pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13681 · v2 · pith:MWOIKIAWnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · 💻 cs.CL

EvoArena: Tracking Memory Evolution for Robust LLM Agents in Dynamic Environments

Jundong Xu , Qingchuan Li , Jiaying Wu , Yihuai Lan , Shuyue Stella Li , Huichi Zhou , Bowen Jiang , Lei Wang
show 6 more authors
Jun Wang Anh Tuan Luu Caiming Xiong Hae Won Park Bryan Hooi Zhiyuan Hu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords LLM agentsdynamic environmentsmemory evolutionbenchmarkagent reliabilityevolving tasks
0
0 comments X

The pith

LLM agents gain from tracking memory changes as patches in dynamic settings

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces EvoArena, a benchmark that presents agents with sequences of progressive updates across terminal, software, and social domains rather than static tasks. It proposes EvoMem as a memory system that stores changes as structured patches instead of overwriting prior states, allowing agents to reason about how conditions have evolved. Experiments show baseline agents reach only 39.6 percent accuracy on these tasks while EvoMem raises performance on EvoArena and transfers gains to other benchmarks. Chain-level accuracy, which requires completing linked subtasks, also rises. A reader would care because real deployments involve ongoing shifts that static memory designs fail to handle.

Core claim

The central claim is that a patch-based memory paradigm recording structured update histories lets agents preserve complete evolving environment states, producing measurable gains in accuracy on both single tasks and consecutive evolutionary sequences.

What carries the argument

EvoMem, the patch-based memory paradigm that records memory evolution as structured update histories, enabling reasoning about environmental changes through memory patches.

Load-bearing premise

The progressive update sequences in EvoArena represent the kinds of environment changes that matter for real-world agent reliability.

What would settle it

Testing whether the reported accuracy gains disappear when agents face environment changes drawn from domains or update patterns outside the terminal, software, and social-preference sequences used in EvoArena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13681 by Anh Tuan Luu, Bowen Jiang, Bryan Hooi, Caiming Xiong, Hae Won Park, Huichi Zhou, Jiaying Wu, Jundong Xu, Jun Wang, Lei Wang, Qingchuan Li, Shuyue Stella Li, Yihuai Lan, Zhiyuan Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Step accuracy vs. chain accuracy on EvoArena. The closer to the upper-right corner the better. Abstract Large language model (LLM) agents have achieved strong performance on a wide range of benchmarks, yet most evaluations assume static environments. In contrast, real-world deployment is inherently dynamic, requiring agents to continually align their knowledge, skills, and behavior with changing environmen… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: EvoArena construction. We convert static agent benchmarks into versioned evolution chains across executable workflows, software engineering, and social intelligence, testing whether agents can adapt to new changes while preserving still-valid prior behavior [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distribution of EvoArena. The central circle shows domain proportions, and the surrounding panels show the question type distribution within each domain. To study this setting, we construct EvoArena, a benchmark suite that evaluates agents under persistent environment evolution. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example of Terminal-Bench-Evo. The end goal stays fixed: push hello.html and serve it on port 8080, while each version changes a key operational constraint: deployment mechanism, served path, permissions, or branch policy. The final TERMINAL-BENCH-EVO dataset contains 89 initial Terminal-Bench tasks, from which 356 evolved task versions are constructed as five-version workflow chains; after quality cont… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example evolution chain in SWE-Chain-Evo. The aiohttp chain evolves across four milestones, progressively hardening protocol and environment boundaries while preserving existing compatible behavior. (2) Update-window extraction. For each retained repository, an update window is a contiguous chronological range of commits from which candidate evolution chains can be formed. This keeps later milestones groun… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Example evolution chain in PersonaMem-Evo. The conversation history reveals evolving user preferences, and the query requires matching the relevant condition to the most appropriate current preference. neutral, health-related, or therapy-related), whether it describes the user or another person, and whether it supersedes or deletes an earlier preference. We concatenate the generated segments into mixed-top… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Overview of EvoMem. EvoMem augments a base memory system with an append-only patch history that records behaviorally meaningful memory updates and retrieves relevant patches as versioned evidence at inference time. EvoMem does not replace this updater. It monitors the transition from Mt−1 to Mt and captures memory changes that would otherwise be discarded. We compute ∆t = Diff(Mt−1, Mt), where ∆t summarize… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Accuracy versus total token usage across evaluated backbone models. Total token usage is measured in millions of tokens, and lower usage indicates higher inference efficiency. Dashed lines mark the cross-model averages. preserves complete preference states needed for downstream reasoning. Category-level results further support this explanation: the largest row-level capture gains occur on temporal trajecto… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents have achieved strong performance on a wide range of benchmarks, yet most evaluations assume static environments. In contrast, real-world deployment is inherently dynamic, requiring agents to continually align their knowledge, skills, and behavior with changing environments and updated task conditions. To address this gap, we introduce EvoArena, a benchmark suite that models environment changes as sequences of progressive updates across terminal, software, and social domains. We further propose EvoMem, a patch-based memory paradigm that records memory evolution as structured update histories, enabling agents to reason about environmental evolution through changes in their memory. Experiments show that current agents struggle on EvoArena, achieving an average accuracy of 39.6% across evolving terminal, software, and social-preference domains. EvoMem consistently improves performance, yielding an average gain of 1.5% on EvoArena and also improving standard benchmarks such as GAIA and LoCoMo by 6.1% and 4.8%. Beyond individual tasks, EvoMem further improves chain-level accuracy by 3.7% on EvoArena, where success requires completing a consecutive sequence of related evolutionary subtasks. Mechanistic analysis shows that EvoMem improves evidence capture in the memory, indicating better preservation of complete evolving environment states. Our results highlight the importance of modeling evolution in both evaluation and memory for reliable agent deployment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces EvoArena, a benchmark modeling dynamic environments via sequences of progressive updates in terminal, software, and social-preference domains. It proposes EvoMem, a patch-based memory paradigm that records structured update histories to allow agents to reason about environmental evolution. Current agents achieve 39.6% average accuracy on EvoArena; EvoMem yields 1.5% average gain on EvoArena, 6.1% on GAIA, 4.8% on LoCoMo, and 3.7% on chain-level accuracy, with mechanistic analysis indicating improved evidence capture.

