Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 66 references

Every smooth del Pezzo surface of degree at least 3 descends to its field of moduli; in degrees 1 and 2 there are complex surfaces that do not.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 20:46 UTC pith:M75RYXMD

load-bearing objection Strong partial results on field of moduli for del Pezzo surfaces, but the degree-1 counterexample is broken as written; fixable, and the rest deserves review. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16519 v2 pith:M75RYXMD submitted 2026-07-17 math.AG

Fields of Moduli of Smooth del Pezzo Surfaces

Tianzhi Yang This is my paper
classification math.AG MSC 14J4514D2314G27
keywords del Pezzo surfacesfield of modulidescentgerbesEckardt configurationsBertini involutionplane quarticsweighted hypersurfaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper settles a classical descent question for smooth del Pezzo surfaces: when a surface over an algebraically closed field K can be defined over the fixed field of the automorphisms that preserve its isomorphism class — its field of moduli. It proves that the answer is always yes for degrees 3 through 9: every such surface has a model over its field of moduli relative to any subfield k, and consequently the moduli stack surjects onto the coarse moduli space over every field extension. For the two lowest degrees, the paper constructs counterexamples over the complex numbers whose field of moduli relative to the reals is R but which admit no real model. The proof mixes a modern gerbe-theoretic descent criterion with explicit geometry: intersections of two quadrics, the action of automorphism groups on the 27 lines and Eckardt configurations of cubic surfaces, double covers branched along plane quartics, and a new weighted-hypersurface construction in degree one. A sympathetic reader will recognize this as a complete, degree-by-degree answer to a long-standing problem for a natural family of surfaces.

Core claim

Theorem A establishes a degree dichotomy. For any characteristic-0 field k with algebraic closure K, every smooth del Pezzo surface over K of degree d≥3 is defined over its field of moduli; hence for 3≤d≤9 the moduli stack maps onto the coarse moduli space over every field extension. In degrees 1 and 2 the theorem gives complex surfaces whose field of moduli relative to C/R is R but which have no real model. The engine is the residue gerbe G_S, a finite stack with geometric stabilizer Aut(S); S descends exactly when G_S is neutral. Degree 4 reduces to an odd-degree divisor on P^1, degree 3 to Eckardt configurations and cyclic triple covers, degree 2 to a branch plane quartic with automorphis

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the residue gerbe G_S — a finite gerbe over the field of moduli whose geometric inertia group is Aut(S). The paper uses the criterion that S descends to its field of moduli if and only if G_S is neutral, i.e. admits a rational point. To prove neutrality in each case, the paper constructs faithful morphisms from G_S into classifying stacks using intrinsic geometric structures: for degree 4, the five-point divisor D_S on P^1 (which determines S and has the same field of moduli); for degree 3, the Eckardt configuration and the normal line bundle at distinguished points, plus the deck-subgroup structure of cyclic cubic surfaces; for degree 2, the branch plane quartic o

Load-bearing premise

The degree-one counterexample depends on the existence of a smooth surface of the form (7.2) whose full automorphism group is exactly the Bertini involution while still admitting the semilinear map (x,y,z,w)↦(−y,x,z,w); the paper asserts this holds on a dense part of the real subspace W_4⊕W_6 defined by F_m(−y,x)=F_m(x,y).

What would settle it

Choose an explicit pair (F_4,F_6) in W_4⊕W_6, for instance F_4=x^4−6x^2y^2+y^4 and F_6=x^6−15x^4y^2+15x^2y^4−y^6, and compute the automorphism group of the weighted surface w^2+z^3+F_4 z+F_6=0 in P(1,1,2,3). If the order-4 map (x,y,z,w)↦(−y,x,z,w) lies in Aut(S), then the claimed generic automorphism group ⟨β⟩ fails and the cocycle obstruction may not be inescapable.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For every field extension h/k and every 3≤d≤9, the map M_d(h)→M_d(h) is surjective: every point of the coarse moduli space comes from an h-model of a del Pezzo surface.
  • All smooth degree-4 del Pezzo surfaces are defined over their field of moduli, since the five singular quadrics give an odd-cardinality divisor that descends.
  • All smooth cubic surfaces are defined over their field of moduli, including the special cyclic and Fermat cases; this follows from the case analysis of automorphism types.
  • In degree 2, the only possible obstruction occurs when the branch quartic has automorphism group C_2; for quartics with larger automorphism group the double cover descends.
  • The degree-1 construction yields a new class of surfaces obstructed from descent, showing the failure phenomenon extends to surfaces beyond curves and K3 surfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same semilinear mechanism might produce a whole family of obstructed degree-one surfaces, since the defining condition (7.3) cuts out a positive-dimensional real subspace of binary forms; one could test whether the obstruction persists as the pair (F_4,F_6) varies.
  • The degree dichotomy hints at a general heuristic: descent to the field of moduli tends to hold when the automorphism group either is trivial or splits through a centralizer, and fails when an intrinsic involution (Bertini or Geiser) is forced into every descent isomorphism.
  • The gerbe-theoretic strategy could be adapted to other surfaces with a canonical map to a low-dimensional projective space, e.g., rational elliptic surfaces with a distinguished involution, by looking for distinguished divisors or semilinear transformations with non-trivial square.
  • A computational check on small examples within W_4⊕W_6 would clarify whether the field of moduli of degree-one surfaces depends only on invariants of the binary forms, potentially revealing a moduli stratification.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies descent of smooth del Pezzo surfaces over an algebraically closed field K of characteristic 0 to their field of moduli relative to an arbitrary subfield k. Theorem A asserts that every smooth del Pezzo surface of degree at least 3 is defined over its field of moduli, while in degrees 1 and 2 there exist complex surfaces whose field of moduli relative to C/R is R but which have no real model. The proofs use standard models for degree at least 5, a trace construction for degree 4, a case-by-case analysis for cubic surfaces based on the gerbe/neutral-representation machinery of Bresciani–Vistoli and the Dolgachev–Duncan classification, and explicit weighted equations for degrees 1 and 2. The degree-2 counterexample is reduced to the Artebani–Quispe plane quartic; the degree-1 counterexample is constructed from binary forms satisfying condition (7.3). The central claim of the paper therefore depends critically on the correctness of Proposition 7.4.

Significance. If the degree-1 construction is repaired, the paper would give a complete and clean answer to the field-of-moduli question for smooth del Pezzo surfaces in characteristic zero, a substantial contribution. The gerbe-theoretic framework and the neutral-representation criteria are well matched to the problem; the degree-4 trace construction is elegant and essentially self-contained modulo [Mar13]; the degree-2 reduction to the existing Artebani–Quispe example is convincing. However, Theorem A(2) for degree 1 rests entirely on Proposition 7.4, and that proof is internally inconsistent as written. Because the paper presents this as part of a complete answer, the degree-1 half is load-bearing and must be fixed. The flaw is local and appears fixable by replacing (7.3) with a genuinely conjugate-linear condition, but that is a substantive change to the present proof. The heavy reliance on companion preprints [BY26] and [BVY26] is acceptable if those preprints are available and correct, but it increases the verification burden.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.2, Eq. (7.3)] As written, condition (7.3), F_m(-y,x)=F_m(x,y), is a complex-linear condition, not a conjugate-linear one. For F_m(x,y)=Σ c_r x^{m-r} y^r, it is equivalent to c_{m-r}=(-1)^r c_r. Hence dim_C W_4 = 3 and dim_C W_6 = 3, while the full binary-form spaces have dimensions 5 and 7. Thus W_4⊕W_6 is a proper closed complex subspace of codimension 6 and is not Zariski dense in the full coefficient space. The proof's choice of a general pair in W_4⊕W_6 is therefore invalid as a way to meet the open locus where Aut(S)=⟨β⟩; indeed the next comment shows that no such pair exists in W_4⊕W_6.
  2. [§7.2, Proposition 7.4] For every pair (F_4,F_6) satisfying (7.3), the map φ(x,y,z,w)=(-y,x,z,w) is a C-linear automorphism of the surface (7.2). In P(1,1,2,3), φ^2 = β: φ^2(-x,-y,z,w) is projectively equivalent to (x,y,z,-w) via the scalar -1. Hence φ has order 4 and Aut(S) strictly contains ⟨β⟩. This directly contradicts the premise Aut(S)=⟨β⟩ used in the proof. No surface of the form (7.2) with (7.3) can have automorphism group exactly C_2 as claimed.
  3. [§7.2, field-of-moduli step] Even putting the density problem aside, a C-linear automorphism does not establish an isomorphism S ≅ \bar S. For the field of moduli to be R one needs a conjugate-linear (c-semilinear) isomorphism S^c → S or a semilinear automorphism of S over C/R. The assertion that 'every isomorphism \bar S→S is either φ or βφ' is unsupported because φ is not an element of that Hom-set. No genuinely semilinear isomorphism is constructed, so the claimed field of moduli R is not proved. The suggested repair—replacing (7.3) by F_m(-y,x)=\overline{F_m(x,y)}—would address this, but it is not the condition in the manuscript.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§5.3, table] The table header would be clearer as 'full automorphism group'; the notation C_2^2 and H_3(3)⋊C_2 needs a brief explanation for readers not familiar with [DD19, Table 1]. Also the row for Eck9 should state explicitly that the second entry is the special 12A point, not a second open stratum.
  2. [§7.2] The sentence 'W_m is a real form of the complex vector space of binary forms of degree m' is misleading: W_m is a complex subspace (or a real vector space whose complexification is itself), not a real form of the full space. This is not merely terminology; it is the root of the density error.
  3. [Abstract/title] There is a typo 'SURF ACES' in the running title; the abstract also has a line break issue. These are purely cosmetic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No definitional or fitted-input circularity is demonstrated; the proof leans on the author's joint preprints [BY26]/[BVY26] in the cubic-surface section, but no specific reduction of the conclusion to the premises by construction is exhibited. The degree-1 counterexample has a serious internal inconsistency, but that is a correctness flaw, not a circularity.

full rationale

The paper's descent proofs are largely applications of external or semi-external theorems: [BV24] for gerbe neutrality, [Mar13] for degree-4 divisors, [AQ12] and [Bre23] for degree-2 counterexamples, and [DD19] for the cubic-surface classification. The main possible self-citation concern is the heavy use of [BY26] and [BVY26], both joint works with the present author, for the neutral-representation criteria in the cubic-surface section (e.g., Propositions 6.2, 6.3, and 6.5). However, no text in this manuscript shows that those criteria are equivalent to, or fitted from, the del Pezzo descent statements they are used to prove; they are cited as theorems in separate preprints, and the paper does not define the del Pezzo result in terms of them. Thus no circular step of the required kind can be quoted. The more serious issue is Proposition 7.4: the space W_m defined by (7.3) is a complex-linear subspace, not a real form, and the same condition forces φ(x,y,z,w)=(-y,x,z,w) to be an automorphism with φ^2=β, contradicting the asserted generic condition Aut(S)=⟨β⟩ and invalidating the density claim. This is a fatal mathematical inconsistency in the degree-1 counterexample, but it is not a circularity: the conclusion is not derived from an input that already contains the conclusion by definition or by a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Therefore the correct circularity finding is no significant circularity, with the caveat that the degree-1 proof as written is unsound.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or fitted parameters. It relies on several external theorems and classifications, including two companion preprints by the same author, but these are not assumptions ad hoc to this paper; they are cited background results.

axioms (7)
  • domain assumption [Mar13, Thm 1.1]: a finite subset of odd cardinality of P^1 is defined over its field of moduli.
    Imported theorem used to descend the discriminant divisor of a degree-4 del Pezzo surface (proof of Prop 4.2).
  • standard math [BY26, Prop 5.1]: faithful one-dimensional representations of finite gerbes are neutral.
    Used in Props 6.2 and 6.5 to deduce neutralness from faithful line-bundle characters.
  • standard math [BY26, Thm 5.3]: neutralness criteria for certain rank-2 faithful representations.
    Used in Prop 6.3 to show the Eckardt-pair vector bundle gives a neutral gerbe.
  • standard math [BV24, Prop 4.2]: a finite gerbe is neutral if its geometric inertia group has trivial center and Aut(G)→Out(G) splits.
    Used in Props 6.4 and 6.5 for S_3, S_4, S_5, and S_3×C_2 rigidified.
  • standard math [DD19]: complete classification of automorphism groups and normal forms of smooth cubic surfaces, including Eckardt configurations.
    Provides the case list and explicit coordinates used throughout §5 and §6.
  • domain assumption [AQ12]: existence of the plane quartic (7.1) with field of moduli R and no real model.
    Used in Prop 7.3 to transfer the degree-2 obstruction to a del Pezzo surface.
  • standard math A smooth plane cubic is projectively isomorphic to a plane model over its field of moduli (the field k(j)).
    Used in Lemma 6.9 to descend cyclic cubic surfaces.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 11608 in / 41895 out tokens · 399321 ms · 2026-08-01T20:46:35.113618+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The field of moduli of a variety $X$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ is defined as the fixed field of those automorphisms $\sigma$ of $K$ for which $X\simeq X^{\sigma}$. A fundamental question is under what conditions a variety admits a model over its field of moduli. We give a complete answer for smooth del Pezzo surfaces in characteristic $0$: every smooth del Pezzo surface of degree at least $3$ has a model over its field of moduli, whereas in degrees $1$ and $2$ there exist smooth complex del Pezzo surfaces with field of moduli $\mathbb{R}$ which do not admit a real model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2026 , eprint=

    Neutral representations in dimension 3 and fields of moduli , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  2. [2]

    Abramovich, Dan and Graber, Tom and Vistoli, Angelo , TITLE =. Amer. J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1353/ajm.0.0017 , URL =

    doi:10.1353/ajm.0.0017 2008

  3. [3]

    Borne, Niels and Vistoli, Angelo , TITLE =. J. Algebraic Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2015 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/S1056-3911-2014-00638-X , URL =

    work page doi:10.1090/s1056-3911-2014-00638-x 2015

  4. [4]

    Algebra Number Theory , FJOURNAL =

    Borne, Niels and Vistoli, Angelo , TITLE =. Algebra Number Theory , FJOURNAL =. 2019 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/ant.2019.13.531 , URL =

    work page doi:10.2140/ant.2019.13.531 2019

  5. [5]

    Murphy's

    Bragg, Daniel and Lieblich, Max , year=. Murphy's. 2402.00862 , archivePrefix=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    2024 , eprint=

    Uniform bounds for fields of definition in projective spaces , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  7. [7]

    Bresciani, Giulio , TITLE =. Math. Nach. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1002/mana.70049 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1002/mana.70049 2025

  8. [8]

    Bresciani, Giulio , TITLE =. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnad079 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1093/imrn/rnad079 2024

  9. [9]

    Bresciani, Giulio , TITLE =. J. Algebra , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2024.02.021 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2024.02.021 2024

  10. [10]

    2023 , eprint=

    The field of moduli of plane curves , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  11. [11]

    2023 , eprint=

    Real versus complex plane curves , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  12. [12]

    2025 , eprint=

    On the section conjecture for the toric fundamental group , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  13. [13]

    Bresciani, Giulio , TITLE =. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s40574-023-00399-z , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s40574-023-00399-z 2024

  14. [14]

    Bresciani, Giulio and Vistoli, Angelo , TITLE =. Compos. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/S0010437X2400705X , URL =

    work page doi:10.1112/s0010437x2400705x 2024

  15. [15]

    Manuscripta Math

    Bresciani, Giulio and Vistoli, Angelo , TITLE =. Manuscripta Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00229-023-01491-6 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/s00229-023-01491-6 2024

  16. [16]

    Colliot-Th\'el\`ene, Jean-Louis and Sansuc, Jean-Jacques , TITLE =. J. Algebra , FJOURNAL =. 1987 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/0021-8693(87)90026-3 , URL =

    doi:10.1016/0021-8693(87)90026-3 1987

  17. [17]

    , TITLE =

    Deligne, P. , TITLE =. The. 1990 , ISBN =

    1990

  18. [18]

    and Satriano, Matthew and Zureick-Brown, David , TITLE =

    Ellenberg, Jordan S. and Satriano, Matthew and Zureick-Brown, David , TITLE =. Forum Math. Sigma , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/fms.2023.5 , URL =

    doi:10.1017/fms.2023.5 2023

  19. [19]

    Transform

    Huruguen, Mathieu , TITLE =. Transform. Groups , FJOURNAL =. 2016 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00031-016-9378-5 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00031-016-9378-5 2016

  20. [20]

    Duke Math

    Lieblich, Max , TITLE =. Duke Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 2007 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-07-13812-2 , URL =

    doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-07-13812-2 2007

  21. [21]

    Lieblich, Max , TITLE =. Compos. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/S0010437X07003144 , URL =

    doi:10.1112/s0010437x07003144 2008

  22. [22]

    Malle's conjecture and

    Loughran, Daniel and Santens, Tim , year=. Malle's conjecture and. 2412.04196 , archivePrefix=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Moduli , FJOURNAL =

    Loughran, Daniel and Sankaran, Gregory , TITLE =. Moduli , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , PAGES =. doi:10.1112/mod.2024.10 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1112/mod.2024.10 2025

  24. [24]

    Miller, G. A. and Blichfeldt, H. F. and Dickson, L. E. , TITLE =. 1961 , PAGES =

    1961

  25. [25]

    Serre, Jean-Pierre , TITLE =

  26. [26]

    The Stacks project , howpublished =

    The. The Stacks project , howpublished =

  27. [27]

    Vistoli, Angelo , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1989 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01388892 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/bf01388892 1989

  28. [28]

    2016 , publisher=

    Algebraic Spaces and Stacks , author=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  29. [29]

    2011 , publisher=

    Toric Varieties , author=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  30. [30]

    V. I. Danilov , title =. 1978 , month =. doi:10.1070/RM1978v033n02ABEH002305 , url =

    work page doi:10.1070/rm1978v033n02abeh002305 1978

  31. [31]

    arXiv: Algebraic Geometry , year=

    Some implications between Grothendieck's anabelian conjectures , author=. arXiv: Algebraic Geometry , year=

  32. [32]

    American Journal of Mathematics , volume =

    Teruhisa Matsusaka , title =. American Journal of Mathematics , volume =. 1958 , pages =

    1958

  33. [33]

    The field of definition of a variety , journal =

    Andr. The field of definition of a variety , journal =. 1956 , pages =

    1956

  34. [34]

    Annals of Mathematics , series =

    Goro Shimura , title =. Annals of Mathematics , series =. 1959 , pages =

    1959

  35. [35]

    Journal f

    Naoki Murabayashi , title =. Journal f. 1996 , pages =

    1996

  36. [36]

    Algebraic covers: field of moduli versus field of definition , journal =

    Pierre D. Algebraic covers: field of moduli versus field of definition , journal =. 1997 , pages =

    1997

  37. [37]

    On fields of moduli of curves , journal =

    Pierre D. On fields of moduli of curves , journal =. 1999 , pages =

    1999

  38. [38]

    Computational Aspects of Algebraic Curves , publisher =

    Gabriel Cardona and Jordi Quer , title =. Computational Aspects of Algebraic Curves , publisher =. 2005 , pages =

    2005

  39. [39]

    Mathematical Research Letters , volume =

    Bonnie Huggins , title =. Mathematical Research Letters , volume =. 2007 , pages =

    2007

  40. [40]

    Journal de Th

    Aristides Kontogeorgis , title =. Journal de Th. 2009 , pages =

    2009

  41. [41]

    Non-hyperelliptic Riemann surfaces with real field of moduli but not definable over the reals , journal =

