Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of synthetic dataset generation methods for medical intervention rooms using medical clothing detection as an example

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.11493 v1 pith:MW2NVE7X submitted 2022-09-23 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords dataclothingdatasetdomainmedicaltargetadditionallysynthetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The availability of real data from areas with high privacy requirements, such as the medical intervention space, is low and the acquisition legally complex. Therefore, this work presents a way to create a synthetic dataset for the medical context, using medical clothing as an example. The goal is to close the reality gap between the synthetic and real data. For this purpose, methods of 3D-scanned clothing and designed clothing are compared in a Domain-Randomization and Structured-Domain-Randomization scenario using an Unreal-Engine plugin or Unity. Additionally a Mixed-Reality dataset in front of a greenscreen and a target domain dataset were used. Our experiments show, that Structured-Domain-Randomization of designed clothing together with Mixed-Reality data provide a baseline achieving 72.0% mAP on a test dataset of the clinical target domain. When additionally using 15% of available target domain train data, the gap towards 100% (660 images) target domain train data could be nearly closed 80.05% mAP (81.95% mAP). Finally we show that when additionally using 100% target domain train data the accuracy could be increased to 83.35% mAP.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools