Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 74 references

Microwave-driven same-species sympathetic cooling for trapped ions

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Same-isotope microwave cooling brings ion motion to 0.16 quanta with a per-cycle data-qubit error of 1.7×10⁻⁴.

desk verdict Solid experimental demonstration of microwave-driven same-isotope sympathetic cooling with careful benchmarking; the coolant-depletion caveat is real but disclosed and does not sink the central result. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20292 v1 pith:METLHQXU submitted 2026-07-22 quant-ph

M. C. Smith , E. Vandrey , A. D. Leu , N. Drotleff , A. Agrawal , K. Miyanishi , D. M. Lucas , M. F. Gely This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 03.67.-a37.10.Ty37.10.Rs
keywords sympatheticcoolingtrappedionsmicrowavecontrolZeemansplittingsidebandsame-isotopeinterleavedrandomizedbenchmarking43Ca+
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that sympathetic cooling of a data qubit can be done with a coolant ion of the same species and isotope, using only global near-field microwaves, by separating the coolant and data transitions in frequency via a static magnetic field's Zeeman splitting. In ⁴³Ca⁺, pulsed resolved sideband cooling on a coolant transition lowers the shared in-plane radial rocking mode to an average phonon occupation of 0.16(2), with a cooling rate of 0.27(1) quanta per cycle at n̄ = 1. Interleaved randomized benchmarking puts the induced data-qubit error at 1.7(4)×10⁻⁴ per cooling cycle, of which 0.7(2)×10⁻⁴ is idle error. The authors attribute most of the residual error to thermal drifts in the microwave drive chain and estimate a fundamental photon-scattering floor near 1.6×10⁻⁶ per cycle. They also note, in the supplement, that coolant population is lost when cooling is interleaved with gates and that replenishment is not demonstrated.

What carries the argument

Zeeman-frequency separation within the ground-state manifold, enabled by a homogeneous 28.8 mT static magnetic field. The global near-field microwave tone drives a resolved sideband on the coolant transition |4,2⟩→|3,2⟩ while the data clock transition |4,1⟩→|3,1⟩ is detuned by about 200 MHz. Simultaneous detuned compensation tones cancel ac Zeeman shifts on both coolant and data transitions, and spin-echo pulses applied between pairs of cooling cycles cancel residual shifts; SK1 composite pulses stabilize against amplitude noise from thermal transients.

What would settle it

Run the interleaved randomized benchmarking sequence for many more cooling cycles (e.g., 10⁴) while monitoring the coolant ion population. If the coolant population decays at the ~3×10⁻³ per sequence rate reported in Supplement S2B and the cooling rate correspondingly degrades, the scheme cannot sustain n̄ ≈ 1 without coolant replenishment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that sympathetic cooling of a trapped-ion data qubit can be driven by global near-field microwaves without a second species, by using the Zeeman splitting of a static magnetic field to isolate the coolant transition from the data qubit transition in frequency space. With ⁴³Ca⁺, the data qubit lives in clock states |4,1⟩ and |3,1⟩, while the coolant uses the |4,2⟩→|3,2⟩ transition; a resolved sideband on this coolant transition cools the shared motion to n̄ = 0.16(2). The measured data-qubit error per cooling cycle is 1.7(4)×10⁻⁴, benchmarked by interleaved randomized benchmarking, and the authors show that the error budget is dominated by technical ac Zeeman shif

Load-bearing premise

The scheme's long-term usefulness depends on replenishing coolant ions, because when cooling is interleaved with gates each sequence loses about 3×10⁻³ of the coolant population, and the paper does not demonstrate such replenishment.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Same-isotope sympathetic cooling removes the need for a second ion species and its extra laser wavelengths; the same microwave control used for logic can drive cooling.
  • The measured data-qubit error of 1.7(4)×10⁻⁴ per cooling cycle, with idle error 0.7(2)×10⁻⁴, implies a net cooling-induced error of about 1.0×10⁻⁴ per cycle.
  • Maintaining n̄ ≈ 1 would require roughly 50 cooling cycles per second; at that occupation the scheme's contribution to a two-qubit gate error would be around 10⁻⁶, below current entangling-gate error rates.
  • Cryogenic operation and microwave power management are identified as routes to lower the technically dominated error, with a fundamental photon-scattering limit about two orders of magnitude below the measured value.
  • The scheme is claimed to be applicable to any ion species with metastable states and at least four states in the ground-state manifold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: A natural next step, not demonstrated here, is to integrate coolant replenishment—for example, shuttling a freshly prepared coolant ion from another zone—so that the scheme can run indefinitely when interleaved with gates; the paper's own supplement shows the coolant population drops by roughly 3×10⁻³ per sequence in that regime.
  • Extension: The compensation-tone approach suggests a general strategy: any pair of transitions driven by the same microwave chain can have common-mode ac Zeeman drifts rejected, which may carry over to other multi-tone microwave control schemes in trapped-ion processors.
  • Extension: A testable improvement would be to use a coolant transition farther from the data qubit in frequency (for example, |4,−3⟩→|3,−3⟩ in ⁴³Ca⁺) or a different species with a larger Zeeman manifold; the paper notes the trade-off but does not implement it.
  • Extension: Since both cooling and entangling logic can be microwave-driven, this scheme points toward a largely laser-free trapped-ion processor, though the present demonstration only benchmarks single-qubit gate sequences and not entangling gates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. Smith et al. demonstrate a same-isotope sympathetic cooling scheme for 43Ca+ ions in which both data and coolant ions remain in the ground-state hyperfine manifold and the coolant is addressed through microwave-driven resolved sideband cooling at a Zeeman-shifted transition. The shared in-plane radial rocking mode is cooled to n̄=0.16(2) quanta after 16 cycles, with a cooling rate of 0.27(1) quanta/cycle at n̄=1. Using interleaved randomized benchmarking, they measure a data-qubit error of 1.7(4)×10−4 per cooling cycle, compared with an idle error of 0.7(2)×10−4. Ac-Zeeman compensation tones and spin-echo pulses are used to protect the data qubit. The manuscript includes a detailed supplementary characterization, an error budget, and simulations of the repumping dynamics.

