Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Constraint evolution in first-order viscous relativistic fluids

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read All constraints of the BDNK first-order viscous fluid reduction satisfy a strongly hyperbolic homogeneous system, so initially satisfied constraints persist for all times, and simulations stay stable.

desk verdict First full constraint-propagation analysis for the BDNK conformal reduction, with a plausible strong-hyperbolicity proof, but the central derivation is asserted and the source terms have an index inconsistency that needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06430 v2 pith:MJGML4FY submitted 2025-06-06 gr-qc

Delfina Fantini , Marcelo E. Rubio This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 35L4535L6035Q7576Y05 PACS 47.75.+f
keywords relativisticviscoushydrodynamicsBDNKfirst-ordertheoryconstraintpropagationstronghyperbolicitywell-posednessconformalfluidsnumericalrelativityalgebraicanddifferentialconstraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper fills a gap in the theory of first-order relativistic viscous fluids: whether the algebraic and differential constraints used to reduce the BDNK equations to first order remain satisfied once they hold at one instant. The authors show that these constraints obey their own homogeneous evolution system and prove that this system is strongly hyperbolic, which makes the identically zero constraint configuration the unique solution for zero initial data. They then evolve plane-symmetric configurations in flat spacetime and report that the constraint residuals stay small and stable, settling near zero after a short transient. If correct, the result turns the BDNK first-order reduction into a sound starting point for numerical simulations of dissipative relativistic fluids, not just a well-posedness proof.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $31\times 31$ principal symbol $M_a{}^A{}_B$ of the constraint system and its characteristic polynomial $p(w)=\det\big((w_a-w t_a)M_a{}^A{}_B\big)$. Its factorisation yields the repeated eigenvalue $w_{29}=u_a w^a/(u_c t^c)$ and the pair $w_{\pm}$; the load-bearing checks are the reality condition $E^2_{wt}>E_{ww}E_{tt}$, equivalent to $\eta<\lambda$ and consistent with the stability conditions on the transport coefficients, and the 29-dimensional eigenspace computed in the appendix. Strong hyperbolicity of the homogeneous system is what upgrades 'zero is a solution' into 'zero is the unique solution with zero initial data'.

What would settle it

Recompute the time derivatives of the 31 constraints directly from (7)-(12) and check whether the principal part and the linear-or-quadratic structure of the source terms match (21)-(27) with the stated $v_i$; any omitted term that is not homogeneous, or any change in $M_a{}^A{}_B$, would invalidate the conclusion. Numerically, seed initial data that satisfy the fluid equations but violate the constraints by a small perturbation and look for exponential growth of the constraint residuals rather than bounded, stationary behavior.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the complete set of constraints (14)-(20) of the BDNK first-order reduction --- the unit-norm and orthogonality conditions on the four-velocity, plus the differential definitions of heat flux and velocity-gradient variables --- forms a homogeneous first-order quasi-linear system (21)-(27). The paper computes the $31\times 31$ principal part and shows that the characteristic polynomial factorises as $[u_a(w^a-w t^a)]^{29}\{[u_a(w^a-w t^a)]^2-(\eta/\lambda)\bar{\Pi}_{ab}(w^a-w t^a)(w^b-w t^b)\}$, giving eigenvalues $w_{29}$ and $w_{\pm}$, all real when $\eta<\lambda$, with eigenspaces of dimensions 29, 1, and 1 that span the whole space. Strong hyperbolicity plus homogeneity means that the identically zero constraint configuration is the unique solution for zero initial data, so the fluid equations themselves preserve the constraints. Numerical evolutions of plane-symmetric smooth data confirm that the two differential constraints, measured by $L^2$ norms, settle to stationary values close to zero after a short transient.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing step is the algebraic reduction that turns the fluid equations (7)-(12) into the constraint evolution system (21)-(27); the paper states that 'one can show' this and gives only the final source terms, so if that reduction is wrong, the strong-hyperbolicity proof would apply to a different system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Constraint preservation becomes a consequence of the fluid equations themselves: initial data satisfying (14)-(20) continue to satisfy them for all times, so no extra constraint projection step is needed during evolution.
  • The local well-posedness result for the conformal BDNK system in Sobolev spaces is reinforced by showing that the full constraint set is itself locally well-posed.
  • Uniform-velocity configurations with non-constant temperature are ruled out for conformally invariant fluids.
  • Plane-symmetric numerical evolutions with smooth Gaussian data show constraint residuals whose $L^2$ norms remain bounded and settle near zero after a short transient.
  • Convergence tests show the expected second-order spatial scaling for the constraints, indicating that the observed preservation is consistent with an accurate discretization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The homogeneity of the constraint system leaves open a practical route the paper does not pursue: adding constraint-damping terms to (21)-(27) that are lower order in the constraints would not alter the principal part, so it could suppress numerical violations without giving up hyperbolicity.
  • The factorisation of the characteristic polynomial suggests that the ratio $\eta/\lambda$ controls the geometry of constraint propagation; testing the boundary case $\eta=\lambda$ could reveal whether the 29-dimensional eigenspace degenerates.
  • Since only plane-symmetric, flat, smooth configurations are simulated, a natural next test is to seed small constraint violations in 3D or curved spacetimes and check whether the $L^2$ norms still settle toward zero.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the constraint-propagation problem for the first-order reduction of conformally invariant BDNK viscous relativistic fluids introduced in [65]. The authors identify a 31-component constraint system consisting of the algebraic constraints (14)-(18) and the differential constraints (19)-(20). They claim that these constraints obey a homogeneous first-order quasi-linear evolution system (21)-(27), that the principal part of this system is strongly hyperbolic with a 29-fold eigenvalue and two simple real eigenvalues, and that therefore vanishing initial constraints remain zero throughout the evolution. The paper then presents plane-symmetric numerical evolutions of the BDNK equations, monitoring two components of the differential constraints plus convergence tests in space and time.

