Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 123 references

Multi-label Classification for Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Electrical Machines

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Multi-label classification can flag unbalance and misalignment in the same motor run.

desk verdict A thin, under-powered application note: the fault-label comparison is an honest but tiny demonstration, and the severity half of the central claim is explicitly undermined by class imbalance. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01078 v1 pith:MQ6KVSUG submitted 2019-08-02 cs.LG eess.SP

Adrienn Dineva , Amir Mosavi , Mate Gyimesi , Istvan Vajda This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGeess.SP
keywords multi-labelclassificationrotatingelectricalmachinesfaultdiagnosisunbalancemisalignmentseveritymotorcurrentsignatureanalysisvibration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that multi-label classification can simultaneously diagnose multiple mechanical faults in rotating electrical machines and grade fault severity, even when disturbing noise is present. This matters because real machines often fail in more than one way at once, and single-fault classifiers can confuse overlapping fault signatures. The authors build feature vectors from stator current and vibration spectra, add synthetic noise components, and compare three multi-label classifiers. Their best fault-label results come from classifier chains and k-nearest neighbours, with f1-scores around 0.88, while a parallel severity tree reached 99% accuracy only because most vibration samples were labelled 'good'.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the multi-label classifier applied to an engineered feature vector: magnitudes of sideband and RMS-variance frequencies from Thomson multitaper spectra of all three stator current phases, plus time-domain features (form factor, kurtosis, entropy deviation from the fault-free sample) and the distance of the observed signature to each pure fault signature. A classifier chain is a sequence of binary classifiers in which each classifier's output becomes an extra input to the next, allowing correlations between fault labels to be exploited. The paper compares a binarized decision tree, a classifier chain using Gaussian Naive Bayes, and multi-label k-nearest neighbours on a dataset of 64 vectors, half containing fault features, with ten to twenty random contaminating frequency components added per sample.

What would settle it

Run the same trained classifiers on signals measured from a machine under real uncontrolled noise, such as a factory floor with variable load and other drives running, and compare label accuracy against the synthetic-noise results; a marked drop would show that the synthetic contamination is not an adequate stand-in for field noise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a multi-label formulation turns motor fault diagnosis into a simultaneous prediction task: each sample can carry binary labels for unbalance and misalignment plus a severity label drawn from ISO 10816 vibration bands. On a dataset of 64 feature vectors assembled from stator current and vibration measurements, with random disturbing frequencies added to mimic noise, classifier chains using Gaussian Naive Bayes achieved an accuracy of 0.8333 and multi-label k-nearest neighbours 0.7, with f1-scores near 0.88-0.90 on the fault labels; a binarized decision tree reached 0.7333. The authors conclude that current signature analysis combined with multi-label machine learning is a viable methodology for fault detection and prediction, and that accuracy should improve with larger training sets and further tuning.

Load-bearing premise

The whole noisy-condition evaluation rests on contaminating clean signals with ten to twenty random synthetic frequency components; if that artificial noise does not behave like real workshop or drivetrain noise, the measured accuracies may not transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single trained model can report both unbalance and misalignment at once, instead of forcing a choice between single-fault categories.
  • Motor current signatures alone can feed the fault-label classifier, reducing reliance on extra vibration sensors and the expertise needed to interpret them.
  • Severity grading can run in parallel with fault detection, using ISO 10816 bands as the label set.
  • On this dataset, classifier chains and k-nearest neighbours outperform the binarized decision tree in f1-score for the fault labels.
  • Larger and more balanced training sets are the stated path to further accuracy gains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit is that synthetic noise made of ten to twenty random frequency components may not reproduce real field noise such as load fluctuations, electrical harmonics, or background machinery; measured noisy data would provide a stronger test.
  • The 99% severity accuracy is likely inflated by class imbalance, since most vibration samples fall in the 'good' band; a severity classifier trained on balanced severity classes would give a more meaningful performance figure.
  • If the multi-label formulation transfers, the same pipeline could be extended to other concurrent fault pairs, such as bearing faults combined with eccentricity, simply by adding labels rather than changing the classifier architecture.
  • A natural next application would be sensorless condition monitoring of wind-turbine drivetrains, where current-based multi-fault detection could reduce the need for additional sensors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a multi-label classification methodology for simultaneous fault diagnosis (unbalance and misalignment) and fault severity evaluation of rotating electrical machines under noisy conditions. The method extracts spectral and time-domain features from current and vibration signals, augments the data with 10–20 synthetic noise components, and compares a binarized decision tree, a classifier chain, and a multi-label KNN. The experiments are based on a dataset of 64 feature vectors with a single 80/20 split; the authors report a best fault-label accuracy of 0.8333 and a severity-classifier accuracy of 99%.

