Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 98 references

Typical star-forming galaxies at z≈5.5 escape less than 32% of their Lyman-alpha photons, an H-alpha-selected JWST sample finds.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 01:27 UTC pith:MUB63TWO

load-bearing objection A genuinely Lyα-unbiased Hα-selected sample at z≈5.5, but the headline escape fraction is not reproducible from the printed table and the galaxy count is inconsistent; worth refereeing after those are fixed. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25801 v1 pith:MUB63TWO submitted 2026-07-28 astro-ph.GA

Lyα Escape in JWST/NIRCam F430M-Selected Hα Emitters at zsimeq5.5

Cheng Cheng , Zhen-Ya Zheng , Chunyan Jiang , Fengwu Sun , Edo Ibar , Xin Wang , Haojing Yan , Fang-Ting Yuan
show 3 more authors
Jia-Sheng Huang Juan Molina Malte Brinch
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Lyman-alpha escape fractionH-alpha emittershigh-redshift galaxiesJWST/NIRCam medium-band photometryMUSE integral-field spectroscopyreionizationdust attenuationgalaxy overdensities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Using a galaxy sample selected by hydrogen-alpha emission rather than by Lyman-alpha, this paper tries to measure how efficiently typical star-forming galaxies at z≈5.5 let Lyman-alpha photons escape. The approach anchors intrinsic Lyman-alpha production to dust-corrected H-alpha flux (Case B ratio 8.7), avoiding the selection bias of Lyman-alpha emitter surveys. Only 4 of 13 galaxies with MUSE coverage show Lyman-alpha; combining detections and upper limits gives a conservative population-averaged escape fraction below 0.32. Detections are nearly dust-free, show no correlation with star-formation rate, and three of four sit in a known overdensity, suggesting environment helps. The method establishes a scalable, less biased way to measure Lyman-alpha visibility in the post-reionization era.

Core claim

The paper claims that among H-alpha-selected star-forming galaxies at z≈5.5, Lyman-alpha escape is rare and inefficient: the population-averaged escape fraction is conservatively bounded by ⟨f_esc⟩ < 0.32, with only about 30% of galaxies showing detectable Lyman-alpha. Lyman-alpha detections occur preferentially in dust-free systems, while the escape fraction does not track star-formation rate, pointing to a stochastic, environment-dependent escape process. Three of the four detected sources lie in a known overdense structure at z≈5.66, hinting that local ionizing radiation may open transparent channels for Lyman-alpha photons.

What carries the argument

The central identity is f_esc^Lyα = L_obs(Lyα) / (8.7 × L_int(Hα)), where the intrinsic H-alpha luminosity is derived from the F430M medium-band excess and corrected for dust using a standard attenuation law with a fixed stellar-to-nebular reddening ratio; non-detections are converted to 3σ upper limits assuming a 200 km/s line width, and the population average uses a survival-analysis estimator that handles censored data. This converts a JWST medium-band photometric excess into an absolute Lyman-alpha escape fraction without ever selecting on Lyman-alpha itself.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation rests on assuming that intrinsic Lyman-alpha luminosity is exactly 8.7 times the dust-corrected H-alpha luminosity, an assumption that depends on the adopted dust correction and on Case B recombination.

What would settle it

Measure the actual Lyman-alpha line widths of the non-detected galaxies (or obtain Balmer-decrement dust corrections): if typical lines are broader than the assumed 200 km/s, the 3σ flux limits are underestimated and the population average could rise above 0.32; if deeper observations still find no Lyman-alpha in those systems, the bound is strengthened.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Typical galaxies at z≈5.5 are not efficient Lyman-alpha leakers; Lyα-selected samples over-represent a minority of favorable systems.
  • Dust content, rather than star-formation rate, is the main internal gate for Lyman-alpha escape in this population.
  • The overdensity association implies local environment—possibly ionized bubbles—can boost Lyα transmission, complicating interpretations of Lyα as a pure reionization probe.
  • The H-alpha-selected framework is transferable to other redshifts via other NIRCam medium-band filters, enabling a systematic, less biased measurement of how f_esc evolves.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the low average escape fraction holds, estimates of the star-formation rate density at z≈5.5 from Lyman-alpha luminosity functions may be undercounted by a factor of several.
  • The single cluster field leaves cosmic variance open; repeating this measurement in several independent fields would show whether the overdensity association is a general environmental effect or a chance alignment.
  • A sensitivity flag: the paper's non-detection limits assume a representative 200 km/s line width; if actual Lyα lines are broader, those 3σ upper limits—and the <0.32 average—could shift upward.
  • A manuscript inconsistency: the abstract reports 3 detections out of 12 galaxies, while the body and Table 1 list 4 detections out of 13; the quoted escape-fraction bound uses the 13-galaxy sample.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs an Hα-selected sample of 41 galaxies at z~5.5 in the Abell 2744 field using JWST/NIRCam F430M medium-band excess, and analyzes the 13 objects covered by archival VLT/MUSE data to measure or limit Lyα emission. The intrinsic Lyα production is anchored to dust-corrected Hα under Case B (Lyα/Hα = 8.7), and individual escape fractions f_esc^Lyα are derived from Eq. (4). Lyα is reported in four of the 13 MUSE-covered entries, two of which are lensed images of the same galaxy (IDs 22444 and 27262). Combining detections and 3σ upper limits, the paper claims a conservative population-averaged upper limit <f_esc^Lyα> < 0.32 (Eq. 5), and interprets the results as evidence that efficient Lyα escape is restricted to a minority of low-dust systems, with a possible environmental enhancement in a known overdensity at z~5.66.

