Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 56 references

Promoting and imaging intervalley coherent order in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene on MoS2

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Intervalley coherent order in rhombohedral graphene imaged at 77 K

desk verdict Genuinely new STM observation of a √3×√3 reconstruction in tetralayer RG on MoS2, plausibly IVC but not yet demonstrated without simulated STM comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14113 v1 pith:M36WW4KN submitted 2024-11-21 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Wei-Yu Liao , Wen-Xiao Wang , Shihao Zhang , Yang Zhang , Ling-Hui Tong , Wenjia Zhang , Hao Cai , Yuan Tian
show 5 more authors
Yuanyuan Hu Li Zhang Lijie Zhang Zhihui Qin Long-Jing Yin
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords intervalleycoherencerhombohedralgraphenescanningtunnelingmicroscopyKekulédistortionflatbandsspin-orbitproximityMoS2substrateHartree-Fockmean-field
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims to have directly imaged intervalley coherent (IVC) order in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, a long-predicted broken-symmetry ground state that had previously been inferred only from transport. In four-layer ABC-stacked graphene placed on MoS2, the authors see a $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ supercell in scanning tunnelling microscopy at 77 K when the flat band is partially filled (~60% and ~70%), and they attribute this pattern to a Kekulé distortion arising from coherent superposition of K and K' valley wavefunctions. The pattern appears only at biases near the flat band and is absent in hBN-supported samples under the same conditions, which the authors take as evidence that MoS2's spin-orbit proximity and screening promote the order. If correct, the result makes a predicted correlated phase routinely observable at liquid-nitrogen temperature rather than millikelvin temperatures and points to substrate proximity as a practical knob for collective states in graphene multilayers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ supercell in the local density of states, which the paper reads as the Kekulé distortion of an intervalley coherent state. The essential theoretical object is the SVL-IVC order parameter $(\tau_x s_x,\tau_z s_z)$, where $\tau$ and $s$ are Pauli matrices in valley and spin space: the $\tau_x s_x$ term is a coherent intervalley component that survives large Ising spin-orbit coupling, and the $\tau_z s_z$ term encodes spin-valley locking. Because this state's effective time-reversal symmetry transforms the intervalley density operator $\hat{\rho}(\mathbf{q}=K-K'+\Delta\mathbf{q})$ without a sign flip, the Kekulé distortion is allowed in real space, in contrast to the Kramers IVC state where it cancels. The supporting calculation is a Hartree-Fock mean-field treatment with a dual-gate screened interaction and a 96x96 momentum grid, using Ising SOC from the MoS2 substrate.

What would settle it

If the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ reconstruction persisted at full filling or at half filling, or appeared identically on hBN after introducing comparable disorder, the intervalley-coherence assignment would fail; a direct check is to compute simulated STM images from the Hartree-Fock SVL-IVC states and compare the real-space phase and bias dependence with the measured maps.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ atomic reconstruction observed in partially filled tetralayer rhombohedral graphene on MoS2 is the intervalley coherent state, i.e. the Kekulé distortion. The state appears at 77 K, forms at partial fillings of the flat band where the spectroscopic peak splits, and is not seen in hBN-supported tetralayer graphene measured the same way. The paper identifies the microscopic mechanism as a spin-valley-locked IVC (SVL-IVC) state with order parameter $(\tau_x s_x,\tau_z s_z)$: the spin-valley locking breaks enough symmetry that the usual cancellation of the Kekulé density modulation in a Kramers IVC state no longer occurs, and the effective time-reversal symmetry $\mathcal{T}=\tau_y s_y \mathcal{K}$ allows a real-space $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ modulation. Hartree-Fock mean-field calculations with screened Coulomb interaction and Ising spin-orbit coupling reproduce this state, and the calculations connect its stability to the combined effect of MoS2-induced spin-orbit coupling and enhanced screening.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's conclusion turns on the assumption that the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ pattern is a spontaneous electronic order rather than a static reconstruction, defect-induced scattering, or tip artifact; the authors argue against disorder and substrate strain but do not directly measure valley coherence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rhombohedral graphene inherits an experimentally accessible IVC phase at 77 K, so the predicted valley-coherent state can be studied with real-space probes instead of only transport.
  • Substrate proximity becomes a control parameter: the same graphene on hBN shows no reconstruction, so choosing a transition-metal dichalcogenide substrate can switch the correlated ground state on and off.
  • The bias and filling dependence of the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ intensity gives a spectroscopic fingerprint for IVC order that can be searched for in other flat-band graphene systems.
  • The observed flat-band splitting and the IVC wavevector constrain the ground-state flavor ordering in tetralayer rhombohedral graphene, favoring SVL-IVC over competing states in the MoS2-supported case.
  • Because IVC order has been linked theoretically to superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, a stable 77 K IVC state narrows the set of pairing mechanisms that need to be considered.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A gate-tunable device should show the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ pattern appearing and disappearing as the filling passes through the ~60-70% window; watching this switch in one sample would test the filling dependence without relying on different local doping regions.
  • The same mechanism predicts that replacing MoS2 with other dichalcogenide substrates of different spin-orbit strength will shift the filling range or temperature ceiling of the IVC order; this is a testable extension the paper does not carry out.
  • Comparing the measured STM images with simulated LDOS maps computed from the Hartree-Fock SVL-IVC wavefunctions would independently confirm the identification; the paper does not report such a comparison.
  • If the order is truly spontaneous rather than pinned by disorder, cooling below 77 K should reveal domain walls or phase slips of the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ modulation where the coherent intervalley phase changes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports STM/STS measurements of tetralayer rhombohedral graphene (RG) placed on MoS2, showing a √3×√3 supercell modulation in atomic-resolution topographic images and dI/dV maps when the flat band is partially filled at ~60% and ~70%. The authors interpret this pattern as intervalley coherent (IVC) order, specifically the SVL-IVC state, and support this with Hartree–Fock mean-field calculations that find the SVL-IVC state to be a ground state with an allowed Kekulé-type LDOS modulation. They also report the absence of the √3×√3 pattern in hBN-supported RG under the same conditions, which they attribute to the proximity-induced Ising spin–orbit coupling from MoS2.

Significance. If the identification is correct, this would be the first real-space visualization of intervalley coherent order in rhombohedral graphene, and at the unusually high temperature of 77 K. The paper's strengths include careful band-structure fitting to determine γ1, a bias- and filling-dependent dataset, a control experiment on hBN, and Hartree–Fock calculations that show the SVL-IVC state is symmetry-allowed to produce the observed periodicity. However, the central inference that the √3×√3 pattern 'demonstrates the existence of the IVC order' is not backed by simulated STM images or dI/dV maps from the SVL-IVC state, and the theoretical calculations do not quantitatively reproduce the bias or filling dependence of the pattern. The claim is therefore plausible but currently under-supported at the image level.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results (Fig. 3) and Methods 'The Kekulé distortion in the SVL-IVC state'] The central claim that the observed √3×√3 pattern "demonstrates the existence of the IVC order" is not supported by any simulated STM image or dI/dV map from the SVL-IVC Hartree–Fock state. The Methods section only proves that the SVL-IVC state is symmetry-allowed to have a nonzero Kekulé component (while KIVC forbids it); it does not compute the LDOS of that state and compare it with the experimental images. Consequently, the statement in the Introduction that "These observations are accurately reproduced by our theoretical calculations" is unsubstantiated at the image level. Without such a comparison, alternative √3×√3 mechanisms—such as defect-induced intervalley scattering, substrate-driven reconstruction, or a tip-induced electronic instability—are not quantitatively excluded. This is a load-bearing gap for the paper's principal conclusion.
  2. [Fig. 5 and Methods 'The Hartree-Fock mean-field calculation method'] The theoretical support does not reproduce the observed bias and filling dependence. The Hartree–Fock calculation is shown for a single doping (0.9×10^12 cm^-2) and no phase diagram as a function of filling is presented, so the observed appearance of the pattern at ~60% and ~70% filling and its absence at ~50% and ~100% is not compared with theory. The parameters ε_r = 5.0, d = 120 nm, and λ_I = 1 meV are stated without sensitivity analysis. The claim of robust IVC order at 77 K would be substantially strengthened by computing the IVC order parameter or spectral gap as a function of filling, screening, and SOC strength, and by showing that the SVL-IVC state is the stable ground state in the parameter range that matches the experiment.
  3. [Results (paragraph on disorder exclusion) and Fig. 4] The paper argues that the bias- and filling-dependence, together with the defect-free and strain-free local topography, "essentially rule out the scattering mechanism induced by disorder." This argument is reasonable but qualitative; it does not exclude all alternative √3×√3 electronic instabilities or substrate-driven reconstructions. Moreover, the paper does not show that the SVL-IVC state is uniquely responsible for the observed pattern as opposed to, for example, the IVC0 state or a charge-density-wave-type instability. The statement that the pattern is "consistent with" SVL-IVC is weaker than the claim of accurate reproduction, and the manuscript should either provide simulated STM images that discriminate between candidate orders or temper the conclusion accordingly.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Main text (paragraph beginning 'It is worth noting that besides inducing')] Typo: "Pervious theoretical analysis" should be "Previous theoretical analysis."
  2. [Methods, 'The Kekulé distortion in the SVL-IVC state'] The equation for ρ(q,E) is garbled: the overline indicating complex conjugation and the bracket structure are unclear, and the trace expression appears incomplete. Please rewrite this formula with clear notation.
  3. [Methods, 'The Kekulé distortion in the SVL-IVC state'] Define Δq and the density operator ρ̂(q) explicitly, and state whether q is a wave vector in the reciprocal lattice or a momentum transfer. The current notation makes the derivation hard to follow.
  4. [Fig. 3h and Fig. 4c] The normalized IVC strength plots lack error bars and information about the number of independent regions or measurements. Adding these would support the claims of bias- and filling-dependent behavior.
  5. [Fig. 3f,g,h] The phrase "2-order IVC" is not defined; if it refers to second-order diffraction spots in the FFT, please state so explicitly and indicate them in the figure.
  6. [Fig. 5 caption and Methods] The Hartree–Fock parameters are only partly specified (λ_I = 1 meV in the caption; ε_r = 5.0 and d = 120 nm in Methods). Please list all numerical inputs (grid size, band projection, interaction truncation) and justify the choice λ_I = 1 meV for MoS2-proximitized graphene.
  7. [Throughout] The term "Kekulé distortion" is used interchangeably to denote an electronic LDOS modulation and a lattice distortion. Since the STM measures LDOS, please clarify that the observed pattern is an electronic reconstruction, not necessarily a structural distortion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the √3×√3 observation is an independent experimental input, and the SVL-IVC periodicity is derived from a microscopic Hartree-Fock calculation with fixed, non-fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The STM-observed √3×√3 reconstruction is an experimental input, not an output of the theory. The Hartree-Fock calculation takes fixed inputs (ε_r = 5.0, λ_I = 1 meV, 96×96 momentum grid) and finds SVL-IVC order; the √3×√3 periodicity is then derived from the SVL-IVC order parameter (τ_x s_x, τ_z s_z) via the intervalley wavevector K₀, as shown in the Methods section 'The Kekulé distortion in the SVL-IVC state'. No fitted parameter from the STM images is reused as a 'prediction'; the γ1 tight-binding fit is calibrated against remote-band edges, not against the √3×√3 pattern. The interpretation that the pattern demonstrates IVC order relies on external theoretical work (refs 27, 28, 46, 47), not on a self-citation chain. The manuscript's self-citations (e.g., refs 36–39) are background or comparison data and are not load-bearing for the central IVC claim. The absence of a simulated STM image comparison is a matter of evidence strength or underdetermination, not circularity: the observation is not defined in terms of the theory, nor is the theory's periodicity an input fitted to the observation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim leans on two external inputs: established STM interpretation and prior predictions of IVC in rhombohedral graphene. The Hartree-Fock calculation introduces hand-set parameters (epsilon_r, lambda_I, d) but does not fit them to the STM pattern. No new particles, mediators, or forces are proposed.

free parameters (4)
  • gamma1 (nearest-neighbor interlayer hopping) = ~0.38 to 0.384 eV
    Fitted to the remote-band edge positions in STS spectra (Fig 1f). Used in the tight-binding model; not directly part of the IVC identification.
  • Ising SOC lambda_I = 1 meV
    Set in the Hartree-Fock calculation (Fig 5a). The existence and type of IVC order depends on its magnitude; too large an Ising SOC kills the IVC0 state.
  • Dielectric constant epsilon_r = 5.0
    Chosen in the Methods to model strong screening by MoS2. It affects the interaction potential and hence the competition between correlated states.
  • Screening distance d = 120 nm
    Set in the dual-gate screened interaction potential. This is a device-model parameter rather than a fit to the IVC data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption STM topographic and dI/dV signals directly represent the local density of states of the top graphene layer.
    Standard STM assumption; the sqrt(3) x sqrt(3) pattern is read as an electronic LDOS modulation rather than a geometric corrugation.
  • domain assumption The sqrt(3) x sqrt(3) reconstruction is a spontaneous intervalley coherent (Kekulé) order, not a static Kekulé distortion from impurity scattering or a substrate-induced reconstruction.
    This is the central interpretive link. The paper argues bias and filling dependence rule out disorder, but it does not measure valley coherence directly.
  • domain assumption Only Ising SOC from MoS2 is relevant; Rashba and Kane-Mele SOC can be neglected at flat-band energies.
    Methods section: Rashba is off-diagonal in the sublattice subspace and weak for sublattice-polarized flat bands; Kane-Mele SOC is negligible.
  • domain assumption Hartree-Fock mean-field with cRPA screening describes the correlated ground state of tetralayer RG on MoS2.
    The HF calculation is used to identify SVL-IVC as the state compatible with observations; mean-field theory can miss fluctuation effects.
  • domain assumption The MoS2 versus hBN comparison isolates the spin-orbit proximity effect as the cause of the IVC pattern.
    Other substrate differences (screening, charge disorder, strain) are not quantitatively controlled; the paper attributes the difference to SOC proximity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Promoting and imaging intervalley coherent order in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene on MoS2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M36WW4KN

@misc{pith2026241114113,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Promoting and imaging intervalley coherent order in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene on MoS2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M36WW4KN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14113}
}
read the original abstract

Multilayer rhombohedral graphene (RG) has recently emerged as a new, structurally simple flat-band system, which facilitates the exploration of interaction-driven correlation states with highly ordered electron arrangements. Despite a variety of many-body order behaviors observed in RG by transport measurements, the direct microscopic visualization of such correlated phases in real space is still lacking. Here, we show the discovery of a robust intervalley coherent order, a long-predicted ground state in RG, at 77 K in tetralayer RG placed on MoS2 via imaging atomic-scale spatial reconstruction of wave functions for correlated states. By using scanning tunnelling microscopy, we observe spectroscopic signatures of electronic correlations at partially filled flat bands, where distinct splitting appears. At ~60% and ~70% fillings of the flat bands, we visualize atomic-scale reconstruction patterns with a <sqrt>3 x <sqrt>3 supercell on graphene lattice at liquid nitrogen temperature, which indicates a robust intervalley coherent phase of the interacting electrons. The <sqrt>3 x <sqrt>3 pattern is observed in MoS2-supported RG, while it is absent in hBN-based ones under the same experimental conditions, suggesting the significant influence of spin-orbit proximity effect. Our results provide microscopic insights into the correlated phases in tetralayer RG and highlight the significant potential for realizing highly accessible collective phenomena through Van der Waals proximity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jiang, Y . et al. Charge order and broken rotational symmetry in magic -angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 573, 91-95 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Kerelsky, A. et al. Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 572, 95-100 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Choi, Y . et al. Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle. Nat. Phys. 15, 1174–1180 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Rubio-Verdú, C. et al. Moiré nematic phase in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 18, 196-202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Tsui, Y .-C. et al. Direct observation of a magnetic -field-induced Wigner crystal. Nature 628, 287-292 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Li, H. et al. Imaging two-dimensional generalized Wigner crystals. Nature 597, 650-654 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Liu, X. et al. Visualizing broken symmetry and topological defects in a quantum Hall ferromagnet. Science 375, 321-326 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Coissard, A. et al. Imaging tunable quantum Hall broken-symmetry orders in graphene. Nature 605, 51-56 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Li, S.-Y ., Zhang, Y ., Yin, L.-J. & He, L. Scanning tunneling microscope study of quantum Hall isospin ferromagnetic states in the zero Landau level in a graphene monolayer. Phys. Rev. B 100, 085437 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Nuckolls, K. P. et al. Quantum textures of the many -body wavefunctions in magic -angle graphene. Nature 620, 525-532 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Kim, H. et al. Imaging inter-valley coherent order in magic -angle twisted trilayer graphene. Nature 623, 942-948 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Liu, K. et al. Spontaneous broken-symmetry insulator and metals in tetralayer rhombohedral graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 188–195 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Han, T. et al. Correlated insulator and Chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral -stacked graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 181–187 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Lee, Y . et al. Gate-Tunable Magnetism and Giant Magnetoresistance in Suspended Rhombohedral-Stacked Few-Layer Graphene. Nano Lett. 22, 5094-5099 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Lee, Y . et al. Competition between spontaneous symmetry breaking and single -particle gaps in trilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 5, 5656 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Zhou, H. et al. Half- and quarter-metals in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nature 598, 429- 433 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Han, T. et al. Orbital multiferroicity in pentalayer rhombohedral graphene. Nature 623, 41-47 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    & Young, A

    Zhou, H., Xie, T., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nature 598, 434-438 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Lu, Z. et al. Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene. Nature 626, 759- 764 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Xie, J. et al. Even- and Odd -denominator Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in Graphene Moire Superlattices. arXiv: 2405.16944 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Sha, Y . et al. Observation of a Chern insulator in crystalline ABCA -tetralayer graphene with spin-orbit coupling. Science 384, 414-419 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Han, T. et al. Large quantum anomalous Hall effect in spin -orbit proximitized rhombohedral graphene. Science 384, 647-651 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Shi, Y . et al. Electronic phase separation in multilayer rhombohedral graphite. Nature 584, 210- 214 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Zhou, W. et al. Layer-polarized ferromagnetism in rhombohedral multilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 15, 2597 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Chen, G. et al. Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice. Nature 572, 215–219 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Chen, G. et al. Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moiré superlattice. Nature 579, 56-61 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    & Zaletel, M

    Chatterjee, S., Wang, T., Berg, E. & Zaletel, M. P. Inter -valley coherent order and isospin fluctuation mediated superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 13, 6013 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    & Vishwanath, A

    You, Y .-Z. & Vishwanath, A. Kohn -Luttinger superconductivity and intervalley coherence in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 105, 134524 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Shi, Y . et al. van der Waals Epitaxy of MoS 2 Layers Using Graphene As Growth Templates. Nano Lett. 12, 2784-2791 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    -P., Li, G., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T

    Lu, C. -P., Li, G., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Andrei, E. Y . MoS 2: Choice Substrate for Accessing and Tuning the Electronic Properties of Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156804 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    & Andrei, E

    Lu, C.-P., Li, G., Mao, J., Wang, L.-M. & Andrei, E. Y . Bandgap, Mid-Gap States, and Gating Effects in MoS2. Nano Lett. 14, 4628-4633 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Siao, M. D. et al. Two-dimensional electronic transport and surface electron accumulation in MoS2. Nat. Commun. 9, 1442 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    & Wallace, R

