Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparisons of Statistical Multifragmentation and Evaporation Models for Heavy Ion Collisions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv nucl-ex/0610005 v1 pith:M2NOOK5H submitted 2006-10-03 nucl-ex

classification nucl-ex
keywords modelsmultifragmentationevaporationobservablesstatisticalcodescomparedgeneral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The results from ten statistical multifragmentation models have been compared with each other using selected experimental observables. Even though details in any single observable may differ, the general trends among models are similar. Thus these models and similar ones are very good in providing important physics insights especially for general properties of the primary fragments and the multifragmentation process. Mean values and ratios of observables are also less sensitive to individual differences in the models. In addition to multifragmentation models, we have compared results from five commonly used evaporation codes. The fluctuations in isotope yield ratios are found to be a good indicator to evaluate the sequential decay implementation in the code. The systems and the observables studied here can be used as benchmarks for the development of statistical multifragmentation models and evaporation codes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools