Spectra of high-dimensional Spearman correlation matrices under scale-mixture dependence

Jean-Philippe Bouchaud; Matteo Smerlak; Pierre Bousseyroux; Tomas Espana

Spectra of high-dimensional Spearman correlation matrices under scale-mixture dependence

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that, under a scale-mixture model, the eigenvalue spectrum of a Spearman rank correlation matrix converges to a generalized Marchenko-Pastur law governed by the distribution of a latent scale variable, so rank-based correla

desk verdict A solid, honest extension of generalized MP theory to Spearman spectra under scale mixtures—the explicit solvable examples are the real contribution, and the symmetry caveat is properly generalized. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25486 v1 pith:MNVQJHPY submitted 2026-07-28 math.ST math.PRstat.TH

Jean-Philippe Bouchaud , Pierre Bousseyroux , Tomas Espana , Matteo Smerlak This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.STmath.PRstat.TH MSC 60B2062H20

keywords Spearmancorrelationmatricesscale-mixturemodellimitingspectraldistributiongeneralizedMarchenko-Pasturlaweffectiverankvariancelatentvariabledependenceheavy-taileddatarandommatrixtheory

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a high-dimensional spectral law for Spearman rank correlation matrices when data come from a scale mixture: each observation is a common scalar scale times an independent symmetric noise vector. It proves that, as dimension and sample size grow at the same rate, the eigenvalue distribution of the sample Spearman matrix converges almost surely to a deterministic generalized Marchenko-Pastur law determined by the distribution of an effective rank variance. The classical Marchenko-Pastur law appears only when the scale variable is constant, so the rank transformation does not remove latent-scale dependence. This gives a concrete handle on heavy-tailed, factor-driven data in which ranking is used for robustness, since the paper also provides solvable examples and an extension to general latent variables.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective rank variance s(σ) = E[g(σξ)^2], where g is the standardized population rank transform; its law μ_s enters a fixed-point equation tying the Stieltjes transform m(z) of the limiting spectrum to z = 1/m(z) + ∫ x/(1 − q x m(z)) dμ_s(x). The proof works by replacing ranks with oracle scores, conditioning on the scale variables, applying a generalized Marchenko-Pastur theorem under a Lindeberg condition, then showing the difference from exact ranks is a vanishing perturbation.

What would settle it

For large N,T with symmetric ξ and non-deterministic σ, compute the empirical eigenvalue density of R_N and compare its second moment with 1 + q + q Var(s(σ)), where s(σ) = E[g(σξ)^2] is estimated from the data; a mismatch beyond finite-size error would contradict Corollary 2.6.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under the scale-mixture model x_t = σ_t ξ_t with symmetric i.i.d. coordinates ξ, and in the proportional regime N/T → q, the empirical spectral distribution of the sample Spearman rank correlation matrix R_N converges almost surely to F_{q,μ_s}, a deterministic probability measure whose Stieltjes transform m satisfies z = 1/m(z) + ∫_{[0,3]} x/(1 − q x m(z)) dμ_s(x), where s(σ) = E[g(σξ)^2] is the effective rank variance, g is the standardized population rank transform, and μ_s is the law of s(σ). The classical Marchenko-Pastur law is recovered only when μ_s is a point mass at 1. The paper also proves a broader latent-variable version: if coordinates are conditionally independent given a late

Load-bearing premise

The directional shocks that get multiplied by the common scale variable are assumed symmetric around zero; if they have a nonzero mean, the simple formula for the bulk spectrum no longer holds without extra terms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The limiting spectrum of the Spearman matrix is computable in closed form whenever the law of s(σ) is known; the paper derives explicit R-transforms for binary-spin and beta-copula models.
If σ is deterministic, the LSD is exactly the classical Marchenko-Pastur law; any non-constant σ increases the spectral variance by q Var(s(σ)).
The same rank-spectrum mechanism extends to any latent-variable dependence where coordinates are conditionally independent given a latent variable, including regime-switching and one-factor Gaussian models.
For latent-variable models with a nonzero conditional mean, the bulk LSD is governed by ψ(L), while the mean component may produce one large outlying eigenvalue without affecting the bulk.
Because Spearman correlations are invariant under increasing transformations, the result covers transelliptical families and heavy-tailed Student data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A reader could use the second-moment excess q Var(s(σ)) as a nonparametric diagnostic for a common latent scale: estimate the spectrum of a Spearman matrix and compare its variance with the classical Marchenko-Pastur benchmark.
The beta-copula structure appearing in the solvable examples suggests that for many scale-mixture laws the effective rank variance may be approximately beta-distributed; testing this on other heavy-tailed families would map how universal the approximation is.
The extension to asymmetric directional components implies a phase transition: as the conditional mean grows, the bulk law changes and a finite-rank outlier appears; one could simulate asymmetric scale mixtures to locate that transition.
Because the formula depends only on the law of g(σξ)^2, a similar fixed-point equation should hold for other bounded score functions, e.g., normal-score transforms, with the same conditional-variance substitution.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague—