    Rub. Non-hyperelliptic Riemann surfaces with real field of moduli but not definable over the reals , journal =. 2009 , pages =

    2009

  42. [42]

    Journal of Algebra , volume =

    Andrea Marinatto , title =. Journal of Algebra , volume =. 2013 , pages =

    2013

  43. [43]

    Fields of moduli and fields of definition of odd signature curves , journal =

    Michela Artebani and Sa. Fields of moduli and fields of definition of odd signature curves , journal =. 2012 , pages =

    2012

  44. [44]

    Dolgachev and Vasily A

    Igor V. Dolgachev and Vasily A. Iskovskikh , title =. Algebra, Arithmetic, and Geometry: In Honor of Yu. I. Manin, Volume I , series =. 2009 , pages =

    2009

  45. [45]

    2026 , eprint=

    A note on complex Lie Algebras isomorphic to their conjugate , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  46. [46]

    1995 , publisher=

    Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces , author=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  47. [47]

    1977 , publisher =

    Algebraic Geometry , author =. 1977 , publisher =

    1977

  48. [48]

    Automorphism groups of compact Riemann surfaces of genera three and four , journal =

    Izumi Kuribayashi and Akikazu Kuribayashi , abstract =. Automorphism groups of compact Riemann surfaces of genera three and four , journal =. 1990 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4049(90)90107-S , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-4049(90)90107-s 1990

  49. [49]

    Martins, R. V. and Gagliardi, E. M. , title =. Manuscripta Mathematica , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  50. [50]

    Giraud, Jean , title =

  51. [51]

    2025 , eprint=

    Large orders of automorphisms of smooth curves in P^1 P^1 , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  52. [52]

    Automorphism groups of pseudoreal Riemann surfaces , journal =

    Michela Artebani and Sa. Automorphism groups of pseudoreal Riemann surfaces , journal =. 2017 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2016.12.039 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2016.12.039 2017

  53. [53]

    Explicit Galois obstruction and descent for hyperelliptic curves with tamely cyclic reduced automorphism group , volume=

    Lercier, Reynald and Ritzenthaler, Christophe and Sijsling, Jeroen , year=. Explicit Galois obstruction and descent for hyperelliptic curves with tamely cyclic reduced automorphism group , volume=. Mathematics of Computation , publisher=. doi:10.1090/mcom3032 , number=

    work page doi:10.1090/mcom3032

  54. [54]

    Automorphisms of

    Blanc, J. Automorphisms of. 2023 , note =. doi:10.46298/epiga.2023.volume6.7603 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.46298/epiga.2023.volume6.7603 2023

  55. [55]

    2024 , eprint=

    The locus of curves with prescribed automorphism group , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  56. [56]

    On the field of moduli of superelliptic curves , booktitle =

    Hidalgo, Rub. On the field of moduli of superelliptic curves , booktitle =. 2018 , doi =. 1606.03160 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    2016 , howpublished =

    Swinarski, David , title =. 2016 , howpublished =

    2016

  58. [58]

    Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universit

    Komeda, Jiryo and Takahashi, Takeshi , title =. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universit. 2024 , pages =

    2024

  59. [59]

    Beauville, Arnaud , title =. S

  60. [60]

    Izvestiya: Mathematics , volume =

    Dolgachev, Igor and Duncan, Alexander , title =. Izvestiya: Mathematics , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  61. [61]

    , title =

    Dolgachev, Igor V. , title =

  62. [62]

    2016 , eprint =

    Laface, Roberto , title =. 2016 , eprint =

    2016

  63. [63]

    Advances in Mathematics , volume =

    Valloni, Domenico , title =. Advances in Mathematics , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  64. [64]

    Journal of Number Theory , volume =

    Valloni, Domenico , title =. Journal of Number Theory , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  65. [65]

    Algebra & Number Theory , volume =

    Couveignes, Jean-Marc and Hallouin, Emmanuel , title =. Algebra & Number Theory , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  66. [66]

    2026 , eprint=

    Neutral representations of finite diagonalizable group schemes and fields of moduli , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026