Significance. If the reported gains and mechanistic findings hold under detailed scrutiny, the work usefully extends agent evaluation beyond static benchmarks and demonstrates a concrete memory mechanism for handling change. The transfer improvements to GAIA and LoCoMo are a strength worth confirming.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims (1.5% EvoArena gain, 3.7% chain-level gain, transfers to GAIA/LoCoMo) are stated without any description of baselines, number of runs, error bars, statistical tests, or ablation controls, rendering the numeric results unverifiable from the provided text.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no construction details, validation against external logs, or ablation on update predictability/noise/branching are supplied for the progressive update sequences; without these, it is impossible to assess whether the benchmark instantiates the real-world dynamics needed to support the claim that EvoMem improves robustness rather than benchmark-specific artifacts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a one-sentence statement of how EvoMem differs from standard retrieval or summarization memory baselines used in LLM agents.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract. We agree that additional details are needed to make performance claims and benchmark construction more verifiable at a glance. We will revise the abstract accordingly while preserving its conciseness, and ensure cross-references to the full experimental details in the main text. Responses to each major comment are provided below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims (1.5% EvoArena gain, 3.7% chain-level gain, transfers to GAIA/LoCoMo) are stated without any description of baselines, number of runs, error bars, statistical tests, or ablation controls, rendering the numeric results unverifiable from the provided text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit context on the experimental protocol. In the revised version we will add a concise clause specifying the baselines (standard LLM agents without EvoMem), the number of runs (five independent runs per task), and that results are reported as averages with standard deviations. Full statistical tests, ablation controls, and per-domain breakdowns already appear in Section 4 and the appendix; we will add a parenthetical reference to these sections in the abstract. This change directly addresses verifiability without exceeding typical abstract length constraints. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no construction details, validation against external logs, or ablation on update predictability/noise/branching are supplied for the progressive update sequences; without these, it is impossible to assess whether the benchmark instantiates the real-world dynamics needed to support the claim that EvoMem improves robustness rather than benchmark-specific artifacts.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract currently omits high-level construction information. The revised abstract will include a brief sentence describing how the progressive update sequences are generated across the three domains (terminal, software, social-preference) to simulate incremental environmental change. Detailed construction methodology, including controlled variability in update timing and content, appears in Section 3; we will add an explicit pointer to this section. Validation against external logs is not applicable because EvoArena is a synthetic benchmark designed to isolate evolutionary dynamics rather than replicate specific real-world traces; however, we will expand the abstract to note that the sequences incorporate controlled noise and branching factors, with corresponding ablations reported in Section 4.3 and the appendix. If the referee considers additional external validation necessary, we are prepared to discuss its feasibility. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely empirical benchmark and method evaluation

full rationale

The paper introduces EvoArena as a new benchmark suite and EvoMem as a patch-based memory paradigm, then reports experimental accuracy numbers (39.6% baseline, +1.5% with EvoMem on EvoArena, plus transfers to GAIA/LoCoMo). No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text. All load-bearing claims rest on direct performance measurements against the introduced tasks and external benchmarks, with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. This is the standard non-circular case for an empirical systems paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only abstract available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the high-level description of EvoMem can be identified.

invented entities (1)
  • EvoMem no independent evidence
    purpose: patch-based memory paradigm recording update histories
    New memory structure introduced to track environmental evolution

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5825 in / 1110 out tokens · 14246 ms · 2026-06-27T06:26:25.007363+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Workarena++: Towards compositional planning and reasoning-based common knowledge work tasks

    Léo Boisvert, Megh Thakkar, Maxime Gasse, Massimo Caccia, Thibault Le Sellier de Chezelles, Quentin Cappart, Nicolas Chapados, Alexandre Lacoste, and Alexandre Drouin. Workarena++: Towards compositional planning and reasoning-based common knowledge work tasks. InThe Thirty-eight Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks T...

    2024

  2. [2]

    Mem0: Building production-ready AI agents with scalable long-term memory

    Prateek Chhikara, Dev Khant, Saket Aryan, Taranjeet Singh, and Deshraj Yadav. Mem0: Building production-ready AI agents with scalable long-term memory. InECAI 2025 - 28th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 25-30 October 2025, Bologna, Italy - Including 14th Conference on Prestigious Applications of Intelligent Systems (PAIS 2025), pages 2993–...

    2025

  3. [3]

    Gaia2: Benchmarking LLM agents on dynamic and asynchronous environments

    Romain Froger, Pierre Andrews, Matteo Bettini, Amar Budhiraja, Ricardo Silveira Cabral, Virginie Do, Emilien Garreau, Jean-Baptiste Gaya, Hugo Laurençon, Maxime Lecanu, Kunal Malkan, Dheeraj Mekala, Pierre Menard, Gerard Moreno-Torres Bertran, Ulyana Piterbarg, Mikhail Plekhanov, Mathieu Rita, Andrey Rusakov, Vladislav V orotilov, Mengjue Wang, Ian Yu, Am...

    2026

  4. [4]

    Scaling synthetic data creation with 1,000,000,000 personas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.20094, 2024

    Tao Ge, Xin Chan, Xiaoyang Wang, Dian Yu, Haitao Mi, and Dong Yu. Scaling synthetic data creation with 1,000,000,000 personas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.20094, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Gemini 3.1 pro: A smarter model for your most complex tasks

    Google. Gemini 3.1 pro: A smarter model for your most complex tasks. https: //blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/ gemini-3-1-pro/, 2026

    2026

  6. [6]

    Personamem-v2: Towards person- alized intelligence via learning implicit user personas and agentic memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.06688, 2025

    Bowen Jiang, Yuan Yuan, Maohao Shen, Zhuoqun Hao, Zhangchen Xu, Zichen Chen, Ziyi Liu, Anvesh Rao Vijjini, Jiashu He, Hanchao Yu, et al. Personamem-v2: Towards person- alized intelligence via learning implicit user personas and agentic memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.06688, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    SWE-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    Carlos E Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik R Narasimhan. SWE-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Langgraph documentation

    LangChain. Langgraph documentation. https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/ langgraph, 2024. Accessed: 2026-05-05

    2024

  9. [9]

    Repolaunch: Automating build&test pipeline of code repositories on any language and any platform.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05026, 2026

    Kenan Li, Rongzhi Li, Linghao Zhang, Qirui Jin, Liao Zhu, Xiaosong Huang, Geng Zhang, Yikai Zhang, Shilin He, Chengxing Xie, et al. Repolaunch: Automating build&test pipeline of code repositories on any language and any platform.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05026, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    Horizonbench: Long-horizon personalization with evolving preferences.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.17283, 2026

    Shuyue Stella Li, Bhargavi Paranjape, Kerem Oktar, Zhongyao Ma, Gelin Zhou, Lin Guan, Na Zhang, Sem Park, Lin Chen, Diyi Yang, et al. Horizonbench: Long-horizon personalization with evolving preferences.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.17283, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Agentbench: Evaluating LLMs as agents

    Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, Shudan Zhang, Xiang Deng, Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Chenhui Zhang, Sheng Shen, Tianjun Zhang, Yu Su, Huan Sun, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. Agentbench: Evaluating LLMs as agents. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning R...

