pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12792 · v1 · pith:MMR5T2XFnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Identification of Lensed Gravitational-Wave Beat Patterns by LISA

Hengyu Wu , Tonghua Liu , Kai Liao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords gravitational wave lensingLISAbeat patternsmassive black hole binariesstrong lensingtime delaywaveform overlapmagnification
0
0 comments X

The pith

LISA can identify beat patterns in about 7% of its detectable two-image lensed massive black hole binary events.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs two-image beat waveforms from LISA signals of massive black hole binaries under a singular isothermal sphere lens model. It evaluates waveform mismatch only during the overlapping inspiral stage before the first image coalesces. Using a specific strong-lensing population model, the analysis finds that 92 of 196 detectable two-image events satisfy the temporal-overlap condition and 14 meet the beat-identification criterion. Posterior inference on a representative event shows the beat template recovers the lensing time delay and magnification. This establishes lensed beat patterns as a distinguishable subset of strongly lensed LISA events.

Core claim

Among 196 detectable two-image lensed events drawn from the HS-nod-SN (B+20) population, 92 satisfy the temporal-overlap condition and 14 satisfy the beat-identification criterion, for an identifiable beat fraction of about 7%. Beat patterns are most readily identified when the lensing time delay is short and the delayed image has relatively large magnification. Bayesian parameter estimation with the beat template recovers the lensing time delay and magnification parameters for a representative beat event.

What carries the argument

Two-image beat waveforms constructed from massive black hole binary signals, with mismatch evaluated only during the overlapping inspiral stage before coalescence of the first image, under a singular isothermal sphere lens model.

If this is right

  • Beat patterns are most readily identified when the lensing time delay is short and the delayed image has relatively large magnification.
  • The beat template recovers the lensing time delay and magnification parameters for a representative beat event.
  • Lensed beat patterns constitute a distinguishable subset of strongly lensed LISA events.
  • These patterns provide a unique observational signature of strong lensing in the LISA band.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Detection of such beats would directly constrain the distribution of time delays and magnifications without relying solely on the population model.
  • The method could be extended to three-image configurations if the overlap condition generalizes.
  • Parameter recovery from beats might help break degeneracies between lens properties and source parameters in LISA data analysis.
  • Absence of beats in future catalogs would tighten upper limits on the fraction of events with short time delays.

Load-bearing premise

The HS-nod-SN (B+20) strong-lensing population model accurately represents the distribution of lensing time delays and magnifications for massive black hole binaries detectable by LISA.

What would settle it

A catalog of LISA events containing many two-image lensed binaries but zero cases where the beat template recovers both time delay and magnification parameters to within the reported posterior uncertainties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12792 by Hengyu Wu, Kai Liao, Tonghua Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Time-domain illustration of the formation of a lensed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Mismatch distributions for lensed gravitational-wave beat identification in the SIS model for two representative sources. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Mismatch as a function of the lensing time delay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Posterior corner plot for the Bayesian parameter-estimation analysis of a lensed beat signal using the beat template. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Strong lensing of massive black hole binaries can produce multiple gravitational-wave images with different magnifications and arrival times. LISA signals remain in band for months to years, allowing multiple lensed images to overlap during the inspiral stage and generate beat patterns. A singular isothermal sphere lens model is adopted to describe the lensing configuration, and two-image beat waveforms are constructed from massive black hole binary signals. To isolate the beat pattern itself, waveform mismatch is evaluated only during the overlapping inspiral stage before the coalescence of the first image, excluding contributions from the delayed merger peak of the second image. Using the HS-nod-SN (B+20) strong-lensing population, the occurrence rate of identifiable beat events is estimated, and Bayesian parameter estimation is performed with a beat template. Beat patterns are most readily identified when the lensing time delay is short and the delayed image has a relatively large magnification. Among 196 detectable two-image lensed events, 92 satisfy the temporal-overlap condition and 14 satisfy the beat-identification criterion, corresponding to an identifiable beat fraction of about 7\%. Posterior inference shows that the beat template can recover the lensing time delay and magnification parameters for a representative beat event. These results indicate that lensed beat patterns constitute a distinguishable subset of strongly lensed LISA events and provide a unique observational signature of strong lensing in the LISA band.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs two-image beat waveforms for strongly lensed massive black hole binaries using a singular isothermal sphere lens model, restricts mismatch evaluation to the overlapping inspiral stage to isolate beat patterns, and uses the HS-nod-SN (B+20) population to estimate that among 196 detectable two-image events, 92 satisfy temporal overlap and 14 meet the beat-identification criterion (∼7% fraction). It further performs Bayesian recovery of lensing time delay and magnification parameters with a beat template for a representative event, concluding that beat patterns form a distinguishable subset of lensed LISA signals.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies a concrete observational signature (beat patterns from short-delay, high-magnification-ratio lensing) that could confirm strong lensing in LISA data and quantify its occurrence. Strengths include the explicit construction of overlap-restricted waveforms, the use of an external population synthesis catalog to produce numerical rates, and the demonstration that parameter estimation recovers the lensing parameters. The approach is falsifiable via the mismatch-threshold criterion and supplies a clear pathway for follow-up template-based searches.