The thing to know: this is a legitimate, well-executed paper that extends the known LSD machinery for rank-based correlation matrices to the scale-mixture case, and it makes the result concrete with solvable examples. It is not a revolution—the proof route is the conditional generalized MP approach from Wu-Wang and Bai-Zhou, plus DKW—but the explicit identification of the effective rank variance s(σ) and the solvable families (binary-spin beta law, beta-copula) are genuinely new and useful.

What's good: Theorem 2.3 is proved cleanly. The three-step argument (oracle scores → ECDF scores → exact rank normalization) is standard but the bounds are checked. The symmetry assumption on ξ is stated clearly, and the paper honestly notes that without it Theorem 2.3's formula is not correct; Theorem 4.1 generalizes the bulk to μ_ψ and flags a possible outlier. The binary-spin result—that s(σ)/3 is always Beta(1/2,1) independent of σ's distribution—is a neat, surprising fact. The beta-copula and one-cut examples are honest approximations, labeled as such.

Soft spots, in proportion: (1) Theorem 4.1's proof is a sketch, adapting the same argument; for a paper whose abstract highlights it as a second main theorem, I'd want the details filled in or at least a clear statement that it is a sketched generalization. (2) The numerical agreement in Figs. 1–2 is partly manufactured: the effective rank variance distribution is fitted to simulations, then the spectral curve is predicted from that fit. That's a sensible workflow, and the paper is transparent about it, but it's a weaker demonstration than a parameter-free prediction. (3) The symmetry assumption is load-bearing: it makes the oracle scores conditionally centered. The paper addresses the asymmetric case via Theorem 4.1, so this is a scope limitation, not a hidden flaw. (4) Novelty is incremental: the fixed-point equation is the same generalized MP form from [27] and [2]. But the explicit computation of s(σ) for the scale-mixture model is the contribution, and it's useful.

Bottom line: this is a serious, honest paper. A good referee should engage with the proof of Theorem 4.1 and ask for more detail there, and should check the numerical fitting disclosure. It deserves peer review, not a desk reject. I'd cite it for the binary-spin and beta-copula results. Bring it to reading group if you want to see the technique cleanly applied; otherwise a quick skim suffices.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the limiting spectral distribution (LSD) of the sample Spearman rank correlation matrix for high-dimensional scale-mixture data x_t = σ_t ξ_t, where σ_t is a common latent scale and ξ_t has i.i.d. symmetric coordinates. Under the proportional-growth regime N/T→q and s(σ)>0 a.s., Theorem 2.3 proves that the empirical spectral distribution converges a.s. to a generalized Marchenko–Pastur law whose Stieltjes transform solves (3) with μ_s = Law(E[g(σξ)^2|σ]); the classical MP law is recovered only when s(σ) is deterministic. Theorem 4.1 extends this to a latent-variable model H(L,ε) and predicts the bulk from μ_ψ = Law(Var[g(H(L,ε))|L]), with a possible finite-rank outlier when φ(L)=E[g(H(L,ε))|L]≠0. Sections 3–4 give solvable examples (Rademacher scale-mixture, beta-copula ansatz, one-cut approximation, one-factor Gaussian, regime-switching, time-varying tail-thickness) and numerical illustrations.