    2024

  12. [12]

    Evaluating very long-term conversational memory of LLM agents

    Adyasha Maharana, Dong-Ho Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Mohit Bansal, Francesco Barbieri, and Yuwei Fang. Evaluating very long-term conversational memory of LLM agents. InProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 13851–13870, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Terminal-bench: Benchmarking agents on hard, realistic tasks in command line interfaces

    Mike A Merrill, Alexander G Shaw, Nicholas Carlini, Boxuan Li, Harsh Raj, Ivan Bercovich, Lin Shi, Jeong Yeon Shin, Thomas Walshe, E Kelly Buchanan, et al. Terminal-bench: Benchmarking agents on hard, realistic tasks in command line interfaces. InThe Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2026. 18

    2026

  14. [14]

    GAIA: a benchmark for general AI assistants

    Grégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun, and Thomas Scialom. GAIA: a benchmark for general AI assistants. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    Kimi k2.6.https://www.kimi.com/ai-models/kimi-k2-6, 2026

    Moonshot AI. Kimi k2.6.https://www.kimi.com/ai-models/kimi-k2-6, 2026

    2026

  16. [16]

    Introducing gpt-5.4 mini and nano

    OpenAI. Introducing gpt-5.4 mini and nano. https://openai.com/index/ introducing-gpt-5-4-mini-and-nano/, 2026

    2026

  17. [17]

    Introducing gpt-5.5

    OpenAI. Introducing gpt-5.5. https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-5/ , 2026

    2026

  18. [18]

    Qwen3.6-27b: Flagship-level coding in a 27b dense model

    Qwen Team. Qwen3.6-27b: Flagship-level coding in a 27b dense model. https://qwen.ai/ blog?id=qwen3.6-27b, 2026

    2026

  19. [19]

    Androidworld: A dynamic benchmarking environment for autonomous agents

    Christopher Rawles, Sarah Clinckemaillie, Yifan Chang, Jonathan Waltz, Gabrielle Lau, Mary- beth Fair, Alice Li, William E Bishop, Wei Li, Folawiyo Campbell-Ajala, Daniel Kenji Toyama, Robert James Berry, Divya Tyamagundlu, Timothy P Lillicrap, and Oriana Riva. Androidworld: A dynamic benchmarking environment for autonomous agents. InThe Thirteenth Intern...

    2025

  20. [20]

    Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learning

    Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. InThirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

    2023

  21. [21]

    V oyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models

    Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. V oyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    Benchmark self-evolving: A multi-agent framework for dynamic LLM evaluation

    Siyuan Wang, Zhuohan Long, Zhihao Fan, Xuanjing Huang, and Zhongyu Wei. Benchmark self-evolving: A multi-agent framework for dynamic LLM evaluation. InProceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 3310–3328, 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    Xu, Xiangru Tang, Mingchen Zhuge, Jiayi Pan, Yueqi Song, Bowen Li, Jaskirat Singh, Hoang H

    Xingyao Wang, Boxuan Li, Yufan Song, Frank F. Xu, Xiangru Tang, Mingchen Zhuge, Jiayi Pan, Yueqi Song, Bowen Li, Jaskirat Singh, Hoang H. Tran, Fuqiang Li, Ren Ma, Mingzhang Zheng, Bill Qian, Yanjun Shao, Niklas Muennighoff, Yizhe Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Junyang Lin, Robert Brennan, Hao Peng, Heng Ji, and Graham Neubig. Openhands: An open platform for AI soft...

    2025

  24. [24]

    A-mem: Agentic memory for LLM agents

    Wujiang Xu, Zujie Liang, Kai Mei, Hang Gao, Juntao Tan, and Yongfeng Zhang. A-mem: Agentic memory for LLM agents. InThe Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models

    Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  26. [26]

    Memento-skills: Let agents design agents

    Huichi Zhou, Siyuan Guo, Anjie Liu, Zhongwei Yu, Ziqin Gong, Bowen Zhao, Zhixun Chen, Menglong Zhang, Yihang Chen, Jinsong Li, et al. Memento-skills: Let agents design agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.18743, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    evolving

    Shuyan Zhou, Frank F Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Uri Alon, et al. Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13854, 2023. 19 List of Appendices A Limitations and Future Directions 22 B Broader Impact 22 C Declaration of LLM Usage 23 D Add...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023