Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Load Balancer Tuning: Comparative Analysis of HAProxy Load Balancing Methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.14198 v1 pith:MDWU7WIT submitted 2022-12-29 cs.DC

Load Balancer Tuning: Comparative Analysis of HAProxy Load Balancing Methods

classification cs.DC
keywords loadbalancerhaproxybalancingdeploymentsmethodsperformancesystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Load balancing is prevalent in practical application (e.g., web) deployments seen today. One such load balancer, HAProxy, remains relevant as an open-source, easy-to-use system. In the context of web systems, the load balancer tier possesses significant influence over system performance and the incurred cost, which is decisive for cloud-based deployments. Therefore, it is imperative to properly tune the load balancer configuration and get the most performance out of the existing resources. In this technical report, we first introduce the HAProxy architecture and its load balancing methods. Then, we discuss fine-tuning parameters within this load balancer and examine their performances in face of various workload intensities. Our evaluation encompasses various types of web requests and homogeneous and heterogeneous back-ends. Lastly, based on the findings of this study, we present a set of best practices to optimally configure HAProxy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.