Significance. At face value, a multi-label approach that diagnoses concurrent faults and grades severity from current and vibration sensors would be a useful contribution to industrial condition monitoring. The paper deserves credit for comparing several multi-label methods and for reporting per-class precision, recall, and F1 rather than only overall accuracy. However, the validation is far too weak to support the central claims: the dataset is extremely small, the noise is synthetic, the feature design is circular, and the severity result is an admitted class-imbalance artifact. The contribution therefore remains at the level of a preliminary idea rather than an established methodology.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4] The severity classifier is reported to achieve 99% accuracy, and the authors state that this is 'because most of the vibration data is labeled good.' With an imbalanced label distribution, a trivial majority-class predictor would achieve near-identical accuracy. The paper reports neither the severity class distribution nor a majority-class baseline, and it does not provide a confusion matrix or per-class precision/recall for the severity labels. Consequently, the 99% figure provides no evidence that the classifier learned to grade severity, which is one of the two stated contributions.
  2. [Section 3.2] The feature vector includes 'the distance calculated between the observed signature and each pure signature associated with the identified fault.' This gives the classifier a direct measure of similarity to each fault class, so the fault-label predictions are strongly influenced by a feature that already encodes the target labels. The reported accuracies therefore do not demonstrate that the method could diagnose faults in real situations where pure fault signatures are not available for comparison.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Section 4] All results are obtained from 64 feature vectors, split once into 80% training and 20% testing, which amounts to roughly 13 test samples. There is no cross-validation, bootstrapping, or confidence intervals, and the random split seed is not reported. The accuracy differences between the three methods (e.g., 0.8333 vs. 0.70) are within the noise of such a small evaluation and cannot be considered statistically meaningful.
  4. [Section 3.2] The claim of performance 'under noisy conditions' is based entirely on synthetically adding 10 to 20 random frequency components to the measured signals. The paper presents no empirical evidence that this contamination process resembles real industrial noise, nor does it test the method on genuinely noisy field data. The external validity of the central claim is therefore unestablished.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2] Table I is titled 'Vibration severity per ISO 10816' while the text refers to 'ISO 2372 Standard'; please use consistent standard names.
  2. [Section 3.2] The text says 'Fifteen different samples are generated' per case but the total dataset is 64 vectors; clarify how many samples belong to each condition and how the 64 vectors are composed.
  3. [Section 4] The term 'error attribute values' is not defined; if it refers to the distance-to-pure-signature features introduced in Section 3.2, please use consistent terminology.
  4. [Whole paper] The abstract and conclusions state that the method is 'experimentally validated' under noisy conditions, but since the noise is synthetic, a more precise formulation is needed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Fault-diagnosis features are partly self-definitional (distance-to-template features), and the severity result is admitted to be a majority-class artifact, so the central claim is partially circular.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.2, Feature Extraction and Dataset Preparation for Training]
    "Fault feature vector includes also the distance calculated between the observed signature and each pure signature associated with the identified fault [122]."

    The feature vector that feeds the multi-label classifier already contains distances to the pure signature of each fault whose presence the classifier is supposed to output as labels (isUnbalance, isMisalignment). Thus the diagnostic information is not independently discovered by the multi-label learner; it is injected by construction as a similarity-to-template feature. The predicted fault labels are, to first order, a threshold on precomputed template distances, so the claimed simultaneous diagnosis is substantially equivalent to the feature definition rather than a learned result.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, Results]
    "The prediction performance of the parallel severity classification tree resulted in 9 9% accuracy because most of the vibration data is labeled ‘good’."

    The paper's own explanation for the 99% severity accuracy is the label distribution, not learned discrimination. With most vibration samples labeled 'good', a trivial majority-class classifier would achieve approximately the same accuracy without evaluating severity. The paper reports no severity class distribution, confusion matrix, or per-class precision/recall/F1, and it does not compare against a majority-class baseline. Therefore the severity half of the central claim reduces to an imbalanced-label artifact rather than demonstrated prediction of ISO severity classes.

full rationale

The fault-label multi-label experiments are not entirely circular: three algorithms are trained and evaluated on held-out data, and ordinary spectral and time-domain features are used. However, the feature set includes a distance to each pure fault signature, meaning the labels to be predicted are already encoded in the feature construction as template similarities; this partially reduces the diagnosis result to the input definition. The severity evaluation is the clearest circularity: the paper explicitly attributes its 99% accuracy to most vibration data being labeled 'good', so the reported number is statistically forced by the training-label prior and does not establish that the tree learned ISO severity thresholds. The synthetic-noise dataset is not itself circular, since ground-truth fault labels are known from generation, but it also means the method is not validated on real field noise. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present; the self-citations are bibliographic context rather than evidence. Taken together, the paper's central claim of 'simultaneously diagnosing multiple faults and evaluating the fault severity' is only partially supported, with one feature-construction step that is self-definitional and one prediction result that is a majority-class artifact, warranting a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is supported by a small, hand-built dataset with synthetic noise and features that partly encode the target fault signatures. The ISO severity thresholds and the synthetic-noise assumption are domain assumptions specific to this test bed, and no code or data are released.

