Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Test of low radioactive molecular sieves for radon filtration in SF6 gas-based rare-event physics experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.06994 v2 pith:MZOX2ZPX submitted 2020-11-13 physics.ins-det hep-exphysics.chem-ph

classification physics.ins-dethep-exphysics.chem-ph
keywords radonexperimentsphysicssievestypeultra-sensitiveavailablebeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Type 5A molecular sieves (MS) have been demonstrated to remove radon from SF$_6$ gas. This is important for ultra-sensitive SF$_6$ gas-based directional dark matter and related rare-event physics experiments, as radon can provide a source of unwanted background events. Unfortunately, commercially available sieves intrinsically emanate radon at levels not suitable for ultra-sensitive physics experiments. A method to produce a low radioactive MS has been developed in Nihon University (NU). In this work, we explore the feasibility of the NU-developed 5A type MS for use in such experiments. A comparison with a commercially available Sigma-Aldrich 5A type MS was made. The comparison was done by calculating a parameter indicating the amount of radon intrinsically emanated by the MS per unit radon captured from SF$_6$ gas. The measurements were made using a specially adapted DURRIDGE RAD7 radon detector. The NU-developed 5A MS emanated radon up to 61$\pm$9$\%$ less per radon captured (2.1$\pm$0.1)$\times 10^{-3}$, compared to the commercial Sigma-Aldrich MS (5.4$\pm$0.4)$\times 10^{-3}$, making it a better candidate for use in a radon filtration setup for future ultra-sensitive SF$_6$ gas based experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools