Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 81 references

Growing Planets Produce Extreme Dust Signatures

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single power law ties the dust in extreme debris disks to the mass of the colliding planets that made it, revealing Mars- to Earth-scale impacts.

desk verdict Solid simulation core, useful scaling relation; the Mars–Earth collider claim overreaches slightly in the observational inversion. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13227 v1 pith:MDQXWNRP submitted 2026-07-14 astro-ph.EP

Philip J. Carter , Zoë M. Leinhardt (School of Physics , University of Bristol) This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords extremedebrisdisksgiantimpactsvaporizedejectaplanetarycollisionscalinglawplanetformationsmoothedparticlehydrodynamicsinfraredexcess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a direct quantitative link between the dust observed in extreme debris disks and the size of the planetary bodies that collided to produce that dust. By running 786 smoothed-particle-hydrodynamic simulations of collisions between rocky bodies, the authors find that the mass of vaporized ejecta scales almost linearly with a modified kinetic energy of the impact. Applying this scaling relation to published infrared-derived dust masses, they conclude that the colliding bodies must be orders of magnitude more massive than the dust itself: Ceres- to Moon-sized for typical disks, and Mars- to Earth-sized for the two most massive known extreme debris disks. If correct, these disks are not the slow grinding of leftover asteroids but direct evidence of ongoing rocky-planet formation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modified kinetic energy K'_R = (1/2) * (αγ/(αγ+1)) * M_targ * v^2, which counts only the geometrically overlapping portion of the projectile in oblique and unequal-mass collisions. The paper shows that the vaporized ejecta mass obeys M_vap_ejecta = 1.22e-6 * (K'_R)^1.01 over ten orders of magnitude in energy. This single scaling relation, together with two plausible collision-scenario assumptions (a 45-degree impact at 5 times the mutual escape velocity, and a maximally eccentric two-body encounter), converts an observed dust mass into a minimum target mass, which is then compared with published disk masses.

What would settle it

Measure the grain size distribution of an extreme debris disk such as HD 172555 across millimeter-to-centimeter wavelengths: vapor condensate should produce a narrow size distribution centered near mm-cm sizes, while a collisional cascade of solid fragments would yield a broad power-law size distribution extending to much larger bodies. Discerning these two signatures would directly test whether the observed dust can be equated with vaporized ejecta.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a power-law scaling relation: the mass of vaporized ejecta produced by a planetary collision is proportional to the modified kinetic energy of the collision to the power 1.01, calibrated across a broad grid of 786 SPH simulations spanning target masses from 0.001 to 1.5 Earth masses, mass ratios from 0.001 to 1, impact angles from 0 to 75 degrees, and impact velocities from 1 to 20 times the mutual escape velocity. The vaporized ejecta mass is computed by isentropically decompressing each particle to the forsterite triple point. The paper then inverts this relation to derive minimum collider masses for known extreme debris disks, finding that the two most massive disks (

Load-bearing premise

The central inference assumes that the observed dust mass in an extreme debris disk equals the vaporized-ejecta mass of a single giant impact, with vapor condensing nearly completely into observable dust; if much of the dust instead comes from a slower collisional cascade of solid fragments, the required collider masses would be smaller, and if condensation is inefficient they would be larger.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Extreme debris disks should be reinterpreted as signposts of ongoing rocky-planet assembly, not as eroded asteroid belts.
  • The minimum collider masses derived for known disks are orders of magnitude larger than the observed dust masses, ruling out the common assumption that the dust mass equals the mass of the parent body.
  • The two most massive extreme debris disks require collisions of Mars- to Earth-mass bodies, implying that terrestrial planets comparable in size to those in the Solar System can form in these systems.
  • Older extreme debris disks (around 1 Gyr or more) are more likely the result of late dynamical instabilities triggering a new round of giant impacts.
  • Because a small dust mass requires a much larger collider, giant impacts may be more frequent than previously estimated from the rarity of extreme debris disks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If a substantial fraction of the dust in these disks is produced over longer timescales by a collisional cascade of solid fragments rather than by rapid vapor condensation, the required collider masses could be considerably smaller than the paper's minima; the paper's numbers are therefore best read as upper bounds on collider size for a given dust mass.
  • Editorial inference: The near-linear scaling suggests that observed dust mass is a direct proxy for impact energy, which implies that time-resolved infrared monitoring of a single extreme debris disk could catch individual post-impact vapor plumes and allow a direct test of the scaling on a per-event basis.
  • Editorial inference: A testable extension would be to compare the grain size distribution of an extreme debris disk: vapor condensate should yield a narrow mm-to-cm size distribution, whereas a collisional cascade would produce a broad power law extending to much larger bodies—this distinction could observationally separate the two dust-production channels.
  • Editorial inference: The scaling relation may extrapolate to lower-mass collisions, but material strength, which the simulations neglect, becomes more important for small bodies; laboratory hypervelocity impact experiments on silicate vaporization could anchor the low-energy end and verify the power law's continuation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper uses 786 SPH simulations of planetary collisions to derive a scaling relation between the mass of vaporized ejecta and the modified kinetic energy of the impact: M_vap^ejecta = 1.22e-6 (K'_R/J)^1.01 (Eq. 2). The relation is then inverted for 15 extreme debris disk systems under assumed collision geometries and velocities, yielding minimum target masses that are orders of magnitude larger than the observed dust masses. The two most massive disks (HD172555 and HD145263) are inferred to require Mars- to Earth-mass colliders, leading the authors to conclude that extreme debris disks are direct evidence of ongoing rocky-planet-forming collisions.

Significance. The numerical core is a substantial contribution: 786 simulations with resolution checks (1e6, 5e6, 1e7 particles), cross-code comparison (SWIFT vs Gadget2), bootstrap fitting, and public data/code release. The near-linear scaling of vaporized-ejecta mass with modified kinetic energy is a valuable, essentially parameter-free result (only amplitude and index are fit) that can inform impact-outcome models. If the single-impact inversion were valid, the paper would provide the first quantitative link between observed debris-disk dust masses and the sizes of colliding planetary embryos, directly probing the giant-impact phase. However, the interpretational step from the scaling relation to individual collider masses is currently under-justified, and the central claim therefore needs revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.3, Table 1, Eq. (2)] The minimum target masses in Table 1 are derived assuming a single impact whose vaporized-ejecta mass equals the observed dust mass. Because Eq. (2) is nearly linear in K'_R, and K'_R ∝ M_targ v^2, the total vapor mass from N impacts with a fixed total colliding mass is approximately independent of N (it scales as N^{-0.01}). The quoted minimum masses are therefore lower limits on the cumulative mass of colliding material, not on the mass of any individual collider, unless a single recent impact is independently established. The paper itself notes in §4.3 that the observed dust 'may not be caused by a single (giant) impact', yet the abstract and §4.3 still present the results as requiring 'collisions with at least Mars-mass and more likely Earth-mass planets' for HD172555 and HD145263, systems not flagged as variable in Table 1. The statement that 'even allowing for multiple collisions o
  2. [§4.1, Eqs. (3) and (5)] The inversion assumes that the IR-derived minimum dust mass M_dust equals the vaporized-ejecta mass M_vap from a single collision. This requires near-100% vapor-to-dust condensation and ignores the non-vaporized ejecta and the longer-lived collisional cascade of solid fragments discussed in §4.2. For a single impact, the non-vaporized fragment population (L. Watt et al. 2024) can produce additional dust without additional vapor, so the required target mass could be smaller; inefficient condensation would push it larger. The paper's treatment of these effects is qualitative. A quantitative assessment, or at least a clear statement of the assumption's effect on the derived masses, is needed before the 'orders of magnitude' claims can be accepted.
  3. [Eq. (2) and Table 1] The scaling relation is fit to simulations with target masses 10^-3 to 1.5 M⊕, but Table 1 lists minimum target masses as low as 3.6×10^-6 M⊕ (HD69830), three orders of magnitude below the simulated range. The paper states that material strength is neglected because the simulated bodies are gravity-dominated, but this justification does not clearly extend to the extrapolated low-mass regime. While this does not affect the highest-mass claims (which use target masses within the simulated range), it affects the quantitative values for the lower-mass disks and should be either acknowledged as an extrapolation or supported by additional low-mass simulations.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2.1] Typo: 'incude' should be 'include'.
  2. [§4.3] Typo: 'minium' should be 'minimum'.
  3. [Throughout] The notation for vaporized-ejecta mass is inconsistent: 'M_vap^ejecta', 'M_vap ejecta', and 'M_vapejecta' are all used. Please define once and use consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scaling relation is calibrated on 786 fresh SPH simulations, and observed dust masses enter only as independent inputs to the inversion.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is: (1) 786 SPH simulations measure vaporized-ejecta mass from particle entropies after isentropic decompression; (2) a bootstrap fit to these simulated masses gives Eq. 2, with amplitude 1.22e-6 and index 1.01±0.01; (3) literature dust masses for extreme debris disks are inserted into the algebraic inversions Eqs. 3 and 5. The observed dust masses never enter the fit, so the inferred minimum target masses are genuine predictions of a calibrated model, not fits to those targets. The paper explicitly kept the index free ('we choose to retain the power law index (gradient) as a free parameter rather than fixing it to one'), so the near-linear result is not an input. The only author-overlapping citations (Leinhardt & Stewart 