free parameters (2)
  • Number of synthetic noise components = 10 to 20 (random)
    Chosen by hand to create noisy samples; the reported accuracy depends on this synthetic noise process (Section 3.2).
  • Training/test split ratio = 80/20
    The dataset is split once into 80% training and 20% testing; no cross-validation is used (Section 3.2).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Fault signatures for unbalance and misalignment are characterized by dominant spectral peaks at rotational frequency harmonics.
    Assumed in Section 3.2 to define which spectral magnitudes are extracted as features.
  • domain assumption ISO 10816/2372 vibration severity thresholds are applicable to this test machine for ground-truth severity labels.
    Used in Section 2.2 to assign 'Good', 'Satisfactory', etc., labels.
  • ad hoc to paper Adding 10 to 20 random frequency components to the measured signals produces data representative of real noisy conditions.
    The entire validation set is generated this way, so the reported accuracies are conditional on this assumption (Section 3.2).
  • standard math The scikit-multi-learn and scikit-learn implementations of the classifiers are correct and used as intended.
    The paper relies on these libraries without modification (Section 4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-label Classification for Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Electrical Machines." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MQ6KVSUG

@misc{pith2026190801078,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-label Classification for Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Electrical Machines},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MQ6KVSUG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01078}
}
read the original abstract

Primary importance is devoted to Fault Detection and Diagnosis (FDI) of electrical machine and drive systems in modern industrial automation. The widespread use of Machine Learning techniques has made it possible to replace traditional motor fault detection techniques with more efficient solutions that are capable of early fault recognition by using large amounts of sensory data. However, the detection of concurrent failures is still a challenge in the presence of disturbing noises or when the multiple faults cause overlapping features. The contribution of this work is to propose a novel methodology using multi-label classification method for simultaneously diagnosing multiple faults and evaluating the fault severity under noisy conditions. Performance of various multi-label classification models are compared. Current and vibration signals are acquired under normal and fault conditions. The applicability of the proposed method is experimentally validated under diverse fault conditions such as unbalance and misalignment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01078 by the authors.

Figure 6
Figure 6. Multitaper power spectral density estimation of generator current signal for fault frequency magnitude detection. The features carrying most of the information of interest are mainly in the frequency domain. However we have inspected a few time-domain features also. The feature vector composed from the magnitudes of the distinguished sideband frequencies and RMS variance frequencies from the spectra for all three ph… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Energies, 2019

    Dineva, A., et al., Review of soft computing models in design and control of rotating electrical machines. Energies, 2019. 12(6)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Bebić, and N

    Jokanović, B., M. Bebić, and N. Kartalović, The influence of combined strain and constructive solutions for stator insulation of rotating electrical machines on duration of their reliable exploitation. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2019. 110: p. 36- 47

    2019

  3. [3]

    COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2019

    Roubache, L., et al., Elementary subdomain technique for magnetic field calculation in rotating electrical machines with local saturation effect. COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2019. 38(1): p. 24- 45

    2019

  4. [4]

    Dubas, and R

    Boughrara, K., F. Dubas, and R. Ibtiouen, 2-D exact analytical method for steady -state heat transfer prediction in rotating electrical machines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2018. 54(9)

    2018

  5. [5]

    International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2018

    Caruso, M., et al., The use of slightly asymmetrical windings for rotating electrical machines. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2018. 28(7)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Machines, 2017

    Kande, M., et al., Rotating electrical machine condition monitoring automation -A review. Machines, 2017. 5(4)

    2017

  7. [7]

    JOM, 2018

    Byerly, K., et al., Metal Amorphous Nanocomposite (MANC) Alloy Cores with Spatially Tuned Permeability for Advanced Power Magnetics Applications. JOM, 2018. 70(6): p. 879-891

    2018

  8. [8]

    Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018

    Fu, Y., et al., Controllable inertial control strategy of rotating motor in DC distribution network. Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018. 38(10): p. 32-38

    2018

Show all 123 references
  1. [9]

    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017

    Guerroudj, C., et al., Performance analysis of Vernier s lotted doubly salient permanent magnet generator for wind power. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017. 42(13): p. 8744- 8755

    2017

  2. [10]

