Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Re-assembling the past: The RePAIR dataset and benchmark for real world 2D and 3D puzzle solving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.24010 v2 pith:MVISZSLK submitted 2024-10-31 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords datasetfragmentssolvingbenchmarkpuzzlereassemblyarchaeologistschallenging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper proposes the RePAIR dataset that represents a challenging benchmark to test modern computational and data driven methods for puzzle-solving and reassembly tasks. Our dataset has unique properties that are uncommon to current benchmarks for 2D and 3D puzzle solving. The fragments and fractures are realistic, caused by a collapse of a fresco during a World War II bombing at the Pompeii archaeological park. The fragments are also eroded and have missing pieces with irregular shapes and different dimensions, challenging further the reassembly algorithms. The dataset is multi-modal providing high resolution images with characteristic pictorial elements, detailed 3D scans of the fragments and meta-data annotated by the archaeologists. Ground truth has been generated through several years of unceasing fieldwork, including the excavation and cleaning of each fragment, followed by manual puzzle solving by archaeologists of a subset of approx. 1000 pieces among the 16000 available. After digitizing all the fragments in 3D, a benchmark was prepared to challenge current reassembly and puzzle-solving methods that often solve more simplistic synthetic scenarios. The tested baselines show that there clearly exists a gap to fill in solving this computationally complex problem.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BiAssemble: Learning Collaborative Affordance for Bimanual Geometric Assembly

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BiAssemble predicts bimanual grasp and assembly actions for geometric reassembly of fractured objects via point-level collaborative affordance, and reports simulation gains over baselines plus a real-world benchmark.

Pith tools