Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SEC-QA: A Systematic Evaluation Corpus for Financial QA

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14394 v1 pith:MRBP2DQG submitted 2024-06-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords financialdocumentsevaluationgenerationabilitycontextdatadataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The financial domain frequently deals with large numbers of long documents that are essential for daily operations. Significant effort is put towards automating financial data analysis. However, a persistent challenge, not limited to the finance domain, is the scarcity of datasets that accurately reflect real-world tasks for model evaluation. Existing datasets are often constrained by size, context, or relevance to practical applications. Moreover, LLMs are currently trained on trillions of tokens of text, limiting access to novel data or documents that models have not encountered during training for unbiased evaluation. We propose SEC-QA, a continuous dataset generation framework with two key features: 1) the semi-automatic generation of Question-Answer (QA) pairs spanning multiple long context financial documents, which better represent real-world financial scenarios; 2) the ability to continually refresh the dataset using the most recent public document collections, not yet ingested by LLMs. Our experiments show that current retrieval augmented generation methods systematically fail to answer these challenging multi-document questions. In response, we introduce a QA system based on program-of-thought that improves the ability to perform complex information retrieval and quantitative reasoning pipelines, thereby increasing QA accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022-2025)

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using LLM extraction on 681 papers, the authors build a public knowledge graph showing financial NLP moved from LLM adoption to limitation-aware, modular system design between 2022 and 2025.

Pith tools