major comments (2)
  1. [population-based rate estimation] Rate estimation (abstract and population-based section): The headline 7% identifiable-beat fraction (14/196 events) is obtained solely by sampling time-delay and magnification distributions from the single HS-nod-SN (B+20) catalog and applying the overlap and mismatch-threshold conditions; no alternative lens-population synthesis, variation of the lens-mass function, or propagation of uncertainties in the LISA selection function is reported. Because the beat-identification criterion is stated to be most efficient for short delays and large magnification ratios, any systematic shift in that joint distribution scales the final fraction directly.
  2. [waveform construction and mismatch] Waveform mismatch evaluation (abstract): Restricting the mismatch integral to the overlapping inspiral stage before the first-image coalescence excludes the delayed merger peak of the second image by construction; while this isolates the beat, the paper provides no quantitative assessment of how this truncation affects the overall signal-to-noise ratio or the fraction of events that would remain detectable when the full waveform (including the second merger) is used.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] Abstract: The abbreviation 'HS-nod-SN (B+20)' is used without expansion or citation on first appearance; a parenthetical reference to the underlying strong-lensing population paper would improve clarity.
  2. Notation: The distinction between the 'beat template' used for parameter estimation and the 'two-image beat waveforms' used for mismatch is not always explicit; consistent terminology across sections would reduce ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript's significance and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [population-based rate estimation] Rate estimation (abstract and population-based section): The headline 7% identifiable-beat fraction (14/196 events) is obtained solely by sampling time-delay and magnification distributions from the single HS-nod-SN (B+20) catalog and applying the overlap and mismatch-threshold conditions; no alternative lens-population synthesis, variation of the lens-mass function, or propagation of uncertainties in the LISA selection function is reported. Because the beat-identification criterion is stated to be most efficient for short delays and large magnification ratios, any systematic shift in that joint distribution scales the final fraction directly.

    Authors: We agree that reliance on a single catalog constitutes a limitation of the current rate estimate. The HS-nod-SN (B+20) catalog was selected because it is a publicly available, widely used strong-lensing population for MBHBs that already incorporates a realistic lens-mass function and selection effects. In the revised manuscript we will (i) explicitly state that the ~7% fraction is derived from this specific catalog and should be viewed as indicative, (ii) add a short discussion of how shifts in the joint time-delay/magnification distribution would affect the fraction, and (iii) note that the same mismatch-threshold pipeline can be applied to future catalogs. A full multi-catalog comparison and propagation of all LISA selection uncertainties lies beyond the scope of the present work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [waveform construction and mismatch] Waveform mismatch evaluation (abstract): Restricting the mismatch integral to the overlapping inspiral stage before the first-image coalescence excludes the delayed merger peak of the second image by construction; while this isolates the beat, the paper provides no quantitative assessment of how this truncation affects the overall signal-to-noise ratio or the fraction of events that would remain detectable when the full waveform (including the second merger) is used.

    Authors: The truncation is deliberate: the beat pattern arises exclusively from the overlapping inspiral portions, whereas the second-image merger occurs after the first coalescence and does not participate in the beat. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that an assessment of the SNR impact is useful for context. In the revised version we will add a quantitative comparison, for the representative events, of the SNR accumulated during the overlap window versus the full two-image waveform (including the delayed merger). This will show that the overlap phase already carries the majority of the SNR for the short-delay, high-magnification-ratio systems that produce identifiable beats, thereby supporting the robustness of the identification criterion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; rate estimates drawn from external population model

full rationale

The paper constructs beat waveforms under the singular isothermal sphere assumption and applies overlap/mismatch criteria to count events, but the headline fractions (196 events, 92 overlaps, 14 beats, ~7%) are obtained by sampling time-delay and magnification distributions from the externally cited HS-nod-SN (B+20) population model. Bayesian recovery with the beat template recovers the injected lensing parameters by design of the forward model, without any reduction of the identification criterion or rate to quantities defined by the paper's own fitted inputs or self-citations. No load-bearing step equates a claimed prediction to its own construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the singular isothermal sphere lens model for constructing waveforms and the external HS-nod-SN (B+20) population model for rate estimation; no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gravitational waves propagate according to general relativity, allowing lensing to produce multiple images with time delays and magnifications.
    Invoked when constructing two-image beat waveforms from MBHB signals.
  • domain assumption The singular isothermal sphere provides a sufficient description of the lensing configuration for the purpose of generating beat patterns.
    Adopted to describe the lensing configuration in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5780 in / 1388 out tokens · 20888 ms · 2026-06-27T06:24:22.687095+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Finite-Core Signatures in LISA-Band Wave-Optics Lensing by Low-Mass Dark Matter Halos

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Finite cores in low-mass dark matter halos produce distinct complex residuals in LISA-band wave-optics amplification that cannot be fully mimicked by lower-concentration NFW profiles and peak at rc/rs ≃ 0.25-0.3.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 42 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Aber- nathy, F. Acernese,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 688 (1916)

    A. Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 688 (1916)

    1916

  3. [3]

    Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 154 (1918)

    A. Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 154 (1918)

    1918

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 031104 (2018), arXiv:1709.09203 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Abbott, T

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley,et al., Astrophys. J. Lett.915, L5 (2021), arXiv:2106.15163 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Einstein, Science84, 506 (1936)

    A. Einstein, Science84, 506 (1936)

    1936

  7. [7]

    J. K. Lawrence, Phys. Rev. D3, 3239 (1971)

    1971

  8. [8]

    S. Cao, G. Covone, M. Paolillo, and Z.-H. Zhu, Re- search in Astronomy and Astrophysics13, 15 (2013), arXiv:1211.4439 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    T. E. Collett and M. W. Auger, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.443, 969 (2014), arXiv:1403.5278 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Schneider, J

    P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco,Gravitational Lenses(Springer, 1992)

    1992

  11. [11]

    Treu, Annu

    T. Treu, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.48, 87 (2010), arXiv:1003.5567 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    Refsdal, Mon

    S. Refsdal, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.128, 307 (1964)

    1964

  13. [13]

    Takahashi, Astrophys

    R. Takahashi, Astrophys. J.835, 103 (2017), arXiv:1606.00458 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    T. T. Nakamura and S. Deguchi, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement133, 137 (1999)

    1999

  15. [15]

    T. T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1138 (1998)

    1998

  16. [16]

    Takahashi and T

    R. Takahashi and T. Nakamura, Astrophys. J.595, 1039 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0305055 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  17. [17]

    K. Liao, M. Biesiada, and X.-L. Fan, Astrophys. J.875, 139 (2019), arXiv:1903.06612 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Bulashenko and H

    O. Bulashenko and H. Ubach, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2022, 022 (2022), arXiv:2112.10773 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Zhang and X

    H. Zhang and X. Fan, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy64, 120462 (2021), arXiv:1809.06511 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Col- laboration, the KAGRA Collaboration, A. G. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.18082 (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Col- laboration, the KAGRA Collaboration, A. G. Abac, A. Abe,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.27223 (2026), arXiv:2605.27223 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Liu and K

    T. Liu and K. Liao, Phys. Rev. D113, 083009 (2026), arXiv:2512.10344 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    H. C. Ohanian, Astrophys. J.271, 551 (1983)

    1983

  24. [24]

    P. V. Bliokh and A. A. Minakov, Astrophys. Space Sci. 34, L7 (1975)

    1975

  25. [25]

    R. J. Bontz and M. P. Haugan, Astrophys. Space Sci.78, 199 (1981)

    1981

  26. [26]

    A. V. Mandzhos, Soviet Astronomy Letters7, 213 (1981)

    1981

  27. [27]

    Schneider and J

    P. Schneider and J. Schmid-Burgk, Astron. Astrophys. 148, 369 (1985)

    1985

  28. [28]

    Deguchi and W

    S. Deguchi and W. D. Watson, inBulletin of the Ameri- can Astronomical Society, Vol. 17 (1985) p. 907

    1985

  29. [29]

    J. B. Peterson and T. Falk, Astrophys. J. Lett.374, L5 (1991)

    1991

  30. [30]

    Yamamoto, Phys

    K. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D71, 101301 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505116 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    Hou, X.-L

    S. Hou, X.-L. Fan, and Z.-H. Zhu, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.507, 761 (2021), arXiv:2106.01765 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Hou, X.-L

    S. Hou, X.-L. Fan, K. Liao, and Z.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 101, 064011 (2020), arXiv:1911.02798 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    Cutler and D

    C. Cutler and D. E. Holz, Phys. Rev. D80, 104009 (2009), arXiv:0906.3752 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  34. [34]

    Camera and A

    S. Camera and A. Nishizawa, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 151103 (2013), arXiv:1303.5446 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Congedo and A

    G. Congedo and A. Taylor, Phys. Rev. D99, 083526 (2019), arXiv:1812.02730 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Jung and C

    S. Jung and C. S. Shin, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 041103 (2019), arXiv:1712.01396 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    X.-L. Fan, K. Liao, M. Biesiada, A. Pi´ orkowska-Kurpas, and Z.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 091102 (2017), arXiv:1612.04095 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    T. E. Collett and D. Bacon, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 091101 (2017), arXiv:1602.05882 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Sereno, A

    M. Sereno, A. Sesana, A. Bleuler, P. Jetzer, M. Volon- teri,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 251101 (2010), 11 arXiv:1011.5238 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    Sereno, P

    M. Sereno, P. Jetzer, A. Sesana, and M. Volonteri, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.415, 2773 (2011), arXiv:1104.1977 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  41. [41]

    Liao, X.-L

    K. Liao, X.-L. Fan, X. Ding, M. Biesiada, and Z.-H. Zhu, Nature Communications8, 1148 (2017), arXiv:1703.04151 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    T. Liu, S. Cao, M. Biesiada, Y. Zhang, and J. Wang, Astrophys. J. Lett.965, L11 (2024), arXiv:2404.07419 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Amaro-Seoane, H

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Ba- rausse,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.00786 (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    J. I. Thorpe, J. Ziemer, I. Thorpe, J. Livas, J. W. Con- klin,et al., inBulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 51 (2019) p. 77, arXiv:1907.06482 [astro- ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Colpi, K

    M. Colpi, K. Danzmann, M. Hewitson, K. Holley- Bockelmann, P. Jetzer,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2402.07571 (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Guti´ errez and M

    J. Guti´ errez and M. Lagos, Phys. Rev. D112, 123512 (2025), arXiv:2510.02061 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    C ¸ alıs,kan, N

    M. C ¸ alıs,kan, N. Anil Kumar, L. Ji, J. M. Ezquiaga, R. Cotesta,et al., Phys. Rev. D108, 123543 (2023), arXiv:2307.06990 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, and D. Scolnic, Astrophys. J.876, 85 (2019), arXiv:1903.07603 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash- down, J. Aumont,et al., Astron. Astrophys.652, C4 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, J. Aasi, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott,et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    Acernese, M

