Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 94 references

PIVOTS: Aligning unseen Structures using Preoperative to Intraoperative Volume-To-Surface Registration for Liver Navigation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Point-cloud network registers livers in under 7 mm from partial views

desk verdict Solid architectural contribution with open code and benchmarks; the headline accuracy numbers are mostly synthetic or clean-MRI, so the clinical superiority claim is still open. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20337 v1 pith:MKGC3JZ2 submitted 2025-07-27 cs.CV

Peng Liu , Bianca Güttner , Yutong Su , Chenyang Li , Jinjing Xu , Mingyang Liu , Zhe Min , Andrey Zhylka
show 11 more authors
Jasper Smit Karin Olthof Matteo Fusaglia Rudi Apolle Matthias Miederer Laura Frohneberger Carina Riediger Jügen Weitz Fiona Kolbinger Stefanie Speidel Micha Pfeiffer
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords intraoperativelivernavigationpointcloudsnon-rigidregistrationvolume-to-surfacedeformationpredictionaugmentedrealitysurgerysynthetictrainingdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

PIVOTS is a neural network that registers a full preoperative liver volume to a noisy, partially visible point cloud of the liver surface captured during laparoscopic surgery. The paper's central claim is that a network trained exclusively on synthetic biomechanical simulations of liver deformation can predict a dense displacement field for every point of the volume, and that this prediction is more accurate and more robust than existing rigid, non-rigid, and biomechanics-based baselines. Across the four evaluation datasets the reported mean errors are 3.11 mm on Synthetic, 4.06 mm on AMOS, 5.96 mm on Phantom, and 6.38 mm on the real breathing-motion dataset HHLBM, the best in the comparison table on each. If the claim holds, augmented-reality overlays of tumors and vessels could be refreshed in about 230 ms while tolerating the large deformations, noise, and occluded views that occur in real surgery.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the PIVOTS architecture paired with a synthetic training-data generator. The encoder uses farthest-point sampling and Dynamic Graph CNN layers to build multi-resolution geometric features from the preoperative and intraoperative clouds. The decoder centers on deformation-aware cross-attention: the intraoperative surface first attends to the volume, and the volume then attends to the updated surface features, letting information flow in both directions at every resolution; an upsampling cross-attention module then propagates coarse features back to fine levels, and a displacement field is regressed at each level under a weighted mean-squared-error loss. The generator creates 193,563 training samples from random organ-like shapes, a homogeneous Neo-Hookean material with randomized Young's modulus (3–30 kPa) and Poisson ratio (0.45–0.48), gravity, fixed, and spring boundary conditions, and partial surfaces corrupted with Perlin and Gaussian noise; this simulator is the source of the network's claimed generalization to real patients.

What would settle it

A direct clinical test would settle it: collect intraoperative liver surfaces during laparoscopic surgery with tracked landmarks or embedded fiducials, run PIVOTS, and measure landmark target registration error. If mean TRE exceeds 10 mm on such unseen surgical data, or if errors grow steeply when pre-registration displacement exceeds 80 mm or visible surface falls below 10%, the claimed synthetic-to-real robustness does not transfer.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that volume-to-surface non-rigid registration can be solved end-to-end directly on point clouds: given a preoperative volume cloud $V$ and an intraoperative partial surface cloud $S$, PIVOTS outputs a dense displacement field $\Phi$ for every point of $V$, including internal points, in a single forward pass. The paper reports the lowest mean registration error on every tested dataset—$3.11\pm3.38$ mm on Synthetic, $4.06\pm3.35$ mm on AMOS, $5.96\pm1.47$ mm on Phantom landmarks, and $6.38\pm2.56$ mm on HHLBM landmarks—with the next-best competing method typically 2–6 mm worse. PIVOTS also keeps mean errors below 10 mm even for the largest pre-registration displacement group (above 80 mm), across Perlin noise amplitudes up to 15 mm and Gaussian noise up to $\sigma=5$ mm, and for visible surface fractions above roughly 10%; the paper reports that all methods struggle below 10% visibility. The authors attribute this stability to the deformation-aware cross-attention decoder and to synthetic training data that randomizes organ shape, material parameters, boundary conditions, partial views, and noise.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the synthetic biomechanical simulator—random organ-like shapes, a homogeneous Neo-Hookean liver with randomized material parameters, simplified gravity/fixed/spring boundary conditions, and Perlin/Gaussian surface noise—produces deformation patterns close enough to real intraoperative liver motion that a network trained only on those samples keeps its accuracy on patients.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported errors hold, a laparoscopic augmented-reality system could update its overlay of vessels and tumors roughly every 230 ms from a single forward pass, without patient-specific retraining.
  • Because the network generalizes from random synthetic shapes to real livers, phantom deformations, and in-vivo breathing motion, the same trained weights could serve as the non-rigid core of a navigation system across different patients.
  • Mean errors below 10 mm even at the largest pre-registration displacement group and with Perlin noise up to 15 mm imply the registration can tolerate imperfect surface reconstruction and substantial pneumoperitoneum-induced deformation.
  • The visibility experiments imply that reliable registration requires more than about 10% visible liver surface, so intraoperative mapping must prioritize wide coverage, not just a narrow initial view.
  • The released synthetic training and test sets, plus the HHLBM real-breathing dataset, give future volume-to-surface liver registration methods a common benchmark for fair comparison.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to apply the same architecture and synthetic-data recipe to other soft organs such as prostate or lung; the paper suggests this is plausible, but its evidence is limited to liver-shaped geometry and liver material ranges.
  • The ablation, in which removing the deformation-aware cross-attention raises error by about 70%, suggests that bidirectional cross-attention, rather than the point-cloud backbone, is the main source of accuracy; other registration networks might close the gap by adding this mechanism.
  • A natural next validation would be quantitative evaluation on true intraoperative laparoscopic surfaces with measured landmarks, since the paper's laparoscopic dataset currently supports only qualitative comparison; a clinical test with tracked tools or preoperative fiducials would directly expose the synthetic-to-real gap.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes PIVOTS, a transformer-based point-cloud network for non-rigid volume-to-surface registration of the liver. The method takes a preoperative liver volume and a partial intraoperative surface as point clouds, uses a DGCNN+FPS encoder with multi-resolution feature extraction, and a decoder with novel deformation-aware cross-attention and upsampling cross-attention modules to predict a dense displacement field at multiple resolutions. Training is supervised on 193,563 synthetic pairs produced by a biomechanical simulator with randomized organ shapes, material parameters, boundary conditions, partial surface extraction, and Perlin/Gaussian noise. The method is evaluated on a synthetic test set, a semi-synthetic AMOS-based set, a six-deformation MRI phantom dataset, a 38-sample healthy human liver breathing motion (HHLBM) dataset, and qualitatively on six real laparoscopic videos. Reported mean errors are 3.11 mm (Synthetic), 4.06 mm (AMOS), 5.96 mm (Phantom), and 6.38 mm (HHLBM), outperforming all baselines on each dataset. The paper also provides robustness experiments for deformation magnitude, noise type and amplitude, and surface visibility, and releases code and datasets.

Significance. If the results hold, PIVOTS represents a strong step toward practical non-rigid liver registration in laparoscopic navigation. The paper's strengths are its extensive evaluation: twelve baselines are retrained or fine-tuned on the same synthetic data, the stress tests for deformation, noise, and visibility are systematic and include error distributions, and the code and datasets are publicly released, including a new real-data benchmark (HHLBM). The ablation study isolates the contributions of the proposed cross-attention modules and manual features. The authors are also transparent about remaining limitations, clearly stating the sim-to-real gap and the absence of a quantitative intraoperative evaluation. The main weakness is that the quantitative real-data experiments are conducted on clean MRI-derived surfaces rather than actual laparoscopic reconstructions, which limits the strength of the clinical generalization claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, Table 2] The quantitative real-data evaluation is performed only on MRI-derived surfaces: the Phantom and HHLBM 'intraoperative' partial surfaces are extracted by simulating a camera field of view from co-registered MRI volumes (Sec. 4.1), so they contain none of the reconstruction noise, illumination artifacts, or instrument occlusion of actual laparoscopic data. The only real laparoscopic surfaces (Laparoscopic Liver dataset, n=6) are evaluated qualitatively (Sec. 4.8). Consequently, the reported TREs of 5.96 mm (Phantom) and 6.38 mm (HHLBM) do not directly establish performance on actual intraoperative point clouds, and the abstract's claim that PIVOTS 'validates its performance on ... real datasets' is overstated for the target application. I recommend adding a quantitative metric on the laparoscopic dataset (e.g., surface-to-surface error between the deformed preoperative volume and the reconstructed intraoperative point cloud, with or without a small set of manual landmarks), or explicitly restricting the conclusion to the evaluated settings.
  2. [§3.5, §4.3–4.6] The synthetic training and test data are generated by the same simulation pipeline (Pfeiffer et al., 2025) with a homogeneous Neo-Hookean liver model, simplified spring/fixed boundary conditions, and Perlin/Gaussian noise; the Synthetic and AMOS test sets come from this same generator. The paper's own Discussion (Sec. 5) lists missing effects (tool-tissue interaction, self-collision, heterogeneous material properties, pneumoperitoneum volume changes, authentic surgical noise) and reports a sim-to-real gap of about 2 mm. Therefore, the robustness claims for large deformation (Sec. 4.4) and noise (Sec. 4.5) are demonstrated only under the simulator's deformation and noise model, not under the intraoperative conditions the method is intended for. I recommend adding an independent synthetic test set from a differently constructed simulator or a controlled physical phantom with larger deformations, and/or explicitly downgrading the claims to 'simulated intraoperative conditions' in the abstract and conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.4, Table 3] The table header contains typos: 'Spearson' should be 'Spearman' and 'BCE_FEM' should be 'BCF_FEM'.
  2. [§3.1] In the definition of the network inputs, the intraoperative point cloud is written as Sr = {Ps, Àv, Fs}, but the positional encoding for the intraoperative stream should be Às, not Àv. The subsequent dimensional equation also mixes the two: 'Às, Às ∈ Rn×(6É)' should read 'Àv, Às ∈ Rn×(6É)'.
  3. [§4.6, Table 4] The claim of a 'critical visibility threshold' at 10% visibility is based on small samples: the Phantom dataset has only six deformation states and the HHLBM dataset 38 samples, and the 0–10% bin contains a fraction of these. The standard deviations in that bin are large (e.g., ±9.92 mm for PIVOTS on HHLBM). Please report confidence intervals or a statistical test (e.g., paired comparison per sample) before asserting a threshold effect.
  4. [§3.5.2] The training data exports the timestep with the highest deformation rather than the equilibrium state, so some training pairs correspond to transient dynamic states that may not represent stable intraoperative configurations. Please justify this choice physically, or provide an ablation comparing training on equilibrium states only.
  5. [§4.3] The baseline list includes surface-to-surface and rigid methods (e.g., Lepard, C2P-Net, LiverMatch+NDP) that are adapted to the volume-to-surface task, but the adaptation is not described. Please add a short description of the input sampling, loss formulation, and any modifications used for each learning-based baseline.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the central comparative claims rest on independent real-data benchmarks, and the synthetic pipeline is a training-data generator rather than a self-referential target.

full rationale

The derivation chain of PIVOTS is not circular. The method is a learned volume-to-surface registration network trained on synthetic pairs, and its headline errors are evaluated on four datasets. The two real-data sets, Phantom and HHLBM, contain genuine deformation (an MR-imaged phantom compressed with a probe, and in vivo breathing motion in human subjects) and use landmark-based TRE with landmarks annotated independently of the network; these evaluations do not depend on the simulation pipeline used for training. The Synthetic and AMOS sets do come from the same finite-element simulation pipeline that generated training data, so those numbers only demonstrate generalization to held-out samples from the training distribution rather than to real physics. That is a limitation of the synthetic evidence, but it is not a circular reduction: the simulation parameters are fixed by the authors' pipeline before training, the ground-truth displacement fields are produced by SOFA mechanics rather than by the network, and the test samples are unseen during training. Baseline methods are retrained on the same synthetic data, so the comparisons are fair. The self-citations to Pfeiffer et al. (2019, 2020, 2025) and Pfeiffer (2022) describe the simulator, the multi-level loss idea, and the shape-generation recipe, but the paper re-specifies the training-data parameters in Section 3.5 and Supplementary Table 1, so no argument reduces to an unverified uniqueness theorem or an ansatz smuggled in by citation. The Discussion openly concedes a noticeable sim-to-real gap and notes that true intraoperative data would be needed for more detailed validation; that concession is an external-validity concern, not evidence that an equation or fitted parameter has been relabeled as a prediction. No circular step satisfies the required evidentiary standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central method is a learned model trained on synthetic data from the authors' own simulation pipeline. The simulation parameters (material model, noise model) are domain assumptions, not independently verified constants. The network hyperparameters are design choices, not fitted to the test sets. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • point cloud size (N) = 2500 points per cloud
    All pre- and intraoperative point clouds are standardized to 2500 points for batch processing; chosen by hand, not fitted to the test data.
  • number of encoder/decoder layers (L) = 6
    Selected based on ablation; more layers improve accuracy but with diminishing returns and higher training cost.
  • attention neighborhood size (k) = 30
    Set for all point attention modules; a standard choice, not fitted to the test sets.
  • attention embedding size (e) = 29
    Listed in Implementation and Training; chosen as part of the architecture.
  • feature vector lengths per layer = [200, 150, 110, 80, 60, 50]
    Chosen for the down/up-sampling stages; part of the design.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The liver can be modeled as a homogeneous hyperelastic Neo-Hookean material with Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio sampled from literature ranges.
    Used in the SOFA simulation pipeline (Sec. 3.5.2) to generate all training deformations. If real liver tissue is highly heterogeneous or viscoelastic, the simulated deformations may not transfer.
  • domain assumption The synthetic noise model (Perlin plus Gaussian) approximates the noise in real intraoperative surface reconstruction.
    Training and synthetic evaluation rely on this noise model; the paper acknowledges the sim-to-real gap and the difficulty of characterizing real noise.
  • domain assumption The ground truth displacement field from the finite element simulation is a valid supervision signal for internal structure deformation.
    The network is trained to reproduce FE displacement; validation on real data (phantom, HHLBM) uses sparse landmarks, not dense fields, so the internal accuracy is only indirectly tested.
  • domain assumption The point-based features (surface normals, distance fields, sinusoidal positional encodings) provide enough geometric information for the network to infer deformation.
    These are hand-crafted inputs chosen to aid the network; an ablation shows they help, but they are not derived from an independent physical principle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PIVOTS: Aligning unseen Structures using Preoperative to Intraoperative Volume-To-Surface Registration for Liver Navigation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MKGC3JZ2

@misc{pith2026250720337,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PIVOTS: Aligning unseen Structures using Preoperative to Intraoperative Volume-To-Surface Registration for Liver Navigation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MKGC3JZ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20337}
}
read the original abstract

Non-rigid registration is essential for Augmented Reality guided laparoscopic liver surgery by fusing preoperative information, such as tumor location and vascular structures, into the limited intraoperative view, thereby enhancing surgical navigation. A prerequisite is the accurate prediction of intraoperative liver deformation which remains highly challenging due to factors such as large deformation caused by pneumoperitoneum, respiration and tool interaction as well as noisy intraoperative data, and limited field of view due to occlusion and constrained camera movement. To address these challenges, we introduce PIVOTS, a Preoperative to Intraoperative VOlume-To-Surface registration neural network that directly takes point clouds as input for deformation prediction. The geometric feature extraction encoder allows multi-resolution feature extraction, and the decoder, comprising novel deformation aware cross attention modules, enables pre- and intraoperative information interaction and accurate multi-level displacement prediction. We train the neural network on synthetic data simulated from a biomechanical simulation pipeline and validate its performance on both synthetic and real datasets. Results demonstrate superior registration performance of our method compared to baseline methods, exhibiting strong robustness against high amounts of noise, large deformation, and various levels of intraoperative visibility. We publish the training and test sets as evaluation benchmarks and call for a fair comparison of liver registration methods with volume-to-surface data. Code and datasets are available here https://github.com/pengliu-nct/PIVOTS.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20337 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Registration with our method. First, the intraoperative surface (orange) is reconstructed from laparoscopic video and the preoperative volume (gray) is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Architecture of the proposed registration network. (a) For the intraoperative target points as well as the surface points of the preoperative point cloud, we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Training data generation. From left to right: Random boundary conditions (blue), including gravity, fixed boundaries (dots) and linear spring boundaries [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of methods on various deformation levels (PRD) on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Input for the noise level experiment. Example partial intraoperative surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Registration error distributions on various noise levels. Two types of noise are involved: Perlin noise (horizontal, range: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative comparison between results of PIVOTS on intraoperative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative comparison on various evaluation datasets. Preoperative point clouds are depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Shape variation in training data alongside two exemplary real livers. Left: synthetic shapes, upper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phantom setup before MRI acquisition. The rail allows to fix the fake US probe and maintain the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  3. [3]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  4. [4]

    title Respiratory cycle 3D - IRCADb -02

    , . title Respiratory cycle 3D - IRCADb -02 . https://www.ircad.fr/research/data-sets/respiratory-cycle-3d-ircadb-02/

  5. [5]

    , author Aldrighetti, L

    author Abu Hilal, M. , author Aldrighetti, L. , author Dagher, I. , author Edwin, B. , author Troisi, R.I. , author Alikhanov, R. , author Aroori, S. , author Belli, G. , author Besselink, M. , author Briceno, J. , author Gayet, B. , author D’Hondt, M. , author Lesurtel, M. , author Menon, K. , author Lodge, P. , author Rotellar, F. , author Santoyo, J. ,...

    work page arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    , author Sano, S

    author Akiba, T. , author Sano, S. , author Yanase, T. , author Ohta, T. , author Koyama, M. , year 2019 . title Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework , in: booktitle Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

    2019

  7. [7]

    , author Espinel, Y

    author Ali, S. , author Espinel, Y. , author Jin, Y. , author Liu, P. , author G \"u ttner, B. , author Zhang, X. , author Zhang, L. , author Dowrick, T. , author Clarkson, M.J. , author Xiao, S. , et al., year 2025 . title An objective comparison of methods for augmented reality in laparoscopic liver resection by preoperative-to-intraoperative image fusi...

    2025

  8. [8]

    , author Romdhani, S

    author Amberg, B. , author Romdhani, S. , author Vetter, T. , year 2007 . title Optimal step nonrigid icp algorithms for surface registration , in: booktitle 2007 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , organization IEEE . pp. pages 1--8

    2007

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    , author Howell, R.S

    author Amodu, L.I. , author Howell, R.S. , author Daskalaki, D. , author Allendorf, J.D. , year 2022 . title Oncologic benefits of laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery: a review of the literature . journal Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery volume 7 , pages 5...

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    , author Goforth, H

    author Aoki, Y. , author Goforth, H. , author Srivatsan, R.A. , author Lucey, S. , year 2019 . title Pointnetlk: Robust & efficient point cloud registration using pointnet , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. p...

    2019

  3. [11]

    , author McKay, N.D

    author Besl, P. , author McKay, N.D. , year 1992 . title A method for registration of 3-d shapes . journal IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence volume 14 , pages 239--256 . :10.1109/34.121791

    1992 doi

  4. [12]

    , author Wood, R.D

    author Bonet, J. , author Wood, R.D. , year 2008 . title Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis . edition 2nd ed ed., publisher Cambridge university press , address Cambridge

    2008

  5. [13]

    , author Zou, B

    author Chen, Z. , author Zou, B. , author Kui, X. , author Shi, Y. , author Lv, D. , author Chen, L. , year 2024 . title Points of interest linear attention network for real-time non-rigid liver volume to surface registration . journal Medical Physics volume 51 , pages 5351--5360

    2024

  6. [14]

    , author Kawaguchi, Y

    author Chu, K.J. , author Kawaguchi, Y. , author Hasegawa, K. , year 2023 . title Current use of intraoperative ultrasound in modern liver surgery . journal Oncology and Translational Medicine volume 9 , pages 168--175 . https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/ot9.0000000000000005, :...

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    , author Bartoli, A

    author Collins, T. , author Bartoli, A. , author Bourdel, N. , author Canis, M. , year 2016 . title Robust, real-time, dense and deformable 3d organ tracking in laparoscopic videos , in: booktitle International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Interv...

    2016

  8. [16]

    , author Pfeiffer, M

    author Docea, R. , author Pfeiffer, M. , author Bodenstedt, S. , author Kolbinger, F.R. , author H \"o ller, L. , author Wittig, I. , author Hoffmann, R.T. , author Troost, E.G.C. , author Riediger, C. , author Weitz, J. , author Speidel, S. , year 2021 . title Simultaneous lo...

    2021

  9. [17]

    , author Pfeiffer, M

    author Docea, R. , author Pfeiffer, M. , author Müller, J. , author Krug, K. , author Hardner, M. , author Riedel, P. , author Menzel, M. , author Kolbinger, F.R. , author Frohneberg, L. , author Weitz, J. , author Speidel, S. , year 2022 . title A laparoscopic liver navigatio...

    2022

  10. [18]

    , author Maclaurin, D

    author Duvenaud, D.K. , author Maclaurin, D. , author Iparraguirre, J. , author Bombarell, R. , author Hirzel, T. , author Aspuru-Guzik, A. , author Adams, R.P. , year 2015 . title Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints . journal Advances in neura...

    2015

  11. [19]

    , author Calvet, L

    author Espinel, Y. , author Calvet, L. , author Botros, K. , author Buc, E. , author Tilmant, C. , author Bartoli, A. , year 2021 . title Using multiple images and contours for deformable 3d-2d registration of a preoperative ct in laparoscopic liver surgery , in: booktitle Med...

    2021

  12. [20]

    , author Pahr, D.H

    author Estermann, S.J. , author Pahr, D.H. , author Reisinger, A. , year 2020 . title Hyperelastic and viscoelastic characterization of hepatic tissue under uniaxial tension in time and frequency domain . journal Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials volum...

    2020

  13. [21]

    , author Duriez, C

    author Faure, F. , author Duriez, C. , author Delingette, H. , author Allard, J. , author Gilles, B. , author Marchesseau, S. , author Talbot, H. , author Courtecuisse, H. , author Bousquet, G. , author Peterlik, I. , author Cotin, S. , year 2012 . title SOFA: A Multi-Model Fr...

    2012

  14. [22]

    , author Remacle, J

    author Geuzaine, C. , author Remacle, J. , year 2009 . title Gmsh: A 3‐ D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities . journal International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering volume 79 , pages 1309--1331 . :10.1002/nme.2579. note...

    2009 doi

  15. [23]

    , author Azhari, H

    author Glozman, T. , author Azhari, H. , year 2010 . title A Method for Characterization of Tissue Elastic Properties Combining Ultrasonic Computed Tomography With Elastography . journal Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine volume 29 , pages 387--398 . http://doi.wiley.com/10.786...

    2010 doi

  16. [24]

    , author Zhou, C

    author Gojcic, Z. , author Zhou, C. , author Wegner, J.D. , author Wieser, A. , year 2019 . title The perfect match: 3d point cloud matching with smoothed densities , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. pages 5545--5554

    2019

  17. [25]

    , author Long, Y

    author Gong, S. , author Long, Y. , author Chen, K. , author Liu, J. , author Xiao, Y. , author Cheng, A. , author Wang, Z. , author Dou, Q. , year 2024 . title Self-supervised cyclic diffeomorphic mapping for soft tissue deformation recovery in robotic surgery scenes . journa...

    2024

  18. [26]

    , author Sohel, F

    author Guo, Y. , author Sohel, F. , author Bennamoun, M. , author Lu, M. , author Wan, J. , year 2013 . title Rotational projection statistics for 3d local surface description and object recognition . journal International journal of computer vision volume 105 , pages 63--86

    2013

  19. [27]

    , author Collins, J.A

    author Heiselman, J.S. , author Collins, J.A. , author Ringel, M.J. , author Kingham, T.P. , author Jarnagin, W.R. , author Miga, M.I. , year 2024 . title The Image-to-Physical Liver Registration Sparse Data Challenge: comparison of state-of-the-art using a common dataset . jo...

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    , year 2022

    author Hirose, O. , year 2022 . title Geodesic-based bayesian coherent point drift . journal IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence volume 45 , pages 5816--5832

    2022

  21. [29]

    , author Gojcic, Z

    author Huang, S. , author Gojcic, Z. , author Usvyatsov, M. , author Wieser, A. , author Schindler, K. , year 2021 . title Predator: Registration of 3d point clouds with low overlap , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on computer vision and pattern recogniti...

    2021

  22. [30]

    , author Mei, G

    author Huang, X. , author Mei, G. , author Zhang, J. , year 2020 . title Feature-metric registration: A fast semi-supervised approach for robust point cloud registration without correspondences , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and patte...

    2020

  23. [31]

    , author MacCuaig, W.M

    author Husarova, T. , author MacCuaig, W.M. , author Dennahy, I.S. , author Sanderson, E.J. , author Edil, B.H. , author Jain, A. , author Bonds, M.M. , author McNally, M.W. , author Menclova, K. , author Pudil, J. , author Zaruba, P. , author Pohnan, R. , author Henson, C.E. ...

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    , author Jaeger, P.F

    author Isensee, F. , author Jaeger, P.F. , author Kohl, S.A. , author Petersen, J. , author Maier-Hein, K.H. , year 2021 . title nnu-net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation . journal Nature methods volume 18 , pages 203--211

    2021

  25. [33]

    , author Bai, H

    author Ji, Y. , author Bai, H. , author Ge, C. , author Yang, J. , author Zhu, Y. , author Zhang, R. , author Li, Z. , author Zhanng, L. , author Ma, W. , author Wan, X. , et al., year 2022 . title Amos: A large-scale abdominal multi-organ benchmark for versatile medical image...

    2022

  26. [34]

    , author Shen, Y

    author Jin, H. , author Shen, Y. , author Lou, J. , author Zhou, K. , author Zheng, Y. , year 2024 . title Keypointdetr: An end-to-end 3d keypoint detector , in: booktitle European Conference on Computer Vision , organization Springer . pp. pages 374--390

    2024

  27. [35]

    , author Fuentes-Jimenez, D

    author Khojasteh, S.B. , author Fuentes-Jimenez, D. , author Pizarro, D. , author Espinel, Y. , author Bartoli, A. , year 2025 . title Mis-nerf: neural radiance fields in minimally-invasive surgery . journal International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery http...

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    , author \"O zg \"u r, E

    author Koo, B. , author \"O zg \"u r, E. , author Le Roy, B. , author Buc, E. , author Bartoli, A. , year 2017 . title Deformable registration of a preoperative 3d liver volume to a laparoscopy image using contour and shading cues , in: booktitle International conference on me...

    2017

  29. [37]

    , author Pizarro, D

    author Labrunie, M. , author Pizarro, D. , author Tilmant, C. , author Bartoli, A. , year 2024 . title Automatic 3d/2d deformable registration in minimally invasive liver resection using a mesh recovery network , in: editor Oguz, I. , editor Noble, J. , editor Li, X. , editor ...

    2024

  30. [38]

    , author Ahmad, Z

    author Lemine, A.S. , author Ahmad, Z. , author Al-Thani, N.J. , author Hasan, A. , author Bhadra, J. , year 2024 . title Mechanical properties of human hepatic tissues to develop liver-mimicking phantoms for medical applications . journal Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanob...

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    , author Harada, T

    author Li, Y. , author Harada, T. , year 2022 a. title Lepard: Learning partial point cloud matching in rigid and deformable scenes , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. pages 5554--5564

    2022

  32. [40]

    , author Harada, T

    author Li, Y. , author Harada, T. , year 2022 b. title Non-rigid point cloud registration with neural deformation pyramid . journal Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems volume 35 , pages 27757--27768

    2022

  33. [41]

    , author Bodenstedt, S

    author Liu, P. , author Bodenstedt, S. , author Kolbinger, F. , author Riediger, C. , author Weitz, J. , author Speidel, S. , author Pfeiffer, M. , year 2024 a. title Leveraging expert knowledge for real-time online adaptation of intraoperative liver registration , in: booktit...

    2024

  34. [42]

    , author Golde, J

    author Liu, P. , author Golde, J. , author Morgenstern, J. , author Bodenstedt, S. , author Li, C. , author Hu, Y. , author Chen, Z. , author Koch, E. , author Neudert, M. , author Speidel, S. , year 2024 b. title Non-rigid point cloud registration for middle ear diagnostics w...

    2024

  35. [43]

    , author Chatelin, S

    author Marchesseau, S. , author Chatelin, S. , author Delingette, H. , year 2017 . title Nonlinear Biomechanical Model of the Liver , in: booktitle Biomechanics of Living Organs . publisher Elsevier , pp. pages 243--265 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B978012804...

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    , author Ahluwalia, A

    author Mattei, G. , author Ahluwalia, A. , year 2016 . title Sample, testing and analysis variables affecting liver mechanical properties: A review . journal Acta Biomaterialia volume 45 , pages 60--71 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1742706116304603, :10.1016/...

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    , author Pizarro, D

    author Mhiri, I. , author Pizarro, D. , author Bartoli, A. , year 2025 . title Neural patient-specific 3d--2d registration in laparoscopic liver resection . journal International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery volume 20 , pages 57--64

    2025

  38. [46]

    , author Liu, L

    author Min, Z. , author Liu, L. , author Meng, M.Q.H. , year 2019 . title Generalized non-rigid point set registration with hybrid mixture models considering anisotropic positional uncertainties , in: booktitle Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention--MICCAI...

    2019

  39. [47]

    , author Zhu, D

    author Min, Z. , author Zhu, D. , author Ren, H. , author Meng, M.Q.H. , year 2020 . title Feature-guided nonrigid 3-d point set registration framework for image-guided liver surgery: From isotropic positional noise to anisotropic positional noise . journal IEEE Transactions o...

    2020

  40. [48]

    , author Collins, T

    author Modrzejewski, R. , author Collins, T. , author Seeliger, B. , author Bartoli, A. , author Hostettler, A. , author Marescaux, J. , year 2019 . title An in vivo porcine dataset and evaluation methodology to measure soft-body laparoscopic liver registration accuracy with a...

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    , author Kinz, M

    author Monji-Azad, S. , author Kinz, M. , author M \"a nnel, D. , author Scherl, C. , author Hesser, J. , year 2024 . title Robust-defreg: a robust coarse to fine non-rigid point cloud registration method based on graph convolutional neural networks . journal Measurement Scien...

    2024

  42. [50]

    , author Romero Enciso, J

    author Murad Gutiérrez, V. , author Romero Enciso, J. , year 2018 . title Liver elastography: What it is, how it is done, and how it is interpreted . journal Radiología (English Edition) volume 60 , pages 183--189 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S217351071830020...

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    , author Song, X

    author Myronenko, A. , author Song, X. , year 2010 . title Point set registration: Coherent point drift . journal IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence volume 32 , pages 2262--2275

    2010

  44. [52]

    , author Marsh, J.W

    author Nguyen, K.T. , author Marsh, J.W. , author Tsung, A. , author Steel, J.J.L. , author Gamblin, T.C. , author Geller, D.A. , year 2011 . title Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal . journal Archives of surgery volume 146 , p...

    2011

  45. [53]

    , author Litwin, D.E.M

    author Novitsky, Y.W. , author Litwin, D.E.M. , author Callery, M.P. , year 2004 . title The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery . journal Surgical Endoscopy volume 18 , pages 1411--1419 . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-003-8275-x, :10.1007/s00464-003-8275-x

    2004 doi

  46. [54]

    , author Koo, B

    author \"O zg \"u r, E. , author Koo, B. , author Le Roy, B. , author Buc, E. , author Bartoli, A. , year 2018 . title Preoperative liver registration for augmented monocular laparoscopy using backward--forward biomechanical simulation . journal International journal of comput...

    2018

  47. [55]

    , year 2022

    author Pfeiffer, M. , year 2022 . title Non- Rigid Liver Registration for Laparoscopy using Data - Driven Biomechanical Models . type Dissertation . Technische Universität Dresden. address Dresden, Germany . https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-793702

    2022

  48. [56]

    , author Güttner, B

    author Pfeiffer, M. , author Güttner, B. , author Liu, P. , author Tagliabue, E. , author Fiorini, P. , author Speidel, S. , year 2025 . title Open-source synthetic organ simulation pipeline for laparoscopic navigation applications , in: booktitle The 16th International Confer...

    2025

  49. [57]

    , author Riediger, C

    author Pfeiffer, M. , author Riediger, C. , author Leger, S. , author K \"u hn, J.P. , author Seppelt, D. , author Hoffmann, R.T. , author Weitz, J. , author Speidel, S. , year 2020 . title Non-rigid volume to surface registration using a data-driven biomechanical model , in: ...

    2020

  50. [58]

    , author Riediger, C

    author Pfeiffer, M. , author Riediger, C. , author Weitz, J. , author Speidel, S. , year 2019 . title Learning soft tissue behavior of organs for surgical navigation with convolutional neural networks . journal International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery v...

    2019 doi

  51. [59]

    , author Su, H

    author Qi, C.R. , author Su, H. , author Mo, K. , author Guibas, L.J. , year 2017 a. title Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. pages 652--660

    2017

  52. [60]

    , author Yi, L

    author Qi, C.R. , author Yi, L. , author Su, H. , author Guibas, L.J. , year 2017 b. title PointNet ++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Space , in: booktitle Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    2017

  53. [61]

    , author Yu, H

    author Qin, Z. , author Yu, H. , author Wang, C. , author Guo, Y. , author Peng, Y. , author Ilic, S. , author Hu, D. , author Xu, K. , year 2023 a. title Geotransformer: Fast and robust point cloud registration with geometric transformer . journal IEEE Transactions on Pattern...

    2023

  54. [62]

    , author Yu, H

    author Qin, Z. , author Yu, H. , author Wang, C. , author Peng, Y. , author Xu, K. , year 2023 b. title Deep graph-based spatial consistency for robust non-rigid point cloud registration , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Reco...

    2023

  55. [63]

    , author Calvet, L

    author Rabbani, N. , author Calvet, L. , author Espinel, Y. , author Le Roy, B. , author Ribeiro, M. , author Buc, E. , author Bartoli, A. , year 2022 . title A methodology and clinical dataset with ground-truth to evaluate registration accuracy quantitatively in computer-assi...

    2022

  56. [64]

    , author Fiorentini, G

    author Ratti, F. , author Fiorentini, G. , author Cipriani, F. , author Catena, M. , author Paganelli, M. , author Aldrighetti, L. , year 2018 . title Laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal liver metastases . journal JAMA surgery volume 153 , pages 1028--1035

    2018

  57. [65]

    , author Ramalhinho, J

    author Robu, M.R. , author Ramalhinho, J. , author Thompson, S. , author Gurusamy, K. , author Davidson, B. , author Hawkes, D. , author Stoyanov, D. , author Clarkson, M.J. , year 2018 . title Global rigid registration of ct to video in laparoscopic liver surgery . journal In...

    2018

  58. [66]

    , author Albarelli, A

    author Rodola, E. , author Albarelli, A. , author Bergamasco, F. , author Torsello, A. , year 2013 . title A scale independent selection process for 3d object recognition in cluttered scenes . journal International journal of computer vision volume 102 , pages 129--145

    2013

  59. [67]

    , author Blodow, N

    author Rusu, R.B. , author Blodow, N. , author Beetz, M. , year 2009 . title Fast point feature histograms (fpfh) for 3d registration , in: booktitle 2009 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation , organization IEEE . pp. pages 3212--3217

    2009

  60. [68]

    , author Blodow, N

    author Rusu, R.B. , author Blodow, N. , author Marton, Z.C. , author Beetz, M. , year 2008 . title Aligning point cloud views using persistent feature histograms , in: booktitle 2008 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems , organization IEEE . pp. ...

    2008

  61. [69]

    , author Yadav, T

    author Santhosh, I. , author Yadav, T. , author Garg, S. , author Kumar, K. , author Singh, H. , author Kurdia, K. , year 2024 . title Study of variations in the biliary anatomy of the liver (extra and intrahepatic biliary apparatus)-a study of 100 cadaveric liver dissection i...

    2024

  62. [70]

    , author Li, X

    author Sarode, V. , author Li, X. , author Goforth, H. , author Aoki, Y. , author Srivatsan, R.A. , author Lucey, S. , author Choset, H. , year 2019 . title Pcrnet: Point cloud registration network using pointnet encoding . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07906

    2019 arXiv

  63. [71]

    , author Gori, M

    author Scarselli, F. , author Gori, M. , author Tsoi, A.C. , author Hagenbuchner, M. , author Monfardini, G. , year 2008 . title The graph neural network model . journal IEEE transactions on neural networks volume 20 , pages 61--80

    2008

  64. [72]

    , author Lackner, C

    author Schöberl, J. , author Lackner, C. , author Hochsteger, M. , author Dorigo, R. , author Hirnschall, S. , author Leonhartsberger, C. , year 2024 . title Netgen/ NGSolve . howpublished https://ngsolve.org/ . https://netgen-mesher.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/netgen-mesher. ...

    2024

  65. [73]

    , author Wan, P

    author Shi, J. , author Wan, P. , author Chen, F. , year 2021 . title An unsupervised non-rigid registration network for fast medical shape alignment , in: booktitle 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) , organi...

    2021

  66. [74]

    , author Rabi, S

    author Singh, H.R. , author Rabi, S. , year 2019 . title Study of morphological variations of liver in human . journal Translational research in Anatomy volume 14 , pages 1--5

    2019

  67. [75]

    , author Bustos, B

    author Sipiran, I. , author Bustos, B. , year 2011 . title Harris 3d: a robust extension of the harris operator for interest point detection on 3d meshes . journal The Visual Computer volume 27 , pages 963--976

    2011

  68. [76]

    , author Topin, N

    author Smith, L.N. , author Topin, N. , year 2019 . title Super-convergence: very fast training of neural networks using large learning rates , in: editor Pham, T. (Ed.), booktitle Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications , organiza...

