Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A comparison of estimators for the two-point correlation function

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/9912088 v2 pith:MSBMANA5 submitted 1999-12-06 astro-ph

A comparison of estimators for the two-point correlation function

classification astro-ph
keywords correlationfunctionestimatorscomparisoncriterionestimatorindicatorsreal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Nine of the most important estimators known for the two-point correlation function are compared using a predetermined, rigorous criterion. The indicators were extracted from over 500 subsamples of the Virgo Hubble Volume simulation cluster catalog. The ``real'' correlation function was determined from the full survey in a 3000Mpc/h periodic cube. The estimators were ranked by the cumulative probability of returning a value within a certain tolerance of the real correlation function. This criterion takes into account bias and variance, and it is independent of the possibly non-Gaussian nature of the error statistics. As a result for astrophysical applications a clear recommendation has emerged: the Landy & Szalay (1993) estimator, in its original or grid version Szapudi & Szalay (1998), are preferred in comparison to the other indicators examined, with a performance almost indistinguishable from the Hamilton (1993) estimator.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mapping the Universe as a Bianchi I cosmology with Gaia data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Gaia quasar proper motions show a significant quadrupole signal matching an axisymmetric Bianchi I anisotropy model, but the amplitude does not increase with redshift as the model requires and the inferred local shear...

  2. High-redshift transverse BAO measurements with the SDSS quasar catalog

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 reject novelty 5.0

    A transverse-BAO angular diameter distance at z≈1.725 is claimed from SDSS DR16 quasars, but the abstract (two shells: θ_BAO=1.911°±0.062° and 1.727°±0.081°, 3.4σ/3.0σ) contradicts the body (one shell: θ_BAO=1.928°±0....