pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.27567 · v2 · pith:MQQVIOQ6new · submitted 2026-03-29 · ✦ hep-th

One-loop finiteness in higher-derivative 6D, {cal N}=(1,0) super Yang-Mills -- hypermultiplet system

I.L.Buchbinder , A.S.Budekhina , E.A.Ivanov , K.V.Stepanyantz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 10:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords higher-derivativesupersymmetric gauge theorysix dimensionsharmonic superspaceone-loop finitenesshypermultipletnon-minimal interactionN=(1,0) supersymmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

A non-minimal interaction cancels one-loop divergences in the gauge sector of a higher-derivative six-dimensional N=(1,0) supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory with hypermultiplets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a six-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theory with higher-derivative terms coupled to an adjoint hypermultiplet. It introduces a new non-minimal interaction between the gauge multiplet and the hypermultiplet that is consistent with the symmetries. This term is shown to eliminate the one-loop divergences that appear in the gauge superfield sector under the usual minimal coupling. The outcome is an off-shell finite theory in that sector at one loop. The result is confirmed through explicit calculations in harmonic superspace using background field methods and supergraph techniques.

Core claim

By introducing a novel non-minimal interaction between the gauge multiplet and the hypermultiplet in the adjoint representation, the one-loop divergences in the gauge superfield sector of a higher-derivative six-dimensional N=(1,0) super Yang-Mills theory are canceled. The resulting theory is off-shell one-loop finite in this sector while preserving gauge invariance and N=(1,0) supersymmetry. The cancellation is verified using both the background field method and supergraph techniques in harmonic superspace.

What carries the argument

The novel non-minimal interaction term between the gauge multiplet and the adjoint hypermultiplet, constructed to preserve off-shell N=(1,0) supersymmetry and gauge invariance within the harmonic superspace framework.

If this is right

  • The gauge superfield sector becomes one-loop finite off-shell.
  • Gauge invariance and N=(1,0) supersymmetry continue to hold after quantization in this sector.
  • Higher-derivative supersymmetric gauge theories in six dimensions can achieve finiteness in the vector multiplet sector through adjusted couplings.
  • The cancellation mechanism works for both the background field method and supergraph techniques.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar non-minimal couplings might be explored to cancel divergences in other sectors or at higher loop orders.
  • The harmonic superspace approach could extend to higher-derivative models with different matter content or in nearby dimensions.
  • If the finiteness pattern persists, it may guide constructions of quantum-consistent higher-derivative theories without new degrees of freedom.

Load-bearing premise

The new non-minimal interaction must remain consistent with off-shell N=(1,0) supersymmetry and gauge invariance without introducing fresh divergences or breaking the harmonic superspace structure.

What would settle it

An explicit one-loop calculation of the effective action for the gauge superfield without the non-minimal term yields divergences, while the same calculation with the term included shows their complete cancellation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.27567 by A.S.Budekhina, E.A.Ivanov, I.L.Buchbinder, K.V.Stepanyantz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Supergraphs with a hypermultiplet loop contribut [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We employ the harmonic superspace methods to study a six-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=(1,0)$ supersymmetric gauge theory with higher derivatives coupled to a hypermultiplet in the adjoint representation. By introducing a novel non-minimal interaction between the gauge multiplet and the hypermultiplet, we demonstrate that the one-loop divergences in gauge superfield sector, which are present in the conventional formulation, are canceled. The resulting theory is off-shell one-loop finite in this sector, while preserving the gauge invariance and $\mathcal{N}=(1,0)$ supersymmetry. The cancelation mechanism is explicitly verified using both the background field method and the supergraph techniques. Thus, we present an example of the higher-derivative supersymmetric gauge theory in six dimensions which is finite in the vector multiplet sector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a six-dimensional N=(1,0) supersymmetric gauge theory with higher derivatives coupled to an adjoint hypermultiplet. By introducing a novel non-minimal interaction between the gauge multiplet and the hypermultiplet, the authors claim that one-loop divergences in the gauge superfield sector (present in the conventional formulation) are canceled. The resulting theory is asserted to be off-shell one-loop finite in this sector while preserving gauge invariance and N=(1,0) supersymmetry. The cancellation is explicitly verified using both the background field method and supergraph techniques in harmonic superspace.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies a concrete example of a higher-derivative supersymmetric gauge theory in six dimensions that achieves one-loop finiteness in the vector multiplet sector. The explicit diagrammatic verification with two independent methods (background field and supergraphs) and the maintenance of off-shell supersymmetry and harmonic superspace structure are positive features that would strengthen the result.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model and interaction term (likely §2–3)] The central claim rests on the novel non-minimal interaction preserving off-shell N=(1,0) supersymmetry closure and the harmonic superspace structure without introducing new uncanceled divergences. The manuscript assumes this consistency a priori when performing the background-field and supergraph calculations; an explicit verification of the supersymmetry variation of the full action (including the new term) and confirmation that the propagator structure remains unaltered would be required to substantiate the reported cancellation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly state the precise form of the higher-derivative terms and the non-minimal interaction to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the major point below regarding explicit verification of supersymmetry closure for the novel interaction term. We will incorporate additional details in the revised version to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim rests on the novel non-minimal interaction preserving off-shell N=(1,0) supersymmetry closure and the harmonic superspace structure without introducing new uncanceled divergences. The manuscript assumes this consistency a priori when performing the background-field and supergraph calculations; an explicit verification of the supersymmetry variation of the full action (including the new term) and confirmation that the propagator structure remains unaltered would be required to substantiate the reported cancellation.

    Authors: We agree that making the supersymmetry closure more explicit would improve the clarity of the manuscript. The novel non-minimal interaction was constructed directly in harmonic superspace to be invariant under the off-shell N=(1,0) supersymmetry transformations of the vector and hypermultiplets, ensuring that the full action closes without additional constraints. The background-field method employed in the paper preserves this off-shell supersymmetry by construction, and the supergraph calculations confirm that the one-loop divergences in the gauge sector cancel while no new divergences arise from the interaction. Regarding the propagator, the new term contributes only to interaction vertices and does not modify the quadratic part of the gauge superfield action, leaving the propagator structure unchanged from the conventional higher-derivative formulation. To address the referee's concern directly, we will add a dedicated subsection (or short appendix) in the revised manuscript that explicitly computes the supersymmetry variation of the new interaction term and verifies that it vanishes, along with a brief statement confirming the unaltered propagator. This addition will substantiate the reported cancellation without requiring changes to the main results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Explicit diagram cancellation in harmonic superspace yields finiteness without definitional reduction

full rationale

The paper introduces a novel non-minimal interaction and verifies one-loop divergence cancellation in the gauge sector by direct computation using the background-field method combined with supergraph techniques in harmonic superspace. This constitutes an independent, calculational check rather than any reduction of the finiteness statement to a fitted input, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation. No equations or steps in the presented derivation chain equate the claimed result to its own assumptions by construction; the consistency of the added term with off-shell N=(1,0) supersymmetry is taken as part of the model definition and then tested through the explicit cancellation, leaving the overall argument self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit list of free parameters or new entities; the non-minimal interaction is introduced but its detailed form and any associated assumptions are not extractable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5694 in / 1099 out tokens · 37202 ms · 2026-05-21T10:40:59.767954+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Emergence of conformal properties in Finite Grand Unified Theories via reduction of couplings

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Finite SUSY GUTs with reduction of couplings exhibit conformal behavior and AMSB-like soft terms without tachyons when connected to a Weyl-invariant supergravity with no-scale Kähler potential.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ultraviolet Divergences in H igher Dimensional Supersymmet- ric Yang-Mills Theories,

    P.S. Howe and K.S. Stelle, “Ultraviolet Divergences in H igher Dimensional Supersymmet- ric Yang-Mills Theories,” Phys. Lett. B 137 (1984), 175

    work page 1984

  2. [2]

    Supersymmetry counterterms revisited

    P.S. Howe and K.S. Stelle, “Supersymmetry counterterms revisited,” Phys. Lett. B 554 (2003), 190 [arXiv:hep-th/0211279 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  3. [3]

    The ultra-violet question in maximally supersymmetric field theories

    G. Bossard, P.S. Howe and K.S. Stelle, “The Ultra-violet question in maximally super- symmetric field theories,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 41 (2009), 919 [arXiv:0901.4661 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    A note on the UV behaviour of maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories

    G. Bossard, P.S. Howe and K.S. Stelle, “A Note on the UV beh aviour of maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories,” Phys. Lett. B 682 (2009), 137 [arXiv:0908.3883 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Quantum Properties of H igher Dimensional and Dimen- sionally Reduced Supersymmetric Theories,

    E.S. Fradkin and A.A. Tseytlin, “Quantum Properties of H igher Dimensional and Dimen- sionally Reduced Supersymmetric Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 227 (1983), 252

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    A Test of Finiteness Predicti ons for Supersymmetric Theo- ries,

    N. Marcus and A. Sagnotti, “A Test of Finiteness Predicti ons for Supersymmetric Theo- ries,” Phys. Lett. B 135 (1984), 85

    work page 1984

  7. [7]

    Ultraviolet divergences in non-renormalizable supersymmetric theories

    A. Smilga, “Ultraviolet divergences in non-renormaliz able supersymmetric theories,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 14 (2017) no.2, 245 [arXiv:1603.06811 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Divergences in maximal supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories in diverse dimensions

    L.V. Bork, D.I. Kazakov, M.V. Kompaniets, D.M. Tolkache v and D.E. Vlasenko, “Diver- gences in maximal supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories in di verse dimensions,” JHEP 11 (2015), 059 [arXiv:1508.05570 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    On Field theories with nonlo calized action,

    A. Pais and G.E. Uhlenbeck, “On Field theories with nonlo calized action,” Phys. Rev. 79 (1950), 145

    work page 1950

  10. [10]

    Renormalization of Higher Derivative Qu antum Gravity,

    K.S. Stelle, “Renormalization of Higher Derivative Qu antum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977), 953

    work page 1977

  11. [11]

    Unconstrained N=2 Matter, Yang-Mills and Supergravity Theories in Harmonic S uperspace,

    A. Galperin, E. Ivanov, S. Kalitzin, V. Ogievetsky and E . Sokatchev, “Unconstrained N=2 Matter, Yang-Mills and Supergravity Theories in Harmonic S uperspace,” Class. Quant. Grav. 1 (1984), 469 [erratum: Class. Quant. Grav. 2 (1985), 127]

    work page 1984

  12. [12]

    Harmonic Supergraphs. Green Functions,

    A. Galperin, E.A. Ivanov, V. Ogievetsky and E. Sokatche v, “Harmonic Supergraphs. Green Functions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 2 (1985), 601

    work page 1985

  13. [13]

    Harmonic Supergraphs. Feyn- man Rules and Examples,

    A. Galperin, E. Ivanov, V. Ogievetsky and E. Sokatchev, “Harmonic Supergraphs. Feyn- man Rules and Examples,” Class. Quant. Grav. 2 (1985), 617

    work page 1985

  14. [14]

    Harmonic superspace

    A.S. Galperin, E.A. Ivanov, V.I. Ogievetsky and E.S. So katchev, “Harmonic superspace”, Cambridge, UK: Univ. Pr. (2001) 306 p

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    Renormalizable supersymmetric gauge theory in six dimensions

    E.A. Ivanov, A.V. Smilga and B.M. Zupnik, “Renormaliza ble supersymmetric gauge the- ory in six dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 726 (2005), 131 [arXiv:hep-th/0505082 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  16. [16]

    One-loop β -functions in 4-derivative gauge theory in 6 dimensions,

    L. Casarin and A.A. Tseytlin, “One-loop β -functions in 4-derivative gauge theory in 6 dimensions,” JHEP 08 (2019), 159 [arXiv:1907.02501 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Supergraph calcula- tion of one-loop divergences in higher-derivative 6 D SYM theory,

    I.L. Buchbinder, E.A. Ivanov, B.S. Merzlikin and K.V. S tepanyantz, “Supergraph calcula- tion of one-loop divergences in higher-derivative 6 D SYM theory,” JHEP 08 (2020), 169 [arXiv:2004.12657 [hep-th]]. 15

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    The renormalization structure of 6D, N = (1, 0) supersymmetric higher-derivative gauge theory,

    I.L. Buchbinder, E.A. Ivanov, B.S. Merzlikin and K.V. S tepanyantz, “The renormalization structure of 6D, N = (1, 0) supersymmetric higher-derivative gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 961 (2020), 115249 [arXiv:2007.02843 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    One-loop divergences in the 6D, N=(1,0) abelian gauge theory

    I.L. Buchbinder, E.A. Ivanov, B.S. Merzlikin and K.V. S tepanyantz, “One-loop di- vergences in the 6 D, N = (1 , 0) abelian gauge theory,” Phys. Lett. B 763 (2016), 375[arXiv:1609.00975 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    One-loop divergences in 6D, N=(1,0) SYM theory

    I.L. Buchbinder, E.A. Ivanov, B.S. Merzlikin and K.V. S tepanyantz, “One-loop divergences in 6D, N = (1, 0) SYM theory,” JHEP 01 (2017), 128 [arXiv:1612.03190 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Supergraph analysis of the one-loop divergences in $6D$, ${\cal N} = (1,0)$ and ${\cal N} = (1,1)$ gauge theories

    I.L. Buchbinder, E.A. Ivanov, B.S. Merzlikin and K.V. S tepanyantz, “Supergraph analysis of the one-loop divergences in 6 D, N = (1, 0) and N = (1, 1) gauge theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 921 (2017), 127 [arXiv:1704.02530 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    One-loop divergen ces in the six-dimensional N=(1,0) hypermultiplet self-coupling model,

    A.S. Budekhina and B.S. Merzlikin, “One-loop divergen ces in the six-dimensional N=(1,0) hypermultiplet self-coupling model,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no.10, 106010 [arXiv:2103.12054 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Conformal Invariance in N= 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,

    M.F. Sohnius and P.C. West, “Conformal Invariance in N= 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Lett. B 100 (1981), 245

    work page 1981

  24. [24]

    Supergraphity. 2. Manifes tly Covariant Rules and Higher Loop Finiteness,

    M.T. Grisaru and W. Siegel, “Supergraphity. 2. Manifes tly Covariant Rules and Higher Loop Finiteness,” Nucl. Phys. B 201 (1982), 292 [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B 206 (1982), 496]

    work page 1982

  25. [25]

    Miraculous U ltraviolet Cancellations in Su- persymmetry Made Manifest,

    P.S. Howe, K.S. Stelle and P.K. Townsend, “Miraculous U ltraviolet Cancellations in Su- persymmetry Made Manifest,” Nucl. Phys. B 236 (1984), 125

    work page 1984

  26. [26]

    Light Cone Superspace and the Ultravio let Finiteness of the N=4 Model,

    S. Mandelstam, “Light Cone Superspace and the Ultravio let Finiteness of the N=4 Model,” Nucl. Phys. B 213 (1983), 149

    work page 1983

  27. [27]

    N=4 Yang-Mil ls Theory on the Light Cone,

    L. Brink, O. Lindgren and B.E.W. Nilsson, “N=4 Yang-Mil ls Theory on the Light Cone,” Nucl. Phys. B 212 (1983), 401

    work page 1983

  28. [28]

    Six-dimensional Supergauge Theories in the Harmonic Superspace,

    B.M. Zupnik, “Six-dimensional Supergauge Theories in the Harmonic Superspace,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 44 (1986), 512 [Yad. Fiz. 44 (1986) 794]

    work page 1986

  29. [29]

    The structure of divergences in the higher-derivative supersymmetric 6D ga uge theory,

    I.L. Buchbinder, A.S. Budekhina, E.A. Ivanov and K.V. S tepanyantz, “The structure of divergences in the higher-derivative supersymmetric 6D ga uge theory,” Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) no.12, 125014 [arXiv:2503.18532 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Chiral anomalies in six dimensions from harmonic superspace

    S.M. Kuzenko, J. Novak and I.B. Samsonov, “Chiral anoma lies in six dimensions from harmonic superspace,” JHEP 11 (2017), 145 [arXiv:1708.08238 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Chiral anomalies in higher-derivative supersymmetric 6D gauge theories

    A.V. Smilga, “Chiral anomalies in higher-derivative s upersymmetric 6D theories,” Phys. Lett. B 647 (2007), 298 [arXiv:hep-th/0606139 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  32. [32]

    Exact Gell-Mann-Low Function of Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories from Insta nton Calculus,

    V.A. Novikov, M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Za kharov, “Exact Gell-Mann-Low Function of Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories from Insta nton Calculus,” Nucl. Phys. B 229 (1983), 381

    work page 1983

  33. [33]

    More on the Axial Anomaly in Supersymmet ric Yang-Mills Theory,

    D.R.T. Jones, “More on the Axial Anomaly in Supersymmet ric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Lett. 123B (1983), 45. 16

    work page 1983

  34. [34]

    Beta Function in Super- symmetric Gauge Theories: Instantons Versus Traditional A pproach,

    V.A. Novikov, M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Za kharov, “Beta Function in Super- symmetric Gauge Theories: Instantons Versus Traditional A pproach,” Phys. Lett. 166B (1986), 329 [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 43 (1986), 294] [Yad. Fiz. 43 (1986), 459]

    work page 1986

  35. [35]

    Solution of the Anom aly Puzzle in SUSY Gauge Theories and the Wilson Operator Expansion,

    M.A. Shifman and A.I. Vainshtein, “Solution of the Anom aly Puzzle in SUSY Gauge Theories and the Wilson Operator Expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986), 456 [Sov. Phys. JETP 64 (1986), 428] [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 91 (1986), 723]

    work page 1986

  36. [36]

    Invariant regularization of nonlinear chiral theories,

    A.A. Slavnov, “Invariant regularization of nonlinear chiral theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 31 (1971), 301

    work page 1971

  37. [37]

    Invariant regularization of gauge theo ries,

    A.A. Slavnov, “Invariant regularization of gauge theo ries,” Theor. Math. Phys. 13 (1972), 1064 [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 13 (1972), 174]

    work page 1972

  38. [38]

    The Pauli-Villars Regularization for N onabelian Gauge Theories,

    A.A. Slavnov, “The Pauli-Villars Regularization for N onabelian Gauge Theories,” Theor. Math. Phys. 33 (1977), 977 [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 33 (1977), 210]

    work page 1977

  39. [39]

    Invariant Regularizations for S upersymmetric Gauge Theories,

    V.K. Krivoshchekov, “Invariant Regularizations for S upersymmetric Gauge Theories,” Theor. Math. Phys. 36 (1978), 745 [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 36 (1978), 291]

    work page 1978

  40. [40]

    Higher Derivative Regulation of Supersymm etric Theories,

    P.C. West, “Higher Derivative Regulation of Supersymm etric Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986), 113

    work page 1986

  41. [41]

    Manifestly N=2 supersymmetric regularization for N=2 supersymmetric field theories

    I L. Buchbinder, N.G. Pletnev and K.V. Stepanyantz, “Ma nifestly N=2 supersymmetric regularization for N=2 supersymmetric field theories,” Phy s. Lett. B 751 (2015), 434 [arXiv:1509.08055 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    The Higher Covariant Derivative Regu larization as a Tool for Revealing the Structure of Quantum Corrections in Supersymmetric Gau ge Theories,

    K. Stepanyantz, “The Higher Covariant Derivative Regu larization as a Tool for Revealing the Structure of Quantum Corrections in Supersymmetric Gau ge Theories,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 309 (2020) no.1, 284 [arXiv:1910.03242 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    The structure of quantum correctio ns and exact results in supersym- metric theories from the higher covariant derivative regul arization,

    K.V. Stepanyantz, “The structure of quantum correctio ns and exact results in supersym- metric theories from the higher covariant derivative regul arization,” Theor. Math. Phys. 217 (2023) no.3, 1954

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Reduction of Couplings and its application in Particle Physics

    S. Heinemeyer, M. Mondrag´ on, N. Tracas and G. Zoupanos , “Reduction of Couplings and its application in Particle Physics,” Phys. Rept. 814 (2019), 1 [arXiv:1904.00410 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Finite N = 1 SUSY Field Theories and Dimensional Regularization,

    D.I. Kazakov, “Finite N = 1 SUSY Field Theories and Dimensional Regularization,” Ph ys. Lett. B 179 (1986), 352

    work page 1986

  46. [46]

    Finite N =1 Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theories,

    A.V. Ermushev, D.I. Kazakov and O.V. Tarasov, “Finite N =1 Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 281 (1987), 72

    work page 1987

  47. [47]

    Vanishing Beta Fu nctions inN = 1 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,

    C. Lucchesi, O. Piguet and K. Sibold, “Vanishing Beta Fu nctions inN = 1 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,” Helv. Phys. Acta 61 (1988), 321

    work page 1988

  48. [48]

    Necessary and Suffi cient Conditions for All Order Vanishing Beta Functions in Supersymmetric Yang-Mills The ories,

    C. Lucchesi, O. Piguet and K. Sibold, “Necessary and Suffi cient Conditions for All Order Vanishing Beta Functions in Supersymmetric Yang-Mills The ories,” Phys. Lett. B 201 (1988), 241

    work page 1988

  49. [49]

    Finiteness in Rigid Supersymm etric Theories,

    A. Parkes and P.C. West, “Finiteness in Rigid Supersymm etric Theories,” Phys. Lett. 138B (1984), 99

    work page 1984

  50. [50]

    The Beta Function in Su persymmetric Yang-Mills The- ory,

    D.R.T. Jones and L. Mezincescu, “The Beta Function in Su persymmetric Yang-Mills The- ory,” Phys. Lett. 136B (1984), 242. 17

    work page 1984

  51. [51]

    The Chiral Anomaly and a Class of Two Loop Finite Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,

    D.R.T. Jones and L. Mezincescu, “The Chiral Anomaly and a Class of Two Loop Finite Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,” Phys. Lett. 138B (1984), 293

    work page 1984

  52. [52]

