Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards Human-Centric Autonomous Driving: A Fast-Slow Architecture Integrating Large Language Model Guidance with Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.06875 v1 pith:MFORRRIW submitted 2025-05-11 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords drivingdecisionframeworkguidanceuserachievingagentarchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous driving has made significant strides through data-driven techniques, achieving robust performance in standardized tasks. However, existing methods frequently overlook user-specific preferences, offering limited scope for interaction and adaptation with users. To address these challenges, we propose a "fast-slow" decision-making framework that integrates a Large Language Model (LLM) for high-level instruction parsing with a Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent for low-level real-time decision. In this dual system, the LLM operates as the "slow" module, translating user directives into structured guidance, while the RL agent functions as the "fast" module, making time-critical maneuvers under stringent latency constraints. By decoupling high-level decision making from rapid control, our framework enables personalized user-centric operation while maintaining robust safety margins. Experimental evaluations across various driving scenarios demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Compared to baseline algorithms, the proposed architecture not only reduces collision rates but also aligns driving behaviors more closely with user preferences, thereby achieving a human-centric mode. By integrating user guidance at the decision level and refining it with real-time control, our framework bridges the gap between individual passenger needs and the rigor required for safe, reliable driving in complex traffic environments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cognitive Dual-Process Planning for Autonomous Driving with Structured Scene Knowledge and Verifiable Reasoning-Action Consistency

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dual-process VLM planner routes easy scenes to fast prediction and hard scenes to structured reasoning with rule-verified consistency rewards, reaching 80.14% planning accuracy and 97.20% LCS on a manually verified ...

  2. Driving Like Yourself: A Benchmark for Closed-Loop Personalized End-to-End Autonomous Driving

    cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Person2Drive is a new benchmark that generates personalized driving datasets via simulation, quantifies styles with MMD and KL metrics, and adapts E2E-AD models using a style reward framework.

  3. Interactive Adversarial Testing of Autonomous Vehicles with Adjustable Confrontation Intensity

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    ExamPPO trains an adversarial surrounding vehicle with a confrontation-intensity dial and attention-based policy, producing graded, scenario-adaptive failures in simulated AV policies.

  4. A Review of Learning-Based Motion Planning: Toward a Data-Driven Optimal Control Approach

    cs.RO 2025-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A position/review paper argues data-driven model predictive control is the best route to safe, adaptive, human-like autonomous-driving motion planning, but provides no new derivation or experiment.

Pith tools