Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Secret Use of Large Language Model (LLM)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.19450 v2 pith:MWYYYFM7 submitted 2024-09-28 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords userssecretllmsbehaviorfoundlanguagelargereal-world
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advancements of Large Language Models (LLMs) have decentralized the responsibility for the transparency of AI usage. Specifically, LLM users are now encouraged or required to disclose the use of LLM-generated content for varied types of real-world tasks. However, an emerging phenomenon, users' secret use of LLM, raises challenges in ensuring end users adhere to the transparency requirement. Our study used mixed-methods with an exploratory survey (125 real-world secret use cases reported) and a controlled experiment among 300 users to investigate the contexts and causes behind the secret use of LLMs. We found that such secretive behavior is often triggered by certain tasks, transcending demographic and personality differences among users. Task types were found to affect users' intentions to use secretive behavior, primarily through influencing perceived external judgment regarding LLM usage. Our results yield important insights for future work on designing interventions to encourage more transparent disclosure of the use of LLMs or other AI technologies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What Shapes Writers' Decisions to Disclose AI Use?

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A literature synthesis identifies 12 procedural, social, and personal factors that may shape writers' decisions to disclose AI use.

Pith tools