Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Delaunay solutions to the fractional Hartree equation with critical growth

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that every positive singular solution of the critical fractional Hartree equation is radially symmetric, and builds nonconstant log-periodic Delaunay-type solutions for every sufficiently large period.

desk verdict A serious, technically rich preprint that likely proves the right theorems, but the key L-infinity regularity step rests on an unverified flattening argument that a referee will need to check carefully. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12734 v1 pith:MAJDBIMH submitted 2026-08-13 math.AP

João Henrique Andrade , Tao Feng , Paolo Piccione , Minbo Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35R1135B0935A2135B40
keywords criticalHartreeequationDelaunaysolutionsfractionalLaplacianRieszpotentialisolatedsingularityradialsymmetryEmden–FowlertransformationDeGiorgitruncation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies singular solutions of the critical fractional Hartree equation, a conformally invariant equation that is doubly nonlocal: the fractional Laplacian acts alongside a Riesz convolution potential. It establishes two results. Theorem 1.1 proves that every positive solution with a non-removable isolated singularity at the origin is radially symmetric, using the Caffarelli–Silvestre extension (a standard device replacing the nonlocal operator by a degenerate local problem in one extra dimension) and the method of moving spheres. Theorem 1.2 proves that for $\alpha \in (\alpha_*, n)$, a range that for $s \geq 1/2$ is just $0 < \alpha < n$, the equation admits nonconstant Delaunay-type solutions $u(x) = |x|^{-(n-2s)/2} v(\ln|x|)$ with $v$ periodic, for every period $T$ above a threshold $T_0$. The key point is that after the Emden–Fowler change of variables $r = e^t$ the Riesz convolution survives as a genuine nonlocal integral, so the periodic problem is not an ODE and no phase-plane analysis is available; the proof instead minimizes a Rayleigh-type quotient (the ratio of energy to Hartree interaction) in a periodic fractional Sobolev space and shows that the minimizer beats the constant solution for large periods.

What carries the argument

The paper runs on two pieces of machinery. For Theorem 1.1, the load-bearing device is the Caffarelli–Silvestre extension, which turns the nonlocal equation into the degenerate elliptic problem $-\mathrm{div}(t^{1-2s}\nabla U) = 0$ in the upper half-space with the Neumann condition $\partial U/\partial \nu_s = (R_\alpha \ast u^{p^*}) u^{p^*-1}$; the method of moving spheres applied to $U$ gives invariance under Kelvin inversions about arbitrary centers, hence radial symmetry. For Theorem 1.2, the central object is the Emden–Fowler transformation $r = e^t$, which rewrites the equation as $L_s v(t) = \bigl(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} K_{-\alpha/2}(t-\tau) v(\tau)^{p^*} d\tau\bigr) v(t)^{p^*-1}$, where $L_s$ is the fractional operator with kernel $K_s$ and $K_{-\alpha/2}$ is the kernel left by the Riesz potential on the sphere; this surviving convolution is exactly why the problem cannot be reduced to an ODE. On $T$-periodic functions the problem becomes the minimization of the Rayleigh-type quotient $F_L$ over the periodic fractional Sobolev space $H^s_L$, and the new technical tool is a De Giorgi truncation through the extension problem on the cylinder $\mathbb{R} \times S^{n-1} \times (0, \rho_*)$, flattened to the Euclidean weighted problem $-\mathrm{div}(y^{1-2s}\nabla V) = 0$, which yields the $L^\infty$ bound on minimizers for $\alpha > \alpha_*$. A final energy comparison — the constant solution growing like $L^{1-1/p^*}$ versus a localized bump of energy $O(1)$ — makes the minimizer nonconstant for all large periods.

