REVIEW 1 cited by
Machine learning complete intersection Calabi-Yau 3-folds
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Gaussian process regression, kernel support vector regression, the random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and the generalized linear model algorithms are applied to data of complete intersection Calabi?Yau threefolds. It is shown that Gaussian process regression is the most suitable for learning the Hodge number h^(2,1)in terms of h^(1,1). The performance of this regression algorithm is such that the Pearson correlation coefficient for the validation set is R^2 = 0.9999999995 with a Root Mean Square Error RMSE = 0.0002895011. As for the calibration set, these two parameters are as follows: R^2 = 0.9999999994 and RMSE = 0.0002854348. The training error and the cross-validation error of this regression are 10^(-9) and 1.28 * 10^(-7), respectively. Learning the Hodge number h^(1,1)in terms of h^(2,1) yields R^2 = 1.000000 and RMSE = 7.395731 * 10^(-5) for the validation set of the Gaussian Process regression.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Machine Learning Free Quotients of CICYs
Machine-learning classifiers, especially a multi-head attention model, correctly identify almost all free Z2, Z3, Z4, and Z2xZ2 quotients of CICYs on held-out manifolds, with only three missed Z2xZ2 cases.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.