2012 for K'_R and alpha; Carter et al. for prior giant-impact energetics; Watt et al. for fragment cascades) are either standard published definitions or caveats that weaken, not force, the central claim. The paper itself flags the single-impact assumption ('The observed dust in an extreme debris disk may therefore not be caused by a single (giant) impact'), so event multiplicity is a stated modeling limitation, not a circular reduction: Eq. 2 would still be a simulation-based prediction. No equation reduces an output to an input by construction; data and code are released for external reproduction. I therefore find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The inference chain rests on two fitted constants of Eq. 2, the disclosed scenario settings (45 deg, gamma=0.5, 5v_esc, rho=5 g/cm3), the Leinhardt & Stewart 2012 modified-energy coordinate, the ANEOS/M-ANEOS equations of state, the isentropic-decompression vapor computation, the M_dust ≈ M_vap single-impact mapping, and an unstated power-law extrapolation below 1e-3 M_earth. No new particles, forces, mediators, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Amplitude A of the vaporized-ejecta scaling (Eq. 2) = 1.22e-6 (bootstrap +1.39/-0.65); log10 intercept mean -5.921 ± 0.334
    Fitted in log space to the 786-simulation dataset. Sets the absolute mass scale of every inferred collider mass through Eqs. 3 and 5; dominates the whole observational inference.
  • Power-law index n of the vaporized-ejecta scaling (Eq. 2) = 1.006 ± 0.011 (Table A1)
    Fitted and deliberately kept free rather than fixed to unity. The near-unity value produces the 0.596 exponent in the minimum-mass formula (Eq. 3) through M_vap ∝ K'^n with K' ∝ M^(5/3).
  • Nominal collision scenario for the observational inversion = theta=45 deg (b≈0.707), gamma=0.5, rho=5 g/cm3, v=5v_esc
    Hand-chosen, disclosed settings that fix the normalization of Eq. 3 and the filled points in Fig. 3; the maximally-eccentric scenario (Eq. 5) is the alternative normalization. Different choices shift minimum masses by factors of several.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Modified specific impact energy Q'_R and interacting mass fraction alpha from Leinhardt & Stewart 2012 define the energy coordinate K'_R = Q'_R M_tot
    Used in Eq. 1 and Appendices C-D to collapse impact geometry (mass ratio, impact parameter) into a single energy variable on which the scaling relation is fit. Prior published framework, co-authored by Leinhardt.
  • domain assumption ANEOS/M-ANEOS forsterite and Fe85Si15 equations of state accurately capture shock vaporization of planetary mantles and cores
    Section 2.1. Vapor mass — the paper's core observable — is computed from EoS phase boundaries. The authors note forsterite-only mantles likely underestimate vapor mass for real multi-mineral mantles, so this is a one-sided systematic.
  • domain assumption Ejecta decompresses isentropically to the forsterite triple point (5.2 Pa) with vapor fraction from the lever rule
    Section 2.2 and Figure A3. The assumption that expansion is fast relative to cooling determines every vapor mass in Table A2; radiative cooling during expansion would change the vaporized masses and hence the fitted Eq. 2.
  • domain assumption Observed dust mass equals the vaporized ejecta mass of a single giant impact (near-100% vapor-to-dust condensation)
    Sections 4.1-4.3: the inversion M_dust -> M_targ. The paper uses minimum literature dust masses to hedge, but the equivalence itself is assumed; sustained dust from solid fragments (Watt et al. 2024) is acknowledged as an alternative source.
  • ad hoc to paper The power-law scaling relation (Eq. 2) extrapolates below the simulated target-mass range
    Table 1 lists minimum target masses as low as 3.55e-6 M_earth (eccentric scenario), below the smallest simulated target of 1e-3 M_earth; the paper does not state the extrapolation or argue that the linear-in-log trend persists where vaporization is marginal.
  • domain assumption Colliding bodies are strengthless, fully differentiated spheres with core mass fraction 0.3 and specified isentropic initial conditions
    Section 2.1. Material strength could reduce vaporized mass for the smallest bodies; the paper argues strength is negligible in the gravity-dominated regime but does not quantify the effect.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Growing Planets Produce Extreme Dust Signatures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MDQXWNRP

