pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21900 · v1 · pith:MVVF57QCnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Dissipation-Selected Resonant Fronts in a Driven-Dissipative Bose-Hubbard Lattice

Wei-Guo Ma , Heng Fan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 03:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph
keywords driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbarddensity frontdissipation gradientStark detuning rampnonlinear resonancenonequilibrium interfacePeierls-Nabarro depinningprogrammable bosonic lattice
0
0 comments X

The pith

A dissipation gradient combined with a Stark detuning ramp selects a nonlinear resonance slice that pins a density front in a driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard lattice.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a spatial gradient in dissipation, paired with a linear detuning ramp from a Stark field, can isolate one specific nonlinear resonance condition inside a two-dimensional lattice of bosons that are both driven and lossy. This selection produces a stationary density front whose position is fixed by the resonance condition and whose shape is an Airy-like profile whose width is set by the tunneling strength and the detuning slope. A sympathetic reader cares because the result supplies a dissipation-based route to create and reposition nonequilibrium interfaces and transport barriers inside programmable bosonic lattices, without needing to engineer the Hamiltonian alone. When the resonance is tuned toward the minimum-loss side the front exhibits depinning steps, transverse pattern locking, chaos, and localization, all mapped by center-of-mass and imbalance diagnostics into a dynamical phase diagram controlled by ramp slope and gradient strength.

Core claim

A dissipation gradient combined with a Stark-induced detuning ramp selects a nonlinear resonance slice in a two-dimensional driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard lattice, producing a pinned density front in generalized Gross-Pitaevskii simulations. The underlying resonance condition fixes the front position, while its Airy-like profile obeys a width scaling set by tunneling stiffness and the effective detuning slope. Treating the front as an emergent interface explains how tuning the selected resonance toward the minimum-loss side yields Peierls-Nabarro depinning steps, discrete transverse pattern locking, spatiotemporal chaos, and minimum-loss localization. Center-of-mass and generalized-imabance

What carries the argument

dissipation gradient together with Stark-induced detuning ramp that selects a nonlinear resonance slice and pins the resulting density front

Load-bearing premise

The generalized Gross-Pitaevskii mean-field simulations faithfully capture the driven-dissipative dynamics and that the identified resonance condition correctly fixes the front position without significant corrections from quantum fluctuations or lattice inhomogeneities.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the steady-state density profile across the lattice and checks whether the front location matches the resonance condition and the profile width scales with tunneling rate and detuning slope as predicted would confirm or refute the selection mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21900 by Heng Fan, Wei-Guo Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Setup and density front formation in a two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Long-time density profiles and transverse spectra at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Generalized imbalance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dynamical phase diagram of the dissipation-selected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spatially structured dissipation organizes driven quantum matter beyond Hamiltonian control. We show that a dissipation gradient combined with a Stark-induced detuning ramp selects a nonlinear resonance slice in a two-dimensional driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard lattice, producing a pinned density front in generalized Gross-Pitaevskii simulations. The underlying resonance condition fixes the front position, while its Airy-like profile obeys a width scaling set by tunneling stiffness and the effective detuning slope. Treating the front as an emergent interface explains how tuning the selected resonance toward the minimum-loss side yields Peierls-Nabarro depinning steps, discrete transverse pattern locking, spatiotemporal chaos, and minimum-loss localization. Center-of-mass and generalized-imbalance diagnostics map these outcomes into a dynamical phase diagram as detuning-ramp slope and dissipation-gradient strength vary. The results suggest structured dissipation as a mechanism for reconfigurable transport barriers and nonequilibrium interfaces in programmable bosonic lattices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript shows that a dissipation gradient combined with a Stark-induced detuning ramp selects a nonlinear resonance slice in a two-dimensional driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard lattice. Generalized Gross-Pitaevskii simulations produce a pinned density front whose position is fixed by the resonance condition; the front exhibits an Airy-like profile whose width scales with tunneling stiffness and effective detuning slope. Tuning the selected resonance toward the minimum-loss side yields Peierls-Nabarro depinning steps, discrete transverse pattern locking, spatiotemporal chaos, and minimum-loss localization. Center-of-mass and generalized-imbalance diagnostics are used to map these behaviors into a dynamical phase diagram parametrized by detuning-ramp slope and dissipation-gradient strength.

Significance. If the mean-field results are robust, the work identifies structured dissipation as a practical route to reconfigurable transport barriers and nonequilibrium interfaces in programmable bosonic lattices. The approach extends control beyond Hamiltonian engineering and supplies concrete, falsifiable predictions (front position, width scaling, and phase boundaries) that can be tested in quantum-gas experiments. The systematic exploration of emergent interface phenomena via diagnostics is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that the resonance condition fixes the front position without significant corrections rests entirely on generalized Gross-Pitaevskii mean-field simulations. No quantitative validation, error analysis, or comparison to exact diagonalization (even on small lattices) is provided to establish the accuracy of the resonance condition or the front pinning. This is load-bearing for the abstract claim and the phase-diagram construction.
  2. Near the sharp density gradients at the resonance-selected front, quantum fluctuations in a 2D lattice can renormalize the effective detuning or destabilize the interface, potentially shifting or depinning the front relative to the mean-field prediction. The manuscript contains no estimate of the size of these corrections or the parameter regime in which they remain negligible.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states simulation outcomes but supplies no lattice size, discretization details, or convergence checks; adding these would improve reproducibility.
  2. Notation for the generalized imbalance diagnostic and the precise definition of the resonance condition could be clarified with an explicit equation in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the work's significance and for the detailed, constructive comments. We respond point by point to the major comments below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the resonance condition fixes the front position without significant corrections rests entirely on generalized Gross-Pitaevskii mean-field simulations. No quantitative validation, error analysis, or comparison to exact diagonalization (even on small lattices) is provided to establish the accuracy of the resonance condition or the front pinning. This is load-bearing for the abstract claim and the phase-diagram construction.

    Authors: We agree that all presented results are obtained within the generalized Gross-Pitaevskii mean-field description, which is the standard approach for driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard lattices in the regime of moderate to high site occupations. Exact diagonalization on lattices large enough to accommodate the extended front and its transverse dynamics is computationally prohibitive. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection that (i) recalls the regime of validity of the mean-field approximation for driven-dissipative systems, (ii) provides a simple error estimate based on the local density and the ratio of tunneling to dissipation, and (iii) cites existing benchmarks in the literature where generalized Gross-Pitaevskii results have been compared with quantum-trajectory or truncated-Wigner calculations for similar parameters. These additions will make the justification for the resonance condition and the phase diagram more explicit. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Near the sharp density gradients at the resonance-selected front, quantum fluctuations in a 2D lattice can renormalize the effective detuning or destabilize the interface, potentially shifting or depinning the front relative to the mean-field prediction. The manuscript contains no estimate of the size of these corrections or the parameter regime in which they remain negligible.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantum fluctuations could in principle renormalize the local detuning or affect interface stability. In the parameter window explored (mean occupations of order unity or higher together with appreciable dissipation), we expect the mean-field description to remain quantitatively reliable. In the revision we will include a brief estimate of fluctuation corrections obtained by linearizing the generalized Gross-Pitaevskii equation around the stationary front solution and examining the Bogoliubov-de Gennes spectrum; we will also delineate the regime (high local density, strong dissipation) in which such corrections are expected to be small. Should a full quantitative calculation exceed the scope of the revision, we will state this limitation clearly while retaining the mean-field results as the leading-order prediction. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A direct, quantitative comparison of the resonance-selected front to exact diagonalization or full quantum-trajectory simulations on two-dimensional lattices of the sizes used in the study, which remains computationally inaccessible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from independent numerical simulations of the driven-dissipative model

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on generalized Gross-Pitaevskii mean-field simulations of a two-dimensional driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard lattice with imposed dissipation gradient and Stark detuning ramp. The resonance condition and Airy-like front profile are obtained directly from the model's equations of motion and numerical diagnostics (center-of-mass motion, generalized imbalance), without any parameter fitting that renames an input as a prediction or any self-citation chain that imports the result. The derivation chain is self-contained because the front pinning, width scaling, and dynamical phase diagram emerge from solving the time-dependent nonlinear Schrödinger equation under the stated boundary conditions; no step reduces the output to a tautological re-expression of the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the generalized Gross-Pitaevskii description for the open lattice and on the numerical identification of the resonance condition; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • detuning-ramp slope
    Tuned across values to produce the phase diagram of front behaviors
  • dissipation-gradient strength
    Tuned across values to produce the phase diagram of front behaviors
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Generalized Gross-Pitaevskii equation adequately describes the driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard dynamics
    Invoked for all reported simulations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5690 in / 1311 out tokens · 44319 ms · 2026-05-22T03:07:53.369062+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 096001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Noh and D

    C. Noh and D. G. Angelakis, Quantum simulations and many-body physics with light, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Dutta, M