    Nongye Go ngcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019

    Song, Z., et al., Rotating core loss model for motor considering skin effect and dynamic hysteresis effect. Nongye Go ngcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019. 35(6): p. 74-80

    2019

  3. [11]

    Diangong Jishu Xuebao/Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2013

    Zhang, J., et al., Dynamic characteristics and experiment analysis of a single phase permanent magnet linear generator for wave energy conversion. Diangong Jishu Xuebao/Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2013. 28(7): p. 110-116

    2013

  4. [12]

    Faizollahzadeh Ardabili, and S

    Mosavi, A., S. Faizollahzadeh Ardabili, and S. Shamshirband, Demand prediction with machine learning models: State of the art and a systematic review of advances. Demand Prediction with Machine Learning Models; State of the Art and a Systematic Review of Advances, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Akhtar, M.J. and R.K. Behera, Optimal design of stator and rotor slot of induction motor for electric vehicle applications. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, 2019. 9(1): p. 35-43

    2019

  6. [14]

    Deng, W. and S. Zuo, Electromagnetic vibration and noise of the permanent-magnet synchronous motors for electric vehicles: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification,

  7. [15]

    IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2019

    Fan, Y., et al., Design and analysis of a new five -phase dual -stator consequent -pole brushless hybrid excitation machine. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2019. 55(1)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Korman, and G

    Ulu, C., O. Korman, and G. Kömürgöz, Electromagnetic and thermal design/analysis of an induction motor for electric vehicles. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 2019. 8(2): p. 239-245

    2019

  9. [17]

    Energies, 2019

    Mosavi, A., et al., State of the art of machine learning models in energy systems, a systematic review. Energies, 2019. 12(7): p. 1301

    2019

  10. [18]

    Mosavi, A. and A. Bahmani, Energy consumption prediction using machine learning: A review. Preprints, 2019. 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Aljehaimi, A.M. and P. Pillay, Operating Envelopes of the Variable-Flux Machine with Positive Reluctance Torque. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2018. 4(3): p. 707 - 719

    2018

  12. [20]

    Catuogno, G.R. and G.O. Garcia, Conversion of Three -phase Commercial Machines into Six - phase Machines for Didactic and Research Purposes. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 2018. 16(2): p. 467-475

    2018

  13. [21]

    SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains, 2018

    Morozov, A., et al., Design, Analysis, and Optimization of a Multi -Speed Powertrain for Class- 7 Electric Trucks. SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains, 2018. 7(1)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Palanivel, A. and S. Padmana bhan, Software-based performance estimation and real -time thermal analysis of brushless direct current motor with corroded permanent magnets. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2018. 71: p. 938-952

    2018

  15. [23]

    Saimurugan, and K.I

    Praveenkumar, T., M. Saimurugan, and K.I. Ramachandran, Comparison of vibration, sound and motor current signature analysis for detection of gear box faults. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 2017. 8(2)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Sbaa, and A.C

    Bessous, N., S. Sbaa, and A.C. Megherbi, Mechanical fault detection in r otating electrical machines using MCSA -FFT and MCSA-DWT techniques. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 2019. 67(3): p. 571-582

    2019

  17. [25]

    IET Science, Measurement and Technology, 2018

    Corne, B., et al., Emulating single point bearing faults with the use of an active magnetic bearing. IET Science, Measurement and Technology, 2018. 12(1): p. 39-48

    2018

  18. [26]

    Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 2017

    Glowacz, A., et al., Fault diagnosis of three phase induction motor using current signal, MSAF - Ratio15 and selected classifiers. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 2017. 62(4): p. 2413- 2419

    2017

  19. [27]

    Glowacz, A. and Z. Glowacz, Diagnosis of stator faults of the single-phase induction motor using acoustic signals. Applied Acoustics, 2017. 117: p. 20-27

    2017

  20. [28]

    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018

    Irhoumah, M., et al., Information Fusion with Belief Functions for Detection of Interturn Short- Circuit Faults in Electrical Machines Using External Flux Sensors. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018. 65(3): p. 2642-2652

    2018

  21. [29]

    Lopez-Perez, D. and J. Antonino -Daviu, Application of Infrared Thermography to Failure Detection i n Industrial Induction Motors: Case Stories. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2017. 53(3): p. 1901-1908

    2017

  22. [30]

    Ma, Y. and X. Wu, Discriminant sparse and collaborative preserving embedding for bearing fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing, 2018. 313: p. 259-270

    2018

  23. [31]

    International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems,

    Sapena-Bano, A., et al., Induction machine model with space harmonics for fault diagnosis based on the convolution theorem. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems,

  24. [32]

