REVIEW 1 cited by
A Deeper Look at Dataset Bias
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The presence of a bias in each image data collection has recently attracted a lot of attention in the computer vision community showing the limits in generalization of any learning method trained on a specific dataset. At the same time, with the rapid development of deep learning architectures, the activation values of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) are emerging as reliable and robust image descriptors. In this paper we propose to verify the potential of the DeCAF features when facing the dataset bias problem. We conduct a series of analyses looking at how existing datasets differ among each other and verifying the performance of existing debiasing methods under different representations. We learn important lessons on which part of the dataset bias problem can be considered solved and which open questions still need to be tackled.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
MEDebiaser: A Human-AI Feedback System for Mitigating Bias in Multi-label Medical Image Classification
A physician-facing system that uses Grad-CAM heatmaps plus pixel-level annotations to fine-tune multi-label medical classifiers reduces measured bias on one rare chest X-ray label and earns positive usability ratings ...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.