Significance. If correct, the main result provides a clean and explicit demonstration that rank-based Spearman matrices are not insensitive to a common latent scale even though marginal magnitudes are discarded; this is of interest in robust multivariate statistics and random matrix theory. The proof of Theorem 2.3 is rigorous and follows a clean three-step strategy: oracle scores, DKW, rank perturbation, built on a generalized Marchenko–Pastur lemma. The paper is transparent about the symmetry assumption (it is explicit, and Theorem 4.1 covers the asymmetric case) and labels all numerical fits as approximations. The solvable examples, in particular the Rademacher case (Proposition 3.1) and the hypergeometric R-transform for beta-copulas (Proposition 3.3), are useful benchmarks. The numerical section is honest: the beta and one-cut densities are fitted to simulated effective rank variances, not presented as parameter-free predictions.

minor comments (5)

[§6.4 (Lemma 6.2)] Lemma 6.2 cites 'Corollary A.42 of [2]', but [2] is a journal article (Statistica Sinica, 2008) rather than a book with appendices. Please correct the reference (likely Corollary A.42 of [1], the Bai–Silverstein book) or supply the appropriate source.
[§5.2 (Theorem 4.1 proof)] Before defining w_{t,n}=A_{n,t}/√ψ_t, the proof should explicitly restrict to the almost-sure event {ψ_t>0 for all t} (analogous to Ω0 in Proposition 5.1). As written, the definition requires positivity of every ψ_t without stating this event; the later bound w²≤12/ψ_t also depends on it.
[§3.2.2 (one-cut approximation)] The fitting procedure for the polynomial coefficients (β_k) and multiplicities (m0,m1) is not described; since Fig. 4 uses these fits, please state how the parameters were selected (e.g., least squares on the simulated density) or label the curves explicitly as illustrative.
[Abstract / §2.1] The abstract states that coordinates are 'pairwise uncorrelated in both the Pearson and Spearman sense' without mentioning the moment condition; the Pearson part requires finite second moments, as acknowledged in §2.1. Add a parenthetical clarification in the abstract.
[§3.2.1, Fig. 3] The claim that 'the fitted parameter appears to grow linearly with ν' is made without a regression line or error bars in the figure. Please either add these or soften the wording to avoid overinterpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorem is derived from an external generalized Marchenko–Pastur lemma and standard rank-perturbation inequalities; numerical fits are explicit approximations and do not feed back into the proof.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorem 2.3 is self-contained in the required sense. The proof replaces ranks by oracle scores g(x_{t,n}), conditions on the scale variables to write the oracle-score Gram matrix as T^{-1} W_T^T D_T W_T with independent centered unit-variance entries, and then invokes the standard triangular-array generalized Marchenko–Pastur lemma (Lemma 6.1, explicitly attributed to Bai–Silverstein’s Theorem 4.3 in [1]). It then bridges oracle scores to ECDF scores via the Dvoretzky–Kiefer–Wolfowitz inequality and to the exact Spearman matrix via a vanishing rank-normalization perturbation. The effective rank variance s(σ) is defined from the model, not fitted from the Spearman spectrum: the theorem’s statement assumes a given μ_s = Law(s(σ)) and derives the LSD equation. The numerical section fits Beta(α,2α) and one-cut densities to the simulated distribution of s(σ)/3 and then uses the theorem to compute a spectrum; the paper explicitly labels this procedure a 'beta-copula approximation' and a 'fit' (Section 3.2.1), so it is not presented as an independent prediction from first principles. Self-citations [5] and [22] are used for motivation and standard one-cut computations, not as load-bearing warrants for the central theorem. The symmetry assumption on ξ is explicit in Assumption (ii), and the paper provides the generalized latent-variable formulation in Theorem 4.1, which covers the asymmetric case in the bulk. This is a scope limitation, not a circular step. No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem has no hidden free parameters: s(σ) is derived from the model ingredients. The only fitted parameters appear in the numerical approximation section, clearly labeled as such. The proof relies on standard external theorems (generalized MP, DKW, interlacing) rather than circular assumptions.

free parameters (2)

α_MLE(ν) = varies with ν, not tabulated
Maximum-likelihood fit of Beta(α,2α) to simulated s(σ)/3 for Student data (§3.2.1, Fig. 3); used to produce the spectral curves in Fig. 2.
one-cut polynomial coefficients (m0, m1, β0, β_k) = not tabulated
Polynomial one-cut density fit to the empirical density of s(σ)/3 (§3.2.2, Fig. 4); provides additional edge flexibility but introduces fitted parameters.