    Antonino-Daviu, J. and P. Popa leny. Detection of induction motor coupling unbalanced and misalignment via advanced transient current signature analysis. 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2018

  25. [33]

    Chemsa, and S

    Bessous, N., A. Chemsa, and S. Sbaa. New Vision about the Mixed Eccentricity Fault Causes in Induction Motors and its relationship with the Rolling Element Bearing Faults : Analytical model dedicated to the REB faults. 2019. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2019

  26. [34]

    Analysis of winding f ault in electric machines by frequency method

    Brandt, M., et al. Analysis of winding f ault in electric machines by frequency method . 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2018

  27. [35]

    Manickavasagam, and S

    Nikita, T., K. Manickavasagam, and S. Sachin. Magnetostriction analysis on doubly fed induction generator under normal and low voltage ride through (LVRT) condition. 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2018

  28. [36]

    Gore, and B.N

    Ugale, R.T., S.N. Gore, and B.N. Chaudhari. Web based remote and locally operated all in one electrical machine laboratory with data acquisition, fault diagnosis and protection. 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2018

  29. [37]

    IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2019

    Ullah, S., et al., A permanent magnet assist, segmented rotor, switched reluctance drive for fault tolerant aerospace applications. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2019. 55(1): p. 298-305

    2019

  30. [38]

    Optimal Design of Electrical Machines: State of the Art Survey

    Baranyai, M., et al. Optimal Design of Electrical Machines: State of the Art Survey . in International Conference on Global Research and Education. 2017. Springer

    2017

  31. [39]

    Sharma, and S.P

    Kankar, P.K., S.C. Sharma, and S.P. Harsha, Fault diagnosis of bal l bearings using machine learning methods. Expert Systems with applications, 2011. 38(3): p. 1876-1886

    2011

  32. [40]

    COMPEL-The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, 2003

    Pöyhönen, S., et al., Numerical magnetic field analysis and signal processing for fault diagnostics of electrical machines. COMPEL-The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, 2003. 22(4): p. 969-981

    2003

  33. [41]

    Optimal Design of Electrical Machines: State of the Art Survey

    Varkonyi-Koczy, A.R. Optimal Design of Electrical Machines: State of the Art Survey. in Recent Advances in Technology Research and Education: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Global Research and Education Inter-Academia 2017. 2017. Springer

    2017

  34. [42]

    ModeFrontier for the optimal design of electrical machines

    Mosavi, A. ModeFrontier for the optimal design of electrical machines . in INTERNATIONAL CAE CONFERENCE AND. 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Zekveld, M. and G.P. Hancke. Vibration Condition Monitoring Using Machine Learning . in IECON 2018-44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. 2018. IEEE

    2018

  36. [44]

    Deep learning based spectrum compression algorithm for rotating machinery condition monitoring

    Aydemir, G. Deep learning based spectrum compression algorithm for rotating machinery condition monitoring. 2018. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Stator winding short -circuit fault diagnosis in induction motors using random forest

    Dos Santos, T., et al. Stator winding short -circuit fault diagnosis in induction motors using random forest. 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2017

  38. [46]

    Ferreira, J.G. and A. Warzecha. An application of machine learning approach to fault detection of a synchronous machine. 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2017

  39. [47]

    Early detection and classification of bearing faults using support vector machine algorithm

    Senanayaka, J.S.L., et al. Early detection and classification of bearing faults using support vector machine algorithm. 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2017

  40. [48]

    Van Khang, and K.G

    Senanayaka, J.S.L., H. Van Khang, and K.G. Robbersmyr. Towards online bearing fault detection using envelope analysis of vibration signal and de cision tree classification algorithm

  41. [49]

    Zhan, and M

    Zhang, J., W. Zhan, and M. Ehsani. On-line fault diagnosis of electric machine based on the Hidden Markov Model. 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2016

  42. [50]

    Zgarni, and A

    Abid, F.B., S. Zgarni, and A. Braham, Distinct bearing faults detection in induction motor by a hybrid optimized SWPT and aiNet -DAG SVM. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion,

  43. [51]

    , Signal Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis for Rotating Electrical Machines: Issues and Solutions , in Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing

    Giantomassi, A., et al. , Signal Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis for Rotating Electrical Machines: Issues and Solutions , in Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing . 2015, Springer Verlag. p. 275-309

    2015

  44. [52]

    Real-Time Bearing Fault Diagnosis of Induction Motors with Accelerated Deep Learning Approach

    Afrasiabi, S., et al. Real-Time Bearing Fault Diagnosis of Induction Motors with Accelerated Deep Learning Approach. 2019. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2019

  45. [53]

    He, D. and B. Fahimi. Power management of a self-powered multi-parameter wireless sensor for IoT application. 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2018

  46. [54]

    IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2018

    Martin-Diaz, I., et al., An Experimental Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Motor Fault Diagnosis under Various Operating Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2018. 54(3): p. 2215-2224

    2018

  47. [55]

    Obermaisser, and J.U

    Meckel, S., R. Obermaisser, and J.U. Yang. Generation of a diagnosis model for hybrid -electric vehicles using machine learning. 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2018

  48. [56]

    Van Khang, and K.G

    Senanayaka, J.S.L., H. Van Khang, and K.G. Robbersmyr. Online Fault Diagnosis System for Electric Powertrains Using Advanced Signal Processing and Machine Learning . 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2018

  49. [57]

    International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2018

    Chahine, K., Rotor fault diagnosis in induction motors by the matrix pencil method a nd support vector machine. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2018. 28(10)

    2018

  50. [58]

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2019

    Kao, I.H., et al., Analysis of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Fault Diagnosis Based on Learning. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2019. 68(2): p. 310-324

    2019

  51. [59]

    Electric Power Systems Research,

    Mendonça, P.L., et al., Detection and modelling of incipient failures in internal combustion engine driven generators using Electrical Signature Analysis. Electric Power Systems Research,

  52. [60]

    Electric Power Systems Research,

    Cabal-Yepez, E., et al., Single-parameter fault identification through information entropy analysis at the startup-transient current in induction motors. Electric Power Systems Research,

  53. [61]

    Machines, 2017

    Kande, M., et al., Rotating electrical machine condition m onitoring automation —A review. Machines, 2017. 5(4): p. 24

    2017

  54. [62]

    Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,

    Delpha, C., et al., Multiple incipient fault diagnosis in three -phase electrical systems using multivariate statistical signal processing. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,

  55. [63]

    Vas, P., Parameter estimation, condition monitoring, and diagnosis of electrical machines. Vol. 27. 1993: Oxford University Press

    1993

  56. [64]

    Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2018

    Tidriri, K., et al., A generic framework for decision fusion in fault detection and diagnosis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2018. 71: p. 73-86

    2018

  57. [65]

    Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2017

    Delgado-Arredondo, P.A., et al., Methodology for fault detection in induction motors via sound and vibration signals. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2017. 83: p. 568-589

    2017

  58. [66]

    Information Sciences, 2015

    Serdio, F., et al., Fuzzy fault isolation using gradient information and quality criteria from system identification models. Information Sciences, 2015. 316: p. 18-39

    2015

  59. [67]

    Applied Soft Computing, 2017

    Serdio, F., et al., Improved fault detection employing hybrid memetic fuzzy modeling and adaptive filters. Applied Soft Computing, 2017. 51: p. 60-82

    2017

  60. [68]

    Jafari, H. and J. Poshtan, Fault detection and isolation based on fuzzy -integral fusion approach. IET Science, Measurement and Technology, 2019. 13(2): p. 296-302

    2019

  61. [69]

    ISA Transactions, 2019

    Chen, Z., et al., A data-driven ground fault detection and isolation method for main circuit in railway electrical traction system. ISA Transactions, 2019. 87: p. 264-271

    2019

  62. [70]

    Jung, D. and E. Frisk, Residual selection for fault detection and isolation using convex optimization. Automatica, 2018. 97: p. 143-149

    2018

  63. [71]

    Jung, D. and C. Sundstrom, A Combined Data -Driven and Model -Based Residual Selection Algorithm for Fault Detection and Isolation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2019. 27(2): p. 616-630

    2019

  64. [72]

    Solai Manohar, and M

    Kannan, R., S. Solai Manohar, and M. Senthil Kumaran, Nominal features-based class specific learning model for fault diagnosis in industrial applications. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2018. 116: p. 163-177

    2018

  65. [73]

    Sensors (Switzerland), 2018

    Na, W., et al., Sensitivity-based fault detection and isolation algorithm for road vehicle chassis sensors. Sensors (Switzerland), 2018. 18(8)

    2018

  66. [74]

    Koumir, and I

    El Bakri, A., M. Koumir, and I. Boumhidi, Extreme learning machine-based non-linear observer for fault detection and isolation of wind turbine. Australian Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2019. 16(1): p. 12-20

    2019

  67. [75]

    Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 2019

    Sarwar, M., et al., High impedance fault detection and isolation in power distribution networks using support vector machines. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 2019

    2019

  68. [76]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2019: p

    Shahnazari, H., et al., Modeling and fault diagnosis design for HVAC systems using recurrent neural networks. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2019: p. 189-203

    2019

  69. [77]

    Guo, and W

    Yang, J., Y. Guo, and W. Zhao, Long short-term memory neural network based fault detection and isolation for electro-mechanical actuators. Neurocomputing, 2019

