Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can LLMs be Good Financial Advisors?: An Initial Study in Personal Decision Making for Optimized Outcomes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.07422 v1 pith:MPKSNXMG submitted 2023-07-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords chatbotsfinancialpersonalbankenglishfinanceaccountaccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Increasingly powerful Large Language Model (LLM) based chatbots, like ChatGPT and Bard, are becoming available to users that have the potential to revolutionize the quality of decision-making achieved by the public. In this context, we set out to investigate how such systems perform in the personal finance domain, where financial inclusion has been an overarching stated aim of banks for decades. We asked 13 questions representing banking products in personal finance: bank account, credit card, and certificate of deposits and their inter-product interactions, and decisions related to high-value purchases, payment of bank dues, and investment advice, and in different dialects and languages (English, African American Vernacular English, and Telugu). We find that although the outputs of the chatbots are fluent and plausible, there are still critical gaps in providing accurate and reliable financial information using LLM-based chatbots.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpretable LLMs for Credit Risk: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy

    q-fin.RM 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review and taxonomy that organizes LLM-based credit risk research by model architecture, data modality, explainability mechanism, and application domain.

Pith tools