Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 23 references

Interfacing Rydberg atoms with a chip-based superconducting microwave resonator using an ac Stark shifted single-photon transition

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Helium Rydberg atoms are resonantly coupled to a chip-based superconducting microwave resonator through an ac-Stark-shifted single-photon transition with a dipole moment near 1500 ea0.

desk verdict Genuine experimental advance in Rydberg-atom–superconducting-resonator coupling, but the headline single-photon Rabi frequency is likely underestimated by roughly a factor of 3 because the analysis ignores inhomogeneous broadening. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20292 v1 pith:MWYGM3RT submitted 2025-08-27 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

L. L. Brown , I. K. Bhangoo , S. D. Hogan This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph PACS 32.80.Ee42.50.Pq85.25.-j
keywords RydbergatomssuperconductingcoplanarwaveguideresonatorcavityQEDacStarkshiftFloquettheoryheliumstatessingle-photoncouplingmicrowavedressing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports resonant coupling between helium Rydberg atoms and a chip-based superconducting coplanar-waveguide (CPW) microwave resonator, using a strong single-photon electric-dipole transition rather than the weaker two-photon transitions used before. The transition $1s50s\,^3S_1 \to 1s50p\,^3P_J$ has a dipole moment near $1500\,ea_0$, but its zero-field frequency lies about $2\pi\times397$ MHz above the resonator's second-harmonic mode. The authors tune it into resonance with a $2\pi\times3.350$ GHz microwave dressing field that ac Stark shifts the $|50p\rangle$ state while preserving the large matrix element. From the observed population depletion in a $1\,\mu\mathrm{s}$ interaction and an estimated photon occupation number $N\sim10^6$, they infer a single-photon Rabi frequency of about $2\pi\times100$ Hz. If correct, this is the first coupling of a strong single-photon Rydberg transition to a chip-based superconducting circuit, and a step toward operating such an interface in the single-photon strong-coupling regime.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the ac Stark shift produced by an off-resonant $2\pi\times3.350$ GHz dressing field detuned about $2\pi\times100$ MHz below the $|50p\rangle \to |50d\rangle$ transition. This field lowers the $|50p\rangle$ state and shifts the single-photon $|50s\rangle \to |50p\rangle$ transition down by the required $\sim2\pi\times397$ MHz, while the dipole moment stays near $1500\,ea_0$. Supporting machinery includes Floquet calculations of the time-periodic Hamiltonian, the $\lambda/4$ CPW resonator with quality factor $Q=3960$, and the circulating-power relation $P_{\mathrm{circ}}=P_{\mathrm{inc}}Q10^{-L_{\mathrm{ins}}/20}/(m\pi)$, from which the photon occupation number $N\sim10^6$ and then the single-photon Rabi frequency are estimated.

What would settle it

Prepare the resonator with an independently calibrated mean photon number near one and measure the $|50s\rangle \to |50p\rangle$ transition; if no $\sim2\pi\times100$ Hz coupling signature (population transfer or vacuum-Rabi splitting) appears at that photon number, or if a direct photon-counting calibration of the circulating power disagrees with the steady-state estimate by more than the stated uncertainties, the central single-photon Rabi frequency claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the helium $1s50s\,^3S_1 \to 1s50p\,^3P_J$ transition, with dipole moment $d\sim1500\,ea_0$, was resonantly coupled to the $2\pi\times11.752$ GHz second harmonic mode of a superconducting CPW resonator by ac Stark shifting it with a detuned $2\pi\times3.350$ GHz dressing field. The evidence is a resonant dip in the $|50s\rangle$ population when dressing power is near 12 dBm and the resonator drive is near $\omega_2$; the dip disappears when the chip is warmed so the resonator mode moves off resonance. The measured depletion at $P_{\mathrm{inc}}=-53.5$ dBm corresponds to a many-photon Rabi frequency of roughly $2\pi\times100$ kHz, and dividing by $\sqrt{N}$ with $N\sim10^6$ photons inferred from the circulating power gives a single-photon Rabi frequency of about $2\pi\times100$ Hz. The transition remains strong under dressing, so the required microwave power is reduced by about three orders of magnitude compared with earlier two-photon coupling experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the atom couples to the resonator mode with the same matrix element at high and low photon numbers, so that the single-photon Rabi frequency can be obtained by dividing the measured many-photon Rabi frequency of about $2\pi\times100$ kHz by the square root of the estimated photon occupation number $N\sim10^6$; if the photon-number estimate or the high-to-low-photon scaling is wrong, the central number changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the coupled transition carries $d\sim1500\,ea_0$, the microwave power needed for observable coupling is roughly a thousand times lower than in the earlier two-photon experiments.
  • Reducing the atom–chip distance from about $300\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ to $30$–$50\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ is estimated to raise the single-photon Rabi frequency toward $2\pi\times1$ MHz.
  • The current spectral width is dominated by inhomogeneity of the dressing field across the extended atom bunch, so localizing or slowing the atoms, or fabricating the resonator closer to the field-free transition frequency, should narrow the resonance and reduce dephasing.
  • Controlling the residual uncanceled dc field caused by the antenna structure, for example by biasing the antenna to the electrode offset potential, is needed to improve homogeneity and move toward strong coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A model-free test of the inferred single-photon Rabi frequency would be to drive the resonator with a mean photon number near one and look for a vacuum-Rabi splitting; the reported $2\pi\times100$ Hz rests on dividing a many-photon Rabi frequency by $\sqrt{N}$.
  • The dressing scheme should generalize to other Rydberg transitions and resonator frequencies: detuning the dressing field below an adjacent transition tunes the resonance without sacrificing the large dipole moment, as long as dc stray fields are held small.
  • The paper's estimate of $N\sim10^6$ assumes the steady-state circulating-power formula applies during the $1\,\mu\mathrm{s}$ pulse; an independent calibration of the in-situ photon number would settle whether the quoted single-photon Rabi frequency is accurate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments in which helium Rydberg atoms in the 1s50s 3S1 level are coupled to the 2π×11.752 GHz mode of a superconducting coplanar-waveguide resonator through the single-photon 1s50s 3S1 → 1s50p 3PJ transition. Because this transition is 397 MHz above the resonator frequency, the authors apply a strong 2π×3.350 GHz microwave dressing field that ac Stark shifts the 50p state, bringing the transition into resonance. The central evidence is a dressing-power scan (Fig. 6(a)) showing depletion of the 50s population only when the dressing field has the correct amplitude, a temperature control (Fig. 6(b)) in which detuning the resonator removes the depletion, and a frequency scan (Fig. 7(b)) showing depletion at the resonator frequency only when the dressing field is on. The paper estimates the single-photon Rabi frequency by dividing the many-photon Rabi frequency inferred from a 10% depletion after 1 μs by the square root of the photon number N~10^6, obtaining ~2π×100 Hz.

Significance. If the central claim is valid, the experiment constitutes an important advance: it is the first demonstration of a strong single-photon Rydberg transition (d~1500 ea0) coupled to a chip-based superconducting resonator, and the use of an ac Stark dressing field to achieve tunability is a useful technique for hybrid quantum interfaces. The control measurements are well designed: the absence of depletion when the resonator is thermally detuned (Fig. 6(b)) and when the dressing field is off (Fig. 7(a)) strongly supports the interpretation that resonant coupling to the resonator mode is responsible for the observed signal. The paper also provides clear Floquet calculations to interpret the dressing-field calibration and the transition dipole moment. However, the quantitative estimate of the single-photon Rabi frequency is based on a simplified coherent-Rabi analysis that ignores the measured inhomogeneous broadening, and the identification of the resonator mode as the 'second harmonic' appears inconsistent with the stated physical dimensions. These issues affect the numerical value of the headline quantity but not the qualitative demonstration of resonant coupling.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section VI, Eq. (3) and Figure 6(c)] The extraction of the single-photon Rabi frequency is not justified. The paper interprets the 0.1 depletion at Pinc = -53.5 dBm as sin^2(Ω T / 2) with T = 1 μs, giving Ω ≈ 2π×100 kHz. However, the resonance in Fig. 7(b) has a FWHM of 2π×7.1 MHz, which is about 70 times larger than this Ω. In this weak-drive, inhomogeneously broadened regime, the depletion is not sin^2(Ω T / 2) but approximately Ω^2 T / (2 Γ) for a Lorentzian distribution with HWHM Γ. Using Γ = 2π×3.55 MHz gives Ω ≈ 2π×330 kHz, and hence a single-photon Rabi frequency g0 = Ω / sqrt(N) ≈ 2π×300 Hz, not 2π×100 Hz. The paper should either correct this estimate or explicitly state that the quoted value is an order-of-magnitude lower bound under the coherent-rotation assumption.
  2. [Section V, Figure 6(a) and Figure 7(b)] There is an inconsistency in the inferred spectral widths. The Gaussian fit to the dressing-power dependence in Fig. 6(a) yields σF/Fdress ≈ 0.2, which the text says corresponds to a spectral FWHM of approximately 55 MHz. With the quoted derivative dω/dF ~ 1 MHz/(mV/cm) at Fdress = 367 mV/cm, the implied FWHM is about 170 MHz, not 55 MHz. More importantly, either value is incompatible with the measured resonance FWHM of 7.1 MHz in Fig. 7(b): if the ac Stark shift were inhomogeneously distributed over 55 MHz, the frequency scan in Fig. 7(b) would show a feature at least that broad. The paper must reconcile these numbers and clarify which inhomogeneous quantity actually dominates the observed linewidth.
  3. [Section II and Section VI, Eq. (3)] The resonator mode is described as the 'second harmonic' of a λ/4 CPW resonator, but the stated physical length of 6.335 mm corresponds to a fundamental λ/4 resonance at approximately 2π×11.84 GHz, so the mode at 2π×11.752 GHz is the fundamental, not the second harmonic. The mode index m = 2 used in Eq. (3) therefore appears incorrect; if m = 1 the circulating power and photon number N are a factor of 2 larger, which reduces the inferred single-photon Rabi frequency by sqrt(2). In addition, the insertion loss is given as Lins = 26.67 dB in Section III but 26.96 dB in Section VI; this discrepancy should be resolved because it directly affects N.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the resonator frequency as 2π×11.721 GHz, but the body of the paper consistently reports 2π×11.752 GHz; this is likely a typo.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The caption lists 'Pinc = 50.5 dBm' without a minus sign and 'ωres = 2π×11.725 GHz' instead of the correct value 2π×11.752 GHz; both should be corrected.
  3. [Section VI and Section VII] The single-photon Rabi frequency is quoted as 2π×100 Hz in Section VI but as 2π×0.1 kHz in Section VII; the notation should be made consistent.
  4. [Figure 6(c)] The dashed line in Fig. 6(c) is a linear fit on the dBm scale, which has no clear physical motivation; a power-law dependence (depletion proportional to Pinc) would be more appropriate for the weak-drive response.
  5. [Section V, general] The data points in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b) are shown without error bars, making it difficult to assess the statistical significance of the depletion feature; adding error bars or a shaded uncertainty band would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: resonant coupling is established by control measurements, and the single-photon Rabi frequency is an inferred estimate, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental observation, not a parameter-free derivation, so the circularity tests apply mainly to the inference chain for the single-photon Rabi frequency. That chain is not circular: the resonant coupling of the |50s> to |50p> transition to the resonator mode is established by three independent control measurements: the dressing-power scan in Fig. 6(a), the off-resonance temperature control in Fig. 6(b), and the frequency scan in Fig. 7(b) showing population depletion centered at the measured resonator frequency omega_2. The Floquet calculations are used to convert the empirically determined dressing power Pdress = 12 dBm into a field amplitude of 367 mV/cm and to compute the corresponding transition dipole moment of about 1500 e a0; these are interpretive calibrations, not inputs that define the observed resonance. The single-photon Rabi frequency is estimated in Section VI as Omega_many / sqrt(N), where Omega_many about 2 pi x 100 kHz is inferred from the measured 0.1 depletion at Pinc = -53.5 dBm and N about 10^6 is computed from the independently measured loaded quality factor, insertion loss, and input power via Eq. (3). No parameter is fitted to the target single-photon value, and the estimate is explicitly labeled as an estimate from the circulating power and photon occupation number. The skeptical concern that the 0.1 depletion may not correspond to a coherent sin^2(Omega T / 2) rotation under inhomogeneous broadening is a modeling and accuracy issue, not a circularity: it does not make the output equivalent to an input. Self-citations (Refs. 8-11) concern the prior apparatus and stray-field compensation methods and are not the load-bearing evidence for the new resonant-coupling observation, which is self-contained in Figs. 6 and 7. Therefore no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or mediators. Its quantitative claims rest on standard Rydberg atomic physics inputs and several field-geometry assumptions that are stated explicitly in the text. The main inferred quantity, the single-photon Rabi frequency, depends on the photon-number estimate and the two-level Rabi mapping rather than on any new physics.