    2019 doi

  69. [77]

    , author Saha, A

    author Srimani, P. , author Saha, A. , year 2020 . title Liver morphology: anatomical study about the outer aspects . journal Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy volume 42 , pages 1425--1434

    2020

  70. [78]

    , author Bernreiter, L

    author Streiff, D. , author Bernreiter, L. , author Tschopp, F. , author Fehr, M. , author Siegwart, R. , year 2021 . title 3d3l: Deep learned 3d keypoint detection and description for lidars , in: booktitle 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) ...

    2021

  71. [79]

    o hl, S. , author Bodenstedt, S. , author Reichard, D. , author Dillmann, R. , author dos Santos, T. , author Maier-Hein, L. , author Wagner, M. , author W \

    author Suwelack, S. , author R \"o hl, S. , author Bodenstedt, S. , author Reichard, D. , author Dillmann, R. , author dos Santos, T. , author Maier-Hein, L. , author Wagner, M. , author W \"u nscher, J. , author Kenngott, H. , et al., year 2014 . title Physics-based shape mat...

    2014

  72. [80]

    , author Qi, C.R

    author Thomas, H. , author Qi, C.R. , author Deschaud, J.E. , author Marcotegui, B. , author Goulette, F. , author Guibas, L.J. , year 2019 . title Kpconv: Flexible and deformable convolution for point clouds , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference...

    2019

  73. [81]

    , author Di Stefano, L

    author Tombari, F. , author Di Stefano, L. , year 2010 . title Object recognition in 3d scenes with occlusions and clutter by hough voting , in: booktitle 2010 Fourth Pacific-Rim Symposium on Image and Video Technology , organization IEEE . pp. pages 349--355

    2010

  74. [82]

    , author Solomon, J.M

    author Wang, Y. , author Solomon, J.M. , year 2019 . title Deep closest point: Learning representations for point cloud registration , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pp. pages 3523--3532

    2019

  75. [83]

    , author Sun, Y

    author Wang, Y. , author Sun, Y. , author Liu, Z. , author Sarma, S.E. , author Bronstein, M.M. , author Solomon, J.M. , year 2019 . title Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds . journal ACM Transactions on Graphics (tog) volume 38 , pages 1--12

    2019

  76. [84]

    , author Trepte, M

    author Wen, B. , author Trepte, M. , author Aribido, J. , author Kautz, J. , author Gallo, O. , author Birchfield, S. , year 2025 . title Foundationstereo: Zero-shot stereo matching . journal CVPR

    2025

  77. [85]

    , author Li, H

    author Yang, J. , author Li, H. , author Campbell, D. , author Jia, Y. , year 2015 . title Go-icp: A globally optimal solution to 3d icp point-set registration . journal IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence volume 38 , pages 2241--2254

    2015

  78. [86]

    , author Zhang, X

    author Yang, J. , author Zhang, X. , author Fan, S. , author Ren, C. , author Zhang, Y. , year 2023 a. title Mutual voting for ranking 3d correspondences . journal IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

    2023

  79. [87]

    , author Simon, R

    author Yang, Z. , author Simon, R. , author Linte, C.A. , year 2023 b. title Learning feature descriptors for pre-and intra-operative point cloud matching for laparoscopic liver registration . journal International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery volume 18 ,...

    2023

  80. [88]

    , author Simon, R.A

    author Yang, Z. , author Simon, R.A. , author Merrell, K. , author Linte, C.A. , year 2024 . title Boundary constraint-free biomechanical model-based surface matching for intraoperative liver deformation correction . journal IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging volume 44 , pag...

    2024

  81. [89]

    , author Lee, G.H

    author Yew, Z.J. , author Lee, G.H. , year 2022 . title Regtr: End-to-end point cloud correspondences with transformers , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. pages 6677--6686

    2022

  82. [90]

    , author Song, S

    author Zeng, A. , author Song, S. , author Nie ner, M. , author Fisher, M. , author Xiao, J. , author Funkhouser, T. , year 2017 . title 3dmatch: Learning local geometric descriptors from rgb-d reconstructions , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer visi...

    2017

  83. [91]

    , author Jiang, L

    author Zhao, H. , author Jiang, L. , author Jia, J. , author Torr, P.H. , author Koltun, V. , year 2021 . title Point transformer , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pp. pages 16259--16268

    2021

  84. [92]

    , author Wu, X

    author Zhao, X. , author Wu, X. , author Miao, J. , author Chen, W. , author Chen, P.C. , author Li, Z. , year 2022 . title Alike: Accurate and lightweight keypoint detection and descriptor extraction . journal IEEE Transactions on Multimedia volume 25 , pages 3101--3112

    2022

  85. [93]

    , author Guan, H

    author Zhu, L. , author Guan, H. , author Lin, C. , author Han, R. , year 2022 . title Neighborhood-aware geometric encoding network for point cloud registration . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12094 volume 4

    2022 arXiv

  86. [94]

    , author Smit, J

    author Zhylka, A. , author Smit, J. , author Olthof, K. , author ter Beek , L. , author Ruers, T. , author Fusaglia, M. , year 2024 . title Simulated liver deformations with intraoperative ultrasound: steps towards a multi-modal dataset . journal International Journal of Compu...

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.