Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Redefining Qualitative Analysis in the AI Era: Utilizing ChatGPT for Efficient Thematic Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.10771 v3 pith:MSOSO5LA submitted 2023-09-19 cs.HC

Redefining Qualitative Analysis in the AI Era: Utilizing ChatGPT for Efficient Thematic Analysis

classification cs.HC
keywords chatgptqualitativeanalysisresearcherspromptsresearchapplicationsenhance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

AI tools, particularly large-scale language model (LLM) based applications such as ChatGPT, have the potential to simplify qualitative research. Through semi-structured interviews with seventeen participants, we identified challenges and concerns in integrating ChatGPT into the qualitative analysis process. Collaborating with thirteen qualitative researchers, we developed a framework for designing prompts to enhance the effectiveness of ChatGPT in thematic analysis. Our findings indicate that improving transparency, providing guidance on prompts, and strengthening users' understanding of LLMs' capabilities significantly enhance the users' ability to interact with ChatGPT. We also discovered and revealed the reasons behind researchers' shift in attitude towards ChatGPT from negative to positive. This research not only highlights the importance of well-designed prompts in LLM applications but also offers reflections for qualitative researchers on the perception of AI's role. Finally, we emphasize the potential ethical risks and the impact of constructing AI ethical expectations by researchers, particularly those who are novices, on future research and AI development.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dynamic Surveys: Using LLMs to Blend Qualitative Depth,Quantitative Structure, and Collaborative Interaction

    cs.HC 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    A survey platform that uses LLMs to cluster open-ended responses live and lets respondents rate, rank, and explain those clusters produced positive user reactions in two small field studies, though the 'richer than tr...

  2. Comparative Analysis of Human vs. AI-powered Support in VRChat Communities on Discord: User Engagement, Response Dynamics and Interaction Patterns

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Comparative study of VRChat Discord finds distinct engagement, response dynamics, and attitudes in human versus AI support channels.