Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards LifeSpan Cognitive Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13265 v2 pith:MYYHDYET submitted 2024-09-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords experienceslscschallengesclassesfourpastsystemtechnologies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Building a human-like system that continuously interacts with complex environments -- whether simulated digital worlds or human society -- presents several key challenges. Central to this is enabling continuous, high-frequency interactions, where the interactions are termed experiences. We refer to this envisioned system as the LifeSpan Cognitive System (LSCS). A critical feature of LSCS is its ability to engage in incremental and rapid updates while retaining and accurately recalling past experiences. In this paper we focus on the domain of Large Language Models (LLMs), where we identify two major challenges: (1) Abstraction and Experience Merging, and (2) Long-term Retention with Accurate Recall. These properties are essential for storing new experiences, organizing past experiences, and responding to the environment in ways that leverage relevant historical data. Unlike language models with continual learning, which typically rely on large corpora for fine-tuning and focus on improving performance within specific domains or tasks, LSCS must rapidly and incrementally update with new information from its environment at a high frequency. Existing technologies with the potential of solving the above two major challenges can be classified into four classes based on a conceptual metric called Storage Complexity, which measures the relative space required to store past experiences. Each of these four classes of technologies has its own strengths and limitations while we argue none of them alone can achieve LSCS alone. To this end, we propose a potential instantiation for LSCS that can integrate all four classes of technologies. The new instantiation, serving as a conjecture, operates through two core processes: Absorbing Experiences and Generating Responses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving Language Agents through BREW: Bootstrapping expeRientially-learned Environmental knoWledge

    cs.AI 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM agent can improve by storing and Monte-Carlo-refining concept-level natural-language recipes mined from its own past trajectories.

  2. M+: Extending MemoryLLM with Scalable Long-Term Memory

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    M+ adds a co-trained retriever and CPU-stored long-term memory to MemoryLLM, extending tested knowledge retention from under 20k to over 160k tokens at similar GPU memory cost.

Pith tools