@misc{pith2026260713227,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Growing Planets Produce Extreme Dust Signatures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MDQXWNRP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13227}
}
read the original abstract

Collisions between planetary bodies are essential to the assembly of rocky planets like the Earth, but they are extremely difficult to observe. We therefore rely on indirect signatures of planetary impacts such as extreme debris disks - bright infrared excesses around other stars. Extreme debris disks are thought to be the result of energetic collisions that ejected large amounts of vaporized rock which rapidly condensed into mm- or cm-sized dust. However, previously there has been no clear way to relate the observed mass of dust to the collision that produced it. Here, we show that the colliding bodies required are orders of magnitude more massive than the mass of dust observed. We find that more massive extreme debris disks require proportionally larger colliding bodies. As a consequence, the most massive observed extreme debris disks require collisions of Mars- to Earth-mass bodies. Extreme debris disks thus reveal the ongoing formation of rocky planets comparable in size to the rocky planets of our own solar system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13227 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Progression of two example simulated collisions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The mass of vaporized ejecta scales with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The observed extreme debris disks require planet-mass collisions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Benz , W., Anic , A., Horner , J., & Whitby , J. A. 2007, title The Origin of Mercury , , 132, 189, 10.1007/s11214-007-9284-1

    doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9284-1 2007

  2. [2]

    Canup , R. M. 2004, title Simulations of a late lunar-forming impact , , 168, 433, 10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.028

    doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.028 2004

  3. [3]

    Canup , R. M. 2005, title A Giant Impact Origin of Pluto-Charon , Science, 307, 546, 10.1126/science.1106818

    doi:10.1126/science.1106818 2005

  4. [4]

    M., Righter , K., Dauphas , N., et al

    Canup , R. M., Righter , K., Dauphas , N., et al. 2021, New views on the Moon II , arXiv:2103.02045. 2103.02045

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    2022, title PhilJCarter/gadget2-planetary: v1.0.0: Gadget2-Planetary initial versioning release, , v1.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5879324

    Carter, P. 2022, title PhilJCarter/gadget2-planetary: v1.0.0: Gadget2-Planetary initial versioning release, , v1.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5879324

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.5879324 2022

  6. [6]

    2026 a , title PhilJCarter/planit: v1.0.0, , v1.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.21347130

    Carter, P. 2026 a , title PhilJCarter/planit: v1.0.0, , v1.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.21347130

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.21347130 2026

  7. [7]

    2026 b , title PhilJCarter/ImpactVaporEjecta: v1.0, , v1.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.21362372

    Carter, P. 2026 b , title PhilJCarter/ImpactVaporEjecta: v1.0, , v1.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.21362372

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.21362372 2026

  8. [8]

    J., & Leinhardt, Z

    Carter, P. J., & Leinhardt, Z. M. 2026, title Replication Data for: ``Growing Planets Produce Extreme Dust Signatures'' , Harvard Dataverse, 10.7910/DVN/PFSTEF

    work page doi:10.7910/dvn/pfstef 2026

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    J., Leinhardt , Z

    Carter , P. J., Leinhardt , Z. M., Elliott , T., Stewart , S. T., & Walter , M. J. 2018, title Collisional stripping of planetary crusts , Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 484, 276, 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.12.012

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    J., Lock, S

    Carter, P. J., Lock, S. J., & Stewart, S. T. 2020, title The Energy Budgets of Giant Impacts, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 125, e2019JE006042, 10.1029/2019JE006042

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    J., & Stewart, S

    Carter, P. J., & Stewart, S. T. 2020, title Colliding in the Shadows of Giants: Planetesimal Collisions during the Growth and Migration of Gas Giants, The Planetary Science Journal, 1, 45, 10.3847/psj/abaecc

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Chambers , J. E. 2001, title Making More Terrestrial Planets , , 152, 205, 10.1006/icar.2001.6639

    2001

  5. [13]

    2018, title Forming Mercury by Giant Impacts , , 865, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad8b0

    Chau , A., Reinhardt , C., Helled , R., & Stadel , J. 2018, title Forming Mercury by Giant Impacts , , 865, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad8b0

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    I., Manga , M., & Tan , E

    Citron , R. I., Manga , M., & Tan , E. 2018, title A hybrid origin of the Martian crustal dichotomy: Degree-1 convection antipodal to a giant impact , Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 491, 58, 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.03.031

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    \'C uk , M., & Stewart , S. T. 2012, title Making the Moon from a Fast-Spinning Earth: A Giant Impact Followed by Resonant Despinning , Science, 338, 1047, 10.1126/science.1225542

    2012 doi

  8. [16]

    J., Carter , P

    Davies , E. J., Carter , P. J., Duncan , M. S., et al. 2019 a , in Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 1256

    2019

  9. [17]

    J., Carter, P

    Davies, E. J., Carter, P. J., Root, S., et al. 2020, title Silicate Melting and Vaporization during Rocky Planet Formation, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 125, 10.1029/2019JE006227

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    J., Root , S., Carter , P

    Davies , E. J., Root , S., Carter , P. J., et al. 2019 b , in Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 1257

    2019

  11. [19]

    de Wit, W. J. , Grinin, V. P. , Potravnov, I. S. , et al. 2013, title Active asteroid belt causes the UXOR phenomenon in RZ\,Piscium, A&A, 553, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220715

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    J., & Leinhardt , Z

    Dou , J., Carter , P. J., & Leinhardt , Z. M. 2024, title Formation of super-Mercuries via giant impacts , , 529, 2577, 10.1093/mnras/stae644

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    2008, title Linked magma ocean solidification and atmospheric growth for Earth and Mars, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 271, 181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.062

    Elkins-Tanton, L. 2008, title Linked magma ocean solidification and atmospheric growth for Earth and Mars, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 271, 181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.062

    2008 doi

  14. [22]

    2012, title Silica-rich Bright Debris Disk around HD 15407A , , 749, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/749/2/L29

    Fujiwara , H., Onaka , T., Yamashita , T., et al. 2012, title Silica-rich Bright Debris Disk around HD 15407A , , 749, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/749/2/L29

    2012 doi

  15. [23]

    2017, title Impact erosion model for gravity-dominated planetesimals , , 294, 234, 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.03.009

    Genda , H., Fujita , T., Kobayashi , H., et al. 2017, title Impact erosion model for gravity-dominated planetesimals , , 294, 234, 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.03.009

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    2015, title WARM DEBRIS DISKS PRODUCED BY GIANT IMPACTS DURING TERRESTRIAL PLANET FORMATION , The Astrophysical Journal, 810, 136, 10.1088/0004-637x/810/2/136

    Genda, H., Kobayashi, H., & Kokubo, E. 2015, title WARM DEBRIS DISKS PRODUCED BY GIANT IMPACTS DURING TERRESTRIAL PLANET FORMATION , The Astrophysical Journal, 810, 136, 10.1088/0004-637x/810/2/136

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    Gessmann, C., Wood, B., Rubie, D., & Kilburn, M. 2001, title Solubility of silicon in liquid metal at high pressure: implications for the composition of the Earth's core, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 184, 367, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00325-3

    2001 doi

  18. [26]

    2007, title Collisional dust avalanches in debris discs , , 461, 537, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065210

    Grigorieva , A., Artymowicz , P., & Th \'e bault , P. 2007, title Collisional dust avalanches in debris discs , , 461, 537, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065210

    2007 doi

  19. [27]

    Hunter , J. D. 2007, title Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  20. [28]

    P., & Wyatt , M

    Jackson , A. P., & Wyatt , M. C. 2012, title Debris from terrestrial planet formation: the Moon-forming collision , , 425, 657, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21546.x

    2012

  21. [29]

    P., Wyatt , M

    Jackson , A. P., Wyatt , M. C., Bonsor , A., & Veras , D. 2014, title Debris froms giant impacts between planetary embryos at large orbital radii , , 440, 3757, 10.1093/mnras/stu476

    2014 doi

  22. [30]

    C., & Melosh , H

    Johnson , B. C., & Melosh , H. J. 2012, title Formation of spherules in impact produced vapor plumes , , 217, 416, 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.11.020

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    C., Lisse, C

    Johnson, B. C., Lisse, C. M., Chen, C. H., et al. 2012, title A SELF - CONSISTENT MODEL OF THE CIRCUMSTELLAR DEBRIS CREATED BY A GIANT HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT IN THE HD 172555 SYSTEM , The Astrophysical Journal, 761, 45, 10.1088/0004-637x/761/1/45

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    A., & Chambers , J

    Kaib , N. A., & Chambers , J. E. 2016, title The fragility of the terrestrial planets during a giant-planet instability , , 455, 3561, 10.1093/mnras/stv2554