Significance. The result is timely and important: it removes the need for a second species or tightly focused lasers for sympathetic cooling and keeps all control in the microwave domain, which is attractive for integrated QCCD architectures. The experimental execution is careful: sideband thermometry with joint red/blue fits, IRB with parametric bootstrapping, two-ion cross-checks, and a component-level error budget. The authors also transparently disclose the coolant-population depletion in the repumping loop (Suppl. S2B), which is a real limitation for continuous interleaved operation but does not invalidate the measured per-cycle error. If the data hold, this is a useful step toward fully microwave-based sympathetic cooling.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Conclusion & Suppl. S2B] The conclusion states that maintaining n̄=1 would require ~50 cooling cycles per second and estimates a per-gate error contribution of ~1e-6. However, Suppl. S2B reports that when cooling is interleaved with gates, the coolant population is lost at ~3e-3 per sequence because the 'cooled' population no longer decreases, and no replenishment is implemented in this work. Please add an explicit caveat in the main text connecting this extrapolation to the need for replenishment (e.g., shuttling in fresh coolant ions), or temper the statement. This is a presentation issue and does not change the measured central claim.
  2. [Throughout] Minor typos: 'between between' (page 1), 'seperation' (page 1), 'processs' (page 4), 'occuring' (page 3), and 'n reproducible frequency shift' in the Fig. S4 caption (likely 'a reproducible').
  3. [Ref. [60]] Reference [60] ('Atomic Physics, GitHub repository') is incomplete; please provide the repository URL, version/commit, and the appropriate citation format so that the simulation can be reproduced.
  4. [Fig. 3 / IRB] The main text states that the two-ion IRB validation used 'shorter gate sequences.' Please state explicitly how many two-ion sequences were acquired and the values/error bars of those points, so the reader can assess the consistency of the single-ion and two-ion error estimates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims are empirical measurements supported by standard thermometry and interleaved randomized benchmarking.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—cooling a two-ion gate mode to n̄≈0.16 and inducing a data-qubit error of 1.7(4)×10⁻⁴ per cooling cycle—are presented as experimental measurements, not as predictions derived from a fitted model. The phonon occupation is extracted via sideband asymmetry thermometry with joint fits to red and blue sideband scans, and the cooling rate is obtained from an exponential fit to measured occupations after varying numbers of cooling cycles. The per-cycle error is measured through interleaved randomized benchmarking, with the idle error separately characterized by replacing cooling cycles with delays. Calibration parameters such as compensation-tone amplitudes and pulse durations are experimentally tuned, but the reported outcomes (cooled occupation and error rate) are not constructed from those parameters by definition. The paper does cite prior work by overlapping authors (e.g., Refs. [43,45,54]), but these citations are technical building blocks (addressing, microwave drive chains, composite pulses) rather than a uniqueness theorem or an ansatz that predetermines the result. The disclosed limitation in Supplement S2B—coolant population loss of ~3×10⁻³ per sequence when interleaved with gates—is an honest caveat about long-term operation, not a circular step; it does not undermine the measured per-cycle performance. No equation is shown to reduce to its own input, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no self-citation chain is invoked to force the scheme. The derivation chain, insofar as there is one, is self-contained with respect to the stated experimental data.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental demonstration; the central claim is a measured performance, not a theoretical derivation. The parameters listed are experimental settings/calibrations that affect the achieved cooling and error rates. The assumptions are standard trapped-ion physics and the specific 43Ca+ level scheme.

free parameters (4)
  • Sideband pulse duration = 500 µs
    Chosen shorter than the π-pulse duration to gain robustness to ~250 Hz detuning drifts (S2A); affects cooling rate and data-qubit error.
  • Sideband compensation tone detuning = -1.37 MHz from |4,2>↔|3,2>
    Chosen to produce opposite ac Zeeman shift without overlapping the sideband; amplitude calibrated to null the shift (S2A).
  • Data compensation tone detuning = +8.37 MHz from data qubit transition
    Chosen to cancel ac Zeeman shift on data qubit; amplitude calibrated (S3A).
  • Number of repumping repeats per cycle = 2
    Hand-chosen to reduce coolant population loss to ~1e-3 (S1C, S2B); affects coolant lifetime and data-qubit error.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Motional occupation n̄ is extracted from the ratio of red/blue sideband amplitudes assuming a thermal (Boltzmann) phonon distribution.
    Used in sideband thermometry (Fig. 2 caption; S2). This is standard for Doppler/sideband-cooled thermal states.
  • domain assumption The 43Ca+ hyperfine structure and Zeeman splittings at 28.8 mT separate the cooling transition |4,2>↔|3,2> from the data qubit |4,1>↔|3,1> by ~200 MHz, making off-resonant drive of the data qubit negligible.
    Central to the addressing scheme (Fig. 1b; main text).
  • domain assumption The repumping closed-loop branching ratios (93% to |4,4>, 6% to D5/2, 1% to D3/2) and the 729 nm π-pulse error model are accurately captured by the Atomic Physics simulation package.
    Used in S2B to estimate coolant population loss (~3e-3 per sequence when interleaved with gates).
  • domain assumption The microwave near-field gradient (from the integrated waveguide) provides sufficient spin-motion coupling to drive resolved sidebands without disturbing the data qubit.
    Required for the sideband cooling mechanism; characterized in the trap described in Ref. [42].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Microwave-driven same-species sympathetic cooling for trapped ions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/METLHQXU

@misc{pith2026260720292,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Microwave-driven same-species sympathetic cooling for trapped ions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/METLHQXU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20292}
}
abstract

