuri Sathyanarayana Rao , Saurabh Singh , Adarsh Kumar Dash , Narendra S. , Yash Agrawal , Keerthipriya S.
show 5 more authors
Somashekar R. Madhavi S. Jacob Rajan Udaya Shankar N. Seetha S
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords RaspberryPi4ModelBsingle-boardcomputerFPGAdigitalcorrelationspectrometerPRATUSHdynamicflagging21-cmglobalsignalsizeweightandpower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

PRATUSH is a proposed space radiometer that will try to detect the sky-averaged 21-cm signal from Cosmic Dawn, an extremely faint signal buried under bright foregrounds. This paper argues that the laboratory model of its digital receiver, a pSPEC FPGA spectrometer paired with a Raspberry Pi 4B single-board computer in place of a laptop, is ready for that task. The paper validates the integrated system against precision terminations and an antenna simulator, and reports that after calibration, dynamic flagging, and a maximally smooth fit, 44 hours of effective data leave Gaussian residuals with an rms of 12.5 mK at native resolution, and 3.4 mK after smoothing to 610 kHz. The claim is that this residual is dominated by thermal noise rather than receiver systematics, so the SBC-based digital system meets PRATUSH's science requirements.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the full digital receiver chain: two 10-bit ADCs sampling at 250 Msps feed a Virtex-6 FPGA that applies a four-term window, computes a 16,384-point FFT, and accumulates self- and cross-power spectra in an X-engine with 134 ms on-chip integration; the integrated spectra are packetized as UDP over 1 GbE and received by the Raspberry Pi 4B, which generates calibration control signals, runs the acquisition script, and executes a time-domain dynamic flagging algorithm that flags channels deviating by a threshold number of median absolute deviations from the median spectrum and drops any spectrum with 16 consecutive flagged channels. The validation metric is the behavior of residuals after subtracting a maximally smooth function: their Gaussianity and the decrease of their rms with frequency smoothing are taken to show the residuals are thermal noise.

What would settle it

Split the 44-hour dataset into two independent halves and process each through the same calibration, dynamic flagging, and maximally smooth fit; if the residuals are pure thermal noise, each half should have rms near $\sqrt{2}\times 12.5$ mK, and the difference of the two half-spectra should be Gaussian with rms near 25 mK, with no correlation to the full-spectrum residuals, whereas any correlated structure would reveal a fixed fitting or instrumental artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the PRATUSH laboratory digital receiver, built around the pSPEC platform and controlled by a Raspberry Pi 4B, achieves thermal-noise-limited performance suitable for the experiment. On 44 hours of data taken with an antenna simulator load, subtracting a maximally smooth function from the calibrated, averaged, dynamically flagged spectrum leaves residuals with a Gaussian distribution and an rms of 12.5 mK at the native 30.51 kHz resolution, falling to 3.4 mK after 610 kHz boxcar averaging. The authors present this as evidence that the FPGA spectrometer and SBC-based acquisition and processing pipeline introduce no non-smooth systematic features above the millikelvin level, and that a space-qualified SBC with comparable specifications should be viable for the flight model.

Load-bearing premise

The 12.5 mK residual claim rests on the unstated assumption that the maximally smooth curve subtracted before the residual analysis absorbs all smooth instrumental response without hiding real spectral structure, since the paper does not specify that curve's form or flexibility.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An SBC-class computer can replace a laptop as the controller and data recorder of a high-dynamic-range correlation spectrometer, cutting the digital receiver's size, weight, and power by about 40%.
  • The dynamic flagging algorithm can remove the broadband step-like artifacts caused by SBC- and SD-card-related data drops, which ordinary per-channel RFI flagging misses, recovering 3 to 10% of a long observation run.
  • The reported residual floor implies that the integrated analog-plus-digital receiver chain is sensitive at the millikelvin level, meeting the dynamic range and spectral smoothness PRATUSH requires to search for a 21-cm signal.
  • Because the residual rms scales with integration time and smoothing in the way thermal noise does, longer observations should continue to improve sensitivity, and the firmware is portable to space-grade FPGAs with reported resource margins.
  • On the RPi4B, post-processing a 25-minute observation takes about 100 minutes, so the authors conclude that raw data should be downlinked and processed on the ground whenever bandwidth allows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit is that the same FPGA-plus-SBC architecture could serve as a low-power template for other lunar or deep-space radio instruments, since the data rate here, about 8 MBps and 0.2 TB per 8 hours, is modest by modern standards.
  • If the residual Gaussianity survives a fully specified maximally smooth fit, the pipeline could set meaningful upper limits on spectrally structured signals at the few-millikelvin scale after longer integrations, since thermal noise continues to fall as the inverse square root of integration time.
  • A natural testable extension is to move the dynamic flagging algorithm from post-processing onto the SBC or into the FPGA itself, so data-quality screening happens in real time and downlink volume can be reduced; the paper only demonstrates the algorithm offline.
  • The current validation used standard terminations and an antenna simulator; the decisive next test the paper has not yet performed is an antenna-connected sky observation, where antenna reflection and environmental systematics enter the same residual analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper describes the design, implementation, and laboratory validation of the digital correlation spectrometer for the PRATUSH global 21-cm experiment, using a Raspberry Pi 4 Model B as the master controller, data recorder, and real-time processor. The authors detail the pSPEC-based hardware (10-bit ADCs, Virtex-6 FPGA, 16384-channel FFT correlator), the SBC selection, the firmware and software architecture, and a custom 'dynamic flagging' algorithm that removes data-drop artifacts caused by the SBC's limited performance. Validation results with standard terminations and an antenna simulator show residual rms values of about 72 mK after an 8-hour run and 12.5 mK (3.4 mK after smoothing) after 44 hours of effective data, with residuals reported as Gaussian and consistent with thermal noise; the paper concludes that the digital system is suitable for PRATUSH's science requirements.

Significance. If the reported residual performance holds, this is a valuable engineering demonstration that a low-power, commercially available single-board computer can serve as the digital back-end for a global 21-cm radiometer. The paper provides substantial concrete detail on the hardware, firmware resources, data rates, and power/EMI considerations, and the dynamic flagging algorithm is a useful contribution to handling data-integrity issues in such systems. The comparison against 100 Gaussian noise realizations and the Gaussianity tests are good falsifiable checks of the statistical properties of the residuals. However, the central 'devoid of systematics' claim rests on an unspecified fitting procedure and unquoted flagging thresholds, and the 'thermal noise limited' claim is not tied to a radiometer-equation prediction, so the scientific significance of the demonstration is not yet fully established as written.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 6 (Figs. 11-13)] The 'maximally smooth function' subtracted from the averaged spectra is never defined: the authors give no basis, order, number of parameters, smoothness penalty, or fitting procedure. Since the central quantitative claims (residual rms of 72 mK, 12.5 mK, and 3.4 mK, and the statement that residuals are 'devoid of systematics') all depend on this subtraction, the claim is not verifiable as written. A sufficiently flexible smooth model can absorb smooth instrumental systematics and, in the science case, a smooth cosmological signal, so a small Gaussian residual after an arbitrary fit does not by itself demonstrate the absence of systematics. Please specify the function completely and demonstrate robustness of the residual rms to the fit's degrees of freedom, and test on simulated spectra with injected smooth components that the fitting procedure does not remove signal-like structure.
  2. [Section 6 (Figs. 11-12)] The claim that residuals are 'consistent with thermal noise expectations' is not supported by a calculation of the expected residual rms from the radiometer equation (system temperature, bandwidth, integration time, number of channels). The comparison against 100 Gaussian realizations with variance matched to the data tests Gaussianity and channel independence, but it does not test whether the absolute residual level equals the thermal noise prediction. Additionally, the 8-hour (72 mK) and 44-hour (12.5 mK) runs use different input terminations (50-ohm load vs antenna simulator), so the reduction in rms cannot be attributed to integration time alone; please provide the predicted rms for each configuration and compare directly with the measured values.
  3. [Section 5.1, Eqs. (1)-(2)] The dynamic flagging thresholds—the MAD multiplier used to set the deviation threshold and the number of consecutive flagged channels required to drop a full spectrum—are described as 'tuned to minimize false or erroneous flagging' but the actual values are never quoted. The moving-window size and step are given only as illustrative examples ('20 spectra' and 'one spectrum'). Because the final residual statistics depend on which spectra are retained, please report the exact parameter values used in the 8-hour and 44-hour analyses, and include a robustness check showing that the residual rms is insensitive to reasonable variations of these parameters.
  4. [Section 6 and Section 8] The conclusion that the system is 'suitable for the science requirements of PRATUSH' is not tied to a quantitative statement of those requirements in this paper. Please state the target sensitivity or allowable systematic residual for the PRATUSH global 21-cm measurement and show explicitly how the measured 12.5 mK (30.51 kHz) and 3.4 mK (610 kHz) residuals satisfy that requirement.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] The window function is referred to as 'Nuttal'; the standard spelling is 'Nuttall' (see also reference [66]).
  2. [Table 6 caption] The footnote 'Sathyanarayana Rao et al., 2023' should be an explicit citation to reference [1] rather than a bare author-year mention.
  3. [Section 5] Please define 'acquisition' in the post-processing timing statement. If it denotes a single switching state of about 8 seconds, 150 acquisitions correspond to about 20 minutes, consistent with the stated '~25 minutes of observation'; if it denotes a full six-state cycle, the timing would be different.
  4. [Table 5] The table is difficult to read because several cells are concatenated and the column alignment is inconsistent; please reformat it into separate rows and columns.
  5. [Section 4.3] 'L VDS' should be 'LVDS' in the description of the GPIO connection to the FPGA.
  6. [Figure 10 caption] The caption says that white lines denote flagged spectra, but the lower panel's vertical lines appear in a darker color; please ensure the figure colors match the caption or adjust the wording.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the paper reports measured post-fit residuals and bench comparisons, not a prediction derived from its own inputs.