What would settle it

For a fixed pair with $0 < s < 1/2$, set $\alpha$ exactly at the threshold $\alpha_*$ of (1.10) and check whether the admissible interval for $q'$ in (4.26) is nonempty: the derivation says the two bounds coincide precisely at $\alpha_*$, so the interval should be empty there and nonempty for every $\alpha > \alpha_*$. A direct algebraic check over a grid of $(n,s)$ settles the sharpness of the range in Theorem 1.2: a nonempty interval below $\alpha_*$ means the range is not sharp, an empty interval above $\alpha_*$ means the $L^\infty$ proof has a gap. A complementary numerical check is to evaluate $F_L$ on the constant profile versus the localized bump for representative parameters (e.g. $n=2$, $s=0.4$, $\alpha=1$): the theorem requires $F_L(c_L) \sim L^{1-1/p^*}$ to diverge while $F_L(\tilde w_L)$ stays $O(1)$, and the crossing of the two curves pins down $T_0$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the critical fractional Hartree equation $(-\Delta)^s u = (R_\alpha \ast u^{p^*}) u^{p^*-1}$ in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}$, with Riesz kernel $R_\alpha(x) = |x|^{\alpha-n}$ and Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev critical exponent $p^* = (n+\alpha)/(n-2s)$, shares the two central qualitative features of the classical Yamabe equation. Theorem 1.1 states that every positive solution with a non-removable singularity is radially symmetric about the origin, under the natural regularity assumption $u \in C^{1,1}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}) \cap L_s(\mathbb{R}^n) \cap L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb{R}^n)$. Theorem 1.2 states that for $n \geq 2$, $s \in (0,1)$ and $\alpha \in (\alpha_*, n)$, with $\alpha_* = \max\{0, (n(1-6s)+8s^2)/(2n-1-2s)\}$, there is a threshold $T_0 < \infty$ such that for every period $T \geq T_0$ the equation admits a positive, nonconstant solution $u(x) = |x|^{-(n-2s)/2} v(\ln|x|)$ with $v(t+T) = v(t) > 0$: a Delaunay-type profile. The mechanism is that the Hartree convolution survives the Emden–Fowler change of variables as a genuinely nonlocal integral term, so the reduced problem is an integro-differential equation rather than an ODE; the authors prove existence by minimizing a Rayleigh-type quotient over a periodic fractional Sobolev space, establish $L^\infty$ regularity via a De Giorgi truncation, and force nonconstancy for large periods by an energy comparison.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction stands on the claim that, near the boundary, the curved cylinder formed by the time axis and the sphere can be replaced by flat Euclidean space, with curvature effects too small to change the outcome even while the nonlocal Hartree boundary term is acting.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every positive solution with a non-removable isolated singularity is radially symmetric (Theorem 1.1), so any future classification of singular profiles can restrict to radial solutions.
  • For $\alpha \in (\alpha_*, n)$ — which for $s \geq 1/2$ is simply $0 < \alpha < n$ — and every period $T \geq T_0$, the equation admits a smooth positive Delaunay-type solution satisfying the self-similar invariance $u(e^T x) = e^{-(n-2s)T/2}u(x)$.
  • The minimizers are proven smooth and positive, and the De Giorgi regularity argument is the first for Hartree-type equations, widening the admissible range of $\alpha$ beyond Moser iteration.
  • The paper leaves open whether nonconstant profiles exist for small periods $T < T_0$ and whether the lower bound $\alpha > \alpha_*$ for small $s$ can be removed entirely.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The threshold $\alpha_*$ likely marks a genuine integrability boundary rather than an artifact of the proof: below it the periodized kernel $K^L_{-\alpha/2}$ no longer satisfies the convolution estimates that close the De Giorgi iteration, and one would expect the variational functional to lose coercivity; a testable conjecture is that no positive singular solutions exist for $0 < s < 1/2$ with $\
  • The same recipe — Emden–Fowler reduction, a surviving convolution kernel, a Rayleigh-type quotient, De Giorgi truncation — should port to other doubly nonlocal critical problems (for instance Choquard-type equations with exponential nonlinearities in the plane), where comparable regularity theories are absent.
  • The energy comparison identifies $T_0$ implicitly as the period at which $F_L(c_L) \sim L^{1-1/p^*}$ overtakes the $O(1)$ energy of the localized profile; should uniqueness of minimizers ever be proved, the equation $c(L) = F_L(c_L)$ would characterize the critical period explicitly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the critical fractional Hartree equation (−Δ)^s u = (R_α ∗ u^{p*}) u^{p*−1} in R^n \ {0}, a doubly nonlocal conformally invariant equation. The first main result (Theorem 1.1) asserts that every positive solution with a non-removable isolated singularity is radially symmetric; the proof combines the Caffarelli–Silvestre extension with the method of moving spheres. The second main result (Theorem 1.2) asserts the existence, for n≥2, s∈(0,1), α∈(α*,n), of nonconstant periodic-in-log solutions u(x)=|x|^{-(n−2s)/2} v(ln|x|) for all sufficiently large periods. The proof follows the variational framework of DelaTorre–del Pino–González–Wei for the fractional Yamabe problem: after the Emden–Fowler transformation the equation becomes a nonlocal periodic equation, which is attacked by minimizing a Rayleigh-type quotient in the periodic fractional Sobolev space H^s_L. The main technical step is an L∞ bound for minimizers via a De Giorgi truncation argument in the Caffarelli–Silvestre extension, followed by a bootstrap to smoothness and an energy comparison that shows the minimizer is nonconstant for large periods.