Sympathetic cooling of data qubits by coolant ions is an essential technique for trapped-ion quantum computing. Conventionally a second ion species is used, requiring additional lasers and complicating optical setups. We propose a scheme for sympathetic cooling using the same species and test it for $^{43}$Ca$^+$ ions. Pulsed sideband cooling and ion addressing are implemented via integrated microwave control, further simplifying optical requirements. We cool a two-ion gate mode close to its ground state ($\bar{n}\approx 0.16$) and benchmark an induced error on the data qubit of $1.7(4)\times 10^{-4}$ per cooling cycle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20292 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    M. C. Smith, A. D. Leu, K. Miyanishi, M. F. Gely, and D. M. Lucas, Single-qubit gates with errors at the 10 −7 level, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 230601 (2025)

    2025

  2. [2]

    Srinivas, S

    R. Srinivas, S. C. Burd, H. M. Knaack, R. T. Sutherland, A. Kwiatkowski, S. Glancy, E. Knill, D. J. Wineland, D. Leibfried, A. C. Wilson, D. T. C. Allcock, and D. H. Slichter, High-fidelity laser-free universal control of trapped ion qubits, Nature597, 209 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    C. R. Clark, H. N. Tinkey, B. C. Sawyer, A. M. Meier, K. A. Burkhardt, C. M. Seck, C. M. Shappert, N. D. Guise, C. E. Volin, S. D. Fallek, H. T. Hayden, W. G. Rel- lergert, and K. R. Brown, High-fidelity Bell-state prepa- ration with 40Ca+ optical qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 130505 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    A. C. Hughes, R. Srinivas, C. M. L¨ oschnauer, H. M. Knaack, R. Matt, C. J. Ballance, M. Malinowski, T. P. Harty, and R. T. Sutherland, Trapped-ion two-qubit gates with>99.99% fidelity without ground-state cool- ing (2025), arXiv:2510.17286

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    A. S. Sotirova, J. D. Leppard, A. Vazquez-Brennan, S. M. Decoppet, F. Pokorny, M. Malinowski, and C. J. Bal- lance, High-fidelity heralded quantum state preparation and measurement (2024), arXiv:2409.05805

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    F. A. An, A. Ransford, A. Schaffer, L. R. Sletten, J. Gae- bler, J. Hostetter, and G. Vittorini, High fidelity state preparation and measurement of ion hyperfine qubits withI >1/2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 130501 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Ransford, C

    A. Ransford, C. Roman, T. Dellaert, P. McMillin, and W. C. Campbell, Weak dissipation for high-fidelity qubit- state preparation and measurement, Phys. Rev. A104, L060402 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    T. P. Harty, D. T. C. Allcock, C. J. Ballance, L. Guidoni, H. A. Janacek, N. M. Linke, D. N. Stacey, and D. M. Lu- cas, High-fidelity preparation, gates, memory, and read- out of a trapped-ion quantum bit, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 220501 (2014)

    2014

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    E. T. Campbell, B. M. Terhal, and C. Vuillot, Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation, Nature549, 172 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Quantum computations with cold trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 4091 (1995)

    1995

  3. [11]

    Mølmer and A

    K. Mølmer and A. Sørensen, Multiparticle entanglement of hot trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1835 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    Sørensen and K

    A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Entanglement and quantum computation with ions in thermal motion, Phys. Rev. A 62, 022311 (2000)

    2000

  5. [13]

    Tyler Sutherland and M

    R. Tyler Sutherland and M. Foss-Feig, Laser-free trapped ion entangling gates with AESE: adiabatic elimination of spin-motion entanglement, New J. Phys.26, 013013 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    R. T. Sutherland, Q. Yu, K. M. Beck, and H. H¨ affner, One- and two-qubit gate infidelities due to motional er- rors in trapped ions and electrons, Phys. Rev. A105, 022437 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Brownnutt, M

    M. Brownnutt, M. Kumph, P. Rabl, and R. Blatt, Ion- trap measurements of electric-field noise near surfaces, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1419 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Kielpinski, C

    D. Kielpinski, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Architec- ture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer, Nature 417, 709 (2002)

    2002

  9. [17]

    S. A. Moses, C. H. Baldwin, M. S. Allman, R. An- cona, L. Ascarrunz, C. Barnes, J. Bartolotta, B. Bjork, P. Blanchard, M. Bohn, J. G. Bohnet, N. C. Brown, N. Q. Burdick, W. C. Burton, S. L. Campbell, J. P. Campora, C. Carron, J. Chambers, J. W. Chan, Y. H. Chen, A. Chernoguzov...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Kielpinski, B

    D. Kielpinski, B. E. King, C. J. Myatt, C. A. Sack- ett, Q. A. Turchette, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, D. J. Wineland, and W. H. Zurek, Sympathetic cooling of trapped ions for quantum logic, Phys. Rev. A61, 032310 (2000)

    2000

  11. [19]

    Rohde, S

    H. Rohde, S. T. Gulde, C. F. Roos, P. A. Barton, D. Leibfried, J. Eschner, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and R. Blatt, Sympathetic ground-state cooling and coherent manipu- lation with two-ion crystals, J. Opt. B: Quantum and Semiclass. Opt.3, S34 (2001)

    2001

  12. [20]

    M. D. Barrett, B. DeMarco, T. Schaetz, V. Meyer, D. Leibfried, J. Britton, J. Chiaverini, W. M. Itano, B. Jelenkovi´ c, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, T. Rosenband, and D. J. Wineland, Sympathetic cooling of 9Be+ and 24Mg+ for quantum logic, Phys. Rev. A68, 042302 (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    Rosenband, P

    T. Rosenband, P. O. Schmidt, D. B. Hume, W. M. Itano, T. M. Fortier, J. E. Stalnaker, K. Kim, S. A. Diddams, J. C. J. Koelemeij, J. C. Bergquist, and D. J. Wineland, Observation of the 1S0 →3 P0 clock transition in 27Al+, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 220801 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    J. P. Home, M. J. McDonnell, D. J. Szwer, B. C. Keitch, D. M. Lucas, D. N. Stacey, and A. M. Steane, Memory coherence of a sympathetically cooled trapped-ion qubit, Phys. Rev. A79, 050305 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    B. B. Blinov, L. Deslauriers, P. Lee, M. J. Mad- sen, R. Miller, and C. Monroe, Sympathetic cooling of 6 trapped Cd + isotopes, Phys. Rev. A65, 040304 (2002)

    2002

  16. [24]

    Imajo, K

    H. Imajo, K. Hayasaka, R. Ohmukai, U. Tanaka, M. Watanabe, and S. Urabe, High-resolution ultraviolet spectra of sympathetically-laser-cooled Cd + ions, Phys. Rev. A53, 122 (1996)

    1996

  17. [25]

    B. Roth, U. Fr¨ ohlich, and S. Schiller, Sympathetic cooling of 4He+ ions in a radio-frequency trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 053001 (2005)

    2005

  18. [26]

    Gruber, J

    L. Gruber, J. P. Holder, J. Steiger, B. R. Beck, H. E. De- Witt, J. Glassman, J. W. McDonald, D. A. Church, and D. Schneider, Evidence for highly charged ion coulomb crystallization in multicomponent strongly coupled plas- mas, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 636 (2001)

    2001

  19. [27]

    Schiller, Hydrogenlike highly charged ions for tests of the time independence of fundamental constants, Phys

    S. Schiller, Hydrogenlike highly charged ions for tests of the time independence of fundamental constants, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 180801 (2007)

    2007

  20. [28]

    Drewsen, Cooling, identification and spectroscopy of super-heavy element ions, Eur

