REVIEW 1 cited by
On the massless tree-level S-matrix in 2d sigma models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Motivated by the search for new integrable string models, we study the properties of massless tree-level S-matrices for 2d sigma models expanded near the trivial vacuum. We find that, in contrast to the standard massive case, there is no apparent link between massless S-matrices and integrability: in well-known integrable models the tree-level massless S-matrix fails to factorize and exhibits particle production. Such tree-level particle production is found in several classically integrable models: the principal chiral model, its classically equivalent "pseudo-dual" model, its non-abelian dual model and also the SO(N+1)/SO(N) coset model. The connection to integrability may, in principle, be restored if one expands near a non-trivial vacuum with massive excitations. We discuss IR ambiguities in 2d massless tree-level amplitudes and their resolution using either a small mass parameter or the i epsilon-regularization. In general, these ambiguities can lead to anomalies in the equivalence of the S-matrix under field redefinitions, and may be linked to the observed particle production in integrable models. We also comment on the transformation of massless S-matrices under sigma model T-duality, comparing the standard and the "doubled" formulations (with T-duality covariance built into the latter).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Particle production in a light-cone gauge fixed Jordanian deformation of $AdS_5\times S^5$
In the light-cone gauge-fixed Jordanian deformation of AdS5×S5, on-shell cubic vertices produce nonzero 1-to-2 and 2-to-1 scattering processes, indicating particle production.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.