Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Causality, Causal Discovery, and Causal Inference in Structural Engineering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.01543 v3 pith:MUIV4KJF submitted 2022-04-04 cs.LG stat.ME

classification cs.LGstat.ME
keywords causaldiscoveryinferencephenomenonapproachcasecausalityengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Much of our experiments are designed to uncover the cause(s) and effect(s) behind a data generating mechanism (i.e., phenomenon) we happen to be interested in. Uncovering such relationships allows us to identify the true working of a phenomenon and, most importantly, articulate a model that may enable us to further explore the phenomenon on hand and/or allow us to predict it accurately. Fundamentally, such models are likely to be derived via a causal approach (as opposed to an observational or empirical mean). In this approach, causal discovery is required to create a causal model, which can then be applied to infer the influence of interventions, and answer any hypothetical questions (i.e., in the form of What ifs? Etc.) that we might have. This paper builds a case for causal discovery and causal inference and contrasts that against traditional machine learning approaches; all from a civil and structural engineering perspective. More specifically, this paper outlines the key principles of causality and the most commonly used algorithms and packages for causal discovery and causal inference. Finally, this paper also presents a series of examples and case studies of how causal concepts can be adopted for our domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bayesian implementation of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for uncertainty quantification in causal effect estimation

    stat.ME 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Three Bayesian TMLE formulations (mean-based, summary-statistic, and joint Bayesian-network) produce posterior distributions of the average treatment effect; the joint version shows higher coverage than classical TMLE...

  2. Causality-informed Anomaly Detection in Partially Observable Sensor Networks: Moving beyond Correlations

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A deep Q-network that mixes causal statistics and a causality-weighted entropy term is proposed for placing sensors in partially observable anomaly detection.

Pith tools