full rationale

The central result is an experimental characterization of a digital receiver, and the claimed residual rms values are measured post-fit statistics rather than predicted quantities. The paper does not fit a parameter and then rename that parameter as a prediction; the 12.5 mK and 3.4 mK residuals are explicitly described as residuals after fitting a maximally smooth function, and the comparison against 100 Gaussian noise realizations in Fig. 12 is an external benchmark that gives the residual claim independent statistical content. The dynamic flagging thresholds are tuned quality cuts, but the thresholds are not used to predict the residual rms, so no fitted input is being relabeled as an output. The main weakness is reproducibility, not circularity: the maximally smooth function is never specified in terms of basis, order, smoothness penalty, or degrees of freedom, and the flagging thresholds are not quoted, so the 'devoid of systematics' claim is hard to verify from the paper alone. A sufficiently flexible smooth fit could absorb smooth instrumental response, which would make a small Gaussian residual less informative about the absence of smooth systematics; however, this is an underspecified analysis model rather than a derivation that reduces, by the paper's own equations or by self-citation, to its own inputs. Self-citations to pSPEC and SARAS provide hardware provenance and prior instrument context, but the current paper independently demonstrates the integrated system's performance, so these citations are not load-bearing in a circular way. Overall, no significant circularity is present; the paper would be strengthened by fully specifying the fit and flagging choices, but that is a completeness and verifiability issue rather than a circularity defect.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The residual rms claims rest on the dynamic flagging thresholds and the unspecified maximally smooth function, which are hand-chosen inputs. The flight-model relevance rests on the unverified equivalence of a space-qualified SBC to the RPi4B. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • Dynamic flagging deviation threshold = not specified in text
    Threshold in standard deviations above which channels are flagged; tuned to minimize false flagging (Section 5.1). It determines which spectra are dropped and thereby shapes the residual statistics.
  • Consecutive flagged channels for full-spectrum drop = 16
    A spectrum with 16 consecutive flagged channels (1/4 of a data packet) is dropped entirely (Section 5.1). This directly sets the 3-10 percent data loss and affects the final residual rms.
  • Dynamic flagging moving window size = 20 spectra
    Median and MAD are computed over a window of 20 spectra, moved by a user step (Section 5.1). The window size assumes system stability over that interval.
  • Dynamic flagging window step = 1 spectrum (example)
    User-determined step for sliding the window (Section 5.1); changes which data are used to define the median reference.
  • Maximally smooth function parameters = unspecified
    A maximally smooth function is fit to the averaged spectrum to define residuals (Section 6). The number and form of basis functions are not stated, yet the residual rms depends on the fit's flexibility.
  • Boxcar averaging kernel size = 20 channels
    Residuals are boxcar-averaged with kernel 20 to reach 610 kHz resolution and 3.4 mK rms (Section 6). The reported smoothing improvement depends on this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math k = 1.4826 converts MAD to standard deviation assuming normally distributed data.
    Used in Eq. (2) for the dynamic flagging threshold. The Gaussian assumption is checked later against noise realizations, but it is an input to the flagging.
  • domain assumption The maximally smooth function models smooth receiver bandpass without absorbing the spectral features of interest.
    Residuals after subtracting this fit are treated as thermal noise (Section 6). The function is not defined in the paper, so its flexibility is an unstated modeling choice.
  • domain assumption Standard terminations (50 ohm load, antenna simulator) are representative of the flight antenna load.
    Laboratory validation replaces the antenna with terminations (Sections 6 and 8); the measured noise performance is assumed to extrapolate to on-orbit conditions.
  • ad hoc to paper A space-qualified SBC with specifications similar to RPi4B will perform comparably.
    Stated in Section 6 and used to motivate the flight model; no space-grade SBC data is presented.
  • domain assumption The system is statistically stationary over each 20-spectrum window used for dynamic flagging.
    The moving-window median/MAD approach assumes stability over the window to avoid flagging good data (Section 5.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An SBC-based controller and processor for the laboratory model of PRATUSH Digital Receiver." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M2N35S4B

@misc{pith2026250705655,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An SBC-based controller and processor for the laboratory model of PRATUSH Digital Receiver},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M2N35S4B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05655}
}
read the original abstract

Probing ReionizATion of the Universe using Signal from Hydrogen (PRATUSH) is a proposed space-based radiometer that aims to detect the sky-averaged 21-cm signal from Cosmic Dawn - a crucial phase in the cosmic evolution of the Universe. PRATUSH will operate in the frequency range of 55-110 MHz. PRATUSH will conduct observations in low earth orbit in its first phase, followed by lunar orbit in the second phase. Digital correlation spectrometer is an integral subsystem of PRATUSH radiometer, enabling phase switching, digitization and generation of sky spectrum. The digital correlation spectrometer for PRATUSH laboratory model features 10-bit analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) and a Virtex-6 Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). A Raspberry Pi 4 Model B-based single-board computer (SBC) serves as the master controller, real-time processor and data recorder, to minimize the power, mass and volume requirement of the laboratory model. This paper presents the implementation of the PRATUSH laboratory model digital receiver, challenges arising from the use of an SBC in place of a conventional computer, and demonstrates the performance of the spectrometer when integrated with the PRATUSH laboratory model analog receiver.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Experimental Astronomy (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10686-023-09909-5

    Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Singh, S., Srivani, K.S., Girish, B.S., Keerthipriya, S., Somashekar, R., Raghunathan, A., Kavitha, K., Gautam, V., Ashish, A., Udaya Shankar, N., Seetha, S.: PRATUSH experiment concept and design overview. Experimental Astronomy (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10686-023-09909-5

    2023

  2. [2]

    Physics Reports349, 125–238 (2001) https://doi.org/10

    Barkana, R., Loeb, A.: In the beginning: the first sources of light and the reion- ization of the universe. Physics Reports349, 125–238 (2001) https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0370-1573(01)00019-9

    2001

  3. [3]

    Space Sci- ence Reviews116, 625–705 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-005-3592-0

    Ciardi, B., Ferrara, A.: The First Cosmic Structures and their Effects. Space Sci- ence Reviews116, 625–705 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-005-3592-0

    doi:10.1007/s11214-005-3592-0 2005

  4. [4]

    Zaroubi, S.: The Epoch of Reionization. In: T. Wiklind, B.M., Bromm, V. (eds.) The First Galaxies, Astrophysics and Space Science Library vol. 396. Springer, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1 2

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1 2012

  5. [5]

    Physics Reports645, 1–59 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.1605.04357

    Barkana, R.: The rise of the first stars: Supersonic Streaming, Radiative Feed- back, and 21-cm Cosmology. Physics Reports645, 1–59 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.1605.04357

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.04357 2016

  6. [6]

    Cham: Springer International (2016) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511

    Haiman, Z.: Cosmic Reionization and the First Nonlinear Structures in the Uni- verse. Cham: Springer International (2016) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511. 01125

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511 2016

  7. [7]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics54, 313–362 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-082214-122355

    McQuinn, M.: The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics54, 313–362 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-082214-122355

    2016

  8. [8]

    The Astronomical Journal122, 2850–2857 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/324231 astro-ph/0108097

    Becker, R.H., Fan, X., White, R.L., Strauss, M.A., Narayanan, V.K., Lupton, R.H., Gunn, J.E., Annis, J., Bahcall, N.A., Brinkmann, J., Connolly, A..J., Csabai, I., Czarapata, P.C., Doi, M., Heckman, T.M., Hennessy, G.S., Ivezi´ c, ˇZ., Knapp, G.R., Lamb, D.Q., McKay, T.A., Munn, J.A., Nash, T., Nichol, R., Pier, J.R., Richards, G.T., Schneider, D.P., Stou...

    arXiv 2001

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    Physical Review D82(023006) (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.023006

    Pritchard, J.R., Loeb, A.: Constraining the unexplored period between the dark ages and reionization with observations of the global 21 cm signal. Physical Review D82(023006) (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.023006

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    Experimental Astronomy45(2), 269–314 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-018-9584-3

    Singh, S., Subrahmanyan, R., Shankar, N.U., Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Girish, B.S., Raghunathan, A., Somashekar, R., Srivani, K.S.: SARAS 2: a spectral 35 radiometer for probing cosmic dawn and the epoch of reionization through detec- tion of the global 21-cm signal. Experimenta...