    2019

  70. [78]

    Abderrahmane, M. and B. Mohammed, Fault diagnosis of a wind turbine benchmark via statistical and support vector machine. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 2018. 37: p. 29-42

    2018

  71. [79]

    Journal of Process Control, 2018

    Ait-Izem, T., et al., On the application of interval PCA to process monitoring: A robust strategy for sensor FDI with new efficient control statistics. Journal of Process Control, 2018. 63: p. 29- 46

    2018

  72. [80]

    International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018

    Fazai, R., et al., Online fault detection and isolation of an AIR quality monitoring network based on machine learning and metaheuristic methods. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018. 99(9-12): p. 2789-2802

    2018

  73. [81]

    Khorasgani, H. and G. Biswas, A methodology for monitoring smart buildings with incomplete models. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2018. 71: p. 396-406

    2018

  74. [82]

    IEEE Sensors Journal, 2018

    Lindahl, P.A., et al., Shipboard Fault Detection Through Nonintrusive Load Monitoring: A Case Study. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2018. 18(21): p. 8986-8995

    2018

  75. [83]

    Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2018

    Mohamed Syed Ali, A., Helmet deduction using image processing. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2018. 9(2): p. 342-344

    2018

  76. [84]

    IEEE Access, 2018

    Zhang, D., et al., A Data-Driven Design for Fault Detection of Wind Turbines Using Random Forests and XGboost. IEEE Access, 2018. 6: p. 21020-21031

    2018

  77. [85]

    Rotor current-based fault diagnosis for DFIG wind turbine drivetrain gearboxes using frequency analysis and a deep classifier

    Cheng, F., et al. Rotor current-based fault diagnosis for DFIG wind turbine drivetrain gearboxes using frequency analysis and a deep classifier . 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

    2017

  78. [86]

    IEEE Transactions on I ndustry Applications, 2018

    Cheng, F., et al., Rotor-Current-Based Fault Diagnosis for DFIG Wind Turbine Drivetrain Gearboxes Using Frequency Analysis and a Deep Classifier. IEEE Transactions on I ndustry Applications, 2018. 54(2): p. 1062-1071

    2018

  79. [87]

    Gao, Z. and S. Sheng, Real-time monitoring, prognosis, and resilient control for wind turbine systems. Renewable Energy, 2018. 116: p. 1-4

    2018

  80. [88]

    International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems,

    Zhu, Y., et al., Improvement of reliability and wind power generation based on wind turbine real- time condition assessment. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems,

  81. [89]

    Fault Detection in Gearbox Using Motor Electrical Signature Analysis

    Vigneshkumar, S., et al. Fault Detection in Gearbox Using Motor Electrical Signature Analysis. in 2018 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). 2018. IEEE

    2018

  82. [90]

    Oh, and A.C.C

    Yang, B.-S., M.-S. Oh, and A.C.C. Tan, Fault diagnosis of induction motor based on decision trees and adaptive neuro -fuzzy inference. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009. 36(2): p. 1840-1849

    2009

  83. [91]

    Patel, R.K. and V. Giri, Feature selection and classification of mechanical fault of an induction motor using random forest classifier. Perspectives in Science, 2016. 8: p. 334-337

    2016

  84. [92]

    Bearing fault detection for drivetrains using adaptive filters based wavelet transform

    Jacop, A., et a l. Bearing fault detection for drivetrains using adaptive filters based wavelet transform. in 2017 20th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS)

    2017

  85. [93]

    Zou, and F

    Qin, Y., J. Zou, and F. Cao, Adaptively detecting the transient fea ture of faulty wind turbine planetary gearboxes by the improved kurtosis and iterative thresholding algorithm. IEEE Access,

  86. [94]

    Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2014

    Zimroz, R., et al., Diagnostics of bearings in presence of strong operating conditions non - stationarity—A procedure of load-dependent features processing with application to wind turbine bearings. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2014. 46(1): p. 16-27

    2014

  87. [95]

    Renewable Energy, 2016

    Chen, J., et al., Generator bearing fault diagnosis for wind turbine via empirical wavelet transform using measured vibration signals. Renewable Energy, 2016. 89: p. 80-92

    2016

  88. [96]

    Renewable Energy, 2016

    Teng, W., et al., Multi-fault detection and failure analysis of wind turbine gearbox using complex wavelet transform. Renewable Energy, 2016. 93: p. 591-598

    2016

  89. [97]

    Muralidharan, V. and V. Sugumaran, Feature extraction using wavelets and classification through decision tree algorithm for fault diagnosis of mono-block centrifugal pump. Measurement,

  90. [98]

