Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 122 references

Dynamic charge order from strong correlations in the cuprates

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that dynamic charge correlations in cuprates are fingerprints of the effective Coulomb interaction, with the quasi-circular RIXS pattern in Bi-2212 matching the minima of that interaction.

desk verdict Plausible but fragile synthesis; honest review that deserves peer review despite resting on an unresolved spectral decomposition. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14408 v1 pith:MVUB6Q77 submitted 2024-12-18 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

Eduardo H. da Silva Neto , Alex Frano , Fabio Boschini This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords cuprateschargeorderdynamiccorrelationsquasi-circularRIXSeffectiveCoulombinteractionstrangemetalstronglycorrelatedelectrons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the dynamic charge correlations seen in resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) near the charge-order wavevector in cuprates are not accidents of Fermi-surface nesting but manifestations of the effective Coulomb interaction. The central piece of evidence is the quasi-circular dynamic correlation (QCDC) pattern in Bi-2212: a nearly constant-radius ring at the charge-order wavevector whose shape and radius match the minima of a calculated effective Coulomb interaction that combines short-range Hubbard repulsion with a long-range Coulomb tail. In electron-doped Nd$_2$$_-$$_x$Ce$_x$CuO$_4$, the dynamic signal appears in the spin-flip channel at energy scales comparable to the magnetic exchange, tying charge order to strong correlations. The review closes by proposing that low-energy QCDCs could mediate the isotropic scattering behind strange-metal $T$-linear resistivity. If correct, this places charge-order fluctuations at the center of the strong-correlation physics of the cuprates rather than at the periphery.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the effective Coulomb interaction $V_{\rm eff}(\mathbf{q})$, built from a short-range Hubbard-like repulsion plus a long-range tail from Poisson's equation. Because momentum-resolved electron energy-loss measurements show the polarizability of Bi-2212 is nearly flat, the RPA susceptibility inherits the structure of $V_{\rm eff}$; the two monotonic contributions cross to create a minimum at intermediate $|\mathbf{q}|$, and those minima trace out a quasi-circular contour in the $q_x$-$q_y$ plane. The paper identifies that contour with the quasi-circular dynamic correlations (QCDCs), a nearly constant-radius ring at $|\mathbf{q}|=q_{\rm CO}$ seen in RIXS at finite energy loss and, via phonon-tracking, below 70 meV.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be polarimetric RIXS of the QCDC in Bi-2212 with the energy spectrum resolved: the paper's claim predicts the quasi-circular pattern persists in the non-spin-flip charge channel across the 100-900 meV range at a fixed radius set by the $V_{\rm eff}$ minimum, whereas a fitting artifact would not survive a change in polarization or integration window. A measurement showing the ring only in a narrow energy window or only in the phonon-softening region would refute the identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the momentum-space structure of dynamic charge correlations in cuprates, in particular the quasi-circular dynamic correlations (QCDCs) observed by RIXS in Bi-2212, is governed by the effective Coulomb interaction $V_{\rm eff}$, not by the bare band-structure polarizability. Within the random phase approximation, the RIXS susceptibility is dominated by $V_{\rm eff}$ because momentum-resolved electron energy-loss measurements indicate that the polarizability of Bi-2212 is nearly featureless. $V_{\rm eff}$ combines a short-range Hubbard-like repulsion with a long-range potential derived from Poisson's equation; separately monotonic in $|\mathbf{q}|$, together they produce a minimum at an intermediate momentum. The minima form a quasi-circular pattern whose radius and shape closely match the observed QCDCs, and the same long-range interaction that prevents phase separation is therefore held responsible for the quasi-circular charge correlations. In electron-doped NCCO, the dynamic charge-order signal appears in the spin-flip channel at magnetic-exchange energy scales, linking dynamic charge order to strong correlations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the faint signal left over after subtracting the five fitted components of the RIXS spectrum, including an unknown broad background, is genuinely dynamic charge order rather than a fitting artifact; the review itself stresses that the origin of that background is unknown and the energy spectrum of the QCDCs is unresolved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, charge-order correlations in cuprates should be understood as a consequence of strong correlations and the long-range Coulomb interaction, not as a byproduct of Fermi-surface nesting.
  • The quasi-circular pattern should appear along all in-plane directions, even where static charge order is absent, because the $V_{\rm eff}$ minimum is directionally broad; this is already consistent with the phonon softening observed at 45 degrees in Bi-2212.
  • Low-energy QCDCs satisfy the two conditions, low energy and broad momentum space, required for isotropic scattering, making them a viable microscopic source of the strange-metal $T$-linear resistivity.
  • Adding a nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion $V$ to the one-band Hubbard model should reproduce both static and dynamic charge-order features simultaneously, as the NCCO calculations already show.
  • Uniaxial strain should transfer spectral weight from the quasi-circular manifold into the static charge-order peaks, offering a way to detect QCDCs in other cuprate families.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the QCDC radius is set by $V_{\rm eff}$ rather than the Fermi surface, the ring should be nearly doping-independent wherever screening is similar; a $q_x$-$q_y$ RIXS doping series could test this directly.
  • Beyond the paper: the authors' time-resolved RIXS proposal implies a concrete signature, namely that near-infrared excitation should transiently shrink or reshape the QCDC ring because hot carriers change screening and therefore the $V_{\rm eff}$ minimum.
  • Beyond the paper: if QCDCs mediate Planckian scattering, the $T$-linear resistivity coefficient should track the spectral weight of the ring rather than the static charge-order peak intensity; combined transport and RIXS under magnetic field or strain could separate the two.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review paper surveys recent Cu-L3 RIXS experiments on dynamic charge order correlations in cuprates, focusing on electron-doped NCCO and hole-doped Bi-2212. The authors argue that dynamic charge correlations near the charge-order wavevector reflect the effective Coulomb interaction Veff, and in particular that the quasi-circular dynamic correlations (QCDCs) observed in Bi-2212 match the minima of a calculated Veff in momentum space. They also propose that low-energy QCDCs, inferred from phonon softening, could mediate the isotropic scattering responsible for strange-metal T-linear resistivity. The paper includes a discussion of experimental techniques, pol-RIXS capabilities, and future directions such as time-resolved RIXS and strain studies.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the review would establish a concrete link between strong Coulomb correlations and dynamic charge order in cuprates, with implications for the strange-metal phase. The paper is a useful and timely summary of recent RIXS progress, and it is careful in describing instrumental limitations and open questions. It also gives appropriate credit to the underlying experimental works and to recent theory (e.g., Ref. [66]). The main significance is therefore as a perspective that may stimulate further quantitative tests, rather than as a settled identification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II.D, Fig. 4(F-H)] The central claim that the quasi-circular RIXS pattern matches the minima of Veff is supported only by qualitative visual comparison. The paper does not provide a quantitative comparison, such as the extracted radius of the RIXS ring as a function of azimuth versus the Veff minimum locus, or a radial intensity profile. Without such analysis, the match is not established beyond a suggestive resemblance, and the text should either add a quantitative analysis or explicitly state that the agreement is qualitative.
  2. [Sec. II.A, Fig. 1 and Fig. 4(F)] The five-component fit used to argue that the quasi-circular feature is dynamic charge order is demonstrated on one-dimensional spectra at a single q, not on the two-dimensional maps. The low-resolution map in Fig. 4(F) integrates intensity over [-0.4, 0.9] eV, which includes phonons, two-phonon processes, paramagnons, and the unknown broad background component (v). A momentum-dependent background or residual phonon/paramagnon tails could produce a quasi-circular pattern independent of charge correlations. The review should address why the pattern is robust against such contamination, or explicitly acknowledge that the charge assignment is not unique.
  3. [Sec. II.E and Sec. III.C] The low-energy QCDCs in Bi-2212 are inferred from the q-dependent softening of the bond-stretching phonon, but the review does not adequately discuss the alternative interpretation that the softening arises from momentum-dependent electron-phonon coupling rather than dynamic charge correlations. The caveat about varying QCDC-phonon coupling in other families, mentioned in Sec. III.C, also applies to Bi-2212 and should be incorporated into the main argument.
  4. [Sec. III.B] The review states that the energy profile of the QCDCs has not been resolved and that high- and low-energy QCDCs may have different origins. This is a major caveat that directly qualifies the central claim, yet it appears only in the future-directions section. The earlier sections present the QCDC-to-Veff connection with stronger certainty than the stated limitations justify. The manuscript should integrate this caveat into Secs. II.D and II.E and temper the language accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.C] There is a typo in the text: 'escisting' should be 'existing'.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption for Fig. 4(B) reads 'Static Lindhard susceptibility aclculated for p = 0.12 doping'; 'aclculated' should be 'calculated'.
  3. [Sec. II.C] The sentence 'Therefore, some dynamic charge order processes will necessarily involve spin flips' could benefit from a brief explanation of why temporal fluctuations of charge order on an antiferromagnetic background require spin-flip processes, for readers unfamiliar with the argument in Ref. [23].
  4. [Sec. II.D] The notation QCDC is used without a formal definition; consider defining the acronym at first use as 'quasi-circular dynamic correlations'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the Veff-QCDC comparison in Sec. II.D uses independently determined parameters and external data, and the review explicitly flags the unresolved spectral decomposition; the score reflects only minor self-citation, not circularity.

full rationale

This is a review with no new equations, so no prediction reduces to a fitted constant by the paper's own formulas. The central comparison in Sec. II.D computes Veff "using known expressions and experimentally determined parameters [71–73]" — tunneling, optical, and transport data independent of the QCDC RIXS maps — and the resulting minimum locus is then compared with, not fitted to, the quasi-circular inelastic intensity from [30]. The NCCO theory [66] is constrained by multiple external data sets (paramagnon dispersion, plasmon, qCO doping dependence, dynamic CO signal) and is not constructed solely from the target conclusion. The low-energy QCDC claim in Sec. II.E is explicitly an inference from the bond-stretching phonon softening, and the review concedes that "the energy profile of the QCDCs, i.e., their energy spectrum, has not been resolved" and that high- and low-energy QCDCs "might have different origins." The skeptical concern about the unknown background component (v) in Sec. II.A and the lack of a demonstrated 2D spectral decomposition is a robustness and identification weakness, not a circularity: the five-component minimal model is not shown to force the quasi-circular residual by construction. Several load-bearing references ([23], [30], [33], [66]) are co-authored by the present reviewers, but they are externally falsifiable experimental and model results being reviewed, so the self-citations are not load-bearing in a circular sense. Score 2 reflects only the minor self-citation density, not a circular derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review's central synthesis rests on model calculations imported from cited papers: an extended Hubbard model for NCCO with parameters U and V (Ref. [66]) and an effective Coulomb interaction Veff for Bi-2212 computed from parameters in Refs. [71-73] (Ref. [30]). No parameters are fitted in this preprint, but the strength of the argument depends on the validity and transferability of those imported parameters. The RIXS spectral decomposition assumptions are listed as domain axioms because the dynamic CO signal is not directly observable; it is isolated through fitting and subtraction.

free parameters (3)
  • On-site Hubbard repulsion U (in the extended Hubbard model of Ref. [66]) = Not stated in this preprint
    The review relies on the model of Ref. [66] to argue that strong correlations produce dynamic CO at paramagnon energies in NCCO; U is an input of that model.
  • Nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion V (extended Hubbard model of Ref. [66]) = Moderate value; exact number not given here
    The review identifies V as the key ingredient that prevents phase separation and generates CO (Sec. II.C); the central mechanistic claim depends on this parameter.
  • Effective Coulomb interaction Veff parameters (short-range Hubbard component and long-range screened potential) = Not given in this preprint; taken from Refs. [71-73] in the QCDC analysis of Ref. [30]
    The claim that Veff minima match the quasi-circular RIXS pattern (Sec. II.D) rests on these experimentally determined parameters.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The five-component minimal model of the Cu-L3 RIXS spectrum (quasi-elastic, one-phonon, two-phonon, damped harmonic oscillator, broad background) is sufficient to isolate dynamic charge order.
    Sec. II.A, Fig. 1(A,B). The review itself states that the origin of component (v) is unknown and that adding fit terms requires great caution; the QCDC interpretation depends on this decomposition.
  • domain assumption Features at qCO in the inelastic RIXS spectrum that survive subtraction of phonon and spin contributions are dynamic charge order correlations.
    Secs. II.B-II.C. In NCCO the high-energy feature appears in the spin-flip sigma-pi' channel, and the review argues spin-flip charge dynamics is natural for CO fluctuating over AF correlations; the assignment is not directly measurable.
  • domain assumption The static and dynamic Lindhard susceptibility calculations used as benchmarks are appropriate and their failure to reproduce the quasi-circular pattern is correctly diagnosed.
    Sec. II.D. The comparison to Lindhard is made visually over the qx-qy plane; the review asserts strong qualitative disagreement without a quantitative metric.
  • standard math The RPA form of the charge susceptibility, with a nearly featureless polarizability, justifies interpreting the RIXS map as a direct image of the effective Coulomb interaction.
    Sec. II.D: 'Within the random phase approximation (RPA) formalism, features in the susceptibility may emerge from either peaks in the Lindhard (polarizability) function or from minima in the effective Coulomb interaction.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamic charge order from strong correlations in the cuprates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MVUB6Q77