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    Shaver, P.A., Windhorst, R.A., Madau, P., Bruyn, A.G.: Can the reionization epoch be detected as a global signature in the cosmic background? Astronomy and Astrophysics345, 380–390 (1999) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/ 9901320

    1999 doi

  4. [12]

    Singh, S., Subrahmanyan, R., Shankar, N.U., Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Fialkov, A., Cohen, R. A. Barkana, Girish, B.S., Raghunathan, A., Somashekar, R., Sri- vani, K.S.: First Results on the Epoch of Reionization from First Light with SARAS 2. The Astrophysical Journal845(2) (201...

    2017

  5. [13]

    Singh, S., Subrahmanyan, R., Shankar, N.U., Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Fialkov, A., Cohen, R. A. Barkana, Girish, B.S., Raghunathan, A., Somashekar, R., Sri- vani, K.S.: SARAS 2 Constraints on Global 21 cm Signals from the Epoch of Reionization. The Astrophysical Journal858(1) (2...

    2018

  6. [14]

    Nature Astronomy 6, 607–617 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01610-5

    Singh, S., Nambissan, T., Subrahmanyan, R., Udaya Shankar, N., Girish, B.S., Raghunathan, A., Somashekar, R., Srivani, K.S., Sathyanarayana Rao, M.: On the detection of a cosmic dawn signal in the radio background. Nature Astronomy 6, 607–617 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41...

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    The Astrophysical Journal835(49) (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/835/1/49

    Monsalve, R.A., Rogers, A.E.E., Bowman, J.D.,et al: Calibration of the EDGES High-band Receiver to Observe the Global 21 cm Signature from the Epoch of Reionization. The Astrophysical Journal835(49) (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/835/1/49

    2017

  8. [16]

    Constraints on Phenomenological Models for the Global 21 cm Signal

    Monsalve, R.A., Rogers, A.E.E., Bowman, J.D.,et al: Results from EDGES High- Band: I. Constraints on Phenomenological Models for the Global 21 cm Signal. The Astrophysical Journal847(64) (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ aa88d1

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    Nature 555, 67–70 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25792

    Bowman, J.D., Rogers, A.E.E., Monsalve, R.A., Mozdzen, T.J., Mahesh, N.: An absorption profile centred at 78megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum. Nature 555, 67–70 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25792

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation08(02) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1142/S2251171719500041

    Philip, L., Abdurashidova, Z., Chiang, H.C., Ghazi, N.,et al: Probing Radio Intensity at high-Z from Marion: 2017 instrument. Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation08(02) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1142/S2251171719500041

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    The Astrophysical Journal799(90) (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/90 36

    Bernardi, G., McQuinn, M., Greenhill, L.J.: Foreground model and antenna cal- ibration errors of the sky-averaged 21 cm signal at z∼20. The Astrophysical Journal799(90) (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/90 36

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    The Astrophysical Journal478(3), 4193–4213 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/sty1244

    Price, D.C., Greenhill, L.J., Fialkov, A.,et al: Design and characterization of the Large- aperture Experiment to Detect the Dark Age (leda) radiometer systems. The Astrophysical Journal478(3), 4193–4213 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/sty1244

    2018

  13. [21]

    Proceedings of the IEEE97(8), 1487–1506 (2009) https://doi

    Lonsdale, C., Cappallo, R.J., Miguel, F.M.,et al: The Murchison Widefield Array: Design Overview. Proceedings of the IEEE97(8), 1487–1506 (2009) https://doi. org/10.1109/JPROC.2009.2017564

    2009

  14. [22]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 129(974) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/129/974/045001

    DeBoer, R.D., Parsons, A.R., Aguirre, J.E.,et al: Hydrogen Epoch of Reion- ization Array HERA. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 129(974) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/129/974/045001

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.556, A2, DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220873556(A2) (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220873

    Haarlem, M.P., Wise, M.W., Gunst, A.W.,et al: LOF AR: The Low- Frequency ARray. Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.556, A2, DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220873556(A2) (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220873

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    In: 2018 2nd URSI Atlantic Radio Science Meeting (AT-RASC, Gran Canaria, Spain), pp

    Zarka, P., Coffre, A., Denis, L., Dumez-Viou, C., Girard, J., Grießmeier, J.-M., Loh, A., Tagger, M.: The Low-Frequency Radiotelescope NenuF AR. In: 2018 2nd URSI Atlantic Radio Science Meeting (AT-RASC, Gran Canaria, Spain), pp. 1–1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.23919/URSI-AT-RA...

