Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The minimum number of clique-saturating edges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.03983 v2 pith:MDIVNUVN submitted 2022-01-11 math.CO

The minimum number of clique-saturating edges

classification math.CO
keywords edgesfracfreegraphbaloghconjectureleftlfloor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Let $G$ be a $K_p$-free graph. We say $e$ is a $K_p$-saturating edge of $G$ if $e\notin E(G)$ and $G+e$ contains a copy of $K_p$. Denote by $f_p(n, e)$ the minimum number of $K_p$-saturating edges that an $n$-vertex $K_p$-free graph with $e$ edges can have. Erd\H{o}s and Tuza conjectured that $f_4(n,\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+1)=\left(1 + o(1)\right)\frac{n^2}{16}.$ Balogh and Liu disproved this by showing $f_4(n,\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+1)=(1+o(1))\frac{2n^2}{33}$. They believed that a natural generalization of their construction for $K_p$-free graph should also be optimal and made a conjecture that $f_{p+1}(n,ex(n,K_p)+1)=\left(\frac{2(p-2)^2}{p(4p^2-11p+8)}+o(1)\right)n^2$ for all integers $p\ge 3$. The main result of this paper is to confirm the above conjecture of Balogh and Liu.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.