REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine Translation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Non-autoregressive machine translation (NAT) systems predict a sequence of output tokens in parallel, achieving substantial improvements in generation speed compared to autoregressive models. Existing NAT models usually rely on the technique of knowledge distillation, which creates the training data from a pretrained autoregressive model for better performance. Knowledge distillation is empirically useful, leading to large gains in accuracy for NAT models, but the reason for this success has, as of yet, been unclear. In this paper, we first design systematic experiments to investigate why knowledge distillation is crucial to NAT training. We find that knowledge distillation can reduce the complexity of data sets and help NAT to model the variations in the output data. Furthermore, a strong correlation is observed between the capacity of an NAT model and the optimal complexity of the distilled data for the best translation quality. Based on these findings, we further propose several approaches that can alter the complexity of data sets to improve the performance of NAT models. We achieve the state-of-the-art performance for the NAT-based models, and close the gap with the autoregressive baseline on WMT14 En-De benchmark.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Your LLM Knows the Future: Uncovering Its Multi-Token Prediction Potential
A gated LoRA and a small sampler let an autoregressive LLM draft multiple future tokens per step, and self-speculative verification converts those drafts into up to roughly 5x fewer generation steps.
-
Prepending or Cross-Attention for Speech-to-Text? An Empirical Comparison
Across controlled ASR and speech translation experiments, dense feature prepending does not outperform cross-attention in quality and is slightly slower and more memory hungry.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.