Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Work Smarter Not Harder: Simple Imitation Learning with CS-PIBT Outperforms Large Scale Imitation Learning for MAPF

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.14491 v1 pith:M4GGQFU4 submitted 2024-09-22 cs.MA cs.RO

classification cs.MAcs.RO
keywords mapflearningimitationlargescalesimplecs-pibtfinding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is the problem of effectively finding efficient collision-free paths for a group of agents in a shared workspace. The MAPF community has largely focused on developing high-performance heuristic search methods. Recently, several works have applied various machine learning (ML) techniques to solve MAPF, usually involving sophisticated architectures, reinforcement learning techniques, and set-ups, but none using large amounts of high-quality supervised data. Our initial objective in this work was to show how simple large scale imitation learning of high-quality heuristic search methods can lead to state-of-the-art ML MAPF performance. However, we find that, at least with our model architecture, simple large scale (700k examples with hundreds of agents per example) imitation learning does \textit{not} produce impressive results. Instead, we find that by using prior work that post-processes MAPF model predictions to resolve 1-step collisions (CS-PIBT), we can train a simple ML MAPF model in minutes that dramatically outperforms existing ML MAPF policies. This has serious implications for all future ML MAPF policies (with local communication) which currently struggle to scale. In particular, this finding implies that future learnt policies should (1) always use smart 1-step collision shields (e.g. CS-PIBT), (2) always include the collision shield with greedy actions as a baseline (e.g. PIBT) and (3) motivates future models to focus on longer horizon / more complex planning as 1-step collisions can be efficiently resolved.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Advancing Learnable Multi-Agent Pathfinding Solvers with Active Fine-Tuning

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 2M-parameter MAPF-GPT model fine-tuned with delta-driven data generation matches or exceeds much larger models on MAPF benchmarks and scales to over a million agents.

Pith tools