Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Angular Correlation Function from sample covariance with BOSS and eBOSS LRG

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.16018 v2 pith:MLDYD2TY submitted 2023-09-27 astro-ph.CO

Angular Correlation Function from sample covariance with BOSS and eBOSS LRG

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords samplecovariancethetaebossagreementcorrelationfunctionmatrix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) are one of the most used probes to understand the accelerated expansion of the Universe. Traditional methods rely on fiducial model information within their statistical analysis, which may be a problem when constraining different families of models. This work aims to provide a method that constrains $\theta_{BAO}$ through a model-independent approach using the covariance matrix from the galaxy sample from thin redshift bins, later validated with a mock sample covariance matrix. We used widths of $\delta z = 0.002$ separation for all samples as the basis for a sample covariance matrix weighted by the statistical importance of the redshift bin. Each sample belongs to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: BOSS1, BOSS2, and eBOSS, with effective redshift $z_{eff}$: 0.35, 0.51, 0.71, and different numbers of bins with 50, 100, and 200. To get $\theta_{BAO}$, we correct the angular separation from the polynomial fit ($\theta_{fit}$) by comparing each bin correlation function with the correlation function of the whole set, a parameter named $\tilde{\alpha}$. We also tested such correction by choosing the bin at $z_{eff}$ and found that for eBOSS $\theta_{BAO}$ is in $1 \sigma$ agreement with the Planck 18 model. Finally, we found that the sample covariances are noisy compared to the mocks for lower $z$ samples, something expected due to nonlinear effects. Such noise impact can be seen in the parameter constraints but does not affect the eBOSS covariance sample. It is shown that mocks' results do tend to its chosen fiducial cosmology $\theta_{BAO}$. BOSS1 and BOSS2 showed agreement with Planck 18 and an agreement with Pantheon + S$H_0$ES when $\tilde{\alpha}$ is based on the bin $z=z_{eff}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the bin sensitivity of the transverse BAO

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    Semi-Gaussian redshift binning recovers the transverse BAO scale more accurately than top-hat or Gaussian bins in SKA-like forecasts, but the advantage depends on survey and bin width.