Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 41 references

Mechanical Force-Driven Charge Redistribution for Hydrogen Release at Ambient Conditions in Transition Metal-Intercalated Bilayer Graphene

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Mechanically compressing transition-metal-intercalated bilayer graphene below element-specific interlayer distances fully releases stored hydrogen at ambient conditions.

desk verdict Plausible computational hydrogen-storage result, but the supplied full text is an unrelated paper, so any verdict has to be provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09501 v1 pith:MN3VVMO6 submitted 2025-08-13 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jongdeok Kim , Vikram Mahamiya , Massimiliano Di Ventra , Hoonkyung Lee This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hydrogenstoragebilayergraphenetransition-metalintercalationmechanicalforcechargeredistributionKubasinteractiondensityfunctionaltheorydesorptiontemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that mechanical compression can replace heating as the switch for hydrogen release in transition-metal-intercalated bilayer graphene. Using density functional theory and thermodynamic occupancy probability calculations, it predicts that shrinking the interlayer distance below 4.7 Å, 5.3 Å, and 5.1 Å for Sc, Ti, and V intercalants drives complete hydrogen desorption at ambient conditions. The binding is weakened not by reducing the total charge the metal donates, but by redistributing that charge between the graphene layers and the H2 molecule, cutting transfer into H2's antibonding orbitals. A sympathetic reader would see this as a fresh handle on the stubborn problem of hydrogen storage: a mechanically controllable storage-release cycle.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the interlayer distance of bilayer graphene acting as a mechanical control parameter. The paper couples density functional theory (DFT) calculations of H2 interaction energies with thermodynamic occupancy probability calculations that convert binding strengths into desorption conditions. The physical interaction at play is the Kubas interaction between transition-metal d-orbitals and H2; compression reduces charge transfer into the H2 antibonding orbitals, and the quantitative thresholds (4.7 Å for Sc, 5.3 Å for Ti, 5.1 Å for V) are the spacings at which the computed hydrogen occupancy drops to zero.

What would settle it

Measure hydrogen desorption from Sc-, Ti-, and V-intercalated bilayer graphene under controlled uniaxial pressure. If complete desorption does not occur at the predicted interlayer distances, or if the desorption temperature does not drop monotonically as the spacing shrinks, the central claim fails. On the theory side, recomputing the H2 binding curve with a wavefunction-based method (e.g., quantum Monte Carlo) at the threshold spacings would test whether the DFT interaction energies are accurate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a quantitative mechanical release mechanism: for Sc-, Ti-, and V-intercalated bilayer graphene, reducing the interlayer distance below material-specific thresholds (4.7 Å, 5.3 Å, and 5.1 Å, respectively) brings the hydrogen occupancy to zero, releasing H2 at ambient conditions. The authors show with DFT and occupancy calculations that the total charge transferred from the transition-metal atom remains almost constant as the layers approach, but its distribution shifts: less charge flows into the H2 antibonding orbitals while more is taken up by the graphene layers. This charge reallocation weakens the Kubas interaction that holds H2, and the thresholds mark where the

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that an external mechanical force can compress the interlayer distance to the predicted thresholds (4.7, 5.3, and 5.1 Å) without destabilizing the intercalated bilayer, and that the DFT-based occupancy calculation faithfully mimics real ambient desorption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Squeezing the bilayer below 4.7, 5.3, or 5.1 Å (depending on the intercalated metal) should fully release stored hydrogen without raising the temperature.
  • Desorption temperature becomes continuously tunable by partial compression, offering a mechanical alternative to thermal desorption cycles.
  • The mechanism is demonstrated for Sc, Ti, and V, suggesting it generalizes to other early transition metals that bind H2 through Kubas interactions.
  • The near-constant total charge transfer identifies charge redistribution, rather than charge magnitude, as the engineering lever for binding strength.
  • The authors point to existing experiments on graphene oxide membranes and noble-gas/alkali-metal intercalation as evidence that the needed interlayer tuning is experimentally accessible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same charge-redistribution logic holds in other layered hosts (MoS2, MXenes), mechanical compression could become a general route to pressure-controlled desorption, not a graphene-specific trick.
  • The distance thresholds could be translated into applied pressure values using the interlayer compressibility of graphene, giving experimentalists a concrete force target the paper does not compute.
  • A direct test of the mechanism would be to measure whether the metal atom's charge state changes under compression; the paper's near-constant total charge prediction is a falsifiable fingerprint.
  • A continuous mapping of desorption temperature as a function of interlayer distance would let the same material serve multiple operating temperatures, a design degree of freedom the paper does not explicitly develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as submitted, consists of an abstract for arXiv:2508.09501, which claims a first-principles DFT and thermodynamic-occupancy study of Sc-, Ti-, and V-intercalated bilayer graphene. The central claim is that reducing the interlayer distance below 4.7 Å, 5.3 Å, and 5.1 Å for Sc, Ti, and V, respectively, drives complete H2 desorption at ambient conditions. The abstract further claims that the total charge transferred from the transition-metal atoms stays nearly constant with interlayer distance, while charge redistribution between the graphene layers and H2 tunes the interaction strength. The supplied full text, however, is arXiv:2508.09504, an unrelated manuscript on causal-graph anomaly detection in cyber-physical systems. As a result, no methods, equations, parameters, numerical results, or error analysis for the claimed hydrogen-storage study are available for inspection. The only citable content is the abstract itself.

Significance. If the claimed effect is real and reproducible, the work addresses a recognized bottleneck in TM-functionalized carbon nanomaterials for hydrogen storage: high desorption temperatures. The mechanical-force strategy, applied to TM-intercalated bilayer graphene, is conceptually attractive, and the predicted thresholds are sharp and in principle falsifiable. The proposed mechanism—nearly constant total charge transfer from the TM atom but redistribution between graphene and H2—is a non-obvious and potentially useful insight. However, because the manuscript as supplied lacks all computational details and even the correct full text, its significance cannot currently be assessed beyond the conceptual level. The thresholds and mechanistic claims are unsupported as presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (arXiv:2508.09504 mismatch)] The supplied full text is not the paper described by the abstract. It is titled "Causal Graph Profiling via Structural Divergence for Robust Anomaly Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems" by Malarkkan et al. and concerns a completely different topic. Consequently, none of the claimed DFT calculations, thermodynamic occupancy equations, structural models, or numerical results are available for inspection. This is not a presentation issue: every load-bearing claim—the 4.7/5.3/5.1 Å desorption thresholds, the occupancy-to-zero statement, and the charge-redistribution mechanism—rests on inaccessible computations. The manuscript as submitted cannot be verified, reproduced, or properly refereed.
  2. [Abstract] The "thermodynamic occupancy probability calculations" are not defined. No partition function, H2 chemical potential, temperature, pressure, or statistical-mechanical model is given. The desorption threshold is set by comparing the TM–H2 binding energy with the H2 gas chemical potential, so the occupancy depends exponentially on the assumed temperature and pressure. A change of ~0.1 eV in binding energy or an order-of-magnitude change in assumed H2 pressure can shift the predicted threshold by several tenths of an Å. Without these inputs the headline thresholds 4.7/5.3/5.1 Å are not reproducible or falsifiable.
  3. [Abstract] No DFT methodology is reported: exchange-correlation functional, dispersion correction, pseudopotential, plane-wave cutoff, k-point sampling, or zero-point energy treatment are absent. Kubas-type TM–H2 binding energies are known to be sensitive to the functional and to van der Waals treatment, and zero-point corrections are typically non-negligible for H2. The quantitative thresholds stated in the abstract therefore cannot be taken as robust predictions until these choices, and any convergence checks, are provided.
  4. [Abstract] The mechanical-force premise is unquantified. The abstract asserts that external mechanical forces can reduce occupancy to zero and that the approach extends to large interlayer distances, citing experiments on graphene oxide membranes, but it does not state the required force magnitude, the stress–strain relation, or whether the intercalated bilayer remains structurally stable at the threshold interlayer distances. In addition, the mechanistic claim that "the total charge transferred from the TM atoms remains nearly constant ... its redistribution ... fine-tunes the interaction strength" is stated without defining the charge-partitioning scheme (Bader, Hirshfeld, etc.) or showing any charge-density, charge-transfer, or binding-energy data. These are central to the paper's quantitative and mechanistic conclusions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] "Ambient conditions" is not defined; the temperature and pressure used in the occupancy calculation should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Abstract] The reference "ACS Nano 12, 9309 (2018)" is given without authors or title, and the phrase "recent experiments" is vague. The relevance of graphene oxide membrane intercalation experiments to bilayer graphene with transition-metal intercalants should be justified in the full text.
  3. [Abstract] No uncertainty estimates or sensitivity analyses are presented for the desorption thresholds. If the full calculations are available, error bars or a sensitivity study would materially strengthen the claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected in the abstract; the claimed thresholds are DFT-derived outputs. The supplied full text is an unrelated paper, which is a missing-support/reproducibility flag, not evidence of circularity.

full rationale

The abstract reports first-principles DFT and thermodynamic occupancy probability calculations. The desorption thresholds (4.7/5.3/5.1 Å for Sc/Ti/V) are presented as computed outputs of this model, not as inputs fitted to the target claim. No equations are available in the abstract, so I cannot exhibit any reduction of a prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citational uniqueness argument. There are no self-citations visible, no uniqueness theorems invoked, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation. The external references to graphene oxide membranes and noble gas/alkali metal intercalation experiments are independent support, not circular inputs. The charge-redistribution statement is an interpretation of DFT charge analysis, not a definition that forces the binding-energy outcome. The main concern is the mismatch between the abstract (arXiv:2508.09501) and the supplied full text (arXiv:2508.09504, titled 'Causal Graph Profiling via Structural Divergence...'), which means the actual computational details (exchange-correlation functional, dispersion treatment, H2 chemical potential/pressure, occupancy model equations) are absent from the provided manuscript. That is a reproducibility and evidence-completeness problem, but it does not constitute circularity under the rubric because no derivation chain can be shown to be equivalent to its own inputs. Score 0 is therefore appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All central claims are based on the abstract alone. The paper assumes standard DFT and thermodynamic modeling, plus the stated premise that mechanical force can tune interlayer distance. No free parameters are disclosed in the abstract, and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption DFT exchange-correlation functional accurately describes TM-graphene-H2 interactions
    Abstract states first-principles DFT is used; accuracy depends on the chosen functional and dispersion corrections.
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic occupancy probability model correctly maps interaction energies to desorption conditions
    Abstract mentions thermodynamic occupancy probability calculations; this assumes equilibrium statistics with the computed binding energies.
  • ad hoc to paper Mechanical force can controllably vary the interlayer distance over the cited range
    Abstract claims external mechanical forces adjust interlayer distance but does not demonstrate how, or whether the structure remains stable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mechanical Force-Driven Charge Redistribution for Hydrogen Release at Ambient Conditions in Transition Metal-Intercalated Bilayer Graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MN3VVMO6

@misc{pith2026250809501,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mechanical Force-Driven Charge Redistribution for Hydrogen Release at Ambient Conditions in Transition Metal-Intercalated Bilayer Graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MN3VVMO6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09501}
}
read the original abstract

Transition-metal (TM) atom-functionalized nanomaterials are promising candidates for hydrogen storage due to their ability to adsorb multiple hydrogen molecules through Kubas interactions. However, achieving efficient hydrogen desorption at ambient conditions remains a critical challenge for practical use. Here, we present a novel approach to modulate the desorption temperature of hydrogen in TM-intercalated bilayer graphene (BLG) using external mechanical forces. By employing first-principles density functional theory (DFT) and thermodynamic occupancy probability calculations, we demonstrate that adjusting the interlayer distance allows for precise control over the interaction energy of H2, thereby facilitating its desorption at ambient conditions. Complete hydrogen desorption occurs when the interlayer distance is reduced below 4.7 {\AA}, 5.3 {\AA}, and 5.1 {\AA} for Sc-, Ti-, and V-intercalated BLG, respectively. Our findings suggest that external mechanical forces can effectively bring hydrogen occupancy to zero by minimizing charge transfer from the TM d-orbitals to H2 antibonding orbitals. Notably, while the total charge transferred from the TM atoms remains nearly constant at varying interlayer distances, its redistribution between the graphene layers and H2 fine-tunes the interaction strength. This approach can be extended to large interlayer distances, as supported by recent experiments on graphene oxide membranes [ACS Nano 12, 9309 (2018)]. Furthermore, recent experimental advances in noble gas and alkali metal intercalation in BLG highlight the potential of this approach to overcome the long-standing challenge of high desorption temperatures in TM-functionalized layered nanomaterials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chuadhry Mujeeb Ahmed, Venkata Reddy Palleti, and Aditya P. Mathur. 2017. WADI: a water distribution testbed for research in the design of secure cyber physical systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Cyber- Physical Systems for Smart Water Networks (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) (CySW A- TER ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New...

    work page arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Mohiuddin Ahmed, Abdun Naser Mahmood, and Jiankun Hu. 2016. A survey of network anomaly detection techniques. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 60 (2016), 19–31

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Paul Beaumont, Ben Horsburgh, Philip Pilgerstorfer, Angel Droth, Richard Oen- taryo, Steven Ler, Hiep Nguyen, Gabriel Azevedo Ferreira, Zain Patel, and Wesley Leong. 2021. CausalNex. https://github.com/quantumblacklabs/causalnex

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Paul Boniol and Themis Palpanas. 2020. Series2Graph: graph-based subsequence anomaly detection for time series. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 13, 12 (Aug. 2020), 1821–1834. https://doi.org/10.14778/3407790.3407792