    O. Dutta, M. Gajda, P. Hauke, M. Lewenstein, D.- S. L¨ uhmann, B. A. Malomed, T. Sowi´ nski, and J. Za- krzewski, Non-standard hubbard models in optical lat- tices: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 066001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase tran- sition in a one-dimensional circuit qed lattice, Phys. Rev. X7, 011016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    J. M. Fink, A. Dombi, A. Vukics, A. Wallraff, and P. Domokos, Observation of the photon-blockade break- down phase transition, Phys. Rev. X7, 011012 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spec- tral theory of liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A98, 042118 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    S. R. K. Rodriguez, W. Casteels, F. Storme, N. Car- lon Zambon, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Amo, C. Ciuti, and J. Bloch, Probing a dissipative phase transition via dynamical optical hys- teresis, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 247402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Letscher, O

    F. Letscher, O. Thomas, T. Niederpr¨ um, M. Fleis- chhauer, and H. Ott, Bistability versus metastability in driven dissipative rydberg gases, Phys. Rev. X7, 021020 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Harari, M

    G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, Y. Lumer, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. D. Chong, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Segev, Topological insu- lator laser: Theory, Science359, eaar4003 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aar4003

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aar4003 2018

  10. [10]

    E. T. Owen, J. Jin, D. Rossini, R. Fazio, and M. J. Hartmann, Quantum correlations and limit cycles in the driven-dissipative heisenberg lattice, New Journal of Physics20, 045004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    R. Rota, F. Storme, N. Bartolo, R. Fazio, and C. Ciuti, Critical behavior of dissipative two-dimensional spin lat- tices, Phys. Rev. B95, 134431 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    H. A. Gersch and G. C. Knollman, Quantum cell model for bosons, Phys. Rev.129, 959 (1963)

    work page 1963

  13. [13]

    M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B40, 546 (1989)

    work page 1989

  14. [14]

    Kordas, D

    G. Kordas, D. Witthaut, P. Buonsante, A. Vezzani, R. Burioni, A. I. Karanikas, and S. Wimberger, The dissipative bose-hubbard model, The European Physical Journal Special Topics224, 2127 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Ekman and E

    C. Ekman and E. J. Bergholtz, Liouvillian skin effects and fragmented condensates in an integrable dissipative bose-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L032067 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Tomadin, V

    A. Tomadin, V. Giovannetti, R. Fazio, D. Gerace, I. Carusotto, H. E. T¨ ureci, and A. Imamoglu, Signa- tures of the superfluid-insulator phase transition in laser- driven dissipative nonlinear cavity arrays, Phys. Rev. A 81, 061801 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Jouanny, S

    V. Jouanny, S. Frasca, V. J. Weibel, l. Peyruchat, M. Scigliuzzo, F. Oppliger, F. De Palma, D. Sbroggi` o, G. Beaulieu, O. Zilberberg, and P. Scarlino, High kinetic inductance cavity arrays for compact band engineering and topology-based disorder meters, Nature Communi- cations16, 3396 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    C.-W. Wu, M. Gao, Z.-J. Deng, H.-Y. Dai, P.-X. Chen, and C.-Z. Li, Quantum phase transition of light in a one- dimensional photon-hopping-controllable resonator ar- ray, Phys. Rev. A84, 043827 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    G. P. Fedorov, S. V. Remizov, D. S. Shapiro, W. V. Pogosov, E. Egorova, I. Tsitsilin, M. Andronik, A. A. Dobronosova, I. A. Rodionov, O. V. Astafiev, and A. V. Ustinov, Photon transport in a bose-hubbard chain of superconducting artificial atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 180503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    H. Zhao, J. Vovrosh, F. Mintert, and J. Knolle, Quantum many-body scars in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 160604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Rossini, M

    D. Rossini, M. Gibertini, V. Giovannetti, and R. Fazio, Topological pumping in the one-dimensional bose- hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B87, 085131 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    Vicentini, F

    F. Vicentini, F. Minganti, R. Rota, G. Orso, and C. Ciuti, Critical slowing down in driven-dissipative bose-hubbard lattices, Phys. Rev. A97, 013853 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Roberts and A

    D. Roberts and A. A. Clerk, Competition between two- photon driving, dissipation, and interactions in bosonic 6 lattice models: An exact solution, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 063601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Miyazaki, Y

    H. Miyazaki, Y. Takahide, A. Kanda, and Y. Ootuka, Quantum fluctuations and dissipative phase transition in one-dimensional josephson junction arrays, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures18, 41 (2003)

    work page 2003

  25. [25]

    Ceulemans and M

    R. Ceulemans and M. Wouters, Nonequilibrium steady states and critical slowing down in the dissipative bose- hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A108, 013314 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Casteels, R

    W. Casteels, R. Fazio, and C. Ciuti, Critical dynami- cal properties of a first-order dissipative phase transition, Phys. Rev. A95, 012128 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Biella, F

