REVIEW 1 cited by
Exploring the Potential of Large Multimodal Models as Effective Alternatives for Pronunciation Assessment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across a wide range of domains. This paper explores their potential in pronunciation assessment tasks, with a particular focus on evaluating the capabilities of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) model, specifically GPT-4o. Our study investigates its ability to process speech and audio for pronunciation assessment across multiple levels of granularity and dimensions, with an emphasis on feedback generation and scoring. For our experiments, we use the publicly available Speechocean762 dataset. The evaluation focuses on two key aspects: multi-level scoring and the practicality of the generated feedback. Scoring results are compared against the manual scores provided in the Speechocean762 dataset, while feedback quality is assessed using Large Language Models (LLMs). The findings highlight the effectiveness of integrating LMMs with traditional methods for pronunciation assessment, offering insights into the model's strengths and identifying areas for further improvement.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
English Pronunciation Evaluation without Complex Joint Training: LoRA Fine-tuned Speech Multimodal LLM
LoRA fine-tuning of the Phi-4 multimodal LLM on Speechocean762 yields pronunciation scores and phoneme-level transcripts from a single model, with PCC up to 0.74 for accuracy and PER down to 0.11.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.