    Procedia CIRP, 2018

    Wen, L., et al., A Jointed Signal Analysis and Con volutional Neural Network Method for Fault Diagnosis. Procedia CIRP, 2018. 72: p. 1084-1087

    2018

  91. [99]

    Tsoumakas, G. and I. Katakis, Multi-label classification: An overview. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), 2007. 3(3): p. 1-13

    2007

  92. [100]

    2016, Springer

    Herrera, F., et al., Multilabel classification, in Multilabel Classification. 2016, Springer. p. 17 - 31

    2016

  93. [101]

    Pfahringer, and G

    Read, J., B. Pfahringer, and G. Holmes. Multi-label classification using ensembles of pruned sets. in 8th IEEE international conference on data mining. 2008. IEEE

    2008

  94. [102]

    Machine learning, 2011

    Read, J., et al., Classifier chains for multi-label classification. Machine learning, 2011. 85(3): p. 333

    2011

  95. [103]

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018

    Fu, H., et al., Joint optic disc and cup segmentation based on multi -label deep network and polar transformation. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018. 37(7): p. 1597-1605

    2018

  96. [104]

    Tao, and C

    Xu, C., D. Tao, and C. Xu. Robust extreme multi-label learning. in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 2016. ACM

    2016

  97. [105]

    Polyphonic sound event detection using multi label deep neural networks

    Cakir, E., et al. Polyphonic sound event detection using multi label deep neural networks. in 2015 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN). 2015. IEEE

    2015

  98. [106]

    Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2019: p

    Yang, X., et al., Identification of unhealthy Panax notoginseng from different geographical origins by means of multi -label classification. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2019: p. 117243

    2019

  99. [107]

    Chang, and C.-J

    Hsu, C.-W., C.-C. Chang, and C.-J. Lin, A practical guide to support vector classification. 2003

    2003

  100. [108]

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1976(4): p

    Dudani, S.A., The distance-weighted k-nearest-neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1976(4): p. 325-327

    1976

  101. [109]

    Scholarpedia, 2009

    Peterson, L.E., K-nearest neighbor. Scholarpedia, 2009. 4(2): p. 1883

    2009

  102. [110]

    Domeniconi, C. and D. Gunopulos. Adaptive near est neighbor classification using support vector machines. in Advances in neural information processing systems. 2002

    2002

  103. [111]

    Braham, and Z

    Keskes, H., A. Braham, and Z. Lachiri, Broken rotor bar diagnosis in induction machines through stationary wavelet packet transform and multiclass wavelet SVM. Electric Power Systems Research, 2013. 97: p. 151-157

    2013

  104. [112]

    Imandoust, S.B. and M. Bolandraftar, Application of k -nearest neighbor (knn) approach for predicting economic events: Theoretical background. International Journal of E ngineering Research and Applications, 2013. 3(5): p. 605-610

    2013

  105. [113]

    -Y., et al., The distance function effect on k -nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets

    Hu, L. -Y., et al., The distance function effect on k -nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets. SpringerPlus, 2016. 5(1): p. 1304

    2016

  106. [114]

    Ensemble methods in machi ne learning

    Dietterich, T.G. Ensemble methods in machi ne learning. in International workshop on multiple classifier systems. 2000. Springer

    2000

  107. [115]

    Gómez, D. and A. Rojas, An empirical overview of the no free lunch theorem and its effect on real-world machine learning classification. Neural computation, 2016. 28(1): p. 216-228

    2016

  108. [116]

    Wolpert, D.H. and W.G. Macready, No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 1997. 1(1): p. 67-82

    1997

  109. [117]

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 2011

    Galar, M., et al., A review on ensembles for the class imbalance problem: bagging-, boosting-, and hybrid-based approaches. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 2011. 42(4): p. 463-484

    2011

  110. [118]

    IEEE Circuits and systems magazine,

    Polikar, R., Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and systems magazine,

  111. [119]

    Habetler, and R.G

    Stack, J.R., T.G. Habetler, and R.G. Harley, Effects of machine speed on the development and detection of rolling element bearing faults. IEEE Power Electronics Letters, 2003. 1(1): p. 19-21

    2003

  112. [120]

    Ground dynamics and man -made processes

    Skipp, B., Ground vibration –codes and standards. Ground dynamics and man -made processes. The Institution of Civil Engineers, United Kingdom, 1998: p. 29-41

    1998

  113. [121]

    Proceedings of the IEEE, 1982

    Thomson, D.J., Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1982. 70(9): p. 1055-1096

    1982

  114. [122]

    Liu, H. and H. Mo toda, Feature extraction, construction and selection: A data mining perspective. Vol. 453. 1998: Springer Science & Business Media

    1998

  115. [2017]

    Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.