    A. Biella, F. Storme, J. Lebreuilly, D. Rossini, R. Fazio, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Phase diagram of incoherently driven strongly correlated photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. A96, 023839 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Le Boit´ e, G

    A. Le Boit´ e, G. Orso, and C. Ciuti, Bose-hubbard model: Relation between driven-dissipative steady states and equilibrium quantum phases, Phys. Rev. A90, 063821 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Casteels and M

    W. Casteels and M. Wouters, Optically bistable driven- dissipative bose-hubbard dimer: Gutzwiller approaches and entanglement, Phys. Rev. A95, 043833 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    S. R. K. Rodriguez, A. Amo, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, and J. Bloch, Interaction- induced hopping phase in driven-dissipative coupled pho- tonic microcavities, Nature Communications7, 11887 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Le Boit´ e, G

    A. Le Boit´ e, G. Orso, and C. Ciuti, Steady-state phases and tunneling-induced instabilities in the driven dissipa- tive bose-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 233601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Z. Wang, C. Navarrete-Benlloch, and Z. Cai, Pattern formation and exotic order in driven-dissipative bose- hubbard systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 115301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Zhang, K.-X

    Z. Zhang, K.-X. Yao, L. Feng, J. Hu, and C. Chin, Pat- tern formation in a driven bose–einstein condensate, Na- ture Physics16, 652 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Meinert, M

    F. Meinert, M. J. Mark, K. Lauber, A. J. Daley, and H.- C. N¨ agerl, Floquet engineering of correlated tunneling in the bose-hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 205301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Z. T. Wang, S.-Y. Zhou, Y.-H. Shi, K. Huang, Z. H. Yang, J. Zhang, K. Zhao, Y. Xu, H. Li, S. K. Zhao, Y. Feng, G. Xue, Y. Liu, W.-G. Ma, C.-P. Fang, H.- T. Liu, Y.-Y. Wang, K. Xu, H. Yu, H. Fan, and S. P. Zhao, Observing two-particle correlation dynam- ics in tunable superconducting bose-hubbard simulators (2025), arXiv:2509.02180 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlas- takis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge, M. Reagor, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science347, 853 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Kannan, M

    B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. Frisk Kockum, J. Braum¨ uller, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaer- gaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Veps¨ al¨ ainen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics with superconducting artificial giant atoms, Nature583, 775 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    A. M. Vadiraj, A. Ask, T. G. McConkey, I. Nsanzineza, C. W. S. Chang, A. F. Kockum, and C. M. Wilson, En- gineering the level structure of a giant artificial atom in waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. A103, 023710 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, Decoherence- free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quan- tum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 140404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    X. Wang, T. Liu, A. F. Kockum, H.-R. Li, and F. Nori, Tunable chiral bound states with giant atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 043602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    H. Deng, G. Weihs, C. Santori, J. Bloch, and Y. Ya- mamoto, Condensation of semiconductor microcavity ex- citon polaritons, Science298, 199 (2002)

    work page 2002

  43. [43]

    Balili, V

    R. Balili, V. Hartwell, D. Snoke, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Bose-einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap, Science316, 1007 (2007)

    work page 2007

  44. [44]

    M. J. Hartmann, Quantum simulation with interacting photons, Journal of Optics18, 104005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with in- dividually controlled rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    R. Ma, B. Saxberg, C. Owens, N. Leung, Y. Lu, J. Si- mon, and D. I. Schuster, A dissipatively stabilized mott insulator of photons, Nature566, 51 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Klembt, T

    S. Klembt, T. H. Harder, O. A. Egorov, K. Winkler, R. Ge, M. A. Bandres, M. Emmerling, L. Worschech, T. C. H. Liew, M. Segev, C. Schneider, and S. H¨ ofling, Exciton-polariton topological insulator, Nature562, 552 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Carusotto, A

    I. Carusotto, A. A. Houck, A. J. Koll´ ar, P. Roushan, D. I. Schuster, and J. Simon, Photonic materials in cir- cuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature Physics16, 268 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Barontini, R

    G. Barontini, R. Labouvie, F. Stubenrauch, A. Vogler, V. Guarrera, and H. Ott, Controlling the dynamics of an open many-body quantum system with localized dissipa- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 035302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Kosior, K

    A. Kosior, K. Gietka, F. Mivehvar, and H. Ritsch, Nonequilibrium nonlinear effects and dynamical boson condensation in a driven-dissipative wannier-stark lat- tice, Phys. Rev. B110, L100303 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Labouvie, B

    R. Labouvie, B. Santra, S. Heun, S. Wimberger, and H. Ott, Negative differential conductivity in an interact- ing quantum gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 050601 (2015). 7

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Z. Li, F. Claude, T. Boulier, E. Giacobino, Q. Glo- rieux, A. Bramati, and C. Ciuti, Dissipative phase transi- tion with driving-controlled spatial dimension and diffu- sive boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 093601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [58]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013)

    work page 2013

  58. [59]

    Provazza and R

    J. Provazza and R. Tempelaar, Perturbation theory un- der the truncated wigner approximation: How system- environment entanglement formation drives quantum de- coherence, Phys. Rev. A106, 042406 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [61]

    See Supplemental Material for the detailed derivation process and more numerical results

    work page

  60. [62]

    L. A. Lugiato and R. Lefever, Spatial dissipative struc- tures in passive optical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 2209 (1987)

    work page 1987

  61. [63]

    V. N. Gladilin, K. Ji, and M. Wouters, Spatial coher- ence of weakly interacting one-dimensional nonequilib- rium bosonic quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. A90, 023615 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [64]

    K. Ji, V. N. Gladilin, and M. Wouters, Temporal coher- ence of one-dimensional nonequilibrium quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. B91, 045301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [67]

    Jenkinson and M

    M. Jenkinson and M. I. Weinstein, Discrete solitary waves in systems with nonlocal interactions and the peierls–nabarro barrier, Communications in Mathemati- cal Physics351, 45 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [69]

    M´ ak, M

    J. M´ ak, M. J. Bhaseen, and A. Pal, Statics and dynam- ics of non-hermitian many-body localization, Communi- cations Physics7, 92 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [70]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of inter- acting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015)

    work page 2015

  66. [71]

    Dissipation-Selected Resonant Fronts in a Driven-Dissipative Bose-Hubbard Lattice

    H. P. L¨ uschen, P. Bordia, S. Scherg, F. Alet, E. Alt- man, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of slow dynamics near the many-body localization transition in one-dimensional quasiperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 260401 (2017). Supplemental Material for: “Dissipation-Selected Resonant Fronts in a Driven-Dissipative Bose-Hubbard Lattice” Wei-Gu...

    work page 2017

  67. [72]

    Sinatra, C

    A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, and Y. Castin, The truncated wigner method for bose-condensed gases: limits of validity and applications1, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics35, 3599 (2002)

    work page 2002

  68. [73]

    Wouters and V

    M. Wouters and V. Savona, Stochastic classical field model for polariton condensates, Phys. Rev. B79, 165302 (2009)

    work page 2009

  69. [74]

    Borletto, L

    F. Borletto, L. Giacomelli, and C. Ciuti, Circuit quantum electrodynamics of direct and dual shapiro steps with finite-size- transmission-line resonators, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 054061 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [75]

    Provazza and R

    J. Provazza and R. Tempelaar, Perturbation theory under the truncated wigner approximation: How system-environment entanglement formation drives quantum decoherence, Phys. Rev. A106, 042406 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [76]

    Sundar, K

    B. Sundar, K. C. Wang, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Analysis of continuous and discrete wigner approximations for spin dynamics, Phys. Rev. A99, 043627 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [77]

    V. N. Gladilin, K. Ji, and M. Wouters, Spatial coherence of weakly interacting one-dimensional nonequilibrium bosonic quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. A90, 023615 (2014)

    work page 2014

  73. [78]

    K. Ji, V. N. Gladilin, and M. Wouters, Temporal coherence of one-dimensional nonequilibrium quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. B91, 045301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  74. [79]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 025004 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [80]

    Ahufinger, A

    V. Ahufinger, A. Sanpera, P. Pedri, L. Santos, and M. Lewenstein, Creation and mobility of discrete solitons in bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A69, 053604 (2004)

    work page 2004

  76. [81]

    Jenkinson and M

    M. Jenkinson and M. I. Weinstein, Discrete solitary waves in systems with nonlocal interactions and the peierls–nabarro barrier, Communications in Mathematical Physics351, 45 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [82]

    Molignini, Stability of quasicrystalline ultracold fermions to dipolar interactions, Phys

    P. Molignini, Stability of quasicrystalline ultracold fermions to dipolar interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L032026 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [83]

    M´ ak, M

    J. M´ ak, M. J. Bhaseen, and A. Pal, Statics and dynamics of non-hermitian many-body localization, Communications Physics7, 92 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [84]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science349, 842 (2015)

    work page 2015

  80. [85]

    H. P. L¨ uschen, P. Bordia, S. Scherg, F. Alet, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of slow dynamics near the many-body localization transition in one-dimensional quasiperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 260401 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.