    2018

  17. [25]

    The Astrophysical Journal 831(1) (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/6

    Datta, A., Burns, J.O., Bradley, R., Harker, G., Komjathy, A., Lazio, T.J.W.: Effects Of The Ionosphere On Ground-Based Detection Of The Global 21 CM Signal From The Cosmic Dawn And The Dark Ages. The Astrophysical Journal 831(1) (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/6

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527(2), 2413–2425 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3378

    Pattison, J.H., Anstey, D.J., Lera Acedo, E.: Modelling a hot horizon in global 21- cm experimental foregrounds. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527(2), 2413–2425 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3378

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    The Astrophysical Journal923(1), 33 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1cde

    Bassett, N., Rapetti, D., Tauscher, K., Nhan, B.D., Bordenave, D.D., Hibbard, J.J., Burns, J.O.: Lost horizon: Quantifying the effect of local topography on global 21 cm cosmology data analysis. The Astrophysical Journal923(1), 33 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1cde

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Astrophysics Journal974(1), 137 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ad6d68 arXiv:2401.10756 [astro-ph.CO]

    Agrawal, Y., Kavitha, K., Singh, S.: Direction-dependent Effects on Global 21 cm Detection. Astrophysics Journal974(1), 137 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ad6d68 arXiv:2401.10756 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    MNRAS515(2), 1580–1597 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1804 arXiv:2206.12158 [astro-ph.IM] 37

    Spinelli, M., Kyriakou, G., Bernardi, G., Bolli, P., Greenhill, L.J., Fialkov, A., Garsden, H.: Antenna beam characterization for the global 21-cm exper- iment LEDA and its impact on signal model parameter reconstruction. MNRAS515(2), 1580–1597 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/m...

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    AJ162(2), 38 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abfdab arXiv:2103.00423 [astro-ph.IM]

    Mahesh, N., Bowman, J.D., Mozdzen, T.J., Rogers, A.E.E., Monsalve, R.A., Murray, S.G., Lewis, D.: Validation of the EDGES Low-band Antenna Beam Model. AJ162(2), 38 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abfdab arXiv:2103.00423 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Astronomy and Computing44, 100727 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2023.100727 arXiv:2302.03799 [astro-ph.IM]

    Ghosh, S., Rao, M.S., Singh, S.: STARFIRE: An algorithm for estimating radio frequency interference in orbits around Earth. Astronomy and Computing44, 100727 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2023.100727 arXiv:2302.03799 [astro-ph.IM]

    2023

  24. [32]

    Nature468(7325), 796–798 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature09601

    Bowman, J.D., Rogers, A.E.: A lower limit ofδz >0.06 for the duration of the reionization epoch. Nature468(7325), 796–798 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature09601

    2010

  25. [33]

    The Astrophysical Journal925(2), 221 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c78

    Abdurashidova, Z., Aguirre, J.E., Alexander, P., Ali, Z.S., Balfour, Y., Beard- sley, A.P., Bernardi, G., Billings, T.S., Bowman, J.D., Bradley, R.F.,et al.: First Results from HERA Phase I: Upper Limits on the Epoch of Reioniza- tion 21 cm Power Spectrum. The Astrophysical Jo...

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Fan, X., Carilli, C., Keating, B.: Observational Constraints on Cosmic Reioniza- tion. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.44(1), 415–462 (2006) https://doi.org/10. 1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092514

    2006 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Physical Review Letters133(12), 121004 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.121004

    Raghunathan, S., Ade, P., Anderson, A., Ansarinejad, B., Archipley, M., Auster- mann, J., Balkenhol, L., Beall, J., Benabed, K., Bender, A.,et al.: First Constraints on the Epoch of Reionization Using the Non-Gaussianity of the Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect from the Sout...

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    MNRAS484(2), 2866–2875 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz175 arXiv:1901.04752 [astro-ph.IM]

    Offringa, A.R., Mertens, F., Koopmans, L.V.E.: The impact of inter- ference excision on 21-cm epoch of reionization power spectrum analy- ses. MNRAS484(2), 2866–2875 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz175 arXiv:1901.04752 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Preprint at https://arxiv.org/ abs/1907.10853 (2019)

    Chen, X., Burns, J., Koopmans, L., Rothkaehi, H., Silk, J., Wu, J., Boonstra, A., Cecconi, B., Chiang, C., Chen, L.,et al: Discovering the Sky at the Longest Wavelengths with Small Satellite Constellations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/ abs/1907.10853 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    The Astrophysical Journal844(1), 33 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa77f4 38

    Burns, J., Bradley, R., Tauscher, K., Furlanetto, S., Mirocha, J., Monsalve, R., Rapetti, D., Purcell, W., Newell, D., Draper, D.,et al.: A Space-based Obser- vational Strategy for Characterizing the First Stars and Galaxies Using the Redshifted 21 cm Global Spectrum). The Ast...

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    Philosophical Trans- actions of The Royal Society A379(2020) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019

    Burns, J.: Transformative science from the lunar farside: observations of the dark ages and exoplanetary systems at low radio frequencies. Philosophical Trans- actions of The Royal Society A379(2020) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019. 0564

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05085 (2021)

    Burns, J., Bale, S., Bradley, R., Ahmed, Z., Allen, S., Bowman, J., Furlanetto, S., MacDowall, R., Mirocha, J., Nhan, B.,et al.: Global 21-cm Cosmology from the Farside of the Moon. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05085 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting 234, id

    Burns, J., Bale, S., Bradley, R.: Dark cosmology: Investigating Dark Matter and Exotic Physics using the Redshifted 21-cm Global Signal with the Dark Ages Polarimeter Pathfinder (DAPPER). American Astronomical Society Meeting 234, id. 212.02. Bulletin of the American Astronomi...

    2019 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    The Astrophysical Journal929(1), 32 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5965

    Shi, Y., Deng, F., Xu, Y., Wu, F., Yan, Q., Chen, X.: Lunar Orbit Measurement of the Cosmic Dawn’s 21 cm Global Spectrum. The Astrophysical Journal929(1), 32 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5965

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society510(2), 3046–3062 (2022) https:// doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3623

    Shi, Y., Xu, Y., Deng, L., Wu, F., Wu, L., Huang, Q., Zuo, S., Yan, J., Chen, X.: Imaging sensitivity of a linear interferometer array on lunar orbit. Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society510(2), 3046–3062 (2022) https:// doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3623

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08649 (2019)

    Burns, J., Hallinan, G., Lux, J., Teitelbaum, L., Kocz, J., MacDowall, R., Bradley, R., Rapetti, D., Wu, W., Furlanetto, S.,et al.: NASA Probe Study Report: Far- side Array for Radio Science Investigations of the Dark ages and Exoplanets (F ARSIDE). Preprint at https://arxiv.o...

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ameri- can Astronomical Society Meeting # 240, id

    Polidan, R., Lopez Jr, J., Burns, J., Ignatiev, A., Carol, E., Curreri, P.: FarView: A Lunar Far Side Radio Telescope to Explore The Cosmic Dark Ages. Ameri- can Astronomical Society Meeting # 240, id. 206.10. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society54(6), 206–10 (2022). ...

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100), Big Sky, MT, USA, pp

    Bandyopadhyay, S., Mcgarey, P., Goel, A., Rafizadeh, R., Delapierre, M., Arya, M., Lazio, J., Goldsmith, P., Chahat, N., Stoica, A.,et al: Conceptual Design of the Lunar Crater Radio Telescope (LCRT) on the Far Side of the Moon. IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100), Big Sky, MT, ...

    2021

  39. [47]

    Summary paper presented at the XXXVth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, 19-26 August (2023)

    Bale, S., Bassett, N., Burns, J., Jones, J., Goetz, K., Hellum-Bye, C., Hermann, S., Hibbard, J., Maksimovic, M., McLean, R.,et al: LuSEE’Night’: The Lunar Surface Electromagnetics Experiment. Summary paper presented at the XXXVth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium...

    2023 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    2023 XXXVth General Assembly And Scientific Symposium Of The International Union Of Radio Science, 19-26 August (URSI GASS) (2023)

    Tamura, E., Fried, J., O’Connor, P., Herrmann, S.: Design and Characteriza- tion of the Engineering Model of the Spectrometer Onboard LuSEE-Night. 2023 XXXVth General Assembly And Scientific Symposium Of The International Union Of Radio Science, 19-26 August (URSI GASS) (2023)...

    2023

  41. [49]

    Space: Science and Technology article id

    Zhang, L.: Development and Prospect of Chinese Lunar Relay Communication Satellite. Space: Science and Technology article id. 34716082021(2021) https: //doi.org/10.34133/2021/3471608

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    The Planetary Science Journal2 44(2021) https://doi.org/10

    Burns, J., MacDowall, R., Bale, S., Hallinan, G., Bassett, N., Hegedus, A.: Low Radio Frequency Observations from the Moon Enabled by (NASA) landed pay- load missions. The Planetary Science Journal2 44(2021) https://doi.org/10. 3847/PSJ/abdfc3

    2021

  43. [51]

    Experimental Astronomy51, 193–234 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-020-09697-2

    Nambissan Jishnu, T., Subrahmanyan, R., Somashekar, R., Udaya Shankar, N., Saurabh, S., Raghunathan, A., Girish, B.S., Srivani, K..S., Mayuri, S.R.: SARAS 3 CD/EoR radiometer: design and performance of the receiver. Experimental Astronomy51, 193–234 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1...

    2021 doi

  44. [52]

    Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation09(02, 2050006) (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1142/S2251171720500063

    Girish, B.S., Srivani, K.S., Subrahmanyan, R., Udaya Shankar, N., Singh, S., Jishnu Nambissan, T., Mayuri, S.R., Somashekar, R., Raghunathan, A.: SARAS CD/EoR Radiometer: Design and Performance of the Digital Correlation Spec- trometer. Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation0...

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation69(10), 6209–6217 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2021.3069563

    Raghunathan, A., Subrahmanyan, R., Shankar, N.U., Singh, S., Nambissan, J., Kavitha, K., Mahesh, N., Somashekar, R., Sindhu, G., Girish, B., Srivani, K.: A Floating Octave Bandwidth Cone-Disk Antenna for Detection of Cosmic Dawn. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation69...

    2021

  46. [54]

    XXIth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium (URSI GASS) (2014)

    Srivani, K.S., Girish, B.S., Shankar, N.U., Subrahmanyan, R.: A precision spec- trometer for measuring signals from the Epoch of Cosmological Recombination. XXIth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium (URSI GASS) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/URSIGASS.2014.6930031

    2014

  47. [55]

    Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation13(01, 2450005) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1142/ S2251171724500053

    Bharat Chandra, P., Nair, B.G., Ghatul, S.J.,et al: Development of rasp- berry pi-based processing unit for uv photon-counting detectors. Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation13(01, 2450005) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1142/ S2251171724500053

    2024

  48. [56]

    Pulupa, S. M.and Bale, Bonnell, J., Bowen, T., Carruth, N., Goetz, K., Gordon, D., Harvey, P., M., M., Mart ´ ınez-Oliveros, J.,et al: The solar probe plus radio frequency spectrometer: measurement requirements, analog design, and digital signal processing. Journal of Geophysi...

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    IEEE Access12, 99537–99569 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3428388

    Cratere, A., Gagliardi, L., Sanca, G.A., Golmar, F., Dell’Olio, F.: On-Board Computer for CubeSats: State-of-the-art and Future Trends. IEEE Access12, 99537–99569 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3428388

    2024

  50. [58]

    International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications13(2), 819 (2022) https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA

    Eric, G., Hernandez, S.: Performance Evaluation of Different Raspberry Pi Models for a Broad Spectrum of Interests. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications13(2), 819 (2022) https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA. 2022.0130295

    2022

  51. [59]

    Energy Storage and Saving3(3), 153–189 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enss

    Yi-Gao, L., Yao-Ting, W., Tong, M., Qiu-Wang, W., Wen-Xiao, C.: Review on thermal management technologies for electronics in spacecraft environment. Energy Storage and Saving3(3), 153–189 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enss. 2024.03.001