    The Structure o f UV Divergences in Ssym Theories,

    M.T. Grisaru, B. Milewski and D. Zanon, “The Structure o f UV Divergences in Ssym Theories,” Phys. Lett. 155B (1985), 357

    work page 1985

  53. [53]

    Exact β -functions for N = 1 supersymmetric theories finite in the lowest loops,

    K. Stepanyantz, “Exact β -functions for N = 1 supersymmetric theories finite in the lowest loops,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) no.7, 571 [arXiv:2105.00900 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    The Background Field Method for N = 2 Super Yang-Mills Theories in Harmonic Superspace

    I. L. Buchbinder, E. I. Buchbinder, S. M. Kuzenko and B. A . Ovrut, “The Background field method for N=2 superYang-Mills theories in harmonic su perspace,” Phys. Lett. B 417 (1998), 61. [arXiv:hep-th/9704214 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  55. [55]

    Low- energy effective action in N = 2 supersymmetric field theories,

    E.I. Buchbinder, B.A. Ovrut, I.L. Buchbinder, E.A. Iva nov and S.M. Kuzenko, “Low- energy effective action in N = 2 supersymmetric field theories, ” Phys. Part. Nucl. 32 (2001), 641 [Fiz. Elem. Chast. Atom. Yadra 32 (2001) 1222]

    work page 2001

  56. [56]

    N=1 d = 6 harmonic s uperspace,

    P. S. Howe, K. S. Stelle and P. C. West, “N=1 d = 6 harmonic s uperspace,” Class. Quant. Grav. 2 (1985), 815

    work page 1985

  57. [57]

    Ultraviolet behav ior of 6D supersymmetric Yang- Mills theories and harmonic superspace,

    G. Bossard, E. Ivanov and A. Smilga, “Ultraviolet behav ior of 6D supersymmetric Yang- Mills theories and harmonic superspace,” JHEP 12 (2015), 085 [arXiv:1509.08027 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Conformal properties of hypermultiplet actions in six dimensions

    E. A. Ivanov and A. V. Smilga, “Conformal properties of h ypermultiplet actions in six dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 637 (2006), 374. [arXiv:hep-th/0510273 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Construction of 6D supersymmetric field models in N=(1,0) harmonic superspace

    I. L. Buchbinder and N. G. Pletnev, “Construction of 6D s upersymmetric field models in N=(1,0) harmonic superspace,” Nucl. Phys. B 892 (2015), 21 [arXiv:1411.1848 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Dynamical theory of groups and fields,

    B.S. DeWitt “Dynamical theory of groups and fields,” Con f. Proc. C 630701 (1964), 585 [Les Houches Lect. Notes 13 (1964), 585]

    work page 1964

  61. [61]

    Quantum Theory of Gravity. 2. The Manifes tly Covariant Theory,

    B. S. DeWitt, “Quantum Theory of Gravity. 2. The Manifes tly Covariant Theory,” Phys. Rev. 162 (1967), 1195

    work page 1967

  62. [62]

    The Renormalization in Nonabelian Gaug e Theories,

    R. E. Kallosh, “The Renormalization in Nonabelian Gaug e Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 78 (1974), 293

    work page 1974

  63. [63]

    Generat ing Functional for the s Matrix in Gauge Theories,

    I.Ya. Arefeva, L.D. Faddeev and A.A. Slavnov, “Generat ing Functional for the s Matrix in Gauge Theories,” Theor. Math. Phys. 21 (1974), 1165 [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 21 (1974), 311]

    work page 1974

  64. [64]

    The Background Field Method Beyond One Lo op,

    L.F. Abbott, “The Background Field Method Beyond One Lo op,” Nucl. Phys. B 185 (1981), 189

    work page 1981

  65. [65]

    Introduction to the Background Field Met hod,

    L.F. Abbott, “Introduction to the Background Field Met hod,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 13 (1982), 33 CERN-TH-3113

    work page 1982

  66. [66]

    Supersymmetric Dimensional Regularizati on via Dimensional Reduction,

    W. Siegel, “Supersymmetric Dimensional Regularizati on via Dimensional Reduction,” Phys. Lett. B 84 (1979), 193

    work page 1979

  67. [67]

    Higher-dimensional invaria nts in 6D super Yang-Mills theory,

    S. Buyucli and E. Ivanov, “Higher-dimensional invaria nts in 6D super Yang-Mills theory,” JHEP 07 (2021), 190 [arXiv:2105.05899 [hep-th]]. 18

    work page arXiv 2021