Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Monash University, UEA, UCR Time Series Extrinsic Regression Archive

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.10996 v3 pith:MPMEHAOR submitted 2020-06-19 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords seriestimeresearcharchivecompetitionstserextrinsicforecasting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time series research has gathered lots of interests in the last decade, especially for Time Series Classification (TSC) and Time Series Forecasting (TSF). Research in TSC has greatly benefited from the University of California Riverside and University of East Anglia (UCR/UEA) Time Series Archives. On the other hand, the advancement in Time Series Forecasting relies on time series forecasting competitions such as the Makridakis competitions, NN3 and NN5 Neural Network competitions, and a few Kaggle competitions. Each year, thousands of papers proposing new algorithms for TSC and TSF have utilized these benchmarking archives. These algorithms are designed for these specific problems, but may not be useful for tasks such as predicting the heart rate of a person using photoplethysmogram (PPG) and accelerometer data. We refer to this problem as Time Series Extrinsic Regression (TSER), where we are interested in a more general methodology of predicting a single continuous value, from univariate or multivariate time series. This prediction can be from the same time series or not directly related to the predictor time series and does not necessarily need to be a future value or depend heavily on recent values. To the best of our knowledge, research into TSER has received much less attention in the time series research community and there are no models developed for general time series extrinsic regression problems. Most models are developed for a specific problem. Therefore, we aim to motivate and support the research into TSER by introducing the first TSER benchmarking archive. This archive contains 19 datasets from different domains, with varying number of dimensions, unequal length dimensions, and missing values. In this paper, we introduce the datasets in this archive and did an initial benchmark on existing models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Statistical comparisons of time-series feature sets on classification tasks

    stat.ME 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 124 time-series classification datasets, six open-source feature sets perform mostly equivalently, with tsfresh winning most often and simple quantile/FFT baselines competitive on several problems.

  2. A Standardized Benchmark for Skeleton-Based Rehabilitation Assessment Using Deep Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rehab-Pile, a standardized archive of 60 rehabilitation skeleton datasets with reproducible baselines, reports that the authors' lightweight LITEMV model wins on efficiency and usually on accuracy.

  3. Enhancing Irregular Time Series Forecasting with Continuous-Time Modeling Framework

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    WrapFlow combines continuous-time event/gap tokenization with simulation-free residual flow matching on a Transformer to improve irregular multivariate time-series forecasting.

Pith tools