Significance. The Hα-selected, Lyα-unbiased approach is a genuinely useful complement to LAE-selected and UV-selected samples, and the combination of JWST medium-band imaging with archival MUSE spectroscopy is scalable to other fields and redshifts. If the headline upper limit survives a transparent recalculation, it would provide a meaningful constraint on the Lyα escape fraction of typical star-forming galaxies near the end of reionization. The study is observational, uses standard external calibrations (Case B, Calzetti attenuation, Kennicutt & Evans SFR), and does not introduce fitted parameters into the f_esc definition; these are strengths. However, the small sample size and the internal inconsistencies described below currently prevent verification of the central quantitative claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eq. (5), Table 1] The headline bound <f_esc^Lyα> < 0.32 is not reproducible from the data as presented. Directly substituting the Table 1 entries into Eq. (5) — summing the observed Lyα luminosities and the 3σ upper limits over all 13 entries and dividing by Σ 8.7×L_int_Hα — yields approximately 0.19, not <0.32. The text states that the mean Lyα luminosity is estimated with the Kaplan–Meier estimator (Appendix B), but Eq. (5) as written is a simple ratio of sums, and the connection between these two procedures is not shown. Because the two lensed images give f_esc values that differ at the ~4σ level (0.50±0.03 and 0.38±0.01), the final number depends on how the duplicate is collapsed. Please provide an explicit, step-by-step calculation with a well-defined unique-object sample, a clear censoring rule, and an uncertainty estimate on the upper bound.
  2. [Abstract vs. §§2.5, 3, 4] The sample definition is inconsistent across the manuscript. The abstract states Lyα is detected in 3 out of 12 galaxies, while Sections 2.5 and 3 state 4 out of 13 Hα emitters with MUSE coverage, and Section 4 refers to '3 unique systems'. Since IDs 22444 and 27262 are multiple images of the same source, there are 12 unique galaxies but 13 entries. The detection fraction is either 4/13 (entries) or 3/12 (unique objects), and the ~30% detection rate quoted in Section 3 is not invariant to this choice. Please adopt a single convention, define 'galaxy' versus 'detection' explicitly, and apply it consistently in the abstract, main text, tables, and figure captions.
  3. [§4, Figure 11] The environmental claim is confounded by the lensed duplicate. The sentence 'The association of 3 (out of 4) Lyα detections (corresponding to 3 unique systems; see Section 2.2)' is incorrect if the three overdensity detections include both 22444 and 27262, because those two entries are one unique system. If instead the three detections are three different unique systems, then the 'remaining source projected close to it' must be a duplicate of one of them, and the text should say so. The claimed environmental enhancement depends on how this duplicate is counted; please specify which entries lie in the overdense region and re-express the result in terms of unique systems.
  4. [§2.4, Eq. (2)] The dust correction uses a fixed nebular-to-stellar reddening ratio f = 0.44. For sources with A_V ~ 0.5–0.8 (e.g., IDs 32191 and 62119), Eq. (2) gives A_Hα ~ 1.0–1.5 mag, corresponding to a factor ~2.5–4 in the inferred L_int_Hα and hence in f_esc. The statement that 'adopting different values of f would not significantly affect the inferred Hα luminosities' is not self-evident from the sample properties. Please provide a sensitivity test (e.g., recompute <f_esc^Lyα> for f = 0.44 ± 0.1 or using the SED-derived reddening directly) to show that the headline bound is robust.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3] The sentence 'stacking analyses are limited by the small number of spectroscopic targets (six in total)' is unclear: the MUSE sample has 13 entries, and it is not obvious which six objects are meant. Please specify the subsample and the purpose of the stacking.
  2. [Appendix B] The Kaplan–Meier estimator is described for survival data with right censoring, but non-detections here are upper limits (left censoring). Please explain the adaptation to upper limits, or use an estimator appropriate for left-censored data, and clarify how the resulting mean luminosity enters Eq. (5).
  3. [Table 1] The table note states that f_esc differs at ~4σ between the two lensed images, but it is not clear whether this comparison is before or after correcting for differential magnification. Please state explicitly the convention used for f_esc in the table and in the note.
  4. [Figure 7] Red diamonds and red upper limits are used for this work; in the printed caption they may be hard to distinguish from other red symbols in the same figure. Consider using distinct shapes or a small legend panel.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the f_esc measurement is a standard observational ratio with no fitted parameters; the inner self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is, at bottom, an observational measurement rather than a predictive or first-principles derivation. Equation (4) defines f_esc^Lyα = L_obs^Lyα / (8.7 × L_int^Hα), and every quantity entering it is either directly measured (MUSE Lyα flux, F430M excess converted to Hα flux) or converted through an external, parameter-free Case B recombination ratio (Lyα/Hα = 8.7, cited to Dopita & Sutherland 2003 and Osterbrock & Ferland 2006). The dust correction uses the Calzetti attenuation law with f = 0.44, an external calibration, and the paper explicitly states the result is insensitive to changing f because the sample has very low A_V. No parameter is fitted to the Lyα data and then renamed as a prediction. Equation (5) defines the population average as a luminosity-weighted ratio; substituting 3σ upper limits for non-detections makes the resulting number an upper bound, and the paper labels it as a conservative upper bound rather than an unbiased estimate, so the construction matches the claim. The self-citations present — Cheng et al. (2025) for the F430M selection strategy, Jiang et al. (2024) for NIRSpec aperture-loss limitations, and Sun et al. (2025) for consistency of the f = 0.44 dust ratio — are methodological or contextual. None is used to force the headline f_esc value, which depends on the MUSE and JWST measurements and the external Case B conversion. The reviewer-noted issues of reproducibility (naive Table 1 substitution giving ~0.19 rather than 0.32; dual counting of the lensed pair IDs 22444/27262; the terse Kaplan-Meier appendix) are transparency and statistical-definition concerns, not circularity: they do not make Eq. 4 or Eq. 5 equal to their inputs by construction. The central claim is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, and no circular step can be quoted from the paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new physical entities or fit free parameters to derive f_esc. It adopts standard astrophysical calibrations (Case B, Calzetti) and makes explicit assumptions about line widths and dust corrections. The largest model dependence is the dust correction, which is entirely borrowed from prior literature.

free parameters (3)
  • Nebular-to-stellar reddening ratio f = 0.44
    Adopted from Calzetti et al. (2000) to convert stellar A_V to nebular extinction at Hα. If f is wrong, the dust-corrected Hα luminosities and all f_esc values shift.
  • Assumed Lyα line width for non-detections = 200 km/s
    Used to convert MUSE noise into 3σ flux upper limits (Section 2.5). The resulting f_esc upper limits are sensitive to this choice.
  • Case B Lyα/Hα ratio = 8.7
    Standard recombination ratio used in Eq. 4. The paper explicitly notes Case A would lower f_esc by 24%.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Intrinsic Lyα production is proportional to dust-corrected Hα under Case B recombination.
    This is the foundation of Eq. 4. It relies on hydrogen recombination physics and assumes Hα is unaffected by resonant scattering.
  • domain assumption The Calzetti attenuation law with f=0.44 accurately describes dust attenuation in these high-redshift galaxies.
    Used in Eq. 2 to correct Hα luminosities. If the true attenuation law differs, the derived f_esc values change.
  • domain assumption The F430M excess is dominated by Hα and contamination from [NII]/[SII] is negligible.
    Stated in Section 2.4, justified by low-metallicity expectations. Contamination would inflate Hα and lower f_esc.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 3336 in / 5336 out tokens · 287050 ms · 2026-08-01T01:27:29.816689+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ly$\alpha$ Escape in JWST/NIRCam F430M-Selected H$\alpha$ Emitters at $z\simeq5.5$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MUB63TWO