    Addou, R., Colombo, L. & Wallace, R. M. Surface Defects on Natural MoS 2. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 7, 11921-11929 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Xu, R. et al. Direct probing of the stacking order and electronic spectrum of rhombohedral trilayer graphene with scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 91, 035410 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Pierucci, D. et al. Evidence for Flat Bands near the Fermi Level in Epitaxial Rhombohedral Multilayer Graphene. ACS Nano 9, 5432–5439 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Yin, L.-J. et al. High-Magnetic-Field Tunneling Spectra of ABC-Stacked Trilayer Graphene on Graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 146802 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Yin, L.-J. et al. Imaging Friedel oscillations in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 107, L041404 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    -Y ., He, L

    Han, Z. -Y ., He, L. & Yin, L.-J. Quantum confinement and interference via Fabry -Pérot-like resonators in rhombohedral trilayer graphene on graphite. Phys. Rev. B 108, 245422 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Zhang, Y . et al. Layer-dependent evolution of electronic structures and correlations in rhombohedral multilayer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024- 01822-y (2024)

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    & Fal’ko, V

    Slizovskiy, S., McCann, E., Koshino, M. & Fal’ko, V . I. Films of rhombohedral graphite as two- dimensional topological semimetals. Communications Physics 2, 164 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    & Koshino, M

    McCann, E. & Koshino, M. The electronic properties of bilayer graphene. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 056503 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    Park, Y ., Kim, Y ., Chittari, B. L. & Jung, J. Topological flat bands in rhombohedral tetralayer and multilayer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride moiré superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 108, 155406 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    W., Girit, C., Zettl, A

    Zhang, Y ., Brar, V . W., Girit, C., Zettl, A. & Crommie, M. F. Origin of spatial charge inhomogeneity in graphene. Nat. Phys. 5, 722-726 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    Hagymási, I. et al. Observation of competing, correlated ground states in the flat band of rhombohedral graphite. Science Advances 8, eabo6879 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Kerelsky, A. et al. Moiréless correlations in ABCA graphene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2017366118 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Wang, T., Vila, M., Zaletel, M. P. & Chatterjee, S. Electrical Control of Spin and Valley in Spin- Orbit Coupled Graphene Multilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 116504 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    M., Alicea, J

    Koh, J. M., Alicea, J. & Lantagne -Hurtubise, É. Correlated phases in spin -orbit-coupled rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 109, 035113 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    & Das Sarma, S

    Xie, M. & Das Sarma, S. Flavor symmetry breaking in spin -orbit coupled bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 107, L201119 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Arp, T. et al. Intervalley coherence and intrinsic spin –orbit coupling in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 20, 1413–1420 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Patterson, C. L. et al. Superconductivity and spin canting in spin -orbit proximitized rhombohedral trilayer graphene. arXiv: 2408.10190 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Yang, J. et al. Diverse Impacts of Spin-Orbit Coupling on Superconductivity in Rhombohedral Graphene. arXiv: 2408.09906 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Han, T. et al. Signatures of Chiral Superconductivity in Rhombohedral Graphene. arXiv: 2408.15233 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    & Fabian, J

    Zhumagulov, Y ., Kochan, D. & Fabian, J. Emergent Correlated Phases in Rhombohedral Trilayer Graphene Induced by Proximity Spin -Orbit and Exchange Coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 186401 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    & Fabian, J

    Gmitra, M. & Fabian, J. Graphene on transition -metal dichalcogenides: A platform for proximity spin-orbit physics and optospintronics. Phys. Rev. B 92, 155403 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  48. [56]

    P., Soejima, T

    Hong, J. P., Soejima, T. & Zaletel, M. P. Detecting Symmetry Breaking in Magic Angle Graphene Using Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 147001 (2022). Fig.1 | Topography and spectroscopy of rhombohedral 4 -layer graphene. a , Schematic diagram of the experimen...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.