assumptions (7)

standard math Lemma 6.1 (generalized Marchenko–Pastur theorem for W^T D W with Lindeberg condition)
Core of Proposition 5.1; taken from Bai–Silverstein [1, Thm 4.3].
standard math Dvoretzky–Kiefer–Wolfowitz inequality
Used in Proposition 5.2 to control the uniform distance between ECDF and true CDF.
standard math Lemma 6.2 (Lévy distance bound for sample covariance matrices)
Taken from Bai–Zhou [2, Cor. A.42] to compare oracle-score and ECDF-score matrices.
standard math Lemma 6.3 (ESD distance bounded by rank difference)
Taken from Bai–Silverstein [1, Thm A.43]; used in proof of Theorem 4.1.
standard math Silverstein–Choi support characterization of fixed-point equations
Used in the proof of Corollary 2.6 for compact support and atom at zero.
domain assumption Model assumptions (i)–(iv): σ>0 a.s., ξ symmetric, independence, continuous F
Defines the scale-mixture model and secures that the rank transform g is odd, giving zero conditional mean of oracle scores.
domain assumption Proportional regime N/T→q∈(0,∞)
High-dimensional asymptotic setting required by the generalized MP theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectra of high-dimensional Spearman correlation matrices under scale-mixture dependence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MNVQJHPY

@misc{pith2026260725486,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectra of high-dimensional Spearman correlation matrices under scale-mixture dependence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MNVQJHPY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25486}
}

abstract

We study the asymptotic spectral properties of high-dimensional Spearman correlation matrices for scale-mixture data. We consider observations of the form $x_t=\sigma_t \xi_t \in \mathbb{R}^N,$ where the coordinates of $\xi_t$ are i.i.d.\ and the scalar mixture variable $\sigma_t$ is shared by all coordinates. Under natural symmetry assumptions, the coordinates of $x_t$ are pairwise uncorrelated in both the Pearson and Spearman sense. Nevertheless, they are not independent when the mixture variable is non-degenerate. We show that this higher-order dependence survives the rank transformation and leaves a nontrivial spectral signature. In the proportional regime $N/T\to q\in(0,\infty),$ the empirical spectral distribution of the Spearman correlation matrix converges almost surely to a generalized Mar\v{c}enko--Pastur law governed by the limiting distribution of an effective rank variance. We also formulate a broader latent-variable extension, which covers, in particular, some scale-mixture models with correlated directional components. We discuss solvable examples and numerical approximations, motivated in part by heavy-tailed data in robust multivariate statistics, econometrics, and finance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25486 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Binary-spin model. The orange histograms show the empirical eigenvalue distributions of RN obtained from simulations with N = 200 and several values of the aspect ratio q = N/T. The blue curves show the analytical limiting density derived from the explicit R-transform of Proposition 3.1, and the black curves show the classical Marˇcenko–Pastur density with aspect ratio q. 3.2. Beta-copula and one-cut approximations… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Student data and beta-copula approximation. Empirical results for multivariate Student observations with N = 200, q = 0.5 and degrees of freedom ν = 1, . . . , 6. The orange histograms show the empirical eigenvalue distributions of RN obtained from simulations, the blue curves show the analytical densities obtained by fitting a beta-copula law Beta(α, 2α) to the simulated distribution of s(σ)/3, and the black curves… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Fitted beta parameter αbMLE as a function of the Student degrees of freedom ν. For each ν, the parameter is obtained by maximum-likelihood fitting of a Beta(α, 2α) law to the simulated normalized effective rank variance s(σ)/3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Fit of the empirical density of s(σ)/3 for Student data with degrees of freedom ν = 1, . . . , 6. The solid blue curve is the average empirical density over 100 simulations, with the shaded region corresponding to a 95% confidence interval. The dashed orange curve is t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

[27]

Limiting spectral distribution of large dimensional spearman’s rank correlation matrices.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 191:105011, 2022

Zeyu Wu and Cheng Wang. Limiting spectral distribution of large dimensional spearman’s rank correlation matrices.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 191:105011, 2022. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud: Acad ´emie des Sciences, 23 Quai de Conti, 75006 Paris, France and Capital Fund Management, 23 rue de l’Universit ´e, 75007 Paris, France Email address:Jean-Philippe.Bo...

