Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 138 references

Spin-orbit-coupled quantum memory of a double quantum dot

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin-orbit coupling in a double quantum dot can act as a quantum memory, lowering the uncertainty of spin measurements for pure states.

desk verdict The paper has a good instinct—applying quantum-memory uncertainty to a spin-orbit-coupled double dot—but the analytic derivation omits a first-order triplet term, so the central claims are not established as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07766 v2 pith:MAQRIRUO submitted 2019-08-21 quant-ph

L. Chotorlishvili , A. Gudyma , J. Wätzel , A. Ernst , J. Berakdar This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81P4081P4581V65 PACS 03.67.-a03.67.Mn71.70.Ej73.21.La
keywords quantummemoryspin-orbitcouplingdoubledotconditionalentropyPOVMmeasuremententropicuncertaintyrelationRashbainteractionentanglement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that spin-orbit coupling in a two-electron double quantum dot can function as a quantum memory: a measurement performed on the spin subsystem decreases the uncertainty about the orbital subsystem, and the effect grows with the strength of the spin-orbit coupling. The authors show analytically, from a first-order perturbative treatment of the spin-orbit term, that the post-measurement von Neumann entropy of the orbital part is lower than its pre-measurement value, and they support the result with configuration-interaction numerics that include the Coulomb interaction. They further show that for the pure bipartite state the conditional quantum entropy $S(A|B)$ is negative, meaning the spin-orbit correlations reduce the uncertainty of two incompatible spin measurements, whereas for the mixed state obtained by tracing out the orbital part the conditional entropy is positive and the coupling enhances uncertainty. If the claims hold, a solid-state spin-orbit channel is a tunable built-in resource for quantum memory rather than only a source of decoherence.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the first-order spin-orbit perturbed two-electron state of Eq. (4), which mixes the antisymmetric orbital state $|\psi^A_{0,1}\rangle$ with the symmetric orbitals $|\psi^S_{1,1}\rangle$ and $|\psi^S_{0,0}\rangle$ and mixes the triplet spin state $|\chi^{T+}_S\rangle$ with the singlet $|\chi^A\rangle$ at amplitude $\alpha/(2\sqrt{\beta})$. From this state the paper builds reduced density matrices for the spin and orbital subsystems, the fidelity between pre- and post-measurement states, von Neumann entropies, concurrence, quantum discord, and the conditional quantum entropies that enter the entropic uncertainty relation $S(R|B)+S(Q|B)\ge \ln(1/c)+S(A|B)$. The sign of $S(A|B)$ is the criterion that decides whether the spin-orbit coupling works as quantum memory: negative for the pure state, positive for the orbital-traced mixed state.

What would settle it

Prepare a two-electron double quantum dot in the spin-orbit entangled pure state of Eq. (4), perform projective $\sigma_z$ and $\sigma_x$ measurements on one spin, and reconstruct the post-measurement conditional quantum entropy $S(A|B)$; finding $S(A|B)\ge 0$ for $0<\alpha<\sqrt{\beta}$ would refute the quantum-memory claim. Repeating the same protocol after tracing out the orbital part should give $S(A|B)>0$, and a nonpositive value there would likewise contradict the paper's prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that spin-orbit coupling entangles spin and orbital degrees of freedom in a double quantum dot in a way that lets a spin measurement extract information about the orbital part. Starting from the first-order perturbed state $|\Phi_M\rangle = |\psi^A_{0,1}\rangle\otimes|\chi^{T+}_S\rangle + \frac{\alpha}{2\sqrt{\beta}}\left(\frac12|\psi^S_{1,1}\rangle - |\psi^S_{0,0}\rangle\right)\otimes|\chi^A\rangle$, the paper constructs the reduced spin and orbital density matrices, applies POVM projectors on one spin, and computes pre- and post-measurement entropies. The result is $S(\hat\rho_{or}) - S(\hat\varrho_{AB}) > 0$: the orbital entropy drops after the spin measurement, and the drop increases with $\alpha$ and decreases with the confinement parameter $\beta$. For two incompatible spin measurements, the pure state yields $S(A|B)_{\hat\rho_{AB}} < 0$ for $0<\alpha<\sqrt{\beta}$, so the total spin-orbit entanglement acts as quantum memory and lowers the uncertainty bound; the mixed state obtained after tracing out the orbital part yields $S(A|B)_{\hat\rho^S_{AB}} > 0$, so the residual spin-spin entanglement alone is not enough to reduce uncertainty.

Load-bearing premise

The analytic claims rest on the first-order perturbative ansatz of Eq. (4), which assumes the spin-orbit correction is small ($\alpha/\sqrt{\beta}<1$) and neglects the Coulomb interaction in the analytic part; if that ansatz is inaccurate at moderate coupling or when Coulomb and tunneling effects matter, the predicted entropy reduction and negative conditional entropy would need revision.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A POVM measurement on one spin lowers the von Neumann entropy of the orbital subsystem by an amount that grows with the spin-orbit coupling strength $\alpha$.
  • For the pure shared state with $0<\alpha<\sqrt{\beta}$, the conditional quantum entropy is negative, so spin-orbit correlations satisfy the quantum-memory condition in the entropic uncertainty relation.
  • For the mixed state obtained by tracing out the orbital part, the conditional quantum entropy is positive, so spin-orbit coupling can also enhance the uncertainty of two incompatible spin measurements.
  • The studied POVM protocol has zero quantum witness, so within this protocol the measurements are noninvasive.
  • Configuration-interaction numerics including the Coulomb interaction and quantum Monte Carlo results for a four-dot extension support the analytic picture for realistic material parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sign of $S(A|B)$ is controllable through the ratio $\alpha/\sqrt{\beta}$, the same double dot could be switched between a quantum-memory mode (pure-state regime) and an uncertainty-enhancing mode (mixed-state regime), making the device a tunable information-processing resource; this control protocol is an inference, since the paper reports the two regimes but does not frame them as a switch
  • Because the effect scales with $\alpha/\sqrt{\beta}$, an external electric field that reshapes the dot confinement and inter-dot distance could serve as an in-situ knob for the memory strength; the paper computes field-induced density reshuffling but does not propose this control use.
  • Extending the conditional-entropy analysis to longer chains of spin-orbit-coupled dots might reveal whether the quantum-memory benefit is additive or saturates as correlations spread over more sites, an extension the paper does not address.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a two-electron double quantum dot with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and examines quantum-information measures: post-measurement entropies, Uhlmann fidelity, quantum discord, and conditional quantum entropy. The central claim is that a POVM measurement on the spin subsystem reduces the entropy and uncertainty of the orbital subsystem, and that for a pure state the spin-orbit coupling acts as a quantum memory (S(A|B)<0), while for a mixed state obtained by tracing out orbital degrees of freedom it enhances uncertainty (S(A|B)>0). The analytic results are based on a first-order perturbative state, Eq. (4), and are supplemented by configuration-interaction and quantum Monte Carlo numerics.

Significance. The topic is timely: extending quantum-memory and uncertainty-relation concepts to spin-orbit-coupled solid-state systems is of interest for quantum information processing. If the central result holds, the paper offers a concrete physical realization of negative conditional entropy in a double dot. The paper includes self-consistent analytic calculations and numerical checks; however, the analytic derivation is built on a perturbative state that omits a first-order triplet component generated by the Rashba term, which undermines the quantitative and potentially the qualitative conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (4)] The first-order perturbative state in Eq. (4) is incomplete. Acting with the Rashba Hamiltonian of Eq. (2) on the unperturbed state |ψ^A_{0,1}>|χ^{T+}_S> yields, in addition to the singlet component retained in Eq. (4), a triplet m=0 component |χ^{T0}_S> at the same order O(α/√β), with the antisymmetric orbital wavefunction (∂_{x1}+∂_{x2})ψ^A_{0,1}. No selection rule is identified that would eliminate this term. Because Eqs. (9), (10), and (28)–(31) are all derived from Eq. (4), the reported reduced density matrices, von Neumann entropies, conditional entropies, and the sign of S(A|B) for the pure state are not established for the Hamiltonian (1)–(2). The authors should either include the triplet component in the analytic treatment or demonstrate explicitly that it vanishes.
  2. [Section VIII, Fig. 2] The claim that the numerical calculations 'frankly confirm the validity and correctness of analytical results' is not supported by the text. The analytic results assume large β (zero overlap S=0) and neglect the Coulomb term, whereas the numerics are presented for β of order 1 with Coulomb interactions; no numerical data, error bars, or detailed comparison between the analytic and numerical entropies are provided. This issue is secondary to the main claim, but it should be clarified so that the numerical support is verifiable.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IV, text after Eq. (8)] The sentence 'Spin and orbital von Neumann entropies increase with the Rashba SO coupling constant β' is a typo; the entropies are proportional to α^2/β and increase with α while decreasing with β.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'quantum memory inmate' is a typo; 'inmate' should presumably be 'inherent' or 'inbuilt'.
  3. [Section V, notation] The notation S(σ^S) is used inconsistently; the pre-measurement spin density matrix is denoted ˆρ_s elsewhere, so S(ρ_s) would be clearer.
  4. [Section V, Eq. (12)] The asymptotic expansion of the Uhlmann fidelity given after Eq. (12) is correct to first order in α^2/β, but the phrase 'the distance between pre and post-measurement states decays with SO constant α' is misleading: the fidelity decreases with α, so the distance increases.
  5. [Section X, Eq. (29)] The statement that S(A|B)>0 for the mixed state ρ^S_AB is asserted without an explicit demonstration; a short proof or a reference to a verified inequality would strengthen the argument.
  6. [Section IX] The quantum Monte Carlo results for the four-dot system are not used in the quantum-memory analysis; this section appears disconnected from the main claim and should be better motivated or moved to an appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the entropy and quantum-memory results follow from a first-order perturbative calculation of the stated Rashba Hamiltonian, with no fitted inputs and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived self-consistently from the stated Rashba Hamiltonian. The unperturbed two-electron basis and the first-order correction in Eq. (4) follow from H_SO in Eq. (2) by standard perturbation theory, and the reduced density matrices, von Neumann entropies, conditional entropies, and fidelities are then computed from that state rather than assumed. No parameter is fitted to any target observable, no claim depends on a self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked. The alpha^2/beta scaling of the entropies is a legitimate lowest-order consequence of the alpha-dependent Hamiltonian, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The negative conditional entropy for the pure state reflects the entanglement generated by H_SO; for any pure bipartite state negative conditional entropy is a standard property, but the physical burden is carried by the model calculation, which is supplemented by configuration-interaction numerics. The possible omission of the triplet-m=0 channel in the first-order state is a correctness or convergence concern, not a circularity. Accordingly, no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, dimensions, or invented entities. The free parameters are physically motivated material and field parameters that are scanned rather than fitted to data. The load-bearing assumptions are the quasi-1D reduction, first-order perturbation theory in spin-orbit coupling, the Heitler-London ansatz, and the isolated-system treatment.

free parameters (4)
  • Rashba spin-orbit coupling strength α = scanned 0 < α < 1
    The central claim depends on nonzero α; all derived entropy differences are proportional to α²/β. It is a material parameter, not fitted to data.
  • Confinement strength parameter β = 1 (GaAs parameters)
    Set by hand to match GaAs: ħω = 11.4 meV, d0 = 10 nm. Used throughout the analytic and numerical sections.
  • Dimensionless electric field E0 = scanned 0 < E0 < 8
    Scanned in the CI calculations; shown to enhance both pre- and post-measurement entropies and to saturate for E0 > 2.
  • Interdot distance Δ = 𝓁 d0 = 0.8 d0 in Fig. 2(a); other values in Fig. 2(b)
    Scanned through the dimensionless factor 𝓁; the entropy reduction is compared for different interdot distances.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Strong confinement in y and z directions restricts dynamics to the lowest subbands (ny = nz = 0), reducing the system to quasi-one-dimensional motion.
    Invoked in Section III before Eq. (1); the multi-dimensional Coulomb interaction is later reduced to (x1, x2) variables.
  • domain assumption Spin-orbit coupling is treated perturbatively to first order in α/√β.
    The unperturbed state in Eq. (4) includes only the first-order correction; all higher-order terms are neglected, and α/√β is assumed small throughout the analytic sections.
  • domain assumption Heitler-London ansatz for two-electron orbital wavefunctions with harmonic-oscillator orbitals localized on each dot.
    Used in Section III to construct the symmetric and antisymmetric coordinate functions in Eq. (3).
  • domain assumption The overlap integral S between left and right dot orbitals is zero for the large-β regime considered.
    Stated in Section III after Eq. (3), with reference to 'exact numerical calculations (not shown)'.
  • domain assumption The system is treated as an isolated bipartite quantum system with no environment-induced decoherence for the quantum memory analysis.
    Section X applies the uncertainty relation with quantum memory to the pure state ρ_AB; no relaxation or dephasing channels are included in the analytic model.
  • standard math The continuous spin variational Monte Carlo mapping of spin operators to differential operators in Eq. (23) is valid.
    Section IX relies on this transformation to simulate the four-electron system; the paper cites Melton et al. for the method.
  • standard math The Berta et al. uncertainty relation with quantum memory, Eq. (27), is taken as a formally proven background result.
    Section X applies Eq. (27) directly, citing ref. 4, without derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-orbit-coupled quantum memory of a double quantum dot." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MAQRIRUO

@misc{pith2026190807766,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-orbit-coupled quantum memory of a double quantum dot},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MAQRIRUO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07766}
}
abstract

The concept of quantum memory plays an incisive role in the quantum information theory. As confirmed by several recent rigorous mathematical studies, the quantum memory inmate in the bipartite system $\rho_{AB}$ can reduce uncertainty about the part $B$, after measurements done on the part $A$. In the present work, we extend this concept to the systems with a spin-orbit coupling and introduce a notion of spin-orbit quantum memory. We self-consistently explore Uhlmann fidelity, pre and post measurement entanglement entropy and post measurement conditional quantum entropy of the system with spin-orbit coupling and show that measurement performed on the spin subsystem decreases the uncertainty of the orbital part. The uncovered effect enhances with the strength of the spin-orbit coupling. We explored the concept of macroscopic realism introduced by Leggett and Garg and observed that POVM measurements done on the system under the particular protocol are non-noninvasive. For the extended system, we performed the quantum Monte Carlo calculations and explored reshuffling of the electron densities due to the external electric field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07766 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the considered double [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dependence of the von Neumann entropy on the system’s and field parameters: (a) Planes describe the pre (green) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The pair distribution function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The pair distribution function. The applied electric field steers the electronic density to the edge of the sample in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alber , author T

    author author G. Alber , author T. Beth , author M. Horodecki , author P. Horodecki , author R. Horodecki , author M. R \"o tteler , author H. Weinfurter , author R. Werner , \ and\ author A. Zeilinger ,\ @noop title Quantum information: An introduction to basic theoretical concepts and experiments ,\ Vol.\ volume 173 \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  2. [2]

    Heisenberg ,\ 10.1007/BF01397280 journal journal Zeitschrift f \"u r Physik \ volume 43 ,\ pages 172 ( year 1927 ) NoStop

    author author W. Heisenberg ,\ 10.1007/BF01397280 journal journal Zeitschrift f \"u r Physik \ volume 43 ,\ pages 172 ( year 1927 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1007/bf01397280 1927

  3. [3]

    author author H. P. \ Robertson ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.34.163 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 34 ,\ pages 163 ( year 1929 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.34.163 1929

  4. [4]

    Berta , author M

    author author M. Berta , author M. Christandl , author R. Colbeck , author J. M. \ Renes , \ and\ author R. Renner ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 659 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  5. [5]

    Brataas \ and\ author E

    author author A. Brataas \ and\ author E. I. \ Rashba ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.045301 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 84 ,\ pages 045301 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.045301 2011

  6. [6]

    author author J. R. \ Petta , author A. C. \ Johnson , author A. Yacoby , author C. M. \ Marcus , author M. P. \ Hanson , \ and\ author A. C. \ Gossard ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.161301 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 72 ,\ pages 161301 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.161301

  7. [7]

    Meunier , author I

    author author T. Meunier , author I. T. \ Vink , author L. H. \ Willems van Beveren , author F. H. L. \ Koppens , author H. P. \ Tranitz , author W. Wegscheider , author L. P. \ Kouwenhoven , \ and\ author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.195303 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 74 ,\ pages 195303 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.195303

  8. [8]

    Loss \ and\ author D

    author author D. Loss \ and\ author D. P. \ DiVincenzo ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 57 ,\ pages 120 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 1998

Show all 138 references
  1. [9]

    author author B. E. \ Kane ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 393 ,\ pages 133 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

  2. [10]

    Recher , author E

    author author P. Recher , author E. V. \ Sukhorukov , \ and\ author D. Loss ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1962 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 85 ,\ pages 1962 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    1962 doi

  3. [11]

    Hanson \ and\ author G

    author author R. Hanson \ and\ author G. Burkard ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.050502 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 98 ,\ pages 050502 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  4. [12]

    Elzerman , author R

    author author J. Elzerman , author R. Hanson , author L. W. \ Van Beveren , author B. Witkamp , author L. Vandersypen , \ and\ author L. P. \ Kouwenhoven ,\ @noop journal journal nature \ volume 430 ,\ pages 431 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  5. [13]

    Hanson , author L

    author author R. Hanson , author L. H. W. \ van Beveren , author I. T. \ Vink , author J. M. \ Elzerman , author W. J. M. \ Naber , author F. H. L. \ Koppens , author L. P. \ Kouwenhoven , \ and\ author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.196802 journal journal Ph...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Hanson \ and\ author D

    author author R. Hanson \ and\ author D. D. \ Awschalom ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 453 ,\ pages 1043 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  7. [15]

    Hanson , author L

    author author R. Hanson , author L. P. \ Kouwenhoven , author J. R. \ Petta , author S. Tarucha , \ and\ author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.1217 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 1217 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi

  8. [16]

    Fujisawa , author D

    author author T. Fujisawa , author D. G. \ Austing , author Y. Tokura , author Y. Hirayama , \ and\ author S. Tarucha ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 419 ,\ pages 278 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  9. [17]

    Hanson , author B

    author author R. Hanson , author B. Witkamp , author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen , author L. H. W. \ van Beveren , author J. M. \ Elzerman , \ and\ author L. P. \ Kouwenhoven ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.196802 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 196802 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author J. A. \ Folk , author R. M. \ Potok , author C. M. \ Marcus , \ and\ author V. Umansky ,\ 10.1126/science.1078419 journal journal Science \ volume 299 ,\ pages 679 ( year 2003 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://science.sciencemag.org/content/299/5607/679.full.pdf ...

    2003 doi

  11. [19]

    Lu , author Z

    author author W. Lu , author Z. Ji , author L. Pfeiffer , author K. West , \ and\ author A. Rimberg ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 423 ,\ pages 422 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  12. [20]

    author author D. D. \ Awschalom , author D. Loss , \ and\ author N. Samarth ,\ @noop title Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation \ ( publisher Springer Science & Business Media ,\ year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  13. [21]

    Scalbert ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.205305 journal journal Phys

    author author D. Scalbert ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.205305 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 205305 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    Adabi , author S

    author author F. Adabi , author S. Haseli , \ and\ author S. Salimi ,\ 10.1209/0295-5075/115/60004 journal journal EPL (Europhysics Letters) \ volume 115 ,\ pages 60004 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    Adesso , author T

    author author G. Adesso , author T. R. \ Bromley , \ and\ author M. Cianciaruso ,\ 10.1088/1751-8113/49/47/473001 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 49 ,\ pages 473001 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    author author A. K. \ Pati , author M. M. \ Wilde , author A. R. U. \ Devi , author A. K. \ Rajagopal , \ and\ author Sudha ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.042105 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 86 ,\ pages 042105 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  17. [25]

    author author P. J. \ Coles \ and\ author M. Piani ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.022112 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 89 ,\ pages 022112 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    Nemoto , author F

    author author T. Nemoto , author F. Bouchet , author R. L. \ Jack , \ and\ author V. Lecomte ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062123 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 93 ,\ pages 062123 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    author author P. J. \ Coles , author M. Berta , author M. Tomamichel , \ and\ author S. Wehner ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015002 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 015002 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    Wehner \ and\ author A

    author author S. Wehner \ and\ author A. Winter ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/025009 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 025009 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    Kumar \ and\ author S

    author author R. Kumar \ and\ author S. Ghosh ,\ 10.1088/1361-6455/aad149 journal journal Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics \ volume 51 ,\ pages 165301 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    author author E. I. \ Rashba \ and\ author A. L. \ Efros ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.126405 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 126405 ( year 2003 a ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    author author E. I. \ Rashba \ and\ author A. L. \ Efros ,\ 10.1063/1.1635987 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 83 ,\ pages 5295 ( year 2003 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1635987 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1635987 NoStop

    2003 doi

  24. [32]

    author author D. V. \ Khomitsky \ and\ author E. Y. \ Sherman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.245321 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 79 ,\ pages 245321 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    author author D. V. \ Khomitsky , author L. V. \ Gulyaev , \ and\ author E. Y. \ Sherman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.125312 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 85 ,\ pages 125312 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    author author E. Y. \ Sherman \ and\ author D. Sokolovski ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/015013 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 16 ,\ pages 015013 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  27. [35]

    Faniel , author T

    author author S. Faniel , author T. Matsuura , author S. Mineshige , author Y. Sekine , \ and\ author T. Koga ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.115309 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 83 ,\ pages 115309 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  28. [36]

    author author P. I. \ Tamborenea \ and\ author H. Metiu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3912 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 3912 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  29. [37]

    Stepanenko , author M

    author author D. Stepanenko , author M. Rudner , author B. I. \ Halperin , \ and\ author D. Loss ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075416 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 85 ,\ pages 075416 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    Paw owski , author P

    author author J. Paw owski , author P. Szumniak , author A. Skubis , \ and\ author S. Bednarek ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/26/34/345302 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 26 ,\ pages 345302 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    Li , author L

    author author Q. Li , author L. Cywi n \' n ski , author D. Culcer , author X. Hu , \ and\ author S. Das Sarma ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.085313 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 81 ,\ pages 085313 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  32. [40]

    Hu \ and\ author S

    author author X. Hu \ and\ author S. Das Sarma ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.062301 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 61 ,\ pages 062301 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  33. [41]

    Heitler \ and\ author F

    author author W. Heitler \ and\ author F. London ,\ 10.1007/BF01397394 journal journal Zeitschrift f \"u r Physik \ volume 44 ,\ pages 455 ( year 1927 ) NoStop

    1927 doi

  34. [42]