Significance. If the analytic result is correct, it fills a real gap in the BDNK program: local well-posedness was proved in [65] without explicitly analyzing propagation of the constraints needed for the first-order reduction, and the present paper would supply exactly that missing ingredient. The hyperbolicity computation is compact and parameter-free, depending only on the BDNK inequalities (13), and the numerical experiments are a reasonable first exploration of constraint stability. The main reservation is that the derivation of the constraint evolution system is not actually displayed, and a concrete index inconsistency appears in the printed source terms; the central theorem is therefore currently supported by an unverified algebraic reduction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.A and Appendix A] The central claim of the paper rests on the assertion that the constraints (14)-(20) satisfy the evolution system (21)-(27), but the derivation is not shown. Section III.A states 'one can show' and refers to Appendix A for the source terms, without displaying any intermediate steps. Since the strong-hyperbolicity analysis in Section III.B is applied to the principal part of (21)-(27), any error in this reduction would mean that the proof targets a system different from the true constraint system. This is a load-bearing step, not a presentation detail. In addition, Eq. (A14) as printed is not index-consistent: the first two terms, u^a S_b C3 and S_b C5^a, carry a free lower index b, whereas the left-hand side v7^{ab} requires an upper b. The authors should provide a complete derivation or a computer-algebra verification of (21)-(27) and correct the source terms.
  2. [Section III.B and Appendix B] The proof of strong hyperbolicity depends on the claim that the eigenvalue w29 has a 29-dimensional eigenspace, but the verification in Appendix B is not usable as written. The displayed block matrix mixes blocks labeled '07×7' and '024×24' in a way that does not assemble into a 31×31 matrix, and the list of spanning vectors does not obviously contain 29 vectors. Since the completeness of the eigenspaces is exactly what distinguishes strong hyperbolicity from mere weak hyperbolicity, this computation needs to be rewritten cleanly so that the nullity of N^A_B is actually verified for every relevant covector.
  3. [Section V.B, Eqs. (36)-(37)] The numerical section monitors only the two plane-symmetric components CQ1 and CS11 of the differential constraints C6 and C7. It does not follow the full 31-component constraint system, nor does it monitor the algebraic constraints C1-C5 directly. The text does explain in Section IV.A that the algebraic constraints are used to reduce the number of evolution variables, so the omission may be acceptable for an exploratory study, but the paper should state explicitly that the numerical evidence is partial and is not a substitute for the analytic constraint-propagation proof.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III.B, Eq. (30)] The sentence 'p(w) \equiv 0 if and only if ...' should read 'p(w) = 0 if and only if ...'; the identical-equality symbol is not what is meant.
  2. [Section IV.C and V.C] The numerical convergence tests in Figure 4 and the surrounding text are reported as supporting second-order convergence of the constraints, but the figure shows only the difference between resolutions, not the ratio itself; adding the measured convergence factor would make the claim easier to verify.
  3. [Section II, Eq. (13)] The relation between the inequality (13) and the condition η < λ used in Section III.B is asserted but not derived; a short derivation would help the reader see that (13) indeed implies a2 > 1 and hence η < λ.
  4. [Appendix C] The uniform-velocity argument in Appendix C is a separate application and is not needed for the main theorem; if kept, it should be clearly marked as a physical consequence rather than as part of the proof of constraint preservation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the constraint-propagation system is derived from the fluid equations themselves, the strong-hyperbolicity proof is a direct computation on that system, and the numerical results are self-validated rather than fitted.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the algebraic and differential constraints (14)-(20) of the BDNK first-order reduction satisfy the homogeneous evolution system (21)-(27), and that this system is strongly hyperbolic, so that zero initial constraints remain zero. This is the standard, non-circular way to prove constraint preservation. The derivation of (21)-(27) is asserted through 'one can show' and only the final source terms are listed in Appendix A, so the intermediate algebra is not displayed; however, nothing in the text defines the constraints in terms of the evolution system or fits any parameter to the claimed result. The source terms v_i are explicitly homogeneous functions of the constraints, so the zero state is a solution of (21)-(27), and uniqueness is then established independently by the strong-hyperbolicity calculation: the characteristic polynomial (30), the reality of the eigenvalues under the stated transport-coefficient conditions, and the eigenspace dimension count 29+1+1 in Appendix B. The transport-coefficient inequalities (13) are imported from BDNK [65] as stated assumptions, not derived from the present result, and the inequality eta < lambda used for eigenvalue reality follows from those assumptions; this is not circular. The numerical section is a validation exercise: initial data are constructed to satisfy (33)-(34) by construction, the constraints are then evolved and monitored, and convergence tests are performed. No constraint quantity is fitted to produce the reported stability, and no prediction is equivalent to an input by construction. The only co-authored references ([39], [44]) provide background and numerical context and are not load-bearing for the constraint-propagation proof. The abbreviated 'one can show' step is an exposition and verifiability gap, not a circular step; under the reviewing rule it is noted as a correctness risk but does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. It relies on the BDNK reduction as given in [65], on standard hyperbolicity theory, and on the flat-spacetime assumption. The numerical tests use chosen amplitudes and grid parameters, but these are not fitted to achieve the reported stability.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The BDNK first-order reduction (7)-(12) is a correct formulation of conformal viscous fluid dynamics in flat spacetime.
    All derivations start from this system; the paper does not re-derive it, citing [65].
  • standard math Fields are smooth enough (Sobolev regularity) for the strong-hyperbolicity well-posedness theorem to apply.
    The paper invokes standard results linking strong hyperbolicity to local well-posedness in Sobolev spaces (Section I).
  • domain assumption Covariant derivatives commute in Minkowski spacetime, so no curvature terms appear in the constraint derivation.
    The BDNK reduction and constraint evolution are computed in flat spacetime; the paper notes that curvature terms would appear when coupled to gravity (Section VI).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraint evolution in first-order viscous relativistic fluids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MJGML4FY

@misc{pith2026250606430,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraint evolution in first-order viscous relativistic fluids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MJGML4FY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06430}
}
read the original abstract

Relativistic hydrodynamics provides a solid framework for evolving matter and energy in a wide variety of phenomena. Nevertheless, the inclusion of dissipative effects in realistic scenarios through causal, stable, and well-posed theories still constitutes an open problem. In this paper, we study the evolution of the algebraic and differential constraints stemmed from the first-order reduction proposed by Bemfica, Disconzi, Noronha and Kovtun (BDNK), for proving the local well-posedness of conformally-invariant viscous fluids in Sobolev spaces. First, we show analytically that the whole set of constraints satisfies a homogeneous, strongly-hyperbolic system of equations, ensuring a correct propagation as a consequence of the fluid equations. Motivated by this result, we explore their numerical stability by performing simulations of the BDNK reduction restricted to plane-symmetric configurations, in flat spacetime. We report on different initial data sets initially satisfying the constraints, and whose evolution leads to stable configurations. This result suggests that the proposed reduction by BDNK is suitable for numerical evolutions, keeping the constraints accurate under small numerical errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06430 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The analogous result for convergence in space is shown in the left panel. In this second test, we instead fixed the time step to ∆t = 0.001, considered three dif￾ferent spatial resolutions: N1 = 8001 (low), N2 = 16001 (mid) and N3 = 32001 (high), and computed the same convergence ratio. In this case, the result yields the ac￾curacy order of the chosen finite difference operator, and is reported in the left panel of … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Relativistic Dispersion Spectra across Lorentz boosted frames: Spurious modes and the enigma of causality

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Rest-frame dispersion modes can be mapped into Lorentz-boosted frames through a parametric re-parametrization; the boost-generated 'spurious' roots appear exactly when the mode count is not conserved, which the author...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [65]

    On constraint preservation and strong hyperbolicity,

    J. F. Abalos, “On constraint preservation and strong hyperbolicity,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 39, no. 21, p. 215004, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Indeed, we displayed convergence tests both in time and space domains

    Convergence tests In order to assess the validity of our numerical scheme, we performed several convergence tests, verifying the ac- curacy of the methods here used. Indeed, we displayed convergence tests both in time and space domains. As it was pointed out in the previous sections, for the time integration we implemented a fourth-order Runge-Kutta schem...