@misc{pith2026260725801,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ly$\alpha$ Escape in JWST/NIRCam F430M-Selected H$\alpha$ Emitters at $z\simeq5.5$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MUB63TWO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25801}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study the Ly$\alpha$ escape fraction ($f_{\rm esc}$) in an H$\alpha$-selected sample of star-forming galaxies at $z\simeq5.5$, identified via JWST/NIRCam F430M excess and covered by archival VLT/MUSE data. By anchoring the intrinsic Ly$\alpha$ production to H$\alpha$ emission, our approach provides a direct and Ly$\alpha$-unbiased probe of the escape of Ly$\alpha$ photons in galaxies with SFR $\gtrsim 0.1\,M_\odot\,{\rm yr^{-1}}$ at this epoch. Ly$\alpha$ emission is detected in 3 out of 12 galaxies covered by VLT/MUSE. Combining detections and upper limits, we place a conservative upper bound of $\langle f_{\rm esc}^{\rm Ly\alpha} \rangle < 0.32$ on the population-averaged Ly$\alpha$ escape fraction. We find that Ly$\alpha$ detections are preferentially associated with nearly dust-free systems, while no clear correlation between SFR and $f_{\rm esc}$, suggesting a stochastic picture of Ly$\alpha$ escape. Interestingly, three of the four Ly$\alpha$-detected galaxies reside within a known overdense structure, suggesting that local environment may further facilitate Ly$\alpha$ photons escape. Our H$\alpha$-selected approach establishes a general and scalable framework for probing Ly$\alpha$ escape by combining JWST medium- or narrow-band imaging with ground-based spectroscopic data, enabling systematic and less biased studies of Ly$\alpha$ visibility in typical star-forming galaxies during the post-reionization era.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25801 by Cheng cheng, Chunyan Jiang, Edo Ibar, Fang-Ting Yuan, Fengwu Sun, Haojing Yan, Jia-Sheng Huang, Juan Molina, Malte Brinch, Xin Wang, Zhen-Ya Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Upper panel: F444W−F430M color vs. F430M magnitude for the F430M image-selected galaxies. Red plus signs mark sources with a 3σ excess in the F430M−F444W color, and the solid line shows the 3σ detection limit eval￾uated in 0.5 mag bins. Blue circles highlight the F430M emitters with 5 < zphot < 6. Lower panel: F444W magni￾tude vs. photometric redshift for the F430M excess sample. Dotted lines indicate the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Upper panel: Response curves for the JWST/NIRCam filter F430M, F444W. We show the NIR￾Spec spectrum for one Hα emitter ID 27262, which is down￾loaded from DAWN JWST Archive (K. E. Heintz et al. 2024; A. de Graaff et al. 2025). The emission line is the Hα at z = 5.66. The dashed lines show the redshifts for Hα emis￾sion at redshift z = 5.66, as well as the redshift 5.4, which are the range of the available … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: JWST/NIRCam false-color stamps (F360M, F430M, F444W assigned to blue, green, red) of the Hα sample in this work. Orange boxes highlight the four targets with Lyα emission detected in the MUSE data cube. Each stamp is 6′′ ×6 ′′. The white bar in the lower right indicates 0.5 ′′ (∼3 kpc at z = 5.5). and 18.1c in P. Bergamini et al. 2023) are identified as multiple images of the same system. Treating them as … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: upper panel: SEDs of the Hα selected sample. The orange lines are the model spectra, and the blue dots show the photometric data from the SED released by UNCOVER (J. R. Weaver et al. 2024). Lower panel: Star formation histories (SFHs) of the Hα-selected sample derived with Bagpipes, assuming a double power-law parameterization. The inferred SFHs indicate enhanced recent star formation relative to the past-… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Star formation rate of the Hα emitter sample. Star formation rates estimated from SED fitting with Bag￾pipes (SFRSED) are shown as red circles, while those de￾rived from Hα emission (SFRHα) are shown as blue circles. Sources covered by MUSE observations are highlighted with solid symbols. The star-forming main sequence at z ∼ 5.5 from J. S. Speagle et al. (2014) is shown in dotted and dashed lines for comp… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The VLT/MUSE spectra of the four Lyα de￾tected targets. The dotted lines show the wavelength of 1216×(1+zspec) ˚A. The shaded regions indicate the spectral channels with flux densities exceeding 3σ of the rms noise, which are integrated to obtain the total Lyα flux. may provide qualitative information on resonant scat￾tering and gas kinematics. For the remaining nine galaxies, no significant Lyα signal is … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The Lyα escape fraction as a function of redshift. Our results are shown in red diamonds or red upper limits. We list the results from literature, including the Lyα emitters (open circles) from G. A. Blanc et al. (2011, navy blue), Z.-Y. Zheng et al. (2012, lime green), H. Atek et al. (2009, blue), L. Napolitano et al. (2024, black), the UV selected galaxy sample (blue open squares) from Z. Chen et al. (20… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the f Lyα esc with the E(B-V) from SED fitting (red diamonds or upper limits), comparing with the Hα emitters at z ≃ 2.2 (M. Hayes et al. 2010), and the lyman break galaxy sample at z ≃ 3 (K. A. Kornei et al. 2010). The E(B-V) is estimated from AV /3.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Lyα escape fraction as a function of the SFRHα and SFRSED ratio. Red diamonds show Lyα detections with error bars, while gray markers with arrows denote 3σ upper limits. Both populations span a similar range of burstiness, with no clear correlation between f Lyα esc and SFRHα/SFRSED, supporting a stochastic picture of Lyα escape. a function of star formation rate for galaxies with negli￾gible dust attenua… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    S., et al

    Ajiki , M., Taniguchi , Y., Fujita , S. S., et al. 2003, title A Subaru Search for Ly Emitters at Redshift 5.7 , , 126, 2091, 10.1086/378481

    work page doi:10.1086/378481 2003

  2. [2]

    X., Zheng , X

    An , F. X., Zheng , X. Z., Hao , C.-N., Huang , J.-S., & Xia , X.-Y. 2017, title Extinction Correction Significantly Influences the Estimate of the Ly Escape Fraction , , 835, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/116

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/116 2017

  3. [3]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, title Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  4. [4]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, title The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  5. [5]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, title The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package , , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  6. [6]

    J., Oesch , P., et al

    Atek , H., Furtak , L. J., Oesch , P., et al. 2022, title The star formation burstiness and ionizing efficiency of low-mass galaxies , , 511, 4464, 10.1093/mnras/stac360

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac360 2022

  7. [7]

    2009, title Empirical estimate of Ly escape fraction in a statistical sample of Ly emitters , , 506, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912787

    Atek , H., Kunth , D., Schaerer , D., et al. 2009, title Empirical estimate of Ly escape fraction in a statistical sample of Ly emitters , , 506, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912787

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912787 2009

  8. [8]

    J., et al

    Atek , H., Labb \'e , I., Furtak , L. J., et al. 2024, title Most of the photons that reionized the Universe came from dwarf galaxies , , 626, 975, 10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6 2024

  9. [9]

    2023, title New high-precision strong lensing modeling of Abell 2744

    Bergamini , P., Acebron , A., Grillo , C., et al. 2023, title New high-precision strong lensing modeling of Abell 2744. Preparing for JWST observations , , 670, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244575

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244575 2023

  10. [10]

    1996, title SExtractor: Software for source extraction

    Bertin , E., & Arnouts , S. 1996, title SExtractor: Software for source extraction. , , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 1996

  11. [11]

    E., et al

    Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., Whitaker , K. E., et al. 2024, title The JWST UNCOVER Treasury Survey: Ultradeep NIRSpec and NIRCam Observations before the Epoch of Reionization , , 974, 92, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf 2024

  12. [12]

    2025, title Ly with SPICE: interpreting Ly emission at z > 5 , , 542, 128, 10.1093/mnras/staf1121