Significance. The results are significant if correct: Theorem 1.2 would provide the first Delaunay-type (periodic-in-log, singular) solutions for a critical equation with two independent nonlocalities, and Theorem 1.1 extends the radial symmetry theory of isolated singularities from the fractional Yamabe equation to the Hartree setting. The variational construction with a genuinely nonlocal Hartree energy, the analysis of the periodic kernel K^L_{−α/2}, and the De Giorgi-type regularity for a nonlocal nonlinearity go beyond a routine adaptation of [18]. The paper is generally well organized and the statements are precise. The main weakness is that the L∞-regularity step rests on an unverified local reduction of the curved extension problem to a Euclidean one; this is the load-bearing point for the smoothness of the minimizer and hence for Theorem 1.2.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.2, Proposition 4.5 (paragraph before Eq. (4.14))] The proof of the L∞ bound for minimizers, which is the essential bridge from H^s_L to C^∞ in Lemma 5.1, is not complete as written. The text asserts that after flattening the boundary the cylindrical problem (4.10) is 'locally equivalent' to the Euclidean weighted problem (4.14), with curvature terms 'absorbed into lower-order perturbations,' citing [18, Proposition 3.4]. That proposition was established for the fractional Yamabe equation, whose boundary nonlinearity is the local function v^{p*}. Here the nonlinearity is B(t)v^{p*−1} with B(t)=∫_0^L K^L_{−α/2}(t−τ)v(τ)^{p*}dτ, a nonlocal functional of the whole period. The paper does not specify the coordinate change, the transformed metric, the resulting boundary condition, or the precise form of the lower-order terms. If the flattening introduces t-dependent factors into B(t) or first-order tangential terms into the energy identity, then the identity (4.15) and the estimates (4.18)–(4.19) are not justified and the De Giorgi iteration collapses. Since every subsequent bootstrap (Hölder continuity, C^∞ regularity) uses the L∞ bound, this gap is load-bearing for Theorem 1.2. The authors should either prove the reduction in the Hartree setting with all terms tracked, or perform the De Giorgi iteration directly on the cylinder using the appropriate weighted trace inequality.
  2. [Section 5.1, Lemma 5.1 Claim 5] The application of Proposition 4.5 to the minimizer v_L is not fully justified: the paper does not verify the hypothesis (4.12), namely that ∫_0^L |v_L|^{2/(1−2s)} dt is finite. This is not a consequence of the compact embedding stated in Proposition 4.2, which covers only q < 2/(1−2s) when s ≤ 1/2. The missing fact is the continuous (non-compact) Sobolev embedding H^s(S^1) ⊂ L^{2/(1−2s)}(S^1) for s < 1/2, which does hold; the authors should state this explicitly and apply it to v_L before invoking Proposition 4.5. As written, the proof jumps from membership in H^s_L to the L∞ bound without checking the required integrability hypothesis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 5.2, Lemma 5.2, Eq. (5.6)] The displayed formula for c_L appears to be (c_{n,s} ∫_{−∞}^{∞} K_{−α/2}(τ) dτ)^{1/(2(p*−1))}, i.e., the product of c_{n,s} and the integral. Solving the constant equation c_{n,s} c = c^{2p*−1} ∫ K gives c = (c_{n,s}/∫K)^{1/(2(p*−1))}, so the printed formula should show a quotient. The proof text and the subsequent energy formula (5.7) are consistent with the quotient version, so this is a typographical/algebraic error that should be corrected.
  2. [Section 4.2, Prop. 4.5 Claim 4] The sentence 'Such a choice is possible under the assumption (4.12) on α' mis-references (4.12), which is the hypothesis ∫|v|^{2/(1−2s)} = ζ < ∞ and contains no condition on α. The non-emptiness of the interval (4.26) depends on the condition α > α* from (1.10) (or, for s ≥ 1/2, on Remark 4.7); the reference should be corrected.
  3. [Section 2.2, Lemma 2.1 Claim 3] In the proof of the gradient estimate (2.6), the case (x,t) ∈ Ω_2 with |y−x| ≥ |x|/2 is explicitly omitted 'for brevity' with a reference to the proof of (2.8). Since the W^{1,2} regularity of the extension is used in the moving spheres argument, this missing case should be supplied or the reference made precise; as written, the estimate is not fully verifiable.
  4. [Section 1, references] The in-text citation 'Ma, Shang and Zhang [31]' does not match the reference list entry [31], which is by Guo, Hu, Peng and Shuai (Choquard equation). The authors should correct the citation and ensure that the intended Ma–Shang–Zhang paper is properly referenced.
