Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Faster super-resolution imaging with auto-correlation two-step deconvolution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.07410 v4 pith:MWK5ANVB submitted 2018-09-19 physics.optics

classification physics.optics
keywords super-resolutionimagingsacdauto-correlationdeconvolutionimageopticalresolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite super-resolution fluorescence blinking microscopes break the diffraction limit, the intense phototoxic illumination and long-term image sequences thus far still pose to major challenges in visualizing live-organisms. Here, we proposed a super-resolution method based on auto-correlation two-step deconvolution (SACD) to enhance the temporal resolution at lower signal intensity levels. Unlike conventional techniques, such as super-resolution optical fluctuation imaging (SOFI) or stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), our model allows 16 frames to generate super-resolution images, without noticeable degradation in recording quality. We demonstrate SACD both in simulated predictions and experimental validations, with the resulting spatial resolution of 64 nm and 2-10 fold speed improvements. The use of low signal-to-noise ratio acquisition of image sequences, our SACD enables fast, background-free, super-resolution imaging that maybe advance implemented as a suitable tool for rapid live-cells imaging.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VQualA 2025 Challenge on Visual Quality Comparison for Large Multimodal Models: Methods and Results

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A challenge report finding that ensemble-tuned LMMs reach 75.7% accuracy on a 4,000-question visual quality comparison benchmark, only ~0.2 points above a Qwen2.5-VL-72B baseline.

Pith tools