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Markus M Breunig, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Raymond T Ng, and Jörg Sander. 2000. LOF: identifying density-based local outliers. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data . 93–104

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    James Cervini, Aviel Rubin, and Lanier Watkins. 2022. Don’t drink the cyber: Extrapolating the possibilities of Oldsmar’s water treatment cyberattack. InInter- national conference on cyber warfare and security , Vol. 17. Academic Conferences International Limited, 19–25

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Varun Chandola, Arindam Banerjee, and Vipin Kumar. 2009. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 41, 3 (2009), 1–58

    2009

  8. [8]

    Xiaolu Chen. 2019. Tennessee Eastman simulation dataset. https://doi.org/10. 21227/4519-z502

    work page 2019

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Xiaoyun Deng, Yujie Zhou, Wei Hu, Yadong Wang, and Lichao Zhang. 2021. Graph neural network-based anomaly detection in multivariate time series. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2829–2838

    2021

  2. [10]

    Falih Gozi Febrinanto, Kristen Moore, Chandra Thapa, Mujie Liu, Vidya Saikr- ishna, Jiangang Ma, and Feng Xia. 2023. Entropy Causal Graphs for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection. arXiv:2312.09478 [cs.LG]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Astha Garg, Wenyu Zhang, Jules Samaran, Ramasamy Savitha, and Chuan-Sheng Foo. 2022. An Evaluation of Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis in Multivariate Time Series. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 33, 6 (2022), 2508–2517. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2...

    2022

  4. [12]

    Chang Gong, Di Yao, Chuzhe Zhang, Wenbin Li, and Jingping Bi. 2023. Causal Discovery from Temporal Data: An Overview and New Perspectives. arXiv:2303.10112 [cs.LG]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Michał Gorawski and Krzysztof Grochla. 2019. Graph Representation of Linear Infrastructure in Smart City IoT Systems. In 2019 11th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT) . 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUMT48472.2019.8970674

    2019

  6. [14]

    Konstantin Kirchheim. 2023. Towards Deep Anomaly Detection with Structured Knowledge Representations. In International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. Springer, 382–389

    2023

  7. [15]

    Hans-Peter Kriegel, Matthias Schubert, and Arthur Zimek. 2008. Angle-Based Outlier Detection in High-Dimensional Data. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Las Vegas, Nevada, USA) (KDD ’08). Association for Comp...

    2008

  8. [16]

    Zheng Li, Yue Zhao, Xiyang Hu, Nicola Botta, Cezar Ionescu, and George H. Chen. 2023. ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 35, 12 (2023), 12181–12193. https://doi.org/10.1109...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Qin Lin, Sridha Adepu, Sicco Verwer, and Aditya Mathur. 2018. TABOR: A Graph- ical Model-Based Approach for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control Systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Se- curity (Incheon, Republic of Korea)(ASI...

    2018

  10. [18]

    Arun Vignesh Malarkkan, Haoyue Bai, Xinyuan Wang, Anjali Kaushik, Dongjie Wang, and Yanjie Fu. 2025. Rethinking spatio-temporal anomaly detection: A vision for causality-driven cybersecurity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.08177 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Arun Vignesh Malarkkan, Dongjie Wang, Haoyue Bai, and Yanjie Fu. 2025. In- cremental Causal Graph Learning for Online Cyberattack Detection in Cyber- Physical Infrastructures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14387 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Arun Vignesh Malarkkan, Dongjie Wang, and Yanjie Fu. 2024. Multi-view Causal Graph Fusion Based Anomaly Detection in Cyber-Physical Infrastructures. InPro- ceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Boise, ID, USA) (CIKM ’24). As...

    2024

  13. [21]

    Pankaj Malhotra, Lovekesh Vig, Gautam Shroff, Puneet Agarwal, et al. 2015. Long short term memory networks for anomaly detection in time series.. In Esann, Vol. 2015. 89

    2015

  14. [22]

    Mathur and Nils Ole Tippenhauer

    Aditya P. Mathur and Nils Ole Tippenhauer. 2016. SWaT: a water treatment testbed for research and training on ICS security. In 2016 International Workshop on Cyber-physical Systems for Smart Water Networks (CySWater) . 31–36. https: //doi.org/10.1109/CySWater.2016.7469060

    2016

  15. [23]

    Douglas C Montgomery. 2007. Introduction to statistical quality control . John Wiley & Sons

    2007

  16. [24]

    Meike Nauta, Darius Bucur, and Christin Seifert. 2019. Causal discovery with attention-based convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining . 2299– 2307

    2019

  17. [25]

    Roxana Pamfil, Nisara Sriwattanaworachai, Shaan Desai, Philip Pilgerstorfer, Paul Beaumont, Konstantinos Georgatzis, and Bryon Aragam. 2020. DYNOTEARS: Structure Learning from Time-Series Data. arXiv:2002.00498 [stat.ML]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Zhiqiang Pan, Chen Gao, Fei Cai, Wanyu Chen, Xin Zhang, Honghui Chen, and Yong Li. 2025. On the Cross-Graph Transferability of Dynamic Link Prediction. In Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025 (Sydney NSW, Australia) (WWW ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New ...