  5. [Section 4.1, Proposition 4.2] The statement of the compact embedding gives the range q ∈ (1, 2/(1−2s)) for s ≤ 1/2, but when s = 1/2 the denominator vanishes; the case s = 1/2 should be treated separately (e.g., q ∈ (1,∞)).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the existence and symmetry proofs are self-contained and benchmarked against external results; the few self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorem 1.2 is a genuine variational construction rather than a disguised input. The periodic problem (3.4) is obtained from the original equation by an explicit Emden–Fowler computation, with the Hartree term surviving as the nonlocal integral of K^L_{-alpha/2}; the variational functional F_L is then minimized over H^s_L, and the minimizer is shown to solve the Euler–Lagrange equation with the Lagrange multiplier absorbed by rescaling. The key regularity step, Proposition 4.5, uses the Caffarelli–Silvestre extension and cites the flattening/curvature-absorption reduction to [18, Proposition 3.4]; this is an external benchmark, not a self-citation, and although the transfer of that geometric reduction to the nonlocal Hartree boundary term is a legitimate correctness risk, it is not a circular reduction: the proposition assumes a weak solution of (4.10) and derives an L-infinity bound for the trace, with no equation being equivalent by construction to an input. The lower critical weight alpha* in (1.10) is introduced explicitly so that the admissible-exponent interval (4.26) is nonempty in the De Giorgi iteration; it is an algebraic consistency condition, not a renamed conclusion. The nonconstancy proof compares the explicit constant solution's energy F_L(c_L) ~ L^{1-1/p*}, given in Lemma 5.2, with the O(1) energy of the localized test function w_L in Proposition 5.4; this comparison is computed, not assumed. Theorem 1.1 likewise follows from the externally cited maximum principle Lemma A ([36, Prop. 3.1]) and the moving-spheres argument, with the Kelvin invariance of the Riesz term verified from the criticality of p*. The self-references [1] and [24] are contextual literature citations for related Hartree problems and play no role in the proofs of Theorems 1.1 or 1.2. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force a choice, and no ansatz is smuggled in through self-citation. The paper's own open-problems section explicitly identifies the residual limitation (whether the alpha>alpha* restriction for 0<s<1/2 can be removed), underscoring that the restriction is not a hidden assumption of the conclusion. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants and no invented entities. The central results rest on standard analytic machinery (Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, Caffarelli-Silvestre extension, fractional Sobolev embeddings, maximum principles) and on two structural assumptions: the standing regularity class for u, and the radial and periodic ansatz for the Delaunay construction. One imported premise is flagged as the weakest assumption: the boundary flattening of the periodic extension problem.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality with critical exponent p* = (n+alpha)/(n-2s)
    Used throughout Section 4 to bound the Hartree interaction H_L and in the moving-spheres estimates of Section 2.3.
  • standard math Caffarelli-Silvestre extension: the trace of the extension equals u and the conormal derivative matches the fractional Laplacian
    Basis for the extension problems (1.3) and (3.6)-(3.8); cited to [5,14].
  • standard math Compact embedding H^s_L into L^q(0,L) for q < 2/(1-2s), and q >= 1 for s > 1/2
    Proposition 4.2, imported from [18,20]; gives convergence of minimizing sequences and finiteness of the Hartree term.
  • standard math Strong maximum principle for the periodic fractional operator L_s on the circle
    Proposition 4.4, quoted from [18]; used to upgrade nonnegative minimizers to strictly positive ones.
  • domain assumption Kelvin transform invariance of (P_{n,s,alpha}) under the critical exponent p*
    Used in Section 2.3 to assert u_{x,lambda} solves the same equation; checked by a change of variables in the Riesz integral, following [4].
  • domain assumption Boundary flattening: the periodic extension problem on the cylinder is locally equivalent to the Euclidean weighted problem -div(y^{1-2s} grad V)=0, with curvature terms absorbed
    Imported from [18, Prop 3.4] in Section 4.2 before (4.14); the weakest assumption for the L-infinity bound in Proposition 4.5.
  • domain assumption Standing regularity u in C^{1,1}_{loc}(R^n \ {0}) intersection L_s(R^n) intersection L^1_{loc}(R^n)
    Assumption (2.1) for Theorem 1.1; used to ensure the fractional Laplacian is well-defined and the extension has finite local energy.
  • domain assumption Radial and periodic ansatz u(r) = r^{-(n-2s)/2} v(ln r), v L-periodic
    Starting point for Theorem 1.2; the paper constructs solutions of this form rather than proving all solutions are of this form.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Delaunay solutions to the fractional Hartree equation with critical growth." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MAJDBIMH