    Fazekas ,\ @noop title Series in Modern Condensed Matter Physics: Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism \ ( publisher World Scientific Publishing Co

    author author P. Fazekas ,\ @noop title Series in Modern Condensed Matter Physics: Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism \ ( publisher World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.: River Edge, NJ ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  35. [43]

    Stolze \ and\ author D

    author author J. Stolze \ and\ author D. Suter ,\ @noop title Quantum Computing: a short course from Theory to Experiment \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  36. [44]

    author author K. Z \. Z yczkowski , author P. Horodecki , author A. Sanpera , \ and\ author M. Lewenstein ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.883 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 58 ,\ pages 883 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  37. [45]

    author author W. K. \ Wootters ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 2245 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  38. [47]

    Horodecki , author P

    author author R. Horodecki , author P. Horodecki , author M. Horodecki , \ and\ author K. Horodecki ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 865 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  39. [48]

    \ Duan , author G

    author author L.-M. \ Duan , author G. Giedke , author J. I. \ Cirac , \ and\ author P. Zoller ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2722 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 2722 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  40. [49]

    Amico , author R

    author author L. Amico , author R. Fazio , author A. Osterloh , \ and\ author V. Vedral ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.517 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 517 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  41. [50]

    author author S. L. \ Braunstein \ and\ author P. van Loock ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 513 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  42. [51]

    Simon ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2726 journal journal Phys

    author author R. Simon ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2726 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 2726 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  43. [52]

    Weedbrook , author S

    author author C. Weedbrook , author S. Pirandola , author R. Garc\' a-Patr\'on , author N. J. \ Cerf , author T. C. \ Ralph , author J. H. \ Shapiro , \ and\ author S. Lloyd ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 621 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  44. [53]

    Silberhorn , author P

    author author C. Silberhorn , author P. K. \ Lam , author O. Wei , author F. K\"onig , author N. Korolkova , \ and\ author G. Leuchs ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4267 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 4267 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    doi

  45. [54]

    Adesso \ and\ author F

    author author G. Adesso \ and\ author F. Illuminati ,\ 10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/s01 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 40 ,\ pages 7821 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  46. [55]

    Toscano , author A

    author author F. Toscano , author A. Saboia , author A. T. \ Avelar , \ and\ author S. P. \ Walborn ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.052316 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 92 ,\ pages 052316 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  47. [56]

    Adesso , author A

    author author G. Adesso , author A. Serafini , \ and\ author F. Illuminati ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.022318 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 70 ,\ pages 022318 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  48. [57]

    Shchukin \ and\ author W

    author author E. Shchukin \ and\ author W. Vogel ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.230502 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 230502 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  49. [58]

    author author R. F. \ Werner \ and\ author M. M. \ Wolf ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3658 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 3658 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  50. [59]

    author author M. M. \ Wilde ,\ @noop title Quantum information theory \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  51. [60]

    Vedral ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.197 journal journal Rev

    author author V. Vedral ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.197 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 197 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  52. [61]

    Henderson \ and\ author V

    author author L. Henderson \ and\ author V. Vedral ,\ 10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General \ volume 34 ,\ pages 6899 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  53. [62]

    Ollivier \ and\ author W

    author author H. Ollivier \ and\ author W. H. \ Zurek ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 017901 ( year 2001 b ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  54. [63]

    author author W. H. \ Zurek ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012320 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 67 ,\ pages 012320 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  55. [64]

    author author A. J. \ Leggett \ and\ author A. Garg ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.857 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 54 ,\ pages 857 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    1985 doi

  56. [65]

    Schild \ and\ author C

    author author G. Schild \ and\ author C. Emary ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.032101 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 92 ,\ pages 032101 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  57. [66]

    Wang , author G

    author author K. Wang , author G. C. \ Knee , author X. Zhan , author Z. Bian , author J. Li , \ and\ author P. Xue ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.032122 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 95 ,\ pages 032122 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  58. [67]

    Avis , author P

    author author D. Avis , author P. Hayden , \ and\ author M. M. \ Wilde ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.030102 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 82 ,\ pages 030102 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  59. [68]

    \ Li , author N

    author author C.-M. \ Li , author N. Lambert , author Y.-N. \ Chen , author G.-Y. \ Chen , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00885 journal journal Scientific reports \ volume 2 ,\ pages 885 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  60. [69]

    author author C. A. \ Melton , author M. Zhu , author S. Guo , author A. Ambrosetti , author F. Pederiva , \ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042502 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 93 ,\ pages 042502 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  61. [70]

    author author C. A. \ Melton \ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.043305 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 96 ,\ pages 043305 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  62. [71]

    author author N. D. \ Drummond , author M. D. \ Towler , \ and\ author R. J. \ Needs ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.235119 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 70 ,\ pages 235119 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  63. [72]

