Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Manipulator as a Tail: Promoting Dynamic Stability for Legged Locomotion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.01648 v2 pith:MOALOSTT submitted 2023-05-02 cs.RO

Manipulator as a Tail: Promoting Dynamic Stability for Legged Locomotion

classification cs.RO
keywords locomotionlearningleggedrobotexperimentsexternalsimulationunder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

For locomotion, is an arm on a legged robot a liability or an asset for locomotion? Biological systems evolved additional limbs beyond legs that facilitates postural control. This work shows how a manipulator can be an asset for legged locomotion at high speeds or under external perturbations, where the arm serves beyond manipulation. Since the system has 15 degrees of freedom (twelve for the legged robot and three for the arm), off-the-shelf reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms struggle to learn effective locomotion policies. Inspired by Bernstein's neurophysiological theory of animal motor learning, we develop an incremental training procedure that initially freezes some degrees of freedom and gradually releases them, using behaviour cloning (BC) from an early learning procedure to guide optimization in later learning. Simulation experiments show that our policy increases the success rate by up to 61 percentage points over the baselines. Simulation and real robot experiments suggest that our policy learns to use the arm as a tail to initiate robot turning at high speeds and to stabilize the quadruped under external perturbations. Quantitatively, in simulation experiments, we cut the failure rate up to 43.6% during high-speed turning and up to 31.8% for quadruped under external forces compared to using a locked arm.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.