  3. [2]

    GUVIRP - Gravity tests in the UltraViolet and InfraRed with Pulsar timing

    Convergence of the constraints As a final consistency check of our scheme, we per- formed a convergence test for the differential constraints, in a similar way that is was done for the evolution vari- ables, with the scope to quantify how better the con- straints propagate when increasing the numerical reso- lution (and thus, decreasing the numerical trun...

    2022

  4. [3]

    (A7) Also, following the definition of the tensor Babcd given by the authors right after their Eq

    LOTs of the full evolution system The functions ri = r1, · · ·, r6 are to be written only as algebraic functions of the evolution variables {A, Qa, Sa, Sab, θ, ua}, and were computed to be r1 = 4 3 AS + QaSa − 1 2 ησ 2 + 4εo 3χ A θ4 ; (A1) ra 2 = 4 ASa − η 3ScSc a − 2SS a − 3Sb cSc bua +9ησ abSb − 3QbSbua + 3SQa +3QbSb a + 4εo λ θ4Qa − 9η λ σabQb ; (A2) r...

  5. [4]

    (14)-(20)

    LOTs of the constraint evolution system For the case of the functions vi = v1, · · ·, v7, they should be algebraic functions of the evolution variables {A, Qa, Sa, Sab, θ, ua} but also of the constraints Ci, which were introduced in Eqs. (14)-(20). The explicit 13 form of them is v1 = −2C3 ; (A8) v2 = ηSabSab − QaSa C1 + S + 4ϵ 3λ C2 + A + 2 3 ηS C3 − 3η ...

  6. [5]

    Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger,

    B. P. Abbott et. al., “Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 848, p. L12, oct 2017

    2017

  7. [6]

    Gw170817: Observation of gravita- tional waves from a binary neutron star inspiral,

    B. P. Abbott et. al., “Gw170817: Observation of gravita- tional waves from a binary neutron star inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 119, p. 161101, Oct 2017

    2017

  8. [7]

    An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM De- tection of GRB 170817A,

    A. Goldstein et al. , “An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM De- tection of GRB 170817A,” Astrophys. J. Lett. , vol. 848, no. 2, p. L14, 2017

    2017

Show all 98 references
  1. [8]

    INTEGRAL Detection of the First Prompt Gamma-Ray Signal Coincident with the Gravitational-wave Event GW170817,

    V. Savchenko et. al., “INTEGRAL Detection of the First Prompt Gamma-Ray Signal Coincident with the Gravitational-wave Event GW170817,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 848, p. L15, Oct. 2017

    2017

  2. [9]

    Strong constraints on cosmological grav- ity from gw170817 and grb 170817a,

    T. Baker, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller, and I. Sawicki, “Strong constraints on cosmological grav- ity from gw170817 and grb 170817a,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 119, p. 251301, Dec 2017

    2017

  3. [10]

    Observables and unobservables in dark en- ergy cosmologies,

    L. Amendola, M. Kunz, M. Motta, I. D. Saltas, and I. Sawicki, “Observables and unobservables in dark en- ergy cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 87, p. 023501, Jan 2013

    2013

  4. [11]

    Measuring the speed of cosmological gravitational waves,

    M. Raveri, C. Baccigalupi, A. Silvestri, and S.-Y. Zhou, “Measuring the speed of cosmological gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 91, p. 061501, Mar 2015

    2015

  5. [12]

    Anisotropic stress as a signature of nonstandard propa- gation of gravitational waves,

    I. D. Saltas, I. Sawicki, L. Amendola, and M. Kunz, “Anisotropic stress as a signature of nonstandard propa- gation of gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 113, p. 191101, Nov 2014

    2014

  6. [13]

    Listening to the Universe with next generation ground-based gravitational-wave detectors,

    S. Borhanian and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Listening to the Universe with next generation ground-based gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 110, no. 8, p. 083040, 2024

    2024

  7. [14]

    Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs,

    M. Branchesi et al., “Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs,” JCAP, vol. 07, p. 068, 2023

    2023

  8. [15]

    Measuring tidal effects with the einstein telescope: A design study,

    A. Puecher, A. Samajdar, and T. Dietrich, “Measuring tidal effects with the einstein telescope: A design study,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 108, p. 023018, Jul 2023

    2023

  9. [16]

    Land- scape of stellar-mass black-hole spectroscopy with third- generation gravitational-wave detectors,

    S. Bhagwat, C. Pacilio, P. Pani, and M. Mapelli, “Land- scape of stellar-mass black-hole spectroscopy with third- generation gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 108, p. 043019, Aug 2023

    2023

  10. [17]