    G.Alber, T. Beth, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, M. Rötteler, H. Weinfurter, R. Werner, A. Zeilinger, Quantum Information:An Introduction to Basic Theoretical Concepts and Experiments (Springer, Heidelberg, 2001)

    2001

  64. [73]

    Heisenberg, Z

    W. Heisenberg, Z. Phys, 43, 172 (1927)

    1927

  65. [74]

    Berta, M

    M. Berta, M. Christandl, R. Colbeck, J. M. Renes and R. Renner, Nat. Phys. 6, 659 (2010)

    2010

  66. [75]

    Brataas and E

    A. Brataas and E. I. Rashba, Phys. Rev. B 84, 045301 (2011)

    2011

  67. [76]

    Casola, T

    F. Casola, T. van der Sar, A. Yacoby

  68. [77]

    J. R. Petta, A. C. Johnson, A. Jacoby, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. B 72, 161301 (2005)

    2005

  69. [78]

    Meunier, I

    T. Meunier, I. T. Vink, L. H. Willems van Beveren, F. H. L. Koppens, H. P. Tranitz, W. Wegscheider, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and L. M. K. Vandersypen Phys. Rev. B 74, 195303 (2006)

    2006

  70. [79]

    Loss and D

    D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998)

    1998

  71. [80]

    B. E. Kane, Nature 393, 133–137 (1998)

    1998

  72. [81]

    Recher, E.V

    P. Recher, E.V. Sukhorukov, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1962 (2000)

    2000

  73. [82]

    Hanson, G

    R. Hanson, G. Burkard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 050502 (2007)

    2007

  74. [83]

    J. M. Elzerman, et al, Nature 430, 431 (2004)

    2004

  75. [84]

    Hanson, et al, Phys

    R. Hanson, et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 196802 (2005)

    2005

  76. [85]

    Hanson and D

    R. Hanson and D. D. Awschalom, Nature 453, 1043(2008)

    2008

  77. [86]

    Hanson, L

    R. Hanson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, J. R. Petta, S. Tarucha, L. N. K. Vandersypen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1217 (2007)

    2007

  78. [87]

    Fujisawa, D

    T. Fujisawa, D. G. Austing, Y. Tokura, Y. Hirayama, S. Tarucha, Nature 419, 278 (2002)

    2002

  79. [88]

    Hanson, et al, Phys

    R. Hanson, et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 196802 (2003)

    2003

  80. [89]

    J. A. Folk, R. M. Potok, C. M. Marcus, V. A. Umansky, Science 299, 679 (2003)

    2003

  81. [90]

    W. Lu, Z. Ji, L. Pfeiffer, L. W. West, A. J. Rimberg, Nature 423, 422 (2003)

    2003

  82. [91]

    (Eds.), Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation, (Springer, ISBN 978-3-662-05003-3), (2002)

    Editors: Awschalom, D.D., Loss, D., Samarth, N. (Eds.), Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation, (Springer, ISBN 978-3-662-05003-3), (2002)

    2002

  83. [92]

    Scalbert, Phys

    D. Scalbert, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205305 (2019)

    2019

  84. [93]

    Adabi, S

    F. Adabi, S. Haseli, and S. Salimi Europhysics Letters, 115, 60004 (2016)

    2016

  85. [94]

    Adesso, T

    G. Adesso, T. R. Bromley and M. Cianciaruso J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 473001 (2016)

    2016

  86. [95]

    A. K. Pati, M. M. Wilde, A. R. U. Devi, A. K. Rajagopal, and Sudha Phys. Rev. A 86, 042105 (2012)

    2012

  87. [96]

    P. J. Coles and M. Piani Phys. Rev. A 89, 022112 (2014)

    2014

  88. [97]

    Nemoto, F

    T. Nemoto, F. Bouchet, R. L. Jack, and V. Lecomte Phys. Rev. E 93, 062123 (2016)

    2016

  89. [98]

    P. J. Coles, M. Berta, M. Tomamiche, and S. Wehner Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015002 (2017)

    2017

  90. [99]

    Wehner, and A

    S. Wehner, and A. Winter, New Journal of Physics 12, 025009 (2010)

    2010

  91. [100]

    E. I. Rashba and Al. L. Efros, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 126405 (2003)

    2003

  92. [101]

    D. V. Khomitsky and E. Ya. Sherman Phys. Rev. B 79, 245321 (2009)

    2009

  93. [102]

    Faniel, T

    S. Faniel, T. Matsuura, S. Mineshige, Y. Sekine, and T. Koga, Phys. Rev. B 83, 115309 (2011)

    2011

  94. [103]