@misc{pith2026241214408,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamic charge order from strong correlations in the cuprates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MVUB6Q77}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14408}
}
read the original abstract

Charge order has been a central focus in the study of cuprate high-temperature superconductors due to its intriguing yet not fully understood connection to superconductivity. Recent advances in resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) in the soft x-ray regime have enabled the first momentum-resolved studies of dynamic charge order correlations in the cuprates. This progress has opened a window for a more nuanced investigation into the mechanisms behind the formation of charge order (CO) correlations. This review provides an overview of RIXS-based measurements of dynamic CO correlations in various cuprate materials. It specifically focuses on electron-doped cuprates and Bi-based hole-doped cuprates, where the CO-related RIXS signals may reveal signatures of the effective Coulomb interactions. This aims to explore a connection between two central phenomena in the cuprates: strong Coulomb correlations and CO-forming tendencies. Finally, we discuss current open questions and potential directions for future RIXS studies as the technique continues to improve and mature, along with other probes of dynamic correlations that would provide a more comprehensive picture.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14408 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [66]

    Riegler, J

    D. Riegler, J. Seufert, E. H. da Silva Neto, P. W¨ olfle, R. Thomale, and M. Klett, Phys. Rev. B 108, 195141 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Comin and A

    R. Comin and A. Damascelli, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 369 (2016)

    2016

  3. [2]

    Frano, S

    A. Frano, S. Blanco-Canosa, B. Keimer, and R. J. Birgeneau, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 32, 374005 (2020)

    2020

  4. [3]

    J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sternlieb, J. D. Axe, Y. Nakamura, and S. Uchida, Nature 375, 561 (1995)

    1995

  5. [4]

    J. E. Hoffman, E. W. Hudson, K. M. Lang, V. Madhavan, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, and J. C. Davis, Science 295, 466 (2002). 20

    2002

  6. [5]

    Vershinin, S

    M. Vershinin, S. Misra, S. Ono, Y. Abe, Y. Ando, and A. Yazdani, Science 303, 1995 (2004)

    2004

  7. [6]

    Howald, H

    C. Howald, H. Eisaki, N. Kaneko, and A. Kapitulnik, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 9705 (2003)

    2003

  8. [7]

    Abbamonte, A

    P. Abbamonte, A. Rusydi, S. Smadici, G. D. Gu, G. A. Sawatzky, and D. L. Feng, Nature Physics 1, 155 (2005)

    2005

Show all 122 references
  1. [8]

    W. D. Wise, M. C. Boyer, K. Chatterjee, T. Kondo, T. Takeuchi, H. Ikuta, Y. Wang, and E. W. Hudson, Nature Physics 4, 696 (2008), arXiv:0806.0203 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Ghiringhelli, M

    G. Ghiringhelli, M. Le Tacon, M. Minola, S. Blanco-Canosa, C. Mazzoli, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, A. Frano, D. G. Hawthorn, F. He, T. Loew, M. M. Sala, D. C. Peets, M. Salluzzo, E. Schierle, R. Sutarto, G. A. Sawatzky, E. Weschke, B. Keimer, and L. Braicovich, Science 337, ...

    2012

  3. [10]

    Chang, E

    J. Chang, E. Blackburn, A. T. Holmes, N. B. Christensen, J. Larsen, J. Mesot, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, A. Watenphul, M. v. Zimmermann, E. M. Forgan, and S. M. Hayden, Nature Physics 8, 871 (2012)

    2012

  4. [11]

    Comin, A

    R. Comin, A. Frano, M. M. Yee, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, R. Sutarto, F. He, A. Soumyanarayanan, Y. He, M. Le Tacon, I. S. Elfimov, J. E. Hoffman, G. A. Sawatzky, B. Keimer, and A. Damascelli, Science 343, 390 (2014)

    2014

  5. [12]

    E. H. da Silva Neto, P. Aynajian, A. Frano, R. Comin, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, A. Gyenis, J. Wen, J. Schneeloch, Z. Xu, S. Ono, G. Gu, M. Le Tacon, and A. Yazdani, Science 343, 393 (2014)

    2014

  6. [13]

    Tabis, Y

    W. Tabis, Y. Li, M. Le Tacon, L. Braicovich, A. Kreyssig, M. Minola, G. Dellea, E. Weschke, M. J. Veit, M. Ramazanoglu, A. I. Goldman, T. Schmitt, G. Ghiringhelli, N. Bariˇ si´ c, M. K. Chan, C. J. Dorow, G. Yu, X. Zhao, B. Keimer, and M. Greven, Nat. Comm. 5 (2014)

    2014

  7. [14]

    E. H. da Silva Neto, R. Comin, F. He, R. Sutarto, Y. Jiang, R. L. Greene, G. A. Sawatzky, and A. Damascelli, Science 347, 282 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1256441

    2015 doi

  8. [15]

    E. H. da Silva Neto, B. Yu, M. Minola, R. Sutarto, E. Schierle, F. Boschini, M. Zonno, M. Bluschke, J. Higgins, Y. Li, G. Yu, E. Weschke, F. He, M. Le Tacon, R. L. Greene, M. Greven, G. A. Sawatzky, B. Keimer, and A. Damascelli, Science Adv. 2, e1600782 (2016)

    2016

  9. [16]

    T. Wu, H. Mayaffre, S. Kramer, M. Horvatic, C. Berthier, W. N. Hardy, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, and M.-H. Julien, Nature 477, 191 (2011). 21

    2011

  10. [17]

    Brookes, F

    N. Brookes, F. Yakhou-Harris, K. Kummer, A. Fondacaro, J. Cezar, D. Betto, E. Velez-Fort, A. Amorese, G. Ghiringhelli, L. Braicovich, R. Barrett, G. Berruyer, F. Cianciosi, L. Eybert, P. Marion, P. van der Linden, and L. Zhang, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Resear...