    Searching for primordial black holes with the einstein telescope: Impact of design and systematics,

    G. Franciolini, F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, M. Maggiore, 16 P. Pani, and A. Riotto, “Searching for primordial black holes with the einstein telescope: Impact of design and systematics,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 108, p. 043506, Aug 2023

    2023

  11. [18]

    Nuclear physics constraints from binary neutron star mergers in the einstein telescope era,

    F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, C. Mondal, A. Puecher, T. Dietrich, F. Gulminelli, M. Maggiore, and M. Oer- tel, “Nuclear physics constraints from binary neutron star mergers in the einstein telescope era,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 108, p. 122006, Dec 2023

    2023

  12. [19]

    Neutrino trapping and out-of-equilibrium effects in bi- nary neutron-star merger remnants,

    P. L. Espino, P. Hammond, D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, R. Gamba, F. Zappa, L. F. L. Micchi, and A. Perego, “Neutrino trapping and out-of-equilibrium effects in bi- nary neutron-star merger remnants,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 132, p. 211001, May 2024

    2024

  13. [20]

    Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions,

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, “Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. , vol. 68, pp. 339–376, 2018

    2018

  14. [21]

    Binary neutron star mergers: a review of Einstein’s richest laboratory,

    L. Baiotti and L. Rezzolla, “Binary neutron star mergers: a review of Einstein’s richest laboratory,” Rept. Prog. Phys., vol. 80, no. 9, p. 096901, 2017

    2017

  15. [22]

    Dark matter and the early Universe: a review,

    A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, “Dark matter and the early Universe: a review,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. , vol. 119, p. 103865, 2021

    2021

  16. [23]

    D. J. Acheson, Elementary fluid dynamics . Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1990

    1990

  17. [24]

    Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics

    G. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics . Cam- bridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  18. [25]

    Rezzolla and O

    L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti, Relativistic Hydrodynamics. Oxford University Press, 9 2013

    2013

  19. [26]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics: Volume 6 . No. v. 6, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1987

    1987

  20. [27]

    Doering and J

    C. Doering and J. Gibbon, Applied Analysis of the Navier-Stokes Equations . Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 1995

    1995

  21. [28]

    Relativis- tic Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei,

    R. Blandford, D. Meier, and A. Readhead, “Relativis- tic Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., vol. 57, pp. 467–509, 2019

    2019

  22. [29]

    Relativistic Jets of Blazars,

    T. Hovatta and E. Lindfors, “Relativistic Jets of Blazars,” New Astron. Rev. , vol. 87, p. 101541, 2019

    2019

  23. [30]

    Numerical simula- tions of relativistic jets,

    M. Perucho and J. L´ opez-Miralles, “Numerical simula- tions of relativistic jets,” J. Plasma Phys. , vol. 89, no. 5, p. 915890501, 2023

    2023

  24. [31]

    Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory,

    M. A. Abramowicz and P. C. Fragile, “Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory,” Living Rev. Rel. , vol. 16, p. 1, 2013

    2013

  25. [32]

    Binary neutron star mergers as the source of the highest energy cosmic rays,

    G. R. Farrar, “Binary neutron star mergers as the source of the highest energy cosmic rays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 134, p. 081003, Feb 2025

    2025

  26. [33]

    Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,

    P. Kovtun, “Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 45, p. 473001, Nov. 2012

    2012

  27. [34]

    Causal theories of dissipa- tive relativistic fluids,

    R. Geroch and L. Lindblom, “Causal theories of dissipa- tive relativistic fluids,” Annals of Physics, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 394–416, 1991

    1991

  28. [35]

    Relativistic theories of dissipative fluids,

    R. Geroch, “Relativistic theories of dissipative fluids,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 4226– 4241, 1995

    1995

  29. [36]

    The thermodynamics of irreversible pro- cesses. iii. relativistic theory of the simple fluid,

    C. Eckart, “The thermodynamics of irreversible pro- cesses. iii. relativistic theory of the simple fluid,” Phys. Rev., vol. 58, pp. 919–924, Nov 1940

    1940

  30. [37]

    Stability and causal- ity in dissipative relativistic fluids,

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, “Stability and causal- ity in dissipative relativistic fluids,” Annals of Physics , vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 466–496, 1983

    1983

  31. [38]

    Transient relativistic ther- modynamics and kinetic theory,

    W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, “Transient relativistic ther- modynamics and kinetic theory,” Annals Phys., vol. 118, pp. 341–372, 1979

    1979

  32. [39]

    Nonlinear constraints on relativistic fluids far from equilibrium,

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, V. Hoang, J. Noronha, and M. Radosz, “Nonlinear constraints on relativistic fluids far from equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 126, p. 222301, Jun 2021

    2021

  33. [40]

    Fixing extensions to general relativity in the nonlinear regime,

    J. Cayuso, N. Ortiz, and L. Lehner, “Fixing extensions to general relativity in the nonlinear regime,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, p. 084043, Oct 2017

    2017

  34. [41]

    Dissipative relativistic fluid theories of divergence type,

    R. Geroch and L. Lindblom, “Dissipative relativistic fluid theories of divergence type,” Physical Review D , vol. 41, no. 6, p. 1855, 1990

    1990

  35. [42]

    Relativistic ther- modynamics of gases,

    I.-S. Liu, I. M¨ uller, and T. Ruggeri, “Relativistic ther- modynamics of gases,” Annals of Physics, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 191–219, 1986

    1986

  36. [43]

    Hyperbolic theory of relativistic conformal dissipative fluids,

    L. Lehner, O. A. Reula, and M. E. Rubio, “Hyperbolic theory of relativistic conformal dissipative fluids,” Phys. Rev., vol. D97, no. 2, p. 024013, 2018

    2018

  37. [44]

    Causal- ity and existence of solutions of relativistic viscous fluid dynamics with gravity,

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, “Causal- ity and existence of solutions of relativistic viscous fluid dynamics with gravity,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 98, p. 104064, Nov 2018

    2018

  38. [45]

    Non- linear causality of general first-order relativistic viscous hydrodynamics,

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, “Non- linear causality of general first-order relativistic viscous hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 100, p. 104020, Nov 2019

    2019

  39. [46]

    First- Order General-Relativistic Viscous Fluid Dynamics,

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, “First- Order General-Relativistic Viscous Fluid Dynamics,” Phys. Rev. X , vol. 12, no. 2, p. 021044, 2022

    2022

  40. [47]

    First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is sta- ble,

    P. Kovtun, “First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is sta- ble,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 034, 2019

    2019

  41. [48]

    Numerical simulations of divergence-type theories for conformal dis- sipative fluids,

    P. E. Montes, M. E. Rubio, and O. A. Reula, “Numerical simulations of divergence-type theories for conformal dis- sipative fluids,” Physical Review D , vol. 107, May 2023

    2023

  42. [49]

    Evolutions in first- order viscous hydrodynamics,

    H. Bantilan, Y. Bea, and P. Figueras, “Evolutions in first- order viscous hydrodynamics,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 298, 2022

    2022

  43. [50]

    Numerical exploration of first-order relativistic hydrodynamics,

    A. Pandya and F. Pretorius, “Numerical exploration of first-order relativistic hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 104, p. 023015, Jul 2021

    2021

  44. [51]

    Conservative finite volume scheme for first-order viscous relativistic hydrodynamics,

    A. Pandya, E. R. Most, and F. Pretorius, “Conservative finite volume scheme for first-order viscous relativistic hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 105, p. 123001, Jun 2022

    2022

  45. [52]

    Causal, stable first-order viscous relativistic hydrodynamics with ideal gas microphysics,

    A. Pandya, E. R. Most, and F. Pretorius, “Causal, stable first-order viscous relativistic hydrodynamics with ideal gas microphysics,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 106, p. 123036, Dec 2022

    2022

  46. [53]

    Sur les probl` emes aux d´ eriv´ es partielles et leur signification physique,

    J. Hadamard, “Sur les probl` emes aux d´ eriv´ es partielles et leur signification physique,” Princeton University Bul- letin, vol. 13, pp. 49–52, 1902

    1902

  47. [54]

    Symmetric hyperbolic linear differential equations,

    K. Friedrichs, “Symmetric hyperbolic linear differential equations,” Communications on Pure and Applied Math- ematics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 345–392, 1954

    1954

  48. [55]

    Systems of conservation equations with a convex extension,

    K. O. Friedrichs and P. D. Lax, “Systems of conservation equations with a convex extension,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1686– 1688, 1971

    1971

  49. [56]

    Strongly hyperbolic systems in general relativity,

    O. A. Reula, “Strongly hyperbolic systems in general relativity,” Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations , vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 251–269, 2004

    2004

  50. [57]

    On hyperbolic

    R. Geroch, “On hyperbolic ”theories” of relativistic dis- sipative fluids,” arXiv preprint gr-qc/0103112 , 2001. 17

    2001 arXiv

  51. [58]

    J. O. B. Gustafsson, Heinz-Otto Kreiss, Time dependent problems and difference methods . Wiley, 2013

    2013

  52. [59]

    Initial boundary value problems for hy- perbolic systems,

    H.-O. Kreiss, “Initial boundary value problems for hy- perbolic systems,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 277–298, 1970

    1970

  53. [60]

    Kreiss and J

    H. Kreiss and J. Lorenz, Initial-Boundary Value Prob- lems and the Navier-Stokes Equations . Society for In- dustrial and Applied Mathematics, 2004

    2004

  54. [61]

    Theoreme d’existence pour certains systemes derivees partielles non lineaires,

    Y. Foures-Bruhat, “Theoreme d’existence pour certains systemes derivees partielles non lineaires,” Acta Mat. , vol. 88, pp. 141–225, 1952

    1952

  55. [62]

    Choquet-Bruhat, C

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat, C. DeWitt-Morette, and M. Dillard- Bleick, Analysis, Manifolds and Physics . Elsevier, 1996

    1996

  56. [63]

    Das anfangswertproblem einer quasi- linearen hyperbolischen differentialgleichung zweiter ordnung in beliebiger anzahl von unabh¨ angigen ver¨ anderlichen,

    J. P. Schauder, “Das anfangswertproblem einer quasi- linearen hyperbolischen differentialgleichung zweiter ordnung in beliebiger anzahl von unabh¨ angigen ver¨ anderlichen,”Fundamenta mathematicae , vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 213–246, 1935

    1935

  57. [64]

    A necessary condition for strong hyperbol- icity of general first order systems,

    F. Abalos, “A necessary condition for strong hyperbol- icity of general first order systems,” J. Hyperbol. Diff. Equat., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 193, 2019

    2019

  58. [66]

    Hyperbolic ex- tensions of constrained PDEs,

    F. Abalos, O. Reula, and D. Hilditch, “Hyperbolic ex- tensions of constrained PDEs,” Front. in Phys. , vol. 12, p. 1517192, 2024

    2024

  59. [67]

    Leray and N

    J. Leray and N. Institute for Advanced Study (Princeton, Hyperbolic differential equations. Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, 1953

    1953

  60. [68]

    ´Equations et syst` emes non-lin´ eaires, hyper- boliques non-stricts,

    J. Leray, “ ´Equations et syst` emes non-lin´ eaires, hyper- boliques non-stricts,” S´ eminaire Jean Leray, vol. 1964, no. 2, pp. 16–76, 1965

    1964

  61. [69]

    Local existence and uniqueness in sobolev spaces for first-order conformal causal relativistic viscous hydrodynamics,

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, C. Rodriguez, and Y. Shao, “Local existence and uniqueness in sobolev spaces for first-order conformal causal relativistic viscous hydrodynamics,” Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, vol. 20, pp. 2279–2290, June 2021

    2021

  62. [70]

    Global existence and decay of small solu- tions for quasi-linear second-order uniformly dissipative hyperbolic-hyperbolic systems,

    M. Sroczinski, “Global existence and decay of small solu- tions for quasi-linear second-order uniformly dissipative hyperbolic-hyperbolic systems,” J. Diff. Eq. , vol. 383, pp. 130–162, 2024

    2024

  63. [71]

    Ra- dial and elliptic flow in Pb+Pb collisions at the Large Hadron Collider from viscous hydrodynamic,

    C. Shen, U. Heinz, P. Huovinen, and H. Song, “Ra- dial and elliptic flow in Pb+Pb collisions at the Large Hadron Collider from viscous hydrodynamic,” Phys. Rev. C, vol. 84, p. 044903, 2011

    2011

  64. [72]

    Rela- tivistic anisotropic hydrodynamics,

    M. Alqahtani, M. Nopoush, and M. Strickland, “Rela- tivistic anisotropic hydrodynamics,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., vol. 101, pp. 204–248, 2018

    2018

  65. [73]

    Effective field the- ory of dissipative fluids,

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, “Effective field the- ory of dissipative fluids,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 095, 2017

    2017

  66. [74]

    Dissi- pative hydrodynamics in superspace,

    K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, and A. Yarom, “Dissi- pative hydrodynamics in superspace,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 127, 2018

    2018

  67. [75]

    Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics, conformal invariance, and holography,

    R. Baier, P. Romatschke, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets, and M. A. Stephanov, “Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics, conformal invariance, and holography,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 100, 2008

    2008

  68. [76]

    Conformal Invariance, Microscopic Physics, and the Nature of Gravitation,

    J. D. Bekenstein and A. Meisels, “Conformal Invariance, Microscopic Physics, and the Nature of Gravitation,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 22, p. 1313, 1980

    1980

  69. [77]

    Scale invariance and gravitational coupling,

    S. Deser, “Scale invariance and gravitational coupling,” Annals Phys., vol. 59, pp. 248–253, 1970

    1970

  70. [78]

    Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 48, pp. 1220–1223, 1982

    1982

  71. [79]

    A Mechanism for Reducing the Value of the Cosmological Constant,

    L. F. Abbott, “A Mechanism for Reducing the Value of the Cosmological Constant,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 150, pp. 427–430, 1985