@misc{pith2026260812734,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Delaunay solutions to the fractional Hartree equation with critical growth},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MAJDBIMH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12734}
}
read the original abstract

We study positive solutions of the critical fractional Hartree equation with a non-removable isolated singularity at the origin. This equation is doubly nonlocal, involving both the fractional Laplacian and a Riesz convolution potential. We first prove that every positive singular solution is radially symmetric about the origin, by combining the Caffarelli--Silvestre extension with the method of moving spheres. We then establish the existence of Delaunay-type periodic singular solutions. After the Emden--Fowler transformation, the Hartree convolution survives as a genuinely nonlocal integral term, so that the resulting periodic equation cannot be reduced to an ordinary differential equation. We construct nonconstant periodic solutions for all sufficiently large periods by minimizing a Rayleigh-type quotient in a periodic fractional Sobolev space.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    DelaTorre, M

    A. DelaTorre, M. del Pino, M. d. M. Gonz´ alez and J. Wei, Delaunay-type singular solutions for the fractional Yamabe problem,Math. Ann.369(2017), 597–626. DELAUNAY SOLUTIONS TO CRITICAL HARTREE EQUATIONS 37

    work page 2017

  2. [1]

    J. H. Andrade, T. Feng, P. Piccione and M. Yang, Local asymptotics and Pohozaev identities for singular solutions of critical Hartree equations, preprint (2025), arXiv:2505.19021

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  3. [2]

    Cabr´ e and Y

    X. Cabr´ e and Y. Sire, Nonlinear equations for fractional Laplacians I: Regularity, maximum principles, and Hamiltonian estimates,Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire31(2014), 23–53

    work page 2014

  4. [3]

    Caffarelli, B

    L. Caffarelli, B. Gidas, and J. Spruck, Asymptotic symmetry and local behavior of semilinear elliptic equations with critical Sobolev growth, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,42(1989), 271–297

    work page 1989

  5. [4]

    Caffarelli, T

    L. Caffarelli, T. Jin, Y. Sire, and J. Xiong, Local analysis of solutions of fractional semi-linear elliptic equations with isolated singularities,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.213(2014), no. 1, 245–268

    work page 2014

  6. [5]

    Caffarelli and L

    L. Caffarelli and L. Silvestre, An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian,Comm. Partial Differential Equations32(2007), no. 7–9, 1245–1260

    work page 2007

  7. [6]

    J. S. Case and S.-Y. A. Chang, On fractional GJMS operators,Commun. Pure Appl. Math.69(2016), no. 6, 1017–1061

    work page 2016

  8. [7]

    S.-Y. A. Chang and M. d. M. Gonz´ alez, Fractional Laplacian in conformal geometry,Adv. Math.226(2011), no. 2, 1410–1432

    work page 2011

Show all 49 references
  1. [8]