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    Pritchard, J.R., Loeb, A.: Evolution of the 21cm signal throughout cosmic his- tory. Phys. Rev. D78(10), 103511 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78. 103511 arXiv:0802.2102

    2008 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Pritchard, J.R., Loeb, A.: Constraining the unexplored period between the dark ages and reionization with observations of the global 21 cm signal. Phys. Rev. D82(2), 023006 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.023006 arXiv:1005.4057

    2010 arXiv

  54. [62]

    A&A 676(A75), 20 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346374

    Di Vruno, F., Winkel, B., C.G., B.,et al: Unintended electromagnetic radia- tion from starlink satellites detected with lofar between 110 and 188 mhz. A&A 676(A75), 20 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346374

    2023 doi

  55. [63]

    The Planetary Science Journal2(2) (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/abdfc3

    Burns, J.O., Bale, S., Hallinan, G., Bassett, N., Hegedus, A.: Low radio fre- quency observations from the moon enabled by nasa landed payload missions. The Planetary Science Journal2(2) (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/abdfc3

    2021 doi

  56. [64]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society437(2), 1056–1069 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1878

    Vedantham, H.K., Koopmans, L.V.E., Bruyn, A.G., Wijnholds, S.J., Ciardi, B., Brentjens, M.A.: Chromatic effects in the 21 cm global signal from the cosmic dawn. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society437(2), 1056–1069 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1878

    2014 doi

  57. [65]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society536, 1035–1055 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stae2649

    Engelbrecht, N.B., Santos, M.G., Fonseca, J., Li, Y., Wang, J., Irfan, M.O.,et al: Radio frequency interference from radio navigation satellite systems: simula- tions and comparison to meerkat single-dish data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society536, 1035–1055 (2...

    2025 doi

  58. [66]

    IEEE Transactions On Acoustics, Speech, And Signal Processing29(1), 84–91 (1981) https://doi

    Nuttal, A.H.: Some windows with very good sidelobe behavior. IEEE Transactions On Acoustics, Speech, And Signal Processing29(1), 84–91 (1981) https://doi. org/10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163506

    1981

  59. [67]

    Physics Reports433(4-6), 181–301 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.002

    Furlanetto, S.R., Oh, S.P., Briggs, F.H.: Cosmology at low frequencies: The 21 41 cm transition and the high-redshift Universe. Physics Reports433(4-6), 181–301 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.002

    2006 doi

  60. [68]

    The Astrophysical Journal810(3) (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/810/1/3

    Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Subrahmanyan, R., Udaya Shankar, N.: ON THE DETECTION OF SPECTRAL RIPPLES FROM THE RECOMBINATION EPOCH. The Astrophysical Journal810(3) (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/810/1/3

    2015

  61. [69]

    The Astronomical Journal,168(1), 607– 617 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad4a74

    Sathish, K., Sathyanarayana Rao, M., Sarkar, D.: Antenna design for absolute sky measurements at gigahertz frequencies—a first step toward detecting cmb spectral distortions from recombination. The Astronomical Journal,168(1), 607– 617 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad4a74

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    https://semiconductors

    TELEDYNE Semiconductors: EV10AQ190CTPY. https://semiconductors. teledyneimaging.com/en/products/data-converters/ev10aq190a/ (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    https://docs

    Advanced Micro Devices, I.: DS150-Virtex-6 Family Overview. https://docs. xilinx.com/v/u/en-US/ds150 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    IEEE Wireless Antenna and Microwave Symposium (W AMS), Visakhapatnam, India, pp

    Sathish, K., Sathyanarayana Rao, M., S, K., Srivani, K.S.,et al: RFI Survey in L and S Band for APSERa Cosmology Experiment. IEEE Wireless Antenna and Microwave Symposium (W AMS), Visakhapatnam, India, pp. 1-5 (2024). https: //doi.org/10.1109/W AMS59642.2024.10527901

    2024

  65. [73]

    https://www.analog.com/media/en/ training-seminars/tutorials/MT-003.pdf (2009)

    Kester, W.: Understand SINAD, ENOB, SNR, THD, THD+N, and SFDR so you dont get lost in the noise floor. https://www.analog.com/media/en/ training-seminars/tutorials/MT-003.pdf (2009)

    2009

  66. [74]

    Future Generation Computer Systems 89(2) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.06.048

    Steven, J.J., Philip, J.B., Colin, S.P., Herry, H., Tso, F.P., Dimitrios, P., Robert, D.M., Yoneki, E., Simon, J.C., Singer, J.: Commodity single board computer clus- ters and their applications. Future Generation Computer Systems 89(2) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future....

    2018 doi

  67. [75]

    International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)2(12), 225–227 (2021)

    Ghael, H.D., Solanki, L., , Sahu, G.: A Review Paper on Raspberry Pi and its Applications. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)2(12), 225–227 (2021). https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/348993428 A Review Paper on Raspberry Pi and its A...

    2021

  68. [76]

    Bartolini, A., Honess, D., Brindley, E., Quinlan, O., Sanchez, E., Brown, O., Ansel, S., Hayler, R., Nuttall, B., Talevi, M., Mar´ ee, H.: The Euro- pean Astro Pi Challenge – utilizing the International Space Station as an educational platform for STEM subject learning. Paper ...

    2018

  69. [77]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems8(2022) https: //doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.8.3.036002

    Bharat Chandra, P., Sarpotdar, M., Binukumar, G.N., Rai, R., Mohan, R., Mathew, J., Safonova, M., Murthy, J.: Low-cost Raspberry Pi star sensor for small satellites, journal of astronomical telescopes, instruments, and system. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, a...

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    Kenneth, M.L., Stefan, G., Michael, M.S., Stephen, B., David, V.-G., Frederick, M.W., , John, K.W.: Introducing the Condor Array Telescope. I. Motivation, Configuration, and Performance. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific135(1043) (2023) https://doi.org/10...