    Bhagwat , A., Napolitano , L., Pentericci , L., Ciardi , B., & Costa , T. 2025, title Ly with SPICE: interpreting Ly emission at z > 5 , , 542, 128, 10.1093/mnras/staf1121

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1121 2025

  13. [13]

    A., Adams , J

    Blanc , G. A., Adams , J. J., Gebhardt , K., et al. 2011, title The HETDEX Pilot Survey. II. The Evolution of the Ly Escape Fraction from the Ultraviolet Slope and Luminosity Function of 1.9 < z < 3.8 LAEs , , 736, 31, 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/31

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/31 2011

  14. [14]

    Burnham , E., Wang , B., Leja , J., et al. 2026, title It's More Complicated Than You Think: A Forward Model to Infer the Recent Star Formation History, Bursty or Not, of Galaxy Populations , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20930, 10.48550/arXiv.2601.20930

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20930 2026

  15. [16]

    C., et al

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, title The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies , , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  16. [17]

    C., McLure , R

    Carnall , A. C., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., & Dav \'e , R. 2018, title Inferring the star formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with BAGPIPES: evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms , , 480, 4379, 10.1093/mnras/sty2169

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2169 2018

  17. [18]

    C., McLure , R

    Carnall , A. C., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2019, title The VANDELS survey: the star-formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies at 1.0 < z < 1.3 , , 490, 417, 10.1093/mnras/stz2544

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2544 2019

  18. [19]

    P., Mason , C., et al

    Chen , Z., Stark , D. P., Mason , C., et al. 2024, title JWST spectroscopy of z 5-8 UV-selected galaxies: new constraints on the evolution of the Ly escape fraction in the reionization era , , 528, 7052, 10.1093/mnras/stae455

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae455 2024

  19. [20]

    2025, title Probing Obscured Star Formation in Galaxy Clusters Using JWST Medium-band Images: 3.3 m PAH Emitter Sample in A2744 , , 279, 43, 10.3847/1538-4365/ade147

    Cheng , C., Wang , X., Liang , P., et al. 2025, title Probing Obscured Star Formation in Galaxy Clusters Using JWST Medium-band Images: 3.3 m PAH Emitter Sample in A2744 , , 279, 43, 10.3847/1538-4365/ade147

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ade147 2025

  20. [21]

    A., et al

    Covelo-Paz , A., Giovinazzo , E., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2025, title An H view of galaxy buildup in the first 2 Gyr: Luminosity functions at z 4 - 6.5 from NIRCam/grism spectroscopy , , 694, A178, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452363

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452363 2025

  21. [22]

    2025, title RUBIES: A complete census of the bright and red distant Universe with JWST/NIRSpec , , 697, A189, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452186

    de Graaff , A., Brammer , G., Weibel , A., et al. 2025, title RUBIES: A complete census of the bright and red distant Universe with JWST/NIRSpec , , 697, A189, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452186

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452186 2025

  22. [23]

    2014, title Ly Emitting Galaxies as a Probe of Reionisation , , 31, e040, 10.1017/pasa.2014.33

    Dijkstra , M. 2014, title Ly Emitting Galaxies as a Probe of Reionisation , , 31, e040, 10.1017/pasa.2014.33

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.33 2014

  23. [24]

    A., & Sutherland , R

    Dopita , M. A., & Sutherland , R. S. 2003, Astrophysics of the diffuse universe , 10.1007/978-3-662-05866-4

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-05866-4 2003

  24. [25]

    M., & Radford , S

    Downes , D., Solomon , P. M., & Radford , S. J. E. 1995, title New Observations and a New Interpretation of CO(3--2) in IRAS F10214+4724 , , 453, L65, 10.1086/309754

    work page doi:10.1086/309754 1995

  25. [26]

    2014, title Lyman line and continuum radiative transfer in a clumpy interstellar medium , , 562, A52, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220455

    Duval , F., Schaerer , D., \"O stlin , G., & Laursen , P. 2014, title Lyman line and continuum radiative transfer in a clumpy interstellar medium , , 562, A52, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220455

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220455 2014

  26. [27]

    D., & Nelson , P

    Feigelson , E. D., & Nelson , P. I. 1985, title Statistical methods for astronomical data with upper limits. I. Univariate distributions. , , 293, 192, 10.1086/163225

    doi:10.1086/163225 1985

  27. [28]

    Fox , C., Mahler , G., Sharon , K., & Remolina Gonz \'a lez , J. D. 2022, title The Strongest Cluster Lenses: An Analysis of the Relation between Strong Gravitational Lensing Strength and the Physical Properties of Galaxy Clusters , , 928, 87, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5024

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5024 2022

  28. [29]

    Fu , S., Sun , F., Jiang , L., et al. 2025, title Medium-band Astrophysics with the Grism of NIRCam In Frontier Fields (MAGNIF): Spectroscopic Census of H Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation at z 4.5 and 6.3 , , 987, 186, 10.3847/1538-4357/adddb1

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adddb1 2025

  29. [30]

    2021, title Ly as a tracer of cosmic reionization in the SPHINX radiation-hydrodynamics cosmological simulation , , 504, 1902, 10.1093/mnras/stab990

    Garel , T., Blaizot , J., Rosdahl , J., et al. 2021, title Ly as a tracer of cosmic reionization in the SPHINX radiation-hydrodynamics cosmological simulation , , 504, 1902, 10.1093/mnras/stab990

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab990 2021

  30. [31]

    T., Pello , R., et al

    Goovaerts , I., Thai , T. T., Pello , R., et al. 2024, title Charting the Lyman- escape fraction in the range 2.9 < z < 6.7 and consequences for the LAE reionisation contribution , , 690, A302, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451432

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451432 2024

  31. [32]

    1999, title Models for Dusty Ly Emitters at High Redshift , , 518, 138, 10.1086/307276

    Haiman , Z., & Spaans , M. 1999, title Models for Dusty Ly Emitters at High Redshift , , 518, 138, 10.1086/307276

    doi:10.1086/307276 1999

  32. [33]

    2015, title Lyman Alpha Emitting Galaxies in the Nearby Universe , , 32, e027, 10.1017/pasa.2015.25

    Hayes , M. 2015, title Lyman Alpha Emitting Galaxies in the Nearby Universe , , 32, e027, 10.1017/pasa.2015.25

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.25 2015

  33. [34]

    2011, title On the Redshift Evolution of the Ly Escape Fraction and the Dust Content of Galaxies , , 730, 8, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/8

    Hayes , M., Schaerer , D., \"O stlin , G., et al. 2011, title On the Redshift Evolution of the Ly Escape Fraction and the Dust Content of Galaxies , , 730, 8, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/8

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/730/1/8 2011

  34. [35]

    2010, title Escape of about five per cent of Lyman- photons from high-redshift star-forming galaxies , , 464, 562, 10.1038/nature08881

    Hayes , M., \"O stlin , G., Schaerer , D., et al. 2010, title Escape of about five per cent of Lyman- photons from high-redshift star-forming galaxies , , 464, 562, 10.1038/nature08881

    doi:10.1038/nature08881 2010

  35. [36]

    E., Watson , D., Brammer , G., et al

    Heintz , K. E., Watson , D., Brammer , G., et al. 2024, title Strong damped Lyman- absorption in young star-forming galaxies at redshifts 9 to 11 , Science, 384, 890, 10.1126/science.adj0343

    doi:10.1126/science.adj0343 2024

  36. [37]

    D., Marrone , D

    Hezaveh , Y. D., Marrone , D. P., & Holder , G. P. 2012, title Size Bias and Differential Lensing of Strongly Lensed, Dusty Galaxies Identified in Wide-Field Surveys , , 761, 20, 10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/20

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/1/20 2012

  37. [38]

    M., Cowie , L

    Hu , E. M., Cowie , L. L., Barger , A. J., et al. 2010, title An Atlas of z = 5.7 and z = 6.5 Ly Emitters , , 725, 394, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/394

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/725/1/394 2010

  38. [39]

    M., Cowie , L

    Hu , E. M., Cowie , L. L., Capak , P., et al. 2004, title The Luminosity Function of Ly Emitters at Redshift z -0.5ex 5.7 , , 127, 563, 10.1086/381302

    work page doi:10.1086/381302 2004

  39. [40]

    M., Cowie , L

    Hu , E. M., Cowie , L. L., McMahon , R. G., et al. 2002, title A Redshift z=6.56 Galaxy behind the Cluster Abell 370 , , 568, L75, 10.1086/340424

    doi:10.1086/340424 2002

  40. [41]

    M., McMahon , R

    Hu , E. M., McMahon , R. G., & Cowie , L. L. 1999, title An Extremely Luminous Galaxy at Z = 5.74 , , 522, L9, 10.1086/312205

    work page doi:10.1086/312205 1999

  41. [42]

    2019, title The Ly Luminosity Function and Cosmic Reionization at z 7.0: A Tale of Two LAGER Fields , , 886, 90, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4cf4

    Hu , W., Wang , J., Zheng , Z.-Y., et al. 2019, title The Ly Luminosity Function and Cosmic Reionization at z 7.0: A Tale of Two LAGER Fields , , 886, 90, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4cf4

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4cf4 2019

  42. [43]

    Hu , W., Papovich , C., Shen , L., et al. 2026, title Using Ly α Transmitted Spectrum to Probe IGM Transmission and Identify Ionized Structures in Cosmic Reionization , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.02539, 10.48550/arXiv.2605.02539

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.02539 2026

  43. [44]

    Jaskot , A. E. 2025, title Ionizing Radiation Escape from Low-Redshift Galaxies and Its Connection to Cosmic Reionization , , 63, 45, 10.1146/annurev-astro-111324-074935

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-111324-074935 2025

  44. [45]

    2024, title The Ly Nondetection by JWST NIRSpec of a Strong Ly Emitter at z = 5.66 Confirmed by MUSE , , 972, 121, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad61db

    Jiang , H., Wang , X., Cheng , C., et al. 2024, title The Ly Nondetection by JWST NIRSpec of a Strong Ly Emitter at z = 5.66 Confirmed by MUSE , , 972, 121, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad61db

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad61db 2024

  45. [46]

    2018, title A giant protocluster of galaxies at redshift 5.7 , Nature Astronomy, 2, 962, 10.1038/s41550-018-0587-9

    Jiang , L., Wu , J., Bian , F., et al. 2018, title A giant protocluster of galaxies at redshift 5.7 , Nature Astronomy, 2, 962, 10.1038/s41550-018-0587-9

    doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0587-9 2018

  46. [47]