    S. Y. A. Chang, and P. C. Yang, On uniqueness of solutions of n-th order differential equations in conformal geometry, Math. Res. Lett.,4(1997), 91–102

    1997

  2. [9]

    Chen, and C

    W. Chen, and C. Li, Classification of solutions of some nonlinear elliptic equations, Duke Math. J.,63(1991), 615–622

    1991

  3. [10]

    Chen, and C

    W. Chen, and C. Li, A necessary and sufficient condition for the Nirenberg problem, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 48(1995), no. 6, 657–667

    1995

  4. [11]

    W. Chen, C. Li and B. Ou, Classification of solutions for an integral equation,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.59 (2006) 330–343

    2006

  5. [12]

    K. S. Chou, and Y. H. Wan, Asymptotic radial symmetry for solutions of−∆u+e u = 0 in a punctured disc, Pacific J. Math.,163(1994), no. 2, 269–276

    1994

  6. [13]

    W. Chen, C. Li, and B. Ou, Qualitative properties of solutions for an integral equation,Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.12(2005), no. 2, 347–354

    2005

  7. [14]

    W. Chen, Y. Li and P. Ma,The Fractional Laplacian, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 2019

    2019

  8. [15]

    W. Dai, Y. Fang and G. Qin, Classification of positive solutions to fractional order Hartree equations via a direct method of moving planes,J. Differential Equations265(2018), 2044–2063

    2018

  9. [16]

    W. Dai, J. Huang, Y. Qin, B. Wang and Y. Fang, Regularity and classification of solutions to static Hartree equations involving fractional Laplacians,Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.39(2019), 1389–1403

    2019

  10. [17]

    DelaTorre and M

    A. DelaTorre and M. del Mar Gonz´ alez, Isolated singularities for a semilinear equation for the fractional Laplacian arising in conformal geometry,Rev. Mat. Iberoam.34(2018), 1645–1678

    2018

  11. [19]

    Di Castro, T

    A. Di Castro, T. Kuusi and G. Palatucci, Nonlocal Harnack inequalities,J. Funct. Anal.267(2014), no. 6, 1807–1836

    2014

  12. [20]

    Di Nezza, G

    E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces,Bull. Sci. Math. 136(2012), no. 5, 521–573

    2012

  13. [21]

    Dong and D

    H. Dong and D. Kim, Schauder estimates for a class of non-local elliptic equations,Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 33(2013), 2319–2347

    2013

  14. [22]

    Du and M

    L. Du and M. Yang, Uniqueness and nondegeneracy of solutions for a critical nonlocal equation,Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.39(2019) 5847–5866

    2019

  15. [23]

    E. B. Fabes, C. E. Kenig and R. P. Serapioni, The local regularity of solutions of degenerate elliptic equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations7(1982), no. 1, 77–116

    1982

  16. [24]

    T. Feng, M. Yang, and X. Zhou, Asymptotic behavior of solutions to a planar Hartree equation with isolated singularities, preprint, arXiv:2602.03559

  17. [25]

    R. L. Frank and T. K¨ onig, Classification of positive singular solutions to a nonlinear biharmonic equation with critical exponent,Anal. PDE12(2019) 1101–1113

    2019

  18. [26]

    R. L. Frank, E. Lenzmann and L. Silvestre, Uniqueness of radial solutions for the fractional Laplacian,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.69(2016), no. 9, 1671–1726

    2016

  19. [27]

    Gao and M

    F. Gao and M. Yang, The Brezis-Nirenberg type critical problem for the nonlinear Choquard equation,Sci. China Math.61(2018) 1219–1242

    2018

  20. [28]

    Giusti,Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 2003

    E. Giusti,Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 2003

    2003

  21. [29]

    Gluck, Classification of solutions to an elliptic equation onR 2 with nonlocal nonlinearity, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems,45(2025), 4262–4299

    M. Gluck, Classification of solutions to an elliptic equation onR 2 with nonlocal nonlinearity, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems,45(2025), 4262–4299

    2025

  22. [30]

    M. d. M. Gonz´ alez and J. Qing, Fractional conformal Laplacians and fractional Yamabe problems,Anal. PDE 6(2013), 1535–1576

