REVIEW
Remote Rendering for Virtual Reality: performance comparison of multimedia frameworks and protocols
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Remote Rendering for Virtual Reality: performance comparison of multimedia frameworks and protocols
read the original abstract
The increasing complexity of Extended Reality (XR) applications demands substantial processing power and high bandwidth communications, often unavailable on lightweight devices. Remote rendering consists of offloading processing tasks to a remote node with a powerful GPU, delivering the rendered content to the end device. The delivery is usually performed through popular streaming protocols such as Web Real-Time Communications (WebRTC), offering a data channel for interactions, or Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH), better suitable for scalability. Moreover, new streaming protocols based on QUIC are emerging as potential replacements for WebRTC and DASH and offer benefits like connection migration, stream multiplexing and multipath delivery. This work describes the integration of the two most popular multimedia frameworks, GStreamer and FFmpeg, with a rendering engine acting as a Remote Renderer, and analyzes their performance when offering different protocols for delivering the rendered content to the end device over WIFI or 5G. This solution constitutes a beyond state-of-the-art testbed to conduct cutting-edge research in the XR field.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.