Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

New Regimes in the Observation of Core-Collapse Supernovae

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.02476 v1 pith:M3UMWM3A submitted 2019-08-07 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords explosionsmanyquestionstheyanswerccsnecommoncore-collapse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Core-collapse Supernovae (CCSNe) mark the deaths of stars more massive than about eight times the mass of the sun and are intrinsically the most common kind of catastrophic cosmic explosions. They can teach us about many important physical processes, such as nucleosynthesis and stellar evolution, and thus, they have been studied extensively for decades. However, many crucial questions remain unanswered, including the most basic ones regarding which kinds of massive stars achieve which kind of explosions and how. Observationally, this question is related to the open puzzles of whether CCSNe can be divided into distinct types or whether they are drawn from a population with a continuous set of properties, and of what progenitor characteristics drive the diversity of observed explosions. Recent developments in wide-field surveys and rapid-response followup facilities are helping us answer these questions by providing two new tools: (1) large statistical samples which enable population studies of the most common SNe, and reveal rare (but extremely informative) events that question our standard understanding of the explosion physics involved, and (2) observations of early SNe emission taken shortly after explosion which carries signatures of the progenitor structure and mass loss history. Future facilities will increase our capabilities and allow us to answer many open questions related to these extremely energetic phenomena of the Universe.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Low Can We Go? Minimum Spectroscopic Requirements For Supernova Subtype Classification

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    ABC-SN classifies ten supernova subtypes with no performance loss down to R_λ=50 and SNR=5, and only minimal loss at R_λ=25.

  2. Exploring the multi-wavelength properties of the high energetic event ZTF20abbiixp/GRB 200524A: from prompt emission to afterglow

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-wavelength study of GRB 200524A reports a dense ISM environment with a high kinetic energy and a large magnetic-field energy fraction, inferred from forward plus reverse shock modeling.

  3. SN 2025aico: Early observations of a faint Type IIb supernova with a low-mass envelope

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    SN 2025aico is a low-luminosity Type IIb from a compact He star (M_env≈0.01 M⊙, R_env≈6–10 R⊙) with M_Ni≈0.033 M⊙, M_ej≈2.8 M⊙ and weak-to-moderate 56Ni mixing.

  4. Insights from Modeling Magnetar-driven Light Curves of Stripped-envelope Supernovae

    astro-ph.HE 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A unified magnetar spin-down model reproduces the bolometric light curves of 11 stripped-envelope supernovae, but several reported correlations follow from the fitting formulas rather than from independent physics.

Pith tools