    2016 doi

  25. [33]

    A., Eke, V

    Kegerreis, J. A., Eke, V. R., Gonnet, P., et al. 2019, title Planetary giant impacts: convergence of high-resolution simulations using efficient spherical initial conditions and swift, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 487, 5029, 10.1093/mnras/stz1606

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    2023, title A planetary collision afterglow and transit of the resultant debris cloud , , 622, 251, 10.1038/s41586-023-06573-9

    Kenworthy , M., Lock , S., Kennedy , G., et al. 2023, title A planetary collision afterglow and transit of the resultant debris cloud , , 622, 251, 10.1038/s41586-023-06573-9

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, ed

    Kluyver, T., Ragan-Kelley, B., P \'e rez, F., et al. 2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, ed. F. Loizides & B. Scmidt (Netherlands: IOS Press), 87--90. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/403913/

    2016

  28. [36]

    2010, title Formation of Terrestrial Planets from Protoplanets Under a Realistic Accretion Condition , , 714, L21, 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/L21

    Kokubo , E., & Genda , H. 2010, title Formation of Terrestrial Planets from Protoplanets Under a Realistic Accretion Condition , , 714, L21, 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/L21

    2010 doi

  29. [37]

    M., & Stewart , S

    Leinhardt , Z. M., & Stewart , S. T. 2012, title Collisions between Gravity-dominated Bodies. I. Outcome Regimes and Scaling Laws , , 745, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/79

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    Lewis , T., Watt , L., & Leinhardt , Z. M. 2023, title Isolating the extreme debris disc signature - explorations of eccentric extreme debris discs formed by giant impacts , , 519, 172, 10.1093/mnras/stac3541

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    M., Beichman , C

    Lisse , C. M., Beichman , C. A., Bryden , G., & Wyatt , M. C. 2007, title On the Nature of the Dust in the Debris Disk around HD 69830 , , 658, 584, 10.1086/511001

    2007 doi

  32. [40]

    M., Chen, C

    Lisse, C. M., Chen, C. H., Wyatt, M. C., et al. 2009, title ABUNDANT CIRCUMSTELLAR SILICA DUST AND SiO GAS CREATED BY A GIANT HYPERVELOCITY COLLISION IN THE 12 MYR HD172555 SYSTEM, The Astrophysical Journal, 701, 2019, 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/2019

    2009 doi

  33. [41]

    M., Wyatt, M

    Lisse, C. M., Wyatt, M. C., Chen, C. H., et al. 2012, title SPITZER EVIDENCE FOR A LATE-HEAVY BOMBARDMENT AND THE FORMATION OF UREILITES IN CORVI At 1\,Gyr, The Astrophysical Journal, 747, 93, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/93

    2012 doi

  34. [42]

    M., Meng , H

    Lisse , C. M., Meng , H. Y. A., Sitko , M. L., et al. 2020, title HD 145263: Spectral Observations of Silica Debris Disk Formation via Extreme Space Weathering? , , 894, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b80

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    J., & Stewart , S

    Lock , S. J., & Stewart , S. T. 2017, title The structure of terrestrial bodies: Impact heating, corotation limits, and synestias , Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 122, 950, 10.1002/2016JE005239

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    M., Aharonson , O., & Asphaug , E

    Marinova , M. M., Aharonson , O., & Asphaug , E. 2008, title Mega-impact formation of the Mars hemispheric dichotomy , , 453, 1216, 10.1038/nature07070

    2008 doi

  37. [45]

    H., & Song, I

    Melis, C., Zuckerman, B., Rhee, J. H., & Song, I. 2010, title THE AGE OF THE HD 15407 SYSTEM AND THE EPOCH OF FINAL CATASTROPHIC MASS ACCRETION ONTO TERRESTRIAL PLANETS AROUND SUN-LIKE STARS, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 717, L57, 10.1088/2041-8205/717/1/L57

    2010 doi

  38. [46]

    Melosh , H. J. 1990, Giant impacts and the thermal state of the early Earth. , ed. H. E. Newsom & J. H. Jones , 69--83

    1990

  39. [47]

    J., & Vickery, A

    Melosh, H. J., & Vickery, A. M. 1991, title Melt droplet formation in energetic impact events, Nature, 350, 494, 10.1038/350494a0

    1991 doi

  40. [48]

    Meng , H. Y. A., Su , K. Y. L., Rieke , G. H., et al. 2014, title Large impacts around a solar-analog star in the era of terrestrial planet formation , Science, 345, 1032, 10.1126/science.1255153

    2014 doi

  41. [49]

    2021, title A New Sample of Warm Extreme Debris Disks from the ALLWISE Catalog, The Astrophysical Journal, 910, 27, 10.3847/1538-4357/abdc26

    Mo \'o r, A., \'A brah \'a m, P., Szab \'o , G., et al. 2021, title A New Sample of Warm Extreme Debris Disks from the ALLWISE Catalog, The Astrophysical Journal, 910, 27, 10.3847/1538-4357/abdc26

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    2022, title Mid-infrared time-domain study of recent dust production events in the extreme debris disc of TYC 4209-1322-1 , , 516, 5684, 10.1093/mnras/stac2595

    Mo \'o r , A., \'A brah \'a m , P., K \'o sp \'a l , \'A ., et al. 2022, title Mid-infrared time-domain study of recent dust production events in the extreme debris disc of TYC 4209-1322-1 , , 516, 5684, 10.1093/mnras/stac2595

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    Nagahara, H., Kushiro, I., & Mysen, B. O. 1994, title Evaporation of olivine: Low pressure phase relations of the olivine system and its implication for the origin of chondritic components in the solar nebula, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 58, 1951, https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    1994 doi

  44. [52]

    2013, title The twofold debris disk around HD 113766 A

    Olofsson , J., Henning , T., Nielbock , M., et al. 2013, title The twofold debris disk around HD 113766 A. Warm and cold dust as seen with VLTI/MIDI and Herschel/PACS , , 551, A134, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220904

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    V., Barclay , T., Borucki , W

    Quintana , E. V., Barclay , T., Borucki , W. J., Rowe , J. F., & Chambers , J. E. 2016, title The Frequency of Giant Impacts on Earth-like Worlds , , 821, 126, 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/126

    2016 doi

  46. [54]

    H., Song , I., & Zuckerman , B

    Rhee , J. H., Song , I., & Zuckerman , B. 2008, title Warm Dust in the Terrestrial Planet Zone of a Sun-like Pleiades Star: Collisions between Planetary Embryos? , , 675, 777, 10.1086/524935

    2008 doi

  47. [55]

    H., Su, K

    Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y. L., Melis, C., & G \'a sp \'a r, A. 2021, title Extreme Variability of the V488 Persei Debris Disk, The Astrophysical Journal, 918, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0dc4

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    R., Kegerreis , J

    Ruiz-Bonilla , S., Eke , V. R., Kegerreis , J. A., Massey , R. J., & Teodoro , L. F. A. 2021, title The effect of pre-impact spin on the Moon-forming collision , , 500, 2861, 10.1093/mnras/staa3385

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    W., et al

    Schaller , M., Gonnet , P., Draper , P. W., et al. 2018, title SWIFT: SPH With Inter-dependent Fine-grained Tasking , , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1805.020

    2018

  50. [58]

    W., et al

    Schaller , M., Borrow , J., Draper , P. W., et al. 2024, title SWIFT: A modern highly-parallel gravity and smoothed particle hydrodynamics solver for astrophysical and cosmological applications , , 530, 2378, 10.1093/mnras/stae922

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    W., Gonnet, P., et al

    Schaller, M., Draper, P. W., Gonnet, P., et al. 2025 a , title PhilJCarter/SWIFT: swiftv0.9-planetary\_plus\_subtask\_speedup, , v0.9.0-planetary\_subtask\_speedup Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.15973312

    2025 doi

  52. [60]

    2025 b , title PhilJCarter/SWIFT: swiftv0.9-planetary\_veldamp, , v0.9.0-planetary\_veldamp-v1.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.15973129

    Schaller, M., Pedro, G., Draper, P., et al. 2025 b , title PhilJCarter/SWIFT: swiftv0.9-planetary\_veldamp, , v0.9.0-planetary\_veldamp-v1.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.15973129

    2025 doi

  53. [61]

    W., & Lissauer , J

    Smith , A. W., & Lissauer , J. J. 2009, title Orbital stability of systems of closely-spaced planets , , 201, 381, 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.12.027

    2009 doi

  54. [62]

    2005, title The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2 , , 364, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x

    Springel , V. 2005, title The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2 , , 364, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x

    2005

  55. [63]

    2020, title The shock physics of giant impacts: Key requirements for the equations of state, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2272, 080003, 10.1063/12.0000946

    Stewart, S., Davies, E., Duncan, M., et al. 2020, title The shock physics of giant impacts: Key requirements for the equations of state, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2272, 080003, 10.1063/12.0000946

    2020 doi

  56. [64]

    Stewart, S. T. 2019, title ststewart/aneos-forsterite-2019: Forsterite-ANEOS- SLVTv1.0G1 , , v1.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3478631

    2019 doi

  57. [65]

    Stewart, S. T. 2020 a , title Equation of State Model Iron ANEOS: Documentation and Comparisons (Version SLVTv0.2G1), Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3866507

    2020 doi

  58. [66]

    Stewart, S. T. 2020 b , title Equation of State Model Fe85Si15-ANEOS: Development and documentation (Version SLVTv0.2G1), Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3866550

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    Su , K. Y. L., Kennedy , G. M., Schlawin , E., Jackson , A. P., & Rieke , G. H. 2022, title A Star-sized Impact-produced Dust Clump in the Terrestrial Zone of the HD 166191 System , , 927, 135, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4bbb

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    Su , K. Y. L., Rieke , G. H., Melis , C., et al. 2020, title Mid-infrared Studies of HD 113766 and HD 172555: Assessing Variability in the Terrestrial Zone of Young Exoplanetary Systems , , 898, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9b

    2020 doi

  61. [69]

    Su , K. Y. L., Jackson , A. P., G \'a sp \'a r , A., et al. 2019, title Extreme Debris Disk Variability: Exploring the Diverse Outcomes of Large Asteroid Impacts During the Era of Terrestrial Planet Formation , , 157, 202, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1260

    2019 doi

  62. [70]

    Su, K. Y. L., Kennedy, G. M., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2023, title RZ Piscium Hosts a Compact and Highly Perturbed Debris Disk, The Astrophysical Journal, 959, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad04d9

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    Su, K. Y. L., Mo \'o r, A., Xie, C., et al. 2025, title Discovery of Volatile Gas in the Giant Impact Disk Around the 150 Myr Old HD 23514, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 988, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/ade872

    2025 doi

  64. [72]

    M., Kadono, T., et al

    Takasawa, S., Nakamura, A. M., Kadono, T., et al. 2011, title SILICATE DUST SIZE DISTRIBUTION FROM HYPERVELOCITY COLLISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DUST PRODUCTION IN DEBRIS DISKS, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 733, L39, 10.1088/2041-8205/733/2/L39

    2011 doi

  65. [73]

    S., von Braun, K., et al

    Tanner, A., Boyajian, T. S., von Braun, K., et al. 2015, title STELLAR PARAMETERS FOR HD 69830, A NEARBY STAR WITH THREE NEPTUNE MASS PLANETS AND AN ASTEROID BELT, The Astrophysical Journal, 800, 115, 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/115

    2015 doi

  66. [74]

    2018, title Transient events in bright debris discs: Collisional avalanches revisited , , 609, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731819

    Thebault , P., & Kral , Q. 2018, title Transient events in bright debris discs: Collisional avalanches revisited , , 609, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731819

    2018 doi

  67. [75]

    Tzanidakis, A., & Davenport, J. R. A. 2026, title Gaia-GIC-1: An Evolving Catastrophic Planetesimal Collision Candidate, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 1000, L5, 10.3847/2041-8213/ae3ddc

    2026 doi

  68. [76]

    C., & Varoquaux, G

    Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, title The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22

    2011

  69. [77]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, title SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  70. [78]

    Watt , L., Leinhardt , Z., & Su , K. Y. L. 2021, title Planetary embryo collisions and the wiggly nature of extreme debris discs , , 502, 2984, 10.1093/mnras/stab106

    2021 doi

  71. [79]

    M., & Carter , P

    Watt , L., Leinhardt , Z. M., & Carter , P. J. 2024, title Post-giant impact planetesimals sustaining extreme debris discs , , 527, 7749, 10.1093/mnras/stad3606

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    J., Becklin , E

    Weinberger , A. J., Becklin , E. E., Song , I., & Zuckerman , B. 2011, title The Absence of Cold Dust and the Mineralogy and Origin of the Warm Dust Encircling BD +20 307 , , 726, 72, 10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/72

    2011 doi

  73. [81]

    C., Smith , R., Su , K

    Wyatt , M. C., Smith , R., Su , K. Y. L., et al. 2007, title Steady State Evolution of Debris Disks around A Stars , , 663, 365, 10.1086/518404

    2007 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.