    2018

  11. [18]

    Dvorak, I

    J. Dvorak, I. Jarrige, V. Bisogni, S. Coburn, and W. Leonhardt, Review of Scientific Instru- ments 87, 115109 (2016)

    2016

  12. [19]

    Jarrige, V

    I. Jarrige, V. Bisogni, Y. Zhu, W. Leonhardt, and J. Dvorak, Synchrotron Radiation News 31, 7 (2018)

    2018

  13. [20]

    K.-J. Zhou, A. Walters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, T. Rice, M. Hand, A. Nag, J. Li, S. Agrestini, P. Garland, H. Wang, S. Alcock, I. Nistea, B. Nutter, N. Rubies, G. Knap, M. Gaughran, F. Yuan, P. Chang, J. Emmins, and G. Howell, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 29, 563 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Arpaia and G

    R. Arpaia and G. Ghiringhelli, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 90, 111005 (2021)

    2021

  15. [22]

    Chaix, G

    L. Chaix, G. Ghiringhelli, Y. Y. Peng, M. Hashimoto, B. Moritz, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, Y. He, S. Chen, S. Ishida, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, M. Salluzzo, L. Braicovich, Z. X. Shen, T. P. Devereaux, and W. S. Lee, Nature Physics 13, 952 (2017)

    2017

  16. [23]

    E. H. da Silva Neto, M. Minola, B. Yu, W. Tabis, M. Bluschke, D. Unruh, H. Suzuki, Y. Li, G. Yu, D. Betto, K. Kummer, F. Yakhou, N. B. Brookes, M. Le Tacon, M. Greven, B. Keimer, and A. Damascelli, Phys. Rev. B 98, 161114 (2018)

    2018

  17. [24]

    Arpaia, S

    R. Arpaia, S. Caprara, R. Fumagalli, G. De Vecchi, Y. Y. Peng, E. Andersson, D. Betto, G. M. De Luca, N. B. Brookes, F. Lombardi, M. Salluzzo, L. Braicovich, C. Di Castro, M. Grilli, and G. Ghiringhelli, Science 365, 906 (2019)

    2019

  18. [25]

    B. Yu, W. Tabis, I. Bialo, F. Yakhou, N. B. Brookes, Z. Anderson, Y. Tang, G. Yu, and M. Greven, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021059 (2020)

    2020

  19. [26]

    H. Miao, J. Lorenzana, G. Seibold, Y. Y. Peng, A. Amorese, F. Yakhou-Harris, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, R. M. Konik, V. Thampy, G. D. Gu, G. Ghiringhelli, L. Braicovich, and M. P. M. Dean, ArXiv e-prints (2017), arXiv:1701.00022 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [27]

    H. Miao, R. Fumagalli, M. Rossi, J. Lorenzana, G. Seibold, F. Yakhou-Harris, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, G. D. Gu, L. Braicovich, G. Ghiringhelli, and M. P. M. Dean, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031042 (2019). 22

    2019

  21. [28]

    J. Li, A. Nag, J. Pelliciari, H. Robarts, A. Walters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, H. Eisaki, D. Song, H. Ding, S. Johnston, R. Comin, and K.-J. Zhou, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 16219 (2020)

    2020

  22. [29]

    W. S. Lee, K.-J. Zhou, M. Hepting, J. Li, A. Nag, A. C. Walters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, H. C. Robarts, M. Hashimoto, H. Lu, B. Nosarzewski, D. Song, H. Eisaki, Z. X. Shen, B. Moritz, J. Zaanen, and T. P. Devereaux, Nature Physics 17, 53 (2021)

    2021

  23. [30]

    Boschini, M

    F. Boschini, M. Minola, R. Sutarto, E. Schierle, M. Bluschke, S. Das, Y. Yang, M. Michiardi, Y. C. Shao, X. Feng, S. Ono, R. D. Zhong, J. A. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, E. Weschke, F. He, Y. D. Chuang, B. Keimer, A. Damascelli, A. Frano, and E. H. da Silva Neto, Nature com- municati...

    2021

  24. [31]

    H. Y. Huang, A. Singh, C. Y. Mou, S. Johnston, A. F. Kemper, J. van den Brink, P. J. Chen, T. K. Lee, J. Okamoto, Y. Y. Chu, J. H. Li, S. Komiya, A. C. Komarek, A. Fujimori, C. T. Chen, and D. J. Huang, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041038 (2021)

    2021

  25. [32]

    H. Lu, M. Hashimoto, S.-D. Chen, S. Ishida, D. Song, H. Eisaki, A. Nag, M. Garcia- Fernandez, R. Arpaia, G. Ghiringhelli, L. Braicovich, J. Zaanen, B. Moritz, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, K.-J. Zhou, Z.-X. Shen, T. P. Devereaux, and W.-S. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155109 (2022)

    2022

  26. [33]

    Scott, E

    K. Scott, E. Kisiel, T. J. Boyle, R. Basak, G. Jargot, S. Das, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia- Fernandez, J. Choi, J. Pelliciari, J. Li, Y.-D. Chuang, R. Zhong, J. A. Schneeloch, G. Gu, F. L´ egar´ e, A. F. Kemper, K.-J. Zhou, V. Bisogni, S. Blanco-Canosa, A. Frano, F. Boschini, and ...

    2023

  27. [34]

    Arpaia, L

    R. Arpaia, L. Martinelli, M. M. Sala, S. Caprara, A. Nag, N. B. Brookes, P. Camisa, Q. Li, Q. Gao, X. Zhou, M. Garcia-Fernandez, K.-J. Zhou, E. Schierle, T. Bauch, Y. Y. Peng, C. Di Castro, M. Grilli, F. Lombardi, L. Braicovich, and G. Ghiringhelli, Nature Communi- cations 14,...