    F. Acernese, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, D. Aisa, N. Alle- mandou,et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    Abbott, T

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams,et al., Physical Review X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Somiya, Classical and Quantum Gravity29, 124007 (2012), arXiv:1111.7185 [gr-qc]

    K. Somiya, Classical and Quantum Gravity29, 124007 (2012), arXiv:1111.7185 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa,et al., Phys. Rev. D88, 043007 (2013), arXiv:1306.6747 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  56. [56]

    Akutsu, M

    T. Akutsu, M. Ando, K. Arai, Y. Arai, S. Araki,et al., Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Maggiore, C

    M. Maggiore, C. Van Den Broeck, N. Bartolo, E. Bel- gacem, D. Bertacca,et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020, 050 (2020), arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    A. Abac, R. Abramo, S. Albanesi, A. Albertini, A. Agapito,et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2026, 081 (2026), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Reitze, R

    D. Reitze, R. X. Adhikari, S. Ballmer, B. Barish, L. Bar- sotti,et al., inBulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 51 (2019) p. 35, arXiv:1907.04833 [astro- ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Evans, R

    M. Evans, R. X. Adhikari, C. Afle, S. W. Ballmer, S. Bis- coveanu,et al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2109.09882 (2021), arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    M. A. Varvella, M. C. Angonin, and P. Tourrenc, Gen- eral Relativity and Gravitation36, 983 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0312028 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    A. K. Meena and J. S. Bagla, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 1127 (2020), arXiv:1903.11809 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Natarajan, L

    P. Natarajan, L. L. R. Williams, M. Bradaˇ c, C. Grillo, A. Ghosh,et al., Space Sci. Rev.220, 19 (2024), arXiv:2403.06245 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    R. D. Blandford and R. Narayan, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.30, 311 (1992)

    1992

  65. [65]

    L. V. E. Koopmans, inEAS Publications Series, EAS Publications Series, Vol. 20, edited by G. A. Mamon, F. Combes, C. Deffayet, and B. Fort (EDP, 2006) pp. 161–166, arXiv:astro-ph/0511121 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  66. [66]

    L. V. E. Koopmans, T. Treu, A. S. Bolton, S. Burles, and L. A. Moustakas, Astrophys. J.649, 599 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601628 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  67. [67]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash- down, J. Aumont,et al., Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Yunes and X

    N. Yunes and X. Siemens, Living Reviews in Relativity 16, 9 (2013), arXiv:1304.3473 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    Isi and A

    M. Isi and A. J. Weinstein, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1710.03794 (2017), arXiv:1710.03794 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Physical Review131, 435 (1963)

    1963

  71. [71]

    M. Du, P. Wang, Z. Luo, W.-B. Han, X. Zhang,et al., Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy69, 249501 (2026), arXiv:2505.16500 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Hannam, M. P¨ urrer, F. Ohme, et al., Phys. Rev. D93, 044006 (2016), arXiv:1508.07250 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. P¨ urrer, et al., Phys. Rev. D93, 044007 (2016), arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [74]

    Cutler and ´E

    C. Cutler and ´E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D49, 2658 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9402014 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  75. [75]

    S. Ali, E. Stoikos, E. Meade, M. Kesden, and L. King, Phys. Rev. D107, 103023 (2023), arXiv:2210.01873 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    L. S. Finn and D. F. Chernoff, Phys. Rev. D47, 2198 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9301003 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  77. [77]

    L. S. Finn, Phys. Rev. D46, 5236 (1992), arXiv:gr- qc/9209010 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 1992

  78. [78]

    Tinto, S

    M. Tinto, S. Dhurandhar, and D. Malakar, Phys. Rev. D 107, 082001 (2023), arXiv:2212.05967 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    P. Wang, X. Zhao, Z. Wu, Z. Yang, and C. Shao, Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica55, 230410 (2025)

    2025