    Kakiichi , K., Jin , X., Wang , F., et al. 2025, title JWST ASPIRE: How Did Galaxies Complete Reionization? Evidence for Excess IGM Transmission around [O\, III ] Emitters during Reionization , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.07074, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.07074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.07074 2025

  47. [48]

    L., & Meier, P

    Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. 1958, title Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2281868

    arXiv 1958

  48. [49]

    J., Matthee , J., et al

    Kashino , D., Lilly , S. J., Matthee , J., et al. 2026, title EIGER. VII. The Evolving Relationship between Galaxies and the Intergalactic Medium in the Final Stages of Reionization , , 997, 280, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2799

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2799 2026

  49. [50]

    C., & Evans , N

    Kennicutt , R. C., & Evans , N. J. 2012, title Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies , , 50, 531, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 2012

  50. [51]

    2023, title SILVERRUSH

    Kikuta , S., Ouchi , M., Shibuya , T., et al. 2023, title SILVERRUSH. XIII. A Catalog of 20,567 Ly Emitters at z = 2-7 Identified in the Full-depth Data of the Subaru/HSC-SSP and CHORUS Surveys , , 268, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/ace4cb

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ace4cb 2023

  51. [52]

    Kneib , J.-P., Bonnet , H., Golse , G., et al. 2011, LENSTOOL: A Gravitational Lensing Software for Modeling Mass Distribution of Galaxies and Clusters (strong and weak regime) ,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1102.004 1102.004

    2011

  52. [53]

    2018, title SILVERRUSH

    Konno , A., Ouchi , M., Shibuya , T., et al. 2018, title SILVERRUSH. IV. Ly luminosity functions at z = 5.7 and 6.6 studied with 1300 Ly emitters on the 14-21 deg ^ 2 sky , , 70, S16, 10.1093/pasj/psx131

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psx131 2018

  53. [54]

    A., Shapley , A

    Kornei , K. A., Shapley , A. E., Erb , D. K., et al. 2010, title The Relationship between Stellar Populations and Ly Emission in Lyman Break Galaxies , , 711, 693, 10.1088/0004-637X/711/2/693

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/711/2/693 2010

  54. [55]

    Kroupa , P., & Boily , C. M. 2002, title On the mass function of star clusters , , 336, 1188, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05848.x

    arXiv 2002

  55. [56]

    Laursen , P., Sommer-Larsen , J., & Razoumov , A. O. 2011, title Intergalactic Transmission and Its Impact on the Ly Line , , 728, 52, 10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/52

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/728/1/52 2011

  56. [57]

    N., Juneau , S., et al

    Lebowitz , S., Hainline , K. N., Juneau , S., et al. 2026, title Spatially Resolved AGN Ionization and Star Formation at Cosmic Noon with JWST/JEMS , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.01271, 10.48550/arXiv.2604.01271

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.01271 2026

  57. [58]

    2017, title The MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Field Survey

    Leclercq , F., Bacon , R., Wisotzki , L., et al. 2017, title The MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Field Survey. VIII. Extended Lyman- haloes around high-z star-forming galaxies , , 608, A8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731480

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731480 2017

  58. [59]

    Lin , X., Cai , Z., Wu , Y., et al. 2024, title Quantifying the Escape of Ly at z 5 6: A Census of Ly Escape Fraction with H -emitting Galaxies Spectroscopically Confirmed by JWST and VLT/MUSE , , 272, 33, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad3e7d

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad3e7d 2024

  59. [60]

    M., Koekemoer , A., Coe , D., et al

    Lotz , J. M., Koekemoer , A., Coe , D., et al. 2017, title The Frontier Fields: Survey Design and Initial Results , , 837, 97, 10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/97

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/97 2017

  60. [61]

    A., Treu , T., Dijkstra , M., et al

    Mason , C. A., Treu , T., Dijkstra , M., et al. 2018 a , title The Universe Is Reionizing at z 7: Bayesian Inference of the IGM Neutral Fraction Using Ly Emission from Galaxies , , 856, 2, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a7

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a7 2018

  61. [62]

    A., Treu , T., de Barros , S., et al

    Mason , C. A., Treu , T., de Barros , S., et al. 2018 b , title Beacons into the Cosmic Dark Ages: Boosted Transmission of Ly from UV Bright Galaxies at z 7 , , 857, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/aabbab

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aabbab 2018

  62. [63]

    2017, title The Frontier Fields lens modelling comparison project , , 472, 3177, 10.1093/mnras/stx2064

    Meneghetti , M., Natarajan , P., Coe , D., et al. 2017, title The Frontier Fields lens modelling comparison project , , 472, 3177, 10.1093/mnras/stx2064

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2064 2017

  63. [64]

    2015, title Can the intergalactic medium cause a rapid drop in Ly emission at z > 6? , , 446, 566, 10.1093/mnras/stu2089

    Mesinger , A., Aykutalp , A., Vanzella , E., et al. 2015, title Can the intergalactic medium cause a rapid drop in Ly emission at z > 6? , , 446, 566, 10.1093/mnras/stu2089

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2089 2015

  64. [65]

    A., Roberts-Borsani , G., Oesch , P

    Meyer , R. A., Roberts-Borsani , G., Oesch , P. A., & Ellis , R. S. 2025, title Probing patchy reionization with JWST: IGM opacity constraints from the Lyman forest of galaxies in legacy extragalactic fields , , 542, 1952, 10.1093/mnras/staf1312

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1312 2025

  65. [66]

    A., Kakiichi , K., Bosman , S

    Meyer , R. A., Kakiichi , K., Bosman , S. E. I., et al. 2020, title The role of galaxies and AGN in reionizing the IGM - III. IGM-galaxy cross-correlations at z 6 from eight quasar fields with DEIMOS and MUSE , , 494, 1560, 10.1093/mnras/staa746

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa746 2020

  66. [67]

    2025, title Accelerated Emergence of Evolved Galaxies in Early Overdensities at z 5.7 , , 982, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/adb30f

    Morishita , T., Liu , Z., Stiavelli , M., et al. 2025, title Accelerated Emergence of Evolved Galaxies in Early Overdensities at z 5.7 , , 982, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/adb30f

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb30f 2025

  67. [68]

    P., Matthee , J., Kramarenko , I., et al

    Naidu , R. P., Matthee , J., Kramarenko , I., et al. 2024, title All the Little Things in Abell 2744: > 1000 Gravitationally Lensed Dwarf Galaxies at z=0-9 from JWST NIRCam Grism Spectroscopy , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.01874, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.01874

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.01874 2024

  68. [69]

    2024, title Peering into cosmic reionization: Ly visibility evolution from galaxies at z = 4.5-8.5 with JWST , , 688, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449644

    Napolitano , L., Pentericci , L., Santini , P., et al. 2024, title Peering into cosmic reionization: Ly visibility evolution from galaxies at z = 4.5-8.5 with JWST , , 688, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449644

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449644 2024

  69. [70]

    2023, title An H Impression of Ly Galaxies at z ≃ 6 with Deep JWST/NIRCam Imaging , , 944, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/acb26b

    Ning , Y., Cai , Z., Jiang , L., et al. 2023, title An H Impression of Ly Galaxies at z ≃ 6 with Deep JWST/NIRCam Imaging , , 944, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/acb26b

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb26b 2023

  70. [71]

    Ning , Y., Jiang , L., Zheng , Z.-Y., & Wu , J. 2022, title The Magellan M2FS Spectroscopic Survey of High-z Galaxies: Ly Emitters at z 6.6 and the Evolution of Ly Luminosity Function over z 5.7-6.6 , , 926, 230, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4268

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4268 2022

  71. [72]

    E., & Ferland , G

    Osterbrock , D. E., & Ferland , G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  72. [73]

    2024, title The intrinsic distribution of Lyman- halos , , 690, A343, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451318

    Pharo , J., Wisotzki , L., Urrutia , T., et al. 2024, title The intrinsic distribution of Lyman- halos , , 690, A343, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451318

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451318 2024

  73. [74]

    A., Best , P

    Pirie , C. A., Best , P. N., Duncan , K. J., et al. 2025, title The JWST Emission Line Survey (JELS): an untargeted search for H emission line galaxies at z > 6 and their physical properties , , 541, 1348, 10.1093/mnras/staf1006

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1006 2025

  74. [75]

    H., Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., et al

    Price , S. H., Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., et al. 2025, title The UNCOVER Survey: First Release of Ultradeep JWST/NIRSpec PRISM Spectra for 700 Galaxies from z 0.3 13 in A2744 , , 982, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1 2025

  75. [76]

    A., Strait , V., et al

    Prieto-Lyon , G., Mason , C. A., Strait , V., et al. 2025, title Lyman-alpha emission at the end of reionization: line strengths and profiles from MMT and JWST observations at z -0.5ex 5-6 , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.18302, 10.48550/arXiv.2509.18302

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.18302 2025

  76. [77]

    Schmitt , J. H. M. M. 1985, title Statistical analysis of astronomical data containing upper bounds: general methods and examples drawn from X-ray astronomy. , , 293, 178, 10.1086/163224

    work page doi:10.1086/163224 1985

  77. [78]

    E., Reddy , N

    Shapley , A. E., Reddy , N. A., Sanders , R. L., Topping , M. W., & Brammer , G. B. 2023, title JWST/NIRSpec Measurements of the Relationships between Nebular Emission-line Ratios and Stellar Mass at z 3-6 , , 950, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd939

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd939 2023

  78. [79]

    2025, title Age dependence of Ly escape fraction of Ly emitters and their significant role in cosmic reionization , , 542, 3125, 10.1093/mnras/staf1377

    Shimizu , S., Kashikawa , N., Kikuta , S., et al. 2025, title Age dependence of Ly escape fraction of Ly emitters and their significant role in cosmic reionization , , 542, 3125, 10.1093/mnras/staf1377

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1377 2025

  79. [80]

    2023, title The ionizing photon production efficiency at z 6 for Lyman-alpha emitters using JEMS and MUSE , , 523, 5468, 10.1093/mnras/stad1749

    Simmonds , C., Tacchella , S., Maseda , M., et al. 2023, title The ionizing photon production efficiency at z 6 for Lyman-alpha emitters using JEMS and MUSE , , 523, 5468, 10.1093/mnras/stad1749

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1749 2023

  80. [81]

    L., Barger , A

    Songaila , A., Cowie , L. L., Barger , A. J., Hu , E. M., & Taylor , A. J. 2024, title A Spectral Atlas of Ly Emitters at z = 5.7 and z = 6.6 , , 971, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5674

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5674 2024

Showing first 80 references.