    2023

  28. [35]

    Machida, Physica C: Superconductivity 158, 192 (1989)

    K. Machida, Physica C: Superconductivity 158, 192 (1989)

    1989

  29. [36]

    Zaanen and O

    J. Zaanen and O. Gunnarsson, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7391 (1989)

    1989

  30. [37]

    Emery and S

    V. Emery and S. Kivelson, Physica C: Superconductivity 209, 597 (1993)

    1993

  31. [38]

    E. W. Huang, C. B. Mendl, S. Liu, S. Johnston, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Science 358, 1161 (2017). 23

    2017

  32. [39]

    Zheng, C.-M

    B.-X. Zheng, C.-M. Chung, P. Corboz, G. Ehlers, M.-P. Qin, R. M. Noack, H. Shi, S. R. White, S. Zhang, and G. K.-L. Chan, Science 358, 1155 (2017)

    2017

  33. [40]

    Rossi, R

    M. Rossi, R. Arpaia, R. Fumagalli, M. Moretti Sala, D. Betto, K. Kummer, G. M. De Luca, J. van den Brink, M. Salluzzo, N. B. Brookes, L. Braicovich, and G. Ghiringhelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 027001 (2019)

    2019

  34. [41]

    J. Q. Lin, H. Miao, D. G. Mazzone, G. D. Gu, A. Nag, A. C. Walters, M. Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez, A. Barbour, J. Pelliciari, I. Jarrige, M. Oda, K. Kurosawa, N. Momono, K.-J. Zhou, V. Bisogni, X. Liu, and M. P. M. Dean, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 207005 (2020)

    2020

  35. [42]

    Y. Y. Peng, A. A. Husain, M. Mitrano, S. X.-L. Sun, T. A. Johnson, A. V. Zakrzewski, G. J. MacDougall, A. Barbour, I. Jarrige, V. Bisogni, and P. Abbamonte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 097002 (2020)

    2020

  36. [43]

    Q. Wang, K. von Arx, M. Horio, D. J. Mukkattukavil, J. K¨ uspert, Y. Sassa, T. Schmitt, A. Nag, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, M. Garcia-Fernandez, K.-J. Zhou, and J. Chang, Science Advances 7, eabg7394 (2021)

    2021

  37. [44]

    Braicovich, M

    L. Braicovich, M. Rossi, R. Fumagalli, Y. Peng, Y. Wang, R. Arpaia, D. Betto, G. M. De Luca, D. Di Castro, K. Kummer, M. Moretti Sala, M. Pagetti, G. Balestrino, N. B. Brookes, M. Salluzzo, S. Johnston, J. van den Brink, and G. Ghiringhelli, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023231 (2020)

    2020

  38. [45]

    Y. Peng, L. Martinelli, Q. Li, M. Rossi, M. Mitrano, R. Arpaia, M. M. Sala, Q. Gao, X. Guo, G. M. De Luca, A. Walters, A. Nag, A. Barbour, G. Gu, J. Pelliciari, N. B. Brookes, P. Abbamonte, M. Salluzzo, X. Zhou, K.-J. Zhou, V. Bisogni, L. Braicovich, S. Johnston, and G. Ghirin...

    2022

  39. [46]

    Scott, E

    K. Scott, E. Kisiel, F. Yakhou, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, K. Kummer, J. Choi, R. D. Zhong, J. A. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, K.-J. Zhou, N. B. Brookes, A. F. Kemper, M. Minola, F. Boschini, A. Frano, A. Gozar, and E. H. da Silva Neto, Phys. Rev. B 109, 125126 (2024)

    2024

  40. [47]

    Suzuki, M

    H. Suzuki, M. Minola, Y. Lu, Y. Peng, R. Fumagalli, E. Lefran¸ cois, T. Loew, J. Porras, K. Kummer, D. Betto, S. Ishida, H. Eisaki, C. Hu, X. Zhou, M. W. Haverkort, N. B. Brookes, L. Braicovich, G. Ghiringhelli, M. Le Tacon, and B. Keimer, npj Quantum Materials 3, 65 (2018)

    2018

  41. [48]

    Merzoni, L

    G. Merzoni, L. Martinelli, L. Braicovich, N. B. Brookes, F. Lombardi, F. Rosa, R. Arpaia, M. Moretti Sala, and G. Ghiringhelli, Phys. Rev. B 109, 184506 (2024). 24

    2024

  42. [49]

    J. P. Hill, G. Blumberg, Y.-J. Kim, D. S. Ellis, S. Wakimoto, R. J. Birgeneau, S. Komiya, Y. Ando, B. Liang, R. L. Greene, D. Casa, and T. Gog, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 097001 (2008)

    2008

  43. [50]

    Braicovich, J

    L. Braicovich, J. van den Brink, V. Bisogni, M. M. Sala, L. J. P. Ament, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, M. Salluzzo, T. Schmitt, V. N. Strocov, and G. Ghiringhelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 077002 (2010)

    2010

  44. [51]

    Le Tacon, G

    M. Le Tacon, G. Ghiringhelli, J. Chaloupka, M. M. Sala, V. Hinkov, M. W. Haverkort, M. Minola, M. Bakr, K. J. Zhou, S. Blanco-Canosa, C. Monney, Y. T. Song, G. L. Sun, C. T. Lin, G. M. De Luca, M. Salluzzo, G. Khaliullin, T. Schmitt, L. Braicovich, and B. Keimer, Nat. Phys. 7,...

    2011

  45. [52]

    W. S. Lee, J. J. Lee, E. A. Nowadnick, S. Gerber, W. Tabis, S. W. Huang, V. N. Strocov, E. M. Motoyama, G. Yu, B. Moritz, H. Y. Huang, R. P. Wang, Y. B. Huang, W. B. Wu, C. T. Chen, D. J. Huang, M. Greven, T. Schmitt, Z. X. Shen, and T. P. Devereaux, Nature Physics 10, 883 (2014)

    2014

  46. [53]

    Ishii, M

    K. Ishii, M. Fujita, T. Sasaki, M. Minola, G. Dellea, C. Mazzoli, K. Kummer, G. Ghiringhelli, L. Braicovich, T. Tohyama, K. Tsutsumi, K. Sato, R. Kajimoto, K. Ikeuchi, K. Yamada, M. Yoshida, M. Kurooka, and J. Mizuki, Nature Communications 5, 3714 (2014)

    2014

  47. [54]

    Y. Y. Peng, M. Hashimoto, M. M. Sala, A. Amorese, N. B. Brookes, G. Dellea, W.-S. Lee, M. Minola, T. Schmitt, Y. Yoshida, K.-J. Zhou, H. Eisaki, T. P. Devereaux, Z.-X. Shen, L. Braicovich, and G. Ghiringhelli, Phys. Rev. B 92, 064517 (2015)

    2015

  48. [55]

    Minola, G

    M. Minola, G. Dellea, H. Gretarsson, Y. Y. Peng, Y. Lu, J. Porras, T. Loew, F. Yakhou, N. B. Brookes, Y. B. Huang, J. Pelliciari, T. Schmitt, G. Ghiringhelli, B. Keimer, L. Braicovich, and M. Le Tacon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 217003 (2015)

    2015

  49. [56]

    Fumagalli, L

    R. Fumagalli, L. Braicovich, M. Minola, Y. Y. Peng, K. Kummer, D. Betto, M. Rossi, E. Lefran¸ cois, C. Morawe, M. Salluzzo, H. Suzuki, F. Yakhou, M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer, N. B. Brookes, M. M. Sala, and G. Ghiringhelli, Phys. Rev. B 99, 134517 (2019)

    2019

  50. [57]

    Betto, R

    D. Betto, R. Fumagalli, L. Martinelli, M. Rossi, R. Piombo, K. Yoshimi, D. Di Castro, E. Di Gennaro, A. Sambri, D. Bonn, G. A. Sawatzky, L. Braicovich, N. B. Brookes, J. Loren- zana, and G. Ghiringhelli, Phys. Rev. B 103, L140409 (2021)

    2021

  51. [58]

    Hepting, L

    M. Hepting, L. Chaix, E. W. Huang, R. Fumagalli, Y. Y. Peng, B. Moritz, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, W. C. Lee, M. Hashimoto, T. Sarkar, J.-F. He, C. R. Rotundu, Y. S. Lee, R. L. Greene, L. Braicovich, G. Ghiringhelli, Z.-X. Shen, T. P. Devereaux, and W. S. Lee, 25 Nature 563, 374 (2018)

    2018

  52. [59]

    J. Lin, J. Yuan, K. Jin, Z. Yin, G. Li, K.-J. Zhou, X. Lu, M. Dantz, T. Schmitt, H. Ding, H. Guo, M. P. M. Dean, and X. Liu, npj Quantum Materials 5, 4 (2020)

    2020

  53. [60]

    A. Nag, M. Zhu, M. Bejas, J. Li, H. C. Robarts, H. Yamase, A. N. Petsch, D. Song, H. Eisaki, A. C. Walters, M. Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez, A. Greco, S. M. Hayden, and K.-J. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 257002 (2020)

    2020

  54. [61]

    Singh, H

    A. Singh, H. Y. Huang, C. Lane, J. H. Li, J. Okamoto, S. Komiya, R. S. Markiewicz, A. Bansil, T. K. Lee, A. Fujimori, C. T. Chen, and D. J. Huang, Phys. Rev. B 105, 235105 (2022)

    2022

  55. [62]

    Hepting, M

    M. Hepting, M. Bejas, A. Nag, H. Yamase, N. Coppola, D. Betto, C. Falter, M. Garcia- Fernandez, S. Agrestini, K.-J. Zhou, M. Minola, C. Sacco, L. Maritato, P. Orgiani, H. I. Wei, K. M. Shen, D. G. Schlom, A. Galdi, A. Greco, and B. Keimer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 047001 (2022)

    2022

  56. [63]

    Hepting, T

    M. Hepting, T. D. Boyko, V. Zimmermann, M. Bejas, Y. E. Suyolcu, P. Puphal, R. J. Green, L. Zinni, J. Kim, D. Casa, M. H. Upton, D. Wong, C. Schulz, M. Bartkowiak, K. Habicht, E. Pomjakushina, G. Cristiani, G. Logvenov, M. Minola, H. Yamase, A. Greco, and B. Keimer, Phys. Rev....

    2023

  57. [64]

    M. M. Sala, V. Bisogni, C. Aruta, G. Balestrino, H. Berger, N. B. Brookes, G. M. de Luca, D. D. Castro, M. Grioni, M. Guarise, P. G. Medaglia, F. M. Granozio, M. Minola, P. Perna, M. Radovic, M. Salluzzo, T. Schmitt, K. J. Zhou, L. Braicovich, and G. Ghiringhelli, New Journal ...

    2011

  58. [65]

    Braicovich, M

    L. Braicovich, M. Minola, G. Dellea, M. Le Tacon, M. Moretti Sala, C. Morawe, J. C. Peffen, R. Supruangnet, F. Yakhou, G. Ghiringhelli, and N. B. Brookes, The Review of scientific instruments 85, 115104 (2014)

    2014

  59. [67]

    M. Kang, J. Pelliciari, A. Frano, N. Breznay, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, R. Sutarto, F. He, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, M. Chen, K. Zhang, A. Ruiz, Z. Hao, S. Lewin, J. Analytis, Y. Krock- enberger, H. Yamamoto, T. Das, and R. Comin, Nature Physics 15, 335 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    Yazdani, E

    A. Yazdani, E. H. da Silva Neto, and P. Aynajian, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 11 (2016). 26

    2016

  61. [69]

    Mitrano, A

    M. Mitrano, A. A. Husain, S. Vig, A. Kogar, M. S. Rak, S. I. Rubeck, J. Schmalian, B. Uchoa, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. D. Gu, and P. Abbamonte, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 5392 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    A. A. Husain, M. Mitrano, M. S. Rak, S. Rubeck, B. Uchoa, K. March, C. Dwyer, J. Schnee- loch, R. Zhong, G. D. Gu, and P. Abbamonte, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041062 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    I. K. Drozdov, I. Pletikosi´ c, C.-K. Kim, K. Fujita, G. D. Gu, J. C. S. Davis, P. D. Johnson, I. Boˇ zovi´ c, and T. Valla, Nature Communications9, 5210 (2018)

    2018

  64. [72]

    Hwang, T

    J. Hwang, T. Timusk, and G. D. Gu, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 19, 125208 (2007)

    2007

  65. [73]

    Takayanagi, M

    T. Takayanagi, M. Kogure, and I. Terasaki, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, 1361 (2002)

    2002

  66. [74]

    Becca, M

    F. Becca, M. Tarquini, M. Grilli, and C. Di Castro, Phys. Rev. B 54, 12443 (1996)

    1996

  67. [75]

    Seibold, F

    G. Seibold, F. Becca, F. Bucci, C. Castellani, C. Di Castro, and M. Grilli, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 13, 87 (2000)

    2000

  68. [76]

    Caprara, M

    S. Caprara, M. Grilli, C. Di Castro, and G. Seibold, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 30, 25 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    S. A. Kivelson, I. P. Bindloss, E. Fradkin, V. Oganesyan, J. M. Tranquada, A. Kapitulnik, and C. Howald, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1201 (2003)

    2003

  70. [78]

    Yamase, M

    H. Yamase, M. Bejas, and A. Greco, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045141 (2021)

    2021

  71. [79]

    Bejas, R

    M. Bejas, R. Zeyher, and A. Greco, Phys. Rev. B 106, 224512 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    Wahlberg, R

    E. Wahlberg, R. Arpaia, G. Seibold, M. Rossi, R. Fumagalli, E. Trabaldo, N. B. Brookes, L. Braicovich, S. Caprara, U. Gran, G. Ghiringhelli, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Science 373, 1506 (2021)

    2021

  73. [81]

    Gurvitch and A

    M. Gurvitch and A. T. Fiory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1337 (1987)

    1987

  74. [82]

    Martin, A

    S. Martin, A. T. Fiory, R. M. Fleming, L. F. Schneemeyer, and J. V. Waszczak, Phys. Rev. B 41, 846 (1990)

    1990

  75. [83]

    Grissonnanche, Y

    G. Grissonnanche, Y. Fang, A. Legros, S. Verret, F. Lalibert´ e, C. Collignon, J. Zhou, D. Graf, P. A. Goddard, L. Taillefer, and B. J. Ramshaw, Nature 595, 667 (2021)

    2021

  76. [84]

    C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, E. Abrahams, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1996 (1989)

    1989

  77. [85]

    Aji and C

    V. Aji and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 067003 (2007). 27

    2007

  78. [86]

    A. A. Patel, J. McGreevy, D. P. Arovas, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021049 (2018)

    2018

  79. [87]

    A. A. Patel and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066601 (2019)

    2019

  80. [88]

    P. W. Phillips, N. E. Hussey, and P. Abbamonte, Science 377, eabh4273 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    A. A. Patel, H. Guo, I. Esterlis, and S. Sachdev, Science 381, 790 (2023), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abq6011

    2023 doi

  82. [90]

    Seibold, R

    G. Seibold, R. Arpaia, Y. Y. Peng, R. Fumagalli, L. Braicovich, C. Di Castro, M. Grilli, G. C. Ghiringhelli, and S. Caprara, Communications Physics 4, 1 (2021)

    2021

  83. [91]

    Caprara, C

    S. Caprara, C. D. Castro, G. Mirarchi, G. Seibold, and M. Grilli, Communications Physics 5, 1 (2022)

    2022

  84. [92]

    F. M. F. de Groot, M. W. Haverkort, H. Elnaggar, A. Juhin, K.-J. Zhou, and P. Glatzel, Nature Reviews Methods Primers 4, 45 (2024)

    2024

  85. [93]

    Weschke and E

    E. Weschke and E. Schierle, Journal of large-scale research facilities JLSRF 4, A127 (2018)

    2018

  86. [94]

    At REIXS, measurements were conducted down to 20 K, with the capability to heat the sample stage up to 400 K

    were instrumental. At REIXS, measurements were conducted down to 20 K, with the capability to heat the sample stage up to 400 K. The ability to reach high temperatures was crucial for the temperature-dependent studies of electron-doped cuprate [14, 15], such as the one present...

  87. [95]

    Blanco-Canosa, A

    S. Blanco-Canosa, A. Frano, E. Schierle, J. Porras, T. Loew, M. Minola, M. Bluschke, E. Weschke, B. Keimer, and M. Le Tacon, Phys. Rev. B 90, 054513 (2014)

    2014

  88. [96]

    D. G. Hawthorn, F. He, L. Venema, H. Davis, A. J. Achkar, J. Zhang, R. Sutarto, H. Wadati, A. Radi, T. Wilson, G. Wright, K. M. Shen, J. Geck, H. Zhang, V. Nov´ ak, and G. A. Sawatzky, Review of Scientific Instruments 82, 073104 (2011)

    2011

  89. [97]

    V. N. Strocov, T. Schmitt, U. Flechsig, T. Schmidt, A. Imhof, Q. Chen, J. Raabe, R. Betemps, D. Zimoch, J. Krempasky, X. Wang, M. Grioni, A. Piazzalunga, and L. Patthey, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 17, 631 (2010)

    2010

  90. [98]

    Ghiringhelli, A

    G. Ghiringhelli, A. Piazzalunga, C. Dallera, G. Trezzi, L. Braicovich, T. Schmitt, V. N. Strocov, R. Betemps, L. Patthey, X. Wang, and M. Grioni, Review of Scientific Instruments 77, 113108 (2006)

    2006

  91. [99]

    L. J. P. Ament, M. van Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, J. P. Hill, and J. van den Brink, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 705 (2011)

    2011

  92. [100]

    Chuang, X

    Y.-D. Chuang, X. Feng, A. Cruz, K. Hanzel, A. Brown, A. Spucces, A. Frano, W.-S. Lee, J. Kim, Y.-J. Chen, B. Smith, J. S. Pepper, Y.-C. Shao, S.-W. Huang, L. A. Wray, E. Gullik- son, Z.-X. Shen, T. P. Devereaux, A. Tremsin, W. Yang, J. Guo, R. Duarte, and Z. Hussain, Journal o...