    M. Drewsen, Cooling, identification and spectroscopy of super-heavy element ions, Eur. Phys. J. D45, 125 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    B. Roth, P. Blythe, H. Daerr, L. Patacchini, and S. Schiller, Production of ultracold diatomic and tri- atomic molecular ions of spectroscopic and astrophysi- cal interest, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.39, S1241 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    B. Roth, J. C. J. Koelemeij, H. Daerr, and S. Schiller, Rovibrational spectroscopy of trapped molecular hydro- gen ions at millikelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. A74, 040501 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Willitsch, M

    S. Willitsch, M. T. Bell, A. D. Gingell, and T. P. Soft- ley, Chemical applications of laser- and sympathetically- cooled ions in ion traps, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.10, 7200 (2008)

    2008

  24. [32]

    A. D. Gingell, M. T. Bell, J. M. Oldham, T. P. Softley, and J. N. Harvey, Cold chemistry with electronically ex- cited Ca+ coulomb crystals, J. Chem. Phys.133, 194302 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    P. F. Staanum, K. Højbjerre, R. Wester, and M. Drewsen, Probing isotope effects in chemical reactions using single ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 243003 (2008)

    2008

  26. [34]

    Morigi and H

    G. Morigi and H. Walther, Two-species coulomb chains for quantum information, Eur. Phys. J. D13, 261 (2001)

    2001

  27. [35]

    P.-Y. Hou, J. J. Wu, S. D. Erickson, G. Zarantonello, A. D. Brandt, D. C. Cole, A. C. Wilson, D. H. Slichter, and D. Leibfried, Indirect cooling of weakly coupled trapped-ion mechanical oscillators, Phys. Rev. X14, 021003 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    D. T. C. Allcock, W. C. Campbell, J. Chiaverini, I. L. Chuang, E. R. Hudson, I. D. Moore, A. Ransford, C. Ro- man, J. M. Sage, and D. J. Wineland, omg blueprint for trapped ion quantum computing with metastable states, Appl. Phys. Lett.119, 214002 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Sriarunothai, G

    T. Sriarunothai, G. S. Giri, S. W¨ olk, and C. Wunderlich, Radio frequency sideband cooling and sympathetic cool- ing of trapped ions in a static magnetic field gradient, J. Mod. Opt.65, 560 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Knill, D

    E. Knill, D. Leibfried, R. Reichle, J. Britton, R. B. Blakestad, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, R. Ozeri, S. Seidelin, and D. J. Wineland, Randomized benchmarking of quan- tum gates, Phys. Rev. A77, 012307 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    P. J. J. O’Malley, J. Kelly, R. Barends, B. Camp- bell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. G. Fowler, I.-C. Hoi, E. Jeffrey, A. Megrant, J. Mu- tus, C. Neill, C. Quintana, P. Roushan, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, A. N. Korotkov, A. N. Cleland, an...

    2015

  32. [40]

    M. A. Sepiol, A. C. Hughes, J. E. Tarlton, D. P. Nadlinger, T. G. Ballance, C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, A. M. Steane, J. F. Goodwin, and D. M. Lucas, Probing qubit memory errors at the part-per-million level, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 110503 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    J. M. Epstein, A. W. Cross, E. Magesan, and J. M. Gam- betta, Investigating the limits of randomized benchmark- ing protocols, Phys. Rev. A89, 062321 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    M. A. Weber, C. L¨ oschnauer, J. Wolf, M. F. Gely, R. K. Hanley, J. F. Goodwin, C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, and D. M. Lucas, Cryogenic ion trap system for high-fidelity near-field microwave-driven quantum logic, Quantum Sci. Technol.9, 015007 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    See supplemental material for additional information about the experiments and simulations included in this work

  36. [44]

