REVIEW 2 cited by
Adversarial Variational Optimization of Non-Differentiable Simulators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Complex computer simulators are increasingly used across fields of science as generative models tying parameters of an underlying theory to experimental observations. Inference in this setup is often difficult, as simulators rarely admit a tractable density or likelihood function. We introduce Adversarial Variational Optimization (AVO), a likelihood-free inference algorithm for fitting a non-differentiable generative model incorporating ideas from generative adversarial networks, variational optimization and empirical Bayes. We adapt the training procedure of generative adversarial networks by replacing the differentiable generative network with a domain-specific simulator. We solve the resulting non-differentiable minimax problem by minimizing variational upper bounds of the two adversarial objectives. Effectively, the procedure results in learning a proposal distribution over simulator parameters, such that the JS divergence between the marginal distribution of the synthetic data and the empirical distribution of observed data is minimized. We evaluate and compare the method with simulators producing both discrete and continuous data.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Mining for Dark Matter Substructure: Inferring subhalo population properties from strong lenses with machine learning
A neural likelihood ratio estimator trained on simulated strong lensing images can infer the abundance and mass slope of dark matter subhalos from an ensemble of lenses.
-
Contrastive Normalizing Flows for Uncertainty-Aware Parameter Estimation
A hybrid of contrastive normalizing flows and a deep classifier yields signal-strength estimates with narrower confidence intervals than a likelihood-based method on the HiggsML Uncertainty Challenge dataset.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.