    P. I. Tamborenea and H. Metiu Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3912 (1999)

    1999

  95. [104]

    Stepanenko, M

    D. Stepanenko, M. Rudner, B. I. Halperin, and D. Loss Phys. Rev. B 85, 075416 (2012)

    2012

  96. [105]

    Pawlowski, P Szumniak, A

    J. Pawlowski, P Szumniak, A. Skubis and S. Bednarek J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26 345302 (2014)

    2014

  97. [106]

    Das Sarma, Phys

    Qiuzi Li, Lukasz Cywinski, Dimitrie Culcer, Xuedong Hu, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 81, 085313 (2010)

    2010

  98. [107]

    Fabian and U

    J. Fabian and U. Hohenester Phys. Rev. B 72, 201304(R) (2005)

    2005

  99. [108]

    Baruffa, P

    F. Baruffa, P. Stano, and J. Fabian, Phys. Rev. B 82, 045311 (2010)

    2010

  100. [109]

    Heitler and F

    W. Heitler and F. London, Z. Phys. 44, 455 (1927)

    1927

  101. [110]

    Fazekas, Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism (Series in Modern Condensed Matter Physics), World Scientific, Singapore (1999)

    P. Fazekas, Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism (Series in Modern Condensed Matter Physics), World Scientific, Singapore (1999)

    1999

  102. [111]

    Stolze and D

    J. Stolze and D. Suter Quantum Computing: A short course from Theory to Experiment (Wiley-VCH, 2007)

    2007

  103. [112]

    W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998)

    1998

  104. [113]

    Ollivier and W

    H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901 (2001)

    2001

  105. [114]

    Zyczkowski, P

    K. Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 58, 883 (1998)

    1998

  106. [115]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)

    2009

  107. [116]

    L.-M. Duan, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2722 (2000)

    2000

  108. [117]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)

    2008

  109. [118]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005)

    2005

  110. [119]

    Simon Phys

    R. Simon Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2726 (2000)

    2000

  111. [120]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garcia-Patron, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012)

    2012

  112. [121]

    Silberhorn, P

    Ch. Silberhorn, P. K. Lam, O. Weiß, F. K\"onig, N. Korolkova, and G. Leuchs Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4267 (2001)

    2001

  113. [122]

    Adesso, and F

    G. Adesso, and F. Illuminati, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 7821 (2007)

    2007

  114. [123]

    Toscano, A

    F. Toscano, A. Saboia, A. T. Avelar, and S. P. Walborn Phys. Rev. A 92, 052316 (2015)

    2015

  115. [124]

    Adesso, A

    G. Adesso, A. Serafini, and F. Illuminati Phys. Rev. A 70, 022318 (2004)

    2004

  116. [125]

    Shchukin and W

    E. Shchukin and W. Vogel Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230502 (2005)

    2005

  117. [126]

    R. F. Werner and M. M. Wolf Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3658 (2001)

    2001

  118. [127]

    Wilde, Quantum Information Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2017)

    Mark M. Wilde, Quantum Information Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2017)

    2017

  119. [128]

    Vedral, Rev

    V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 197 (2002)

    2002

  120. [129]

    Henderson and V

    L. Henderson and V. Vedral, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 6899 (2001)

    2001

  121. [130]

    W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012320 (2003)

    2003

  122. [131]

    A. J. Leggett and A. Garg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 857 (1985)

    1985

  123. [132]

    Schild and C

    G. Schild and C. Emary Phys. Rev. A 92, 032101 (2015)

    2015

  124. [133]

    K. Wang, G. C. Knee, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, J. Li, and P. Xue Phys. Rev. A 95, 032122 (2017)

    2017

  125. [134]

    D. Avis, P. Hayden, and M. M. Wilde Phys. Rev. A 82, 030102(R) (2010)

    2010

  126. [135]

    C. M. Li, N. Lambert, Y. N. Chen, G. Y. Chen, and F. Nori, Sci. Rep. 2, 885 (2012)

    2012

  127. [136]

    lynicki-Birula, J

    I. lynicki-Birula, J. Mycielski, Communications in Mathematical Physics 44, 129(1975)

    1975

  128. [137]

    C. A. Melton, M. Zhu, S. Guo, A. Ambrosetti, F. Pederiva, and L. Mitas, Phys. Rev. A 93, 042502 (2016)

    2016

  129. [138]

    C. A. Melton and L. Mitas, Phys. Rev. E 96, 043305 (2017)

    2017

  130. [139]

    N. D. Drummond, M. D. Towler, and R. J. Needs, Phys. Rev. B 70, 235119 (2004)

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.