    D. T. C. Allcock, T. P. Harty, M. A. Sepiol, H. A. Janacek, C. J. Ballance, A. M. Steane, D. M. Lucas, and D. N. Stacey, Dark-resonance doppler cooling and high fluorescence in trapped Ca-43 ions at intermediate magnetic field, New J. Phys.18, 023043 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    A. D. Leu, M. F. Gely, M. A. Weber, M. C. Smith, D. P. Nadlinger, and D. M. Lucas, Fast, high-fidelity ad- dressed single-qubit gates using efficient composite pulse sequences, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 120601 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Diedrich, J

    F. Diedrich, J. C. Bergquist, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Laser cooling to the zero-point energy of mo- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 403 (1989)

    1989

  39. [47]

    C. Roos, T. Zeiger, H. Rohde, H. C. N¨ agerl, J. Eschner, D. Leibfried, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and R. Blatt, Quantum state engineering on an optical transition and decoher- ence in a paul trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4713 (1999)

    1999

  40. [48]

    B. E. King, C. S. Wood, C. J. Myatt, Q. A. Turchette, D. Leibfried, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Cooling the collective motion of trapped ions to initialize a quantum register, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1525 (1998)

    1998

  41. [49]

    Monroe, D

    C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4714 (1995)

    1995

  42. [50]

    Marzoli, J

    I. Marzoli, J. I. Cirac, R. Blatt, and P. Zoller, Laser cool- ing of trapped three-level ions: Designing two-level sys- tems for sideband cooling, Phys. Rev. A49, 2771 (1994)

    1994

  43. [51]

    Ospelkaus, U

    C. Ospelkaus, U. Warring, Y. Colombe, K. R. Brown, J. M. Amini, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Mi- crowave quantum logic gates for trapped ions, Nature 476, 181 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Khromova, C

    A. Khromova, C. Piltz, B. Scharfenberger, T. F. Gloger, M. Johanning, A. F. Var´ on, and C. Wunderlich, Designer spin pseudomolecule implemented with trapped ions in a magnetic gradient, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 220502 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Weidt, J

    S. Weidt, J. Randall, S. C. Webster, E. D. Standing, A. Rodriguez, A. E. Webb, B. Lekitsch, and W. K. Hensinger, Ground-state cooling of a trapped ion using long-wavelength radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 013002 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    M. A. Weber, M. F. Gely, R. K. Hanley, T. P. Harty, A. D. Leu, C. M. L¨ oschnauer, D. P. Nadlinger, and D. M. Lucas, Robust and fast microwave-driven quantum logic for trapped-ion qubits, Phys. Rev. A110, L010601 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    E. L. Hahn, Spin echoes, Phys. Rev.80, 580 (1950). 7

    1950

  48. [56]

    Kabytayev, T

    C. Kabytayev, T. J. Green, K. Khodjasteh, M. J. Bier- cuk, L. Viola, and K. R. Brown, Robustness of composite pulses to time-dependent control noise, Phys. Rev. A90, 012316 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    K. R. Brown, A. W. Harrow, and I. L. Chuang, Arbitrar- ily accurate composite pulse sequences, Phys. Rev. A70, 052318 (2004)

    2004

  50. [58]

    Ranawat, J

    K. Ranawat, J. Yu, A. V. Horn, J. Whitlow, K. R. Brown, and J. Kim, Sympathetic cooling in trapped ions with spectral selectivity via the Zeeman shift (2026), arXiv:2605.27577

    2026 arXiv

  51. [59]

    A. H. Myerson, D. J. Szwer, S. C. Webster, D. T. C. Allcock, M. J. Curtis, G. Imreh, J. A. Sherman, D. N. Stacey, A. M. Steane, and D. M. Lucas, High-fidelity readout of trapped-ion qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 200502 (2008)

    2008

  52. [60]

    8 Supplementary information The sections of the supplementary information each provide details on a figure of the main text

    Atomic Physics, GitHub repository. 8 Supplementary information The sections of the supplementary information each provide details on a figure of the main text. In section S1, we provide a more detailed overview of the sympathetic cooling scheme shown in Fig. 1, as well as our ...