    2023 doi

  71. [79]

    International Conference on Electrical Engineer- ing, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE), 10-12 November 2021 (2021)

    Jetzael, C., Daniel, F., Jes´ us, C., Eduardo, I.-M., Miguel, V., Stan, K., David, H.: Single-Board Computer based Architecture and Firmware for Radiometers with Radio Astronomy applications. International Conference on Electrical Engineer- ing, Computing Science and Automatic...

    2021

  72. [80]

    Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation10(2) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1142/S2251171721500070

    Dyson, T., Chiang, H.C., Egan, E., Ghazi, N., Menard, T., Monsalve, R.A., Moso, T., Peterson, J., Sievers, J.L., S., T.: Radio-frequency Interference at the Mcgill Arctic Research Station. Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation10(2) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1142/S2251171721500070

    2021 doi

  73. [81]

    https://docs.arduino.cc/resources/ datasheets/A000066-datasheet.pdf (2025)

    Manual, P.R.: Arduino®UNO R3. https://docs.arduino.cc/resources/ datasheets/A000066-datasheet.pdf (2025)

    2025

  74. [82]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution1(2021) https://doi.org/10.1111/ 2041-210X.13652

    Jolle, W.J.: Broad-scale applications of the Raspberry Pi: A review and guide for biologists. Methods in Ecology and Evolution1(2021) https://doi.org/10.1111/ 2041-210X.13652

    2021

  75. [83]

    Measurement100, 7–18 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement

    Miha, A.: Raspberry Pi as a low-cost data acquisition system for human powered vehicles. Measurement100, 7–18 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement. 2016.12.037

    2017 doi

  76. [84]

    https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/ raspberry-pi-in-space (2019)

    Alex, B.: Raspberry Pi in space. https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/ raspberry-pi-in-space (2019)

    2019

  77. [85]

    https://www

    Whittaker, A.: Raspberry Pi Zero powers CubeSat space mission. https://www. raspberrypi.com/news/raspberry-pi-zero-powers-cubesat-space-mission (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    Meer, D., L., C., Richard, A.,et al: REALMS: Resilient exploration and lunar mapping system. Front. Robot. AI, Sec. Space Robotics, Volume 10 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1127496

    2023

  79. [87]

    https://www

    Raspberry-Pi-Foundation: Raspberry Pi 4 Model B Specifications. https://www. raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/specifications (2012-2024)

    2012

  80. [88]

    https: 43 //www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/os.html (2012-2024)

    Raspberry-Pi-Foundation: Raspberry Pi 4 Model B Operating System. https: 43 //www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/os.html (2012-2024)

    2012

  81. [89]

    In: Shaw, R.A., Payne, H.E., Hayes, J.J.E

    Sault, R.J., Teuben, P.J., Wright, M.C.H.: A Retrospective View of MIRIAD. In: Shaw, R.A., Payne, H.E., Hayes, J.J.E. (eds.) Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol. 77, p. 433 (1995). https://doi.org/10.48...

    1995 doi arXiv

  82. [90]

    https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/websites/BIMA/bima.astro

    Sault, B., Killeen, N.: Miriad Multichannel Image Reconstruction, Image Analysis and Display. https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/websites/BIMA/bima.astro. umd.edu/miriad/userguide US.pdf (2008)

    2008

  83. [91]

    https:// datasheets.raspberrypi.com/rpi4/raspberry-pi-4-datasheet.pdf (2024)

    Raspberry-Pi-Foundation: Raspberry Pi 4 Model B datasheet. https:// datasheets.raspberrypi.com/rpi4/raspberry-pi-4-datasheet.pdf (2024)

    2024

  84. [92]

    https://www-users.york.ac.uk/ ∼mjf5/bug press/src/ WiringPi.html (2015)

    WP Weaver, P.: Wiring Pi. https://www-users.york.ac.uk/ ∼mjf5/bug press/src/ WiringPi.html (2015)

    2015

  85. [93]

    https:// www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/raspberry-pi.html# raspberry-pi-4-and-raspberry-pi-5-boot-flow (2012-2024)

    Raspberry-Pi-Foundation: Raspberry Pi 4 boot flow. https:// www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/raspberry-pi.html# raspberry-pi-4-and-raspberry-pi-5-boot-flow (2012-2024)

    2012

  86. [94]

    Girish, B.S., Harshavardhan, R.S., Sethi, S., Srivani, K.S., Abhishek, R., Ajithku- mar, B., Sahana, B.,et al.: Progression of Digital-Receiver Architecture: From MW A to SKA1-Low, and beyond. J. Astrophys. Astron44(28) (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s12036-023-09921-3

    2023 doi

  87. [95]

    https://docs.amd.com/v/u/en-US/ds808 xfft (2012)

    Advanced Micro Devices, I.: Fast Fourier Transform v8.0 Data Sheet DS808. https://docs.amd.com/v/u/en-US/ds808 xfft (2012)

    2012

  88. [96]

    https://www.wireshark.org/docs/man-pages/tshark

    Foundation, W.: Tshark. https://www.wireshark.org/docs/man-pages/tshark. html

  89. [97]

    https://documents.westerndigital.com/content/dam/doc-library/ en us/assets/public/sandisk/product/memory-cards/ultra-uhs-i-microsd/ data-sheet-ultra-uhs-i-microsd.pdf

    SanDisk: SanDisk Ultra®microSDXC™& microSDHC™UHS-I Cards. https://documents.westerndigital.com/content/dam/doc-library/ en us/assets/public/sandisk/product/memory-cards/ultra-uhs-i-microsd/ data-sheet-ultra-uhs-i-microsd.pdf

  90. [98]

    35th Annual AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5135& context=smallsat (2021) 44

    Duhoon, A., Dennison, J., Lee, J.: Total Ionizing Dose Tolerance of Micro- SD Cards for Small Satellite Missions. 35th Annual AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5135& context=smallsat (2021) 44

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.