    1985

  72. [80]

    Adjusting the Cosmological Constant Dynamically: Cosmons and a New Force Weaker Than Gravity,

    R. D. Peccei, J. Sola, and C. Wetterich, “Adjusting the Cosmological Constant Dynamically: Cosmons and a New Force Weaker Than Gravity,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 195, pp. 183–190, 1987

    1987

  73. [81]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity. Chicago, USA: Chicago Univ. Pr., 1984

    1984

  74. [82]

    Divergence-type non- linear conformal hydrodynamics,

    J. Peralta-Ramos and E. Calzetta, “Divergence-type non- linear conformal hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 80, p. 126002, Dec 2009

    2009

  75. [83]

    Hydrodynamic approach to boost invariant free streaming,

    E. Calzetta, “Hydrodynamic approach to boost invariant free streaming,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 92, p. 045035, Aug 2015

    2015

  76. [84]

    Causality criteria from stability analysis at ultrahigh boost,

    S. Roy and S. Mitra, “Causality criteria from stability analysis at ultrahigh boost,” Physical Review D, vol. 110, no. 1, p. 016012, 2024

    2024

  77. [85]

    Courant and D

    R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, Volume 2 . Wiley Classics Library, Wiley, 2008

    2008

  78. [86]

    John, Partial Differential Equations

    F. John, Partial Differential Equations . Applied mathe- matical sciences, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sci- ences, New York University, 1971

    1971

  79. [87]

    3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity,

    E. Gourgoulhon, “3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity,” 3 2007

    2007

  80. [88]

    Mathematica, Version 14.2

    W. R. Inc., “Mathematica, Version 14.2.” Champaign, IL, 2024

    2024

  81. [89]

    Methods for the approximate solution of time dependent problems,

    H.-O. Kreiss and J. Oliger, “Methods for the approximate solution of time dependent problems,”GARP Publication Series, 1973

    1973

  82. [90]

    Summation by parts and dissipation for do- mains with excised regions,

    G. Calabrese, L. Lehner, O. Reula, O. Sarbach, and M. Tiglio, “Summation by parts and dissipation for do- mains with excised regions,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 21, pp. 5735–5758, 2004

    2004

  83. [91]

    A Simflowny-based finite-difference code for high-performance computing in numerical relativity,

    C. Palenzuela, B. Mi˜ nano, D. Vigan` o, A. Arbona, C. Bona-Casas, A. Rigo, M. Bezares, C. Bona, and J. Mass´ o, “A Simflowny-based finite-difference code for high-performance computing in numerical relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 35, no. 18, p. 185007, 2018

    2018

  84. [92]

    Kreiss and O

    H. Kreiss and O. Ortiz, Introduction to Numerical Meth- ods for Time Dependent Differential Equations . Wiley, 2014

    2014

  85. [93]

    The convergence rate of approximate solutions for nonlinear scalar conservation laws,

    H. Nessyahu and E. Tadmor, “The convergence rate of approximate solutions for nonlinear scalar conservation laws,” SIAM journal on numerical analysis, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1505–1519, 1992

    1992

  86. [94]

    New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection–diffusion equations,

    A. Kurganov and E. Tadmor, “New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection–diffusion equations,” Journal of computa- tional physics , vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 241–282, 2000

    2000

  87. [95]

    Analytical approximations to the solution of the blasius equation,

    J. Parlange, R. Braddock, and G. Sander, “Analytical approximations to the solution of the blasius equation,” in Australasian Conference on Hydraulics and Fluid Me- chanics (7th: 1980: Brisbane, Qld.) , pp. 467–471, Insti- tution of Engineers, Australia Barton, ACT, 1980

    1980

  88. [96]

    Pozrikidis, Introduction to Theoretical and Computa- tional Fluid Dynamics

    C. Pozrikidis, Introduction to Theoretical and Computa- tional Fluid Dynamics . OUP USA, 2011

    2011

  89. [97]

    Laminar flow heat transfer for simultaneously developing velocity and tem- perature profiles in ducts of rectangular cross section,

    S. Montgomery and P. Wibulswas, “Laminar flow heat transfer for simultaneously developing velocity and tem- perature profiles in ducts of rectangular cross section,” Applied Scientific Research , vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 247–259, 1968. 18

    1968

  90. [98]

    An equation for laminar flow heat transfer for constant heat flux boundary condition in ducts of arbitrary cross-sectional area,

    T. Yilmaz and E. Cihan, “An equation for laminar flow heat transfer for constant heat flux boundary condition in ducts of arbitrary cross-sectional area,”Journal of heat transfer, vol. 117, no. 3, 1995

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.