  53. [61]

    Both ions are subjected to dark-resonance Doppler cooling [44]. Since the two-ion lifetime in this trap is limited to∼2 minutes, we keep data and coolant ions in separate wells during this process, shuttling the ions to the centre of the trap to be laser-cooled in turn. All mo...

  54. [62]

    Both ions are first prepared in the state|4,4⟩through microwave-enhanced optical pumping [8]

    Electronic state preparation is carried out after merging the two single-ion wells. Both ions are first prepared in the state|4,4⟩through microwave-enhanced optical pumping [8]

  55. [63]

    The electronic states of both ions are then transferred to|3,1⟩using MW transfer pulses acting identically on both ions

  56. [64]

    [45] is subsequently used to transfer the data ion to the state|4,1⟩ whilst the coolant ion remains in the state|3,1⟩

    The addressing scheme outlined in Ref. [45] is subsequently used to transfer the data ion to the state|4,1⟩ whilst the coolant ion remains in the state|3,1⟩. Here, DC voltages applied to on-chip electrodes rotate the ion crystal within the near-field microwave amplitude gradie...

  57. [65]

    At this stage, sympathetic cooling combined with either data qubit manipulations or Raman sideband thermometry are carried out

    Finally, MW transfer pulses are used to transfer the coolant ion to|3,2⟩and the data ion to|3,1⟩, which ends the state-preparation sequence. At this stage, sympathetic cooling combined with either data qubit manipulations or Raman sideband thermometry are carried out

  58. [66]

    Dark-resonance cooling 3 ms 440 μs 740 μs 280 μs 280 μs 740 μs 440 μs 3 ms 2 ms 100 μs 16 μs 200 μs 100 μs 550 μs 550 μs Trapping poten�al

  59. [67]

    MW transfer Sympathe�c cooling, data qubit manipula�on, Raman sideband driving

  60. [68]

    Readout4

    Shelving 7. Readout4. Addressed pulse FIG. S1.Overview of state-preparation and measurement sequence.The individual steps follow the numbering used in the written description above and schematically show the use of single-ion wells, or twisted/untwisted two-ion wells with data...

  61. [69]

    The population in|4,4⟩is then shelved to the metastable 5D 5/2 level using 393 nm and 850 nm laser pulses [59]

    The readout sequence first consists of MW transfer pulses to transfer a desired state in either the data qubit (for interleaved benchmarking measurements), or the coolant ion (for thermometry), to the state|4,4⟩. The population in|4,4⟩is then shelved to the metastable 5D 5/2 l...

  62. [70]

    cooled” population, with the “remaining

    At this stage the ions are split into two wells, and are subjected one after the other to the Doppler cooling beams, whereupon the state of each ion is inferred from the fluorescence level. Lastly, either the process starts anew for further data acquisition, or the ions are ke...

  63. [71]

    A 729 nmπ-pulse (13µs) is driven on the transition|4S 1/2,4,4⟩to|3D 5/2,6,6⟩

  64. [72]

    remaining

    A MWπ-pulse is applied to transfer the “remaining” population from|3,3⟩to|4,4⟩

  65. [73]

    The population in the state |4P3/2,5,5⟩will (mostly) decay back to the state|4S 1/2,4,4⟩, emitting a 393 nm photon

    An 854 nm pulse (2µs) is driven on the transition|3D 5/2,6,6⟩to|4P 3/2,5,5⟩. The population in the state |4P3/2,5,5⟩will (mostly) decay back to the state|4S 1/2,4,4⟩, emitting a 393 nm photon. However, during this process, some of the population in the state|4P 3/2,5,5⟩may dec...

  66. [74]

    sideband compensation

    Lastly, an 850 nm pulse (2µs) is applied on the transition|3D 3/2,5,5⟩to|4P 3/2,5,5⟩to empty population which has become trapped in the D 3/2 manifold. S2. MICROW A VE-DRIVEN SIDEBAND COOLING In this section, we give further details on the microwave-driven resolved sideband co...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.