2022
[2]

Large sample covariance matrices without independence structures in columns.Statistica Sinica, pages 425–442, 2008

Zhidong Bai and Wang Zhou. Large sample covariance matrices without independence structures in columns.Statistica Sinica, pages 425–442, 2008

2008
[1]

Springer, 2010

Zhidong Bai and Jack W Silverstein.Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices, vol- ume 20. Springer, 2010

2010
[3]

Tracy–widom limit for spearman’s rho.preprint, 2019

Zhigang Bao. Tracy–widom limit for spearman’s rho.preprint, 2019

2019
[4]

Spectral statistics of large dimen- sional spearman’s rank correlation matrix and its application.The Annals of Statistics, 43(6):2588– 2623, 2015

Zhigang Bao, Liang-Ching Lin, Guangming Pan, and Wang Zhou. Spectral statistics of large dimen- sional spearman’s rank correlation matrix and its application.The Annals of Statistics, 43(6):2588– 2623, 2015

2015
[5]

Biroli, J.-P

G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, and M. Potters. The student ensemble of correlation matrices: Eigenvalue spectrum and kullback–leibler entropy.Acta Physica Polonica B, 38:4009, 2007

2007
[6]

Global testing and large-scale multiple testing for high-dimensional covariance structures

T Tony Cai. Global testing and large-scale multiple testing for high-dimensional covariance structures. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4:423–446, 2017

2017
[7]

Large dimensional spearman’s rank correlation matrices: The central limit theorem and its applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15861, 2024

Hantao Chen and Cheng Wang. Large dimensional spearman’s rank correlation matrices: The central limit theorem and its applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15861, 2024

arXiv 2024

Show all 27 references

[8]

A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices

Peter K Clark. A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, pages 135–155, 1973

1973
[9]

Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues.Quantitative finance, 1(2):223, 2001

Rama Cont. Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues.Quantitative finance, 1(2):223, 2001

2001
[10]

Ties, tails and spectra: On rank-based dependency measures in high dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14992, 2025

Nina D¨ ornemann, Michael Fleermann, and Johannes Heiny. Ties, tails and spectra: On rank-based dependency measures in high dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14992, 2025

2025 arXiv
[11]

Thomas W Epps and Mary Lee Epps. The stochastic dependence of security price changes and trans- action volumes: Implications for the mixture-of-distributions hypothesis.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 305–321, 1976

1976
[12]

An overview of the estimation of large covariance and precision matrices.The Econometrics Journal, 19(1):C1–C32, 2016

Jianqing Fan, Yuan Liao, and Han Liu. An overview of the estimation of large covariance and precision matrices.The Econometrics Journal, 19(1):C1–C32, 2016

2016
[13]

Sequences of elliptical distri- butions and mixtures of normal distributions.Journal of multivariate analysis, 97(2):295–310, 2006

Eusebio G´ omez-S´ anchez-Manzano, MA G´ omez-Villegas, and JM Mar ´ ın. Sequences of elliptical distri- butions and mixtures of normal distributions.Journal of multivariate analysis, 97(2):295–310, 2006

2006
[14]

Scale-invariant sparse pca on high-dimensional meta-elliptical data.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109(505):275–287, 2014

Fang Han and Han Liu. Scale-invariant sparse pca on high-dimensional meta-elliptical data.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109(505):275–287, 2014

2014
[15]

Fang Han and Han Liu. Statistical analysis of latent generalized correlation matrix estimation in transelliptical distribution.Bernoulli: official journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Sta- tistics and Probability, 23(1):23, 2016

2016
[16]

A new measure of rank correlation.Biometrika, 30(1-2):81–93, 1938

Maurice G Kendall. A new measure of rank correlation.Biometrika, 30(1-2):81–93, 1938

1938
[17]

High-dimensional semipara- metric gaussian copula graphical models.The Annals of Statistics, pages 2293–2326, 2012

Han Liu, Fang Han, Ming Yuan, John Lafferty, and Larry Wasserman. High-dimensional semipara- metric gaussian copula graphical models.The Annals of Statistics, pages 2293–2326, 2012

2012
[18]

Transelliptical graphical models.Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems, 25, 2012

Han Liu, Fang Han, and Cun-hui Zhang. Transelliptical graphical models.Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems, 25, 2012

2012
[19]

Statistical properties of the volatil- ity of price fluctuations.Physical review e, 60(2):1390, 1999