    2013

  23. [31]

    L. Guo, T. Hu, S. Peng and W. Shuai, Existence and uniqueness of solutions for Choquard equation involving Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev critical exponent,Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations58(2019) Paper No. 128, 34

    2019

  24. [32]

    Guo, and S

    Y. Guo, and S. Peng, Asymptotic behavior and classification of solutions to Hartree type equations with exponential nonlinearity, J. Geom. Anal.,34(2024), no. 1, Paper No. 23, 21 pp

    2024

  25. [33]

    Z. Guo, X. Huang, L. Wang and J. Wei, On Delaunay solutions of a biharmonic elliptic equation with critical exponent,J. Anal. Math.140(2020) 371–394

    2020

  26. [34]

    Guo, and Z

    Z. Guo, and Z. Liu, Asymptotic behavior of solutions for some elliptic equations in exterior Domains, Pacific J. Math.,309(2020), no. 2, 333–352

    2020

  27. [35]

    G. H. Hardy and J. E. Littlewood, Some properties of fractional integrals. I,Math. Z.27(1928), 565–606

    1928

  28. [36]

    Jin, Y.Y

    T. Jin, Y.Y. Li and J. Xiong, On a fractional Nirenberg problem, part I: blow up analysis and compactness of solutions,J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)16(2014), 1111–1171

    2014

  29. [37]

    Jin and J

    T. Jin and J. Xiong, Asymptotic symmetry and local behavior of solutions of higher order conformally invariant equations with isolated singularities,Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C, Anal. Non Lin´ eaire38(2021), no. 4, 1167–1216

    2021

  30. [38]

    Kassmann, A priori estimates for integro-differential operators with measurable kernels,Calc

    M. Kassmann, A priori estimates for integro-differential operators with measurable kernels,Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations34(2009), 1–21

    2009

  31. [39]

    E. H. Lieb, Sharp constants in the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev and related inequalities,Ann. of Math. (2)118 (1983), 349–374

    1983

  32. [40]

    Y. Y. Li, Remark on some conformally invariant integral equations: the method of moving spheres,J. Eur. Math. Soc.6(2004), 153–180

    2004

  33. [41]

    Lin, A classification of solutions of a conformally invariant fourth order equation inR n,Comment

    C.-S. Lin, A classification of solutions of a conformally invariant fourth order equation inR n,Comment. Math. Helv.73(1998) 206–231

    1998

  34. [42]

    Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations

    P.-L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part 1,Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C, Anal. Non Lin´ eaire1(1984), no. 2, 109–145

    1984

  35. [43]

    Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations

    P.-L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part 2,Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C, Anal. Non Lin´ eaire1(1984), no. 4, 223–283

    1984

  36. [44]

    Niu, Classification of solutions of higher order critical Choquard equation, Commun

    Y. Niu, Classification of solutions of higher order critical Choquard equation, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal.,24 (2025), no. 5, 812–839

    2025

  37. [45]

    Silvestre, H¨ older estimates for solutions of integro-differential equations like the fractional Laplace,Indiana Univ

    L. Silvestre, H¨ older estimates for solutions of integro-differential equations like the fractional Laplace,Indiana Univ. Math. J.55(2006), 1155–1174

    2006

  38. [46]

    Silvestre, Regularity of the obstacle problem for a fractional power of the Laplace operator,Comm

    L. Silvestre, Regularity of the obstacle problem for a fractional power of the Laplace operator,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.60(2007), 67–112. 38 J.H. ANDRADE, T. FENG, P. PICCIONE, AND M. YANG

    2007

  39. [47]

    S. L. Sobolev,Applications of functional analysis in mathematical physics, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 7, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1963), translated from the Russian by F. E. Browder

    1963

  40. [48]

    Wei and X

    J. Wei and X. Xu, Classification of solutions of higher order conformally invariant equation,Math. Ann.313 (1999), 207–228

    1999

  41. [49]

    Yang and R

    H. Yang and R. Yang, On isolated singularities of the conformal Gaussian curvature equation andQ-curvature equation, Math. Ann.,394(2026), Paper No. 97. (J.H. Andrade)Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of S ˜ao Paulo 05508-090, S ˜ao Paulo-SP, Brazil Email add...

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.