free parameters (2)
  • Gaussian width ratio sigma_F/F_dress = ~0.2
    Fitted to the dressing-field power scan in Figure 6(a) to characterize inhomogeneous broadening; not used in the single-photon Rabi frequency estimate.
  • Linear fit slope and intercept in Figure 6(c) = not quoted in text
    Least-squares linear fit to population depletion versus incident power, used to extrapolate the minimum detectable power; not used in the single-photon Rabi frequency estimate.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Quantum defects for triplet helium Rydberg states from Drake [18] accurately describe the field-free energies used in the Floquet Hamiltonian.
    Invoked in Section IV when constructing the Floquet Hamiltonian matrix; these are external high-precision inputs.
  • domain assumption The Floquet Hamiltonian truncated to n=49..51 and |q|<=3 converges for the states of interest.
    States convergence was achieved in eigenvalues for n=50; truncation is a computational assumption.
  • domain assumption The residual dc electric field Fu=104 mV/cm is uniform over the atom cloud and parallel to the microwave dressing field and resonator field polarizations.
    Determined from the Stark shift of the two-photon |50s>->|51s> transition in Section III; orientation from finite-element calculations in Section VI. The Floquet calculations in Section IV assume parallel fields.
  • domain assumption The steady-state circulating-power formula Pcirc = Pinc Q 10^{-Lins/20} / (m*pi) gives the photon occupation number during the 1 microsecond pulse.
    Used in Section VI to estimate N~10^6; assumes the resonator reaches steady state and that Q and Lins measured in Section III apply.
  • domain assumption The observed population depletion of the |50s> state maps to a resonant two-level Rabi frequency via sin^2(Omega*t/2).
    Implicit in the estimate of Omega=2*pi*100 kHz from a 0.1 depletion over 1 microsecond in Section VI; ignores detuning distributions and multilevel effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interfacing Rydberg atoms with a chip-based superconducting microwave resonator using an ac Stark shifted single-photon transition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MWYGM3RT

@misc{pith2026250820292,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interfacing Rydberg atoms with a chip-based superconducting microwave resonator using an ac Stark shifted single-photon transition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MWYGM3RT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20292}
}
abstract

Helium atoms in the 1s50s $^3$S$_1$ Rydberg level have been resonantly coupled to the $2\pi\times11.721$ GHz second harmonic mode of a chip-based superconducting coplanar waveguide microwave resonator. To achieve this, the single-photon electric-dipole-allowed 1s50s $^3$S$_1\rightarrow$ 1s50p $^3$P$_J$ transition was tuned into resonance with the resonator mode through the ac Stark shift induced by a second strong $2\pi\times3.350$ GHz microwave dressing field. The effects of this dressing field, and residual uncanceled dc electric fields at the location of the atoms close to the superconducting chip surface were interpreted with support from Floquet calculations of the energy level structure of the Rydberg states. To observe appreciable population transfer in the $1~\mu$s atom-resonator interaction time using this transition, which had an electric dipole moment of $1500 e a_0$, pulsed microwave fields were injected into the resonator. From the photon occupation number in the resonator mode under these conditions, the single-photon Rabi frequency associated with the coupling of the atoms to the resonator was estimated to be $\sim2\pi\times100$ Hz. These results represent an important step toward operation of this Rydberg-atom-superconducting-circuit interface in the single-photon strong coupling regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20292 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the Rydberg-atom– superconducting-circuit interface (not to scale). The mi￾crowave field distribution in the second harmonic mode of the resonator is indicated by the red arrows in the xz plane. The strong microwave dressing field emanating from the an￾tenna located above the superconducting chip is represented by the red shaded bands. See text for details. shields maintained at ∼30 K and <4 K, … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Microwave spectra of superconducting circuit close [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Microwave spectrum of the two-photon |50s⟩ → |51s⟩ transition recorded for atoms located above the CPW resonator, but probed by a pulsed microwave field emanating from the antenna above the superconducting chip. The refer￾ence frequency of 2π ×26.00019 GHz on the horizontal axis is the field-free single-color two-photon |50s⟩ → |51s⟩ transition frequency. values in agreement with those of the best fit Fano func￾tion… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Calculated dc Stark shift and electric dipole tran [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dependence of the |50s⟩ population on the output power of the microwave source, Pdress, used to generate the pulsed dressing field, when a 1-µs-duration pulsed ωres = 2π× 11.725 GHz field for which Pinc = −50.5 dBm, propagated simultaneously through the CPW. (a) Tres =…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Microwave spectra of the |50s⟩ → |50p⟩ transition in atoms coupled to the CPW resonator with the superconduct￾ing chip operated at Tres = 3.66 K. The data were recorded by varying the frequency of the microwave field in the CPW while monitoring the |50s⟩ population. Th…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Diagram of the central region of the apparatus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. J. Schoelkopf and S. M. Girvin, Wiring up quantum systems, Nature 451, 664 (2008)