Yanhui Liu, Parameswaran Gopikrishnan, H Eugene Stanley, et al. Statistical properties of the volatil- ity of price fluctuations.Physical review e, 60(2):1390, 1999

1999
[20]

The variation of certain speculative prices.Journal of business, 36(4):394, 1963

Benoit Mandelbrot et al. The variation of certain speculative prices.Journal of business, 36(4):394, 1963

1963
[21]

Distribution of eigenvalues for some sets of random matrices.Matematicheskii Sbornik, 114(4):507–536, 1967

Vladimir Alexandrovich Marchenko and Leonid Andreevich Pastur. Distribution of eigenvalues for some sets of random matrices.Matematicheskii Sbornik, 114(4):507–536, 1967

1967
[22]

Cambridge University Press, 2020

Marc Potters and Jean-Philippe Bouchaud.A first course in random matrix theory: for physicists, engineers and data scientists. Cambridge University Press, 2020

2020
[23]

Strong convergence of the empirical distribution of eigenvalues of large dimensional random matrices.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 55(2):331–339, 1995

Jack W Silverstein. Strong convergence of the empirical distribution of eigenvalues of large dimensional random matrices.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 55(2):331–339, 1995. 24 J.-P. BOUCHAUD, P. BOUSSEYROUX, T. ESPANA, AND M. SMERLAK

1995
[24]

On the empirical distribution of eigenvalues of a class of large dimensional random matrices.Journal of Multivariate analysis, 54(2):175–192, 1995

Jack W Silverstein and Zhi Dong Bai. On the empirical distribution of eigenvalues of a class of large dimensional random matrices.Journal of Multivariate analysis, 54(2):175–192, 1995

1995
[25]

Analysis of the limiting spectral distribution of large dimensional random matrices.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 54(2):295–309, 1995

Jack W Silverstein and Sang-Il Choi. Analysis of the limiting spectral distribution of large dimensional random matrices.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 54(2):295–309, 1995

1995
[26]

The proof and measurement of association between two things.The American journal of psychology, 100(3/4):441–471, 1987

Charles Spearman. The proof and measurement of association between two things.The American journal of psychology, 100(3/4):441–471, 1987

1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [27]

Limiting spectral distribution of large dimensional spearman’s rank correlation matrices.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 191:105011, 2022

Zeyu Wu and Cheng Wang. Limiting spectral distribution of large dimensional spearman’s rank correlation matrices.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 191:105011, 2022. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud: Acad ´emie des Sciences, 23 Quai de Conti, 75006 Paris, France and Capital Fund Management, 23 rue de l’Universit ´e, 75007 Paris, France Email address:Jean-Philippe.Bo...

2022

[2] [2]

Large sample covariance matrices without independence structures in columns.Statistica Sinica, pages 425–442, 2008

Zhidong Bai and Wang Zhou. Large sample covariance matrices without independence structures in columns.Statistica Sinica, pages 425–442, 2008

2008

[3] [1]

Springer, 2010

Zhidong Bai and Jack W Silverstein.Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices, vol- ume 20. Springer, 2010

2010

[4] [3]

Tracy–widom limit for spearman’s rho.preprint, 2019

Zhigang Bao. Tracy–widom limit for spearman’s rho.preprint, 2019

2019

[5] [4]

Spectral statistics of large dimen- sional spearman’s rank correlation matrix and its application.The Annals of Statistics, 43(6):2588– 2623, 2015

Zhigang Bao, Liang-Ching Lin, Guangming Pan, and Wang Zhou. Spectral statistics of large dimen- sional spearman’s rank correlation matrix and its application.The Annals of Statistics, 43(6):2588– 2623, 2015

2015

[6] [5]

Biroli, J.-P

G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, and M. Potters. The student ensemble of correlation matrices: Eigenvalue spectrum and kullback–leibler entropy.Acta Physica Polonica B, 38:4009, 2007

2007

[7] [6]

Global testing and large-scale multiple testing for high-dimensional covariance structures

T Tony Cai. Global testing and large-scale multiple testing for high-dimensional covariance structures. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4:423–446, 2017

2017

[8] [7]

Large dimensional spearman’s rank correlation matrices: The central limit theorem and its applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15861, 2024

Hantao Chen and Cheng Wang. Large dimensional spearman’s rank correlation matrices: The central limit theorem and its applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15861, 2024

arXiv 2024