Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Investigating APOKASC Red Giant Stars with Abnormal Carbon to Nitrogen Ratios

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.19872 v1 pith:MUMUQGOH submitted 2023-10-30 astro-ph.SR

Investigating APOKASC Red Giant Stars with Abnormal Carbon to Nitrogen Ratios

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords starsgiantapogeeapokascarchaeologybranchcarbonclump
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The success of galactic archaeology and the reconstruction of the formation history of our galaxy critically relies on precise ages for large populations of stars. For evolved stars in the red clump and red giant branch, the carbon to nitrogen ratio ([C/N]) has recently been identified as a powerful diagnostic of mass and age that can be applied to stellar samples from spectroscopic surveys such as SDSS/APOGEE. Here, we show that at least 10\% of red clump stars and %$\approx 10\%$ of red giant branch stars deviate from the standard relationship between [C/N] and mass. {We use the APOGEE-\kepler\ (APOKASC) overlap sample to show that binary interactions are %the majority contributors to these responsible for the majority of these outliers and that stars with %any indicators of current or previous binarity should be excluded from galactic archaeology analyses that rely on [C/N] abundances to infer stellar masses. We also show that the %standard DR14 APOGEE analysis overestimates the surface gravities for even moderately rotating giants (vsini$>2$ km/s)}

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.