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Henriet, L

    L. Henriet, L. Beguin, A. Signoles, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, G.-O. Reymond, and C. Jurczak, Quantum computing with neutral atoms, Quantum 4, 327 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Petrosyan, K

    D. Petrosyan, K. Mølmer, J. Fort´ agh, and M. Saffman, Microwave to optical conversion with atoms on a super- conducting chip, New J. Phys. 21, 073033 (2019). 10

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    J. Han, T. Vogt, C. Gross, D. Jaksch, M. Kiffner, and W. Li, Coherent microwave-to-optical conversion via six- wave mixing in Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 093201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Petrosyan, J

    D. Petrosyan, J. Fort´ agh, and G. Kurizki, Coherent inter- face between optical and microwave photons on an inte- grated superconducting atom chip, EPJ Quantum Tech- nol. 11, 18 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    L. F. Keary and J. D. Pritchard, Strong coupling and active cooling in a finite-temperature hybrid atom-cavity system, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013707 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Morgan and S

    A. Morgan and S. Hogan, Coupling Rydberg Atoms to Microwave Fields in a Superconducting Coplanar Waveg- uide Resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 193604 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 23 references
  1. [9]

    D. M. Walker, A. A. Morgan, and S. D. Hogan, Cavity-enhanced Ramsey spectroscopy at a Rydberg- atom–superconducting-circuit interface, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 204001 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    L. L. Brown, J. A. L. Grondin, and S. D. Hogan, Demon- stration of a tunable interface between Rydberg atoms and superconducting microwave circuits with differential polarizability nulling, Phys. Rev. A 110, 022615 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    D. M. Walker, L. L. Brown, and S. D. Hogan, Elec- trometry of a single resonator mode at a Rydberg- atom–superconducting-circuit interface, Phys. Rev. A 105, 022626 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Kaiser, C

    M. Kaiser, C. Glaser, L. Y. Ley, J. Grimmel, H. Hatter- mann, D. Bothner, D. Koelle, R. Kleiner, D. Petrosyan, A. G¨ unther, and J. Fort´ agh, Cavity-driven Rabi oscilla- tions between Rydberg states of atoms trapped on a su- perconducting atom chip, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 013...

    2022

  5. [13]

    Hattermann, M

    H. Hattermann, M. Mack, F. Karlewski, F. Jessen, D. Cano, and J. Fort´ agh, Detrimental adsorbate fields in experiments with cold Rydberg gases near surfaces, Phys. Rev. A 86, 022511 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    S. S. Hodgman, R. G. Dall, L. J. Byron, K. G. H. Bald- win, S. J. Buckman, and A. G. Truscott, Metastable Helium: A New Determination of the Longest Atomic Excited-State Lifetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 053002 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    Halfmann, J

    T. Halfmann, J. Koensgen, and K. Bergmann, A source for a high-intensity pulsed beam of metastable helium atoms, Meas. Sci. Technol. 11, 1510 (2000)

    2000

  8. [16]

    S. D. Hogan, Y. Houston, and B. Wei, Laser photoexcita- tion of Rydberg states in helium with n > 400, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 145002 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Probst, F

    S. Probst, F. B. Song, P. A. Bushev, A. V. Ustinov, and M. Weides, Efficient and robust analysis of complex scat- tering data under noise in microwave resonators, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 024706 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    G. W. F. Drake, High precision theory of atomic helium, Phys. Scripta T83, 83 (1999)

    1999

  11. [19]

    Ho, S.-I

    T.-S. Ho, S.-I. Chu, and J. V. Tietz, Semiclassical many- mode Floquet theory, Chem. Phys. Lett. 96, 464 (1983)

    1983

  12. [20]

    M. L. Zimmerman, M. G. Littman, M. M. Kash, and D. Kleppner, Stark structure of the Rydberg states of alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A 20, 2251 (1979)

    1979

  13. [21]

    Bardou, O

    F. Bardou, O. Emile, J.-M. Courty, C. I. Westbrook, and A. Aspect, Magneto-Optical Trapping of Metastable He- lium: Collisions in the Presence of Resonant Light, Eu- rophys. Lett. 20, 681 (1992)

    1992

  14. [22]

    Rooijakkers, W

    W. Rooijakkers, W. Hogervorst, and W. Vassen, Laser deceleration and trapping of metastable helium atoms, Opt. Comm. 135, 149 (1997)

    1997

  15. [23]

    J. M. Sage, V. Bolkhovsky, W. D. Oliver, B. Turek, and P. B. Welander, Study of loss in superconducting copla- nar waveguide resonators, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 063915 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.