    2022

  93. [101]

    X. Chen, J. Choi, Z. Jiang, J. Mei, K. Jiang, J. Li, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, X. Huang, H. Sun, D. Shen, M. Wang, J. Hu, Y. Lu, K.-J. Zhou, and D. Feng, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2401.12657 (2024), arXiv:2401.12657 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  94. [102]

    T. P. Devereaux, A. M. Shvaika, K. Wu, K. Wohlfeld, C. J. Jia, Y. Wang, B. Moritz, L. Chaix, W.-S. Lee, Z.-X. Shen, G. Ghiringhelli, and L. Braicovich, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041019 (2016). 28

    2016

  95. [103]

    T. J. Boyle, M. Walker, A. Ruiz, E. Schierle, Z. Zhao, F. Boschini, R. Sutarto, T. D. Boyko, W. Moore, N. Tamura, F. He, E. Weschke, A. Gozar, W. Peng, A. C. Komarek, A. Damascelli, C. Sch¨ ußler-Langeheine, A. Frano, E. H. da Silva Neto, and S. Blanco-Canosa, Phys. Rev. Res. ...

    2021

  96. [104]

    Martinelli, I

    L. Martinelli, I. Bia lo, X. Hong, J. Oppliger, C. Lin, T. Schaller, J. K¨ uspert, M. H. Fischer, T. Kurosawa, N. Momono, M. Oda, J. Choi, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, K.-J. Zhou, Q. Wang, and J. Chang, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2406.15062 (2024)

    2024

  97. [105]

    Q. Wang, K. von Arx, D. G. Mazzone, S. Mustafi, M. Horio, J. K¨ uspert, J. Choi, D. Bucher, H. Wo, J. Zhao, W. Zhang, T. C. Asmara, Y. Sassa, M. M ˚ ansson, N. B. Christensen, M. Janoschek, T. Kurosawa, N. Momono, M. Oda, M. H. Fischer, T. Schmitt, and J. Chang, Nature Communi...

    2022

  98. [106]

    H.-H. Kim, E. Lefran¸ cois, K. Kummer, R. Fumagalli, N. B. Brookes, D. Betto, S. Nakata, M. Tortora, J. Porras, T. Loew, M. E. Barber, L. Braicovich, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, B. Keimer, M. Minola, and M. Le Tacon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 037002 (2021)

    2021

  99. [107]

    Bluschke, A

    M. Bluschke, A. Frano, E. Schierle, D. Putzky, F. Ghorbani, R. Ortiz, H. Suzuki, G. Chris- tiani, G. Logvenov, E. Weschke, R. J. Birgeneau, E. H. da Silva Neto, M. Minola, S. Blanco- Canosa, and B. Keimer, Nature Communications 9, 1731 (2018)

    2018

  100. [108]

    N. K. Gupta, R. Sutarto, R. Gong, S. H. J. Idziak, H. Hale, Y.-J. Kim, and D. G. Hawthorn, Phys. Rev. B 108, L121113 (2023)

    2023

  101. [109]

    Mitrano, S

    M. Mitrano, S. Lee, A. A. Husain, L. Delacretaz, M. Zhu, G. de la Pe˜ na Munoz, S. X.-L. Sun, Y. I. Joe, A. H. Reid, S. F. Wandel, et al. , Science advances 5, eaax3346 (2019)

    2019

  102. [110]

    A. Ruiz, B. Gunn, Y. Lu, K. Sasmal, C. M. Moir, R. Basak, H. Huang, J.-S. Lee, F. Rodolakis, T. J. Boyle, M. Walker, Y. He, S. Blanco-Canosa, E. H. da Silva Neto, M. B. Maple, and A. Frano, Nature Communications 6197, 6197 (2022)

    2022

  103. [111]

    Bluschke, N

    M. Bluschke, N. K. Gupta, H. Jang, A. A. Husain, B. Lee, M. Kim, M. Na, B. Dos Remedios, S. Smit, P. Moen, et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2400727121 (2024). 29

    2024

  104. [112]

    Mitrano and Y

    M. Mitrano and Y. Wang, Communications Physics 3, 184 (2020)

    2020

  105. [113]

    H. Jang, S. Song, T. Kihara, Y. Liu, S.-J. Lee, S.-Y. Park, M. Kim, H.-D. Kim, G. Coslovich, S. Nakata, et al. , Science advances 8, eabk0832 (2022)

    2022

  106. [114]

    Wandel, F

    S. Wandel, F. Boschini, E. da Silva Neto, L. Shen, M. Na, S. Zohar, Y. Wang, S. Welch, M. Seaberg, J. Koralek, et al. , Science 376, 860 (2022)

    2022

  107. [115]

    Boschini, M

    F. Boschini, M. Zonno, and A. Damascelli, Reviews of Modern Physics 96, 015003 (2024)

    2024

  108. [116]

    D. R. Baykusheva, H. Jang, A. A. Husain, S. Lee, S. F. R. TenHuisen, P. Zhou, S. Park, H. Kim, J.-K. Kim, H.-D. Kim, M. Kim, S.-Y. Park, P. Abbamonte, B. J. Kim, G. D. Gu, Y. Wang, and M. Mitrano, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011013 (2022)

    2022

  109. [117]

    Mahmood, T

    F. Mahmood, T. Devereaux, P. Abbamonte, and D. K. Morr, Physical Review B 105, 064515 (2022)

    2022

  110. [118]

    Tr¨ utzschler, M

    A. Tr¨ utzschler, M. Huth, C.-T. Chiang, R. Kamrla, F. O. Schumann, J. Kirschner, and W. Widdra, Physical Review Letters 118, 136401 (2017)

    2017

  111. [119]

    Su and C

    Y. Su and C. Zhang, Physical Review B 101, 205110 (2020)

    2020

  112. [120]

    Stahl and M

    C. Stahl and M. Eckstein, Physical Review B 99, 241111 (2019)

    2019

  113. [122]

    T. P. Devereaux, M. Claassen, X.-X. Huang, M. Zaletel, J. E. Moore, D. Morr, F. Mahmood, P. Abbamonte, and Z.-X. Shen, Physical Review B 108, 165134 (2023)

    2023

  114. [2023]

    Reprinted with permission from AAAS

    [33]. Reprinted with permission from AAAS. the Cu-O bond direction, i.e., q = ( ±qCO , 0) and q = (0 , ±qCO ). However, dynamic CO correlations do not appear as a salient feature of the Cu- L3 RIXS energy-loss spectrum. In fact, an agnostic minimal model of the spectrum in the...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.