    2025

  19. [27]

    Tomáš Pevn`y. 2016. Loda: Lightweight on-line detector of anomalies. Machine Learning 102 (2016), 275–304

    2016

  20. [28]

    Lukas Ruff, Robert Vandermeulen, Nico Görnitz, Lucas Deecke, Malik Siddiqui, Alexander Binder, Emmanuel Müller, and Marius Kloft. 2018. Deep one-class classification. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 4393–4402

    2018

  21. [29]

    Ali Kivanc Sahin, Bora Cavdar, Ramazan Ozgur Dogan, Selen Ayas, Busra Oz- genc, and Mustafa Sinasi Ayas. 2023. A Hybrid CNN-LSTM Framework for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Water Distribution Plant. In 2023 Inno- vations in Intelligent Systems and Applications Conference (...

    2023

  22. [30]

    Robin Sommer and Vern Paxson. 2010. Outside the closed world: On using machine learning for network intrusion detection. In 2010 IEEE symposium on security and privacy. IEEE, 305–316

    2010

  23. [31]

    Ya Su, Youjian Zhao, Chenhao Niu, Rong Liu, Wei Sun, and Dan Pei. 2019. Robust Anomaly Detection for Multivariate Time Series through Stochastic Recurrent Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Con- ference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (Anc...

    2019

  24. [32]

    Álvarez Carmona, Octavio Loyola- González, Miguel Angel Medina-Pérez, Juan Carlos Velazco-Rossell, and Kim- Kwang Raymond Choo

    Miryam Elizabeth Villa-Pérez, Miguel Á. Álvarez Carmona, Octavio Loyola- González, Miguel Angel Medina-Pérez, Juan Carlos Velazco-Rossell, and Kim- Kwang Raymond Choo. 2021. Semi-supervised anomaly detection algorithms: A comparative summary and future research directions. Kno...

    2021

  25. [33]

    Dongjie Wang, Pengyang Wang, Jinbo Zhou, Leilei Sun, Bowen Du, and Yanjie Fu. 2020. Defending Water Treatment Networks: Exploiting Spatio-Temporal Effects for Cyber Attack Detection. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC...

    2020

  26. [35]

    Shijie Xing, Jing Niu, and Tao Ren. 2023. GCFormer: Granger Causality based Attention Mechanism for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) . IEEE, 1433–1438. https: //doi.org/10.1109/ICDM58522.2023.00187

    2023

  27. [36]

    Dong Xu, Yanjun Wang, Yulong Meng, and Ziying Zhang. 2017. An improved data anomaly detection method based on isolation forest. In 2017 10th international symposium on computational intelligence and design (ISCID), Vol. 2. IEEE, 287–291

    2017

  28. [37]

    Wenqian Xu, Yingbo Zhao, Jian Pei, Xiaoyun Lin, and Yanming He. 2022. Anom- aly transformer: Time series anomaly detection with association discrepancy. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 28858–28872

    2022

  29. [38]

    Shen Yin, Xiangping Zhu, and Chen Jing. 2014. Fault detection based on a robust one class support vector machine. Neurocomputing 145 (2014), 263–268

    2014

  30. [39]

    Xiaotian Zhang, Yuan Luo, Bin Hu, and Hailiang Wang. 2023. A Survey on Attention-based Causal Discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00557 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Zheng Zhang and Xiaogang Deng. 2021. Anomaly detection using improved deep SVDD model with data structure preservation. Pattern Recognition Letters 148 (2021), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2021.04.020

    2021 doi

  32. [41]

    Yue Zhao, Zain Nasrullah, and Zheng Li. 2019. PyOD: A Python Toolbox for Scalable Outlier Detection. Journal of Machine Learning Research 20, 96 (2019), Causal Graph Profiling via Structural Divergence for Robust Anomaly Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems Conference’17, July ...

    2019

  33. [42]

    Xun Zheng, Bryon Aragam, Pradeep Ravikumar, and Eric P. Xing. 2